Skip to content

Browns LBs - key to the defense taking a giant leap forward?

The Browns Board
62 17 2.0k 1
  • I continue to be amazed at how much shit Collins, arguably our most productive LB the past three years, gets.

    As for the LB position... yes, it is key... but then I think it is always key.

    For starters they are the de-facto QBs of the D. Then they are the mops that clean up any mess the DL creates. Then, more than any other position group have to balance great run D with great pass D. The latter including effective pressuring of the QB beginning with great disguise.

    It's the most demanding room on the D-side... and the room that underachieved the most last season. If I had to name one area that must improve, it would be PAP recognition.

    If our D is to go to the next level, then it falls on our LBs to take us there.

    @tour2ma said:

    I continue to be amazed at how much shit Collins, arguably our most productive LB the past three years, gets

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

  • @tour2ma said:

    I continue to be amazed at how much shit Collins, arguably our most productive LB the past three years, gets

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    @clevfan4life said:

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    Who needs to even watch football any more when Pro Football Focus (PFF) has all the answers?     Should I volunteer to tell Bill Belicheck how much time he's wasting especially when PFF has all the answers he can't possibly come up with himself?  Can you imagine some smart asss waterboy in NE correcting Belicheck with "That's not what Pro Football Focus says?" 

  • @clevfan4life said:

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    Who needs to even watch football any more when Pro Football Focus (PFF) has all the answers?     Should I volunteer to tell Bill Belicheck how much time he's wasting especially when PFF has all the answers he can't possibly come up with himself?  Can you imagine some smart asss waterboy in NE correcting Belicheck with "That's not what Pro Football Focus says?" 

    @flugel said:

     Can you imagine some smart asss waterboy in NE correcting Belicheck with "That's not what Pro Football Focus says?" 

    did someone call for the ...aka...the psi snatcher  8bSx.gif    

  • @tour2ma said:

    I continue to be amazed at how much shit Collins, arguably our most productive LB the past three years, gets

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    @clevfan4life said:

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    Collins had moments, Like the alligator arm interception attempt very late in the game against the Raiders, that made it look like he was here for the check only. 

    He was the most experienced and talented LB, he just didn’t play the hardest here.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Game one and this is who we have to deal with. The new coach at Tenn realized halfway through the season exactly what I saw coming into the league, my favorite underutilized (until last year) player. Funny that they use that old Browns' term to describe him, Jim Brown. He will be the first test for this newly formed LB crew.

    It's a good thing he woke up before Rip Van Winkle and former 1st round disappointment - Chance Warmack .  People were beginning to wonder why he was having trouble getting more work load than Dion Lewis half way into his 3rd NFL season. Lucky for him, he contacted Eddie George for input/feedback of what was holding him back and he began playing like the RB TN expected him to be. 

    Good thing too because your buddy Flugel was getting too fat to hide from his prediction Henry would be a great back considering they got him in round 2.

    @flugel said:

    Good thing too because your buddy Flugel was getting too fat to hide from his prediction Henry would be a great back considering they got him in round 2.

    Always good to have a foxhole buddy you can count on. I wanted Henry for the Browns from day 1. Smart of him to talk to a similar back like Eddy George.?

    But I also wanted one of either Michel or Chubb, so I'm happy.?

  • @clevfan4life said:

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    Who needs to even watch football any more when Pro Football Focus (PFF) has all the answers?     Should I volunteer to tell Bill Belicheck how much time he's wasting especially when PFF has all the answers he can't possibly come up with himself?  Can you imagine some smart asss waterboy in NE correcting Belicheck with "That's not what Pro Football Focus says?" 

    @flugel said:

    Who needs to even watch football any more when Pro Football Focus (PFF) has all the answers?     Should I volunteer to tell Bill Belicheck how much time he's wasting especially when PFF has all the answers he can't possibly come up with himself?  Can you imagine some smart asss waterboy in NE correcting Belicheck with "That's not what Pro Football Focus says?" 

    ^^^^^this

  • @clevfan4life said:

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    Collins had moments, Like the alligator arm interception attempt very late in the game against the Raiders, that made it look like he was here for the check only. 

    He was the most experienced and talented LB, he just didn’t play the hardest here.

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    Collins had moments, Like the alligator arm interception attempt very late in the game against the Raiders, that made it look like he was here for the check only. 

    He was the most experienced and talented LB, he just didn’t play the hardest here.

    i understand parting ways with him if he was really adamant about not taking even a slight pay cut....but if the browns way undercut him than i understand. We have way too many pieces we need to pay. But too many people here were completely dismissive of him when he was let go....and i knew better. 

    i hinestly think we'll be good as long as schobert and kirk stay healthy. If either one of those guys or god forbid both of them...get hurt.....we're in trouble defensively. Especially schobert....the D line seems to be in love with tge young jewish boy. Bith vernon and garrett have spoken on joe and how important tgey think he is...

  • no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

  • no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

    @eastsidedawg said:

    no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

    doesn't that depend on what offense they are facing? they would not run the 4-2-5 against some offenses, I think.

  • @eastsidedawg said:

    no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

    doesn't that depend on what offense they are facing? they would not run the 4-2-5 against some offenses, I think.

    @calfoxwc said:

    doesn't that depend on what offense they are facing? they would not run the 4-2-5 against some offenses, I think.

    no not really wilks ran 4-2-5 on 84% of snaps last year with the cardinals. this was most out of any D coordinator.

  • no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

    @eastsidedawg said:

    no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

    to run that scheme effectively dont u need ur interior DL to be more ofvthe lsrger 2 gap variety? Like a shelton or meder type? If u run with one smaller DT than at least the other one ought to be well north of 300lbs. Otherwise OL are gonna be all over those two LB'ers regularly.

  • @eastsidedawg said:

    no the LB's are not the golden key for the D.  the base D for wilks this year is going to be a 4-2-5  so the key is going to be the DB's they will have to cover well and the most important part of the 2019 browns will be the DB's ability to help in run support.

    if they dont do a good job in run support the browns will struggle against the run ....... see the 2018 cardinals run D and shield your eyes/

    to run that scheme effectively dont u need ur interior DL to be more ofvthe lsrger 2 gap variety? Like a shelton or meder type? If u run with one smaller DT than at least the other one ought to be well north of 300lbs. Otherwise OL are gonna be all over those two LB'ers regularly.

    @clevfan4life said:

    to run that scheme effectively dont u need ur interior DL to be more ofvthe lsrger 2 gap variety? Like a shelton or meder type? If u run with one smaller DT than at least the other one ought to be well north of 300lbs. Otherwise OL are gonna be all over those two LB'ers regularly.

    not sure about that i do know the browns have been running it alot in camp so far with larry o and Richardson as the DT.  in big nickle i guess the browns would run more in running situations.

    it would be schobert, kirko and morgan Burnett lined up in the box, whitehead and randall with 2 corners 

  • @clevfan4life said:

    to run that scheme effectively dont u need ur interior DL to be more ofvthe lsrger 2 gap variety? Like a shelton or meder type? If u run with one smaller DT than at least the other one ought to be well north of 300lbs. Otherwise OL are gonna be all over those two LB'ers regularly.

    not sure about that i do know the browns have been running it alot in camp so far with larry o and Richardson as the DT.  in big nickle i guess the browns would run more in running situations.

    it would be schobert, kirko and morgan Burnett lined up in the box, whitehead and randall with 2 corners 

    @eastsidedawg said:

    not sure about that i do know the browns have been running it alot in camp so far with larry o and Richardson as the DT.  in big nickle i guess the browns would run more in running situations.

    it would be schobert, kirko and morgan Burnett lined up in the box, whitehead and randall with 2 corners 

    I like the concept of the scheme if you have a hybrid type like Pep was. A guy that can come up and act as the 3rd LB'er or recover back into deep coverage. 

  • I'm trusting this Coaching Staff & we'll just see what happens. Unlike some Fans, I am convinced they know a helluva lot more than I do! Besides, I also believe we have a helluva lot more talent than Arizona did (does).

    Mike

  • @clevfan4life said:

    ^^^^this

    collins is back with NE....which speaks volumes.

    Collins had moments, Like the alligator arm interception attempt very late in the game against the Raiders, that made it look like he was here for the check only. 

    He was the most experienced and talented LB, he just didn’t play the hardest here.

    So a Safety filling a LB's role is not a LB???

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    Collins had moments, Like the alligator arm interception attempt very late in the game against the Raiders, that made it look like he was here for the check only. 

    He was the most experienced and talented LB, he just didn’t play the hardest here.

    Always hear this... I just never saw it aside from the two half seasons (or more) he missed due to injury... one of which was on pace for a 138 tackle season.

  • here's a browns LB standard to look up to..  https://www.clevelandbrowns.com/news/browns-to-induct-lb-clay-matthews-into-ring-of-honor   Congrats Clay Matthews!! #57 

  • So a Safety filling a LB's role is not a LB???

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    Collins had moments, Like the alligator arm interception attempt very late in the game against the Raiders, that made it look like he was here for the check only. 

    He was the most experienced and talented LB, he just didn’t play the hardest here.

    Always hear this... I just never saw it aside from the two half seasons (or more) he missed due to injury... one of which was on pace for a 138 tackle season.

    @tour2ma said:

    Always hear this... I just never saw it aside from the two half seasons (or more) he missed due to injury... one of which was on pace for a 138 tackle season.

    You saw it on the plays where he didn’t lay his body on the line to make a game changing play.

    Like in the Raiders game. If he would’ve had some balls on that play, it was an game winning INT. But he knew it was coming with contact and didn’t make the play. 

  • All-in on the rookies - It's not implausible..

  • All-in on the rookies - It's not implausible..

    @unsympathetic said:

    All-in on the rookies - It's not implausible..

    huge mistake....especially running only 2 lb'ers. Next year we can talk...but those later round picks we got at lb'er will not be ready this year for full time duty.

    also this 4-2-5 scheme is making me scratch me head. If ur only running 2 lb'ers isnt interior 2 gap style even more important? Maybe im wrong but it looks like wilks is wanting to run an aggressive upfield one gap line...essentislly counting on that baker will have 3 td's by the first commercial. Is that wise to do with 2 lb'ers let alone 2 later round rookies?

  • im starting to wonder if dorsey is nervous about this too since the browns are still actively trying to.pick up a DT.