Skip to content

breaking news, trumps kind of a dickish cocksucking asshole...

Political Discussion
98 13 1.3k
  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    I think Biden has made it clear that he will:

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/08/06/biden_calls_for_gun_buyback_program_making_assault_weapons_illegal_period.html

    yes i know they're all.coning out with their super serious aoc appeasing gun plans.

    @clevfan4life said:

    yes i know they're all.coning out with their super serious aoc appeasing gun plans.

    All the polling shows the majority of people think the dems have swung too far to the left and Biden has benefited by being seen as more moderate. Biden however doesn't take advantage of that and constantly throws his hat in the ring with the other far left candidates. It makes no sense to me. No doubt Biden will try to come back to the center after the primaries but I think he is painting himself into a corner. I'm glad to see Biden making this mistake because I want to see Trump win. 

  • 17903454_10158949965035725_3181251005684
     

    Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! Judicial Watch

  • 17903454_10158949965035725_3181251005684
     

    Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! Judicial Watch

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    17903454_10158949965035725_3181251005684
     

    Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! Judicial Watch

    a44cc601252685d16f56fadbb89dcbdd.jpg

  • FORMER GOOGLE ENGINEER: How Google Discriminates Against Conservatives

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/19/wacker-google-discriminates

  • FORMER GOOGLE ENGINEER: How Google Discriminates Against Conservatives

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/19/wacker-google-discriminates

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    FORMER GOOGLE ENGINEER: How Google Discriminates Against Conservatives

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/19/wacker-google-discriminates

    so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...

    "Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"

    so here we are again,  group A claiming discrimination because  group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage

  • @htownbrown said:

    https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_&_ROBERTSON_2017-A_Method_for_Detecting_Bias_in_Search_Rankings-AIBRT_WP-17-02_6-1-17.pdf

    The point Trump wants to make (which he's tweeting out immediately after watching Fix talk about it ....) is that Google influenced undecided voters.

    That study only followed 21 undecided voters. They even said the "bias rate" for undecided voters was left. Though they don't really go into detail on how they determined bias. 

    And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?

  • @htownbrown said:

    https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_&_ROBERTSON_2017-A_Method_for_Detecting_Bias_in_Search_Rankings-AIBRT_WP-17-02_6-1-17.pdf

    The point Trump wants to make (which he's tweeting out immediately after watching Fix talk about it ....) is that Google influenced undecided voters.

    That study only followed 21 undecided voters. They even said the "bias rate" for undecided voters was left. Though they don't really go into detail on how they determined bias. 

    And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?

    @mld-woody said:

    And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?

    yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...

  • @htownbrown said:

    https://aibrt.org/downloads/EPSTEIN_&_ROBERTSON_2017-A_Method_for_Detecting_Bias_in_Search_Rankings-AIBRT_WP-17-02_6-1-17.pdf

    The point Trump wants to make (which he's tweeting out immediately after watching Fix talk about it ....) is that Google influenced undecided voters.

    That study only followed 21 undecided voters. They even said the "bias rate" for undecided voters was left. Though they don't really go into detail on how they determined bias. 

    And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?

    @mld-woody said:

    The point Trump wants to make (which he's tweeting out immediately after watching Fix talk about it ....) is that Google influenced undecided voters.

    That study only followed 21 undecided voters. They even said the "bias rate" for undecided voters was left. Though they don't really go into detail on how they determined bias. 

    And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?

     

     
    Rating: 6.9/10 - ‎1,202 votes
    Chad Gracia at an event for The Russian Woodpecker (2015) The Russian .... The film focuses on the little-known love affair of the terrorist Fanny Kaplan with ...
  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    FORMER GOOGLE ENGINEER: How Google Discriminates Against Conservatives

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/19/wacker-google-discriminates

    so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...

    "Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"

    so here we are again,  group A claiming discrimination because  group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage

    @clevfan4life said:

    so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...

    "Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"

    so here we are again,  group A claiming discrimination because  group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage

    Too many whistle blowers have come out to expose the bias at Google to discount what they are saying. Some have sacrificed their own jobs to get the message out. Some have remained anonymous to keep from being fired.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/08/14/former_employee_google_has_become_a_highly_biased_political_machine.html

  • @clevfan4life said:

    so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...

    "Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"

    so here we are again,  group A claiming discrimination because  group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage

    Too many whistle blowers have come out to expose the bias at Google to discount what they are saying. Some have sacrificed their own jobs to get the message out. Some have remained anonymous to keep from being fired.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/08/14/former_employee_google_has_become_a_highly_biased_political_machine.html

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Too many whistle blowers have come out to expose the bias at Google to discount what they are saying. Some have sacrificed their own jobs to get the message out. Some have remained anonymous to keep from being fired.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/08/14/former_employee_google_has_become_a_highly_biased_political_machine.html

    but I wanna see the proof of it. Look im not an expert in software code or nothin, but I know enough about how search engines work that I can tell ur previous article was "highly" bereft of some kind of concrete evidence that shows algorithmic manipulation "SPECIFICALLY" to the detriment of conservatives. One of my best friends works on precisely this stuff but with amazon...and he's no liberal, he's a libertarian. And we BOTH hate googles guts. But even he was like I don't see the backing for this claim. Knowing what I know about google, keeping conservative horseshit from the top of their search lists is the least of my gripes with them. They're far more dangerous than this stupid little bullshit. Go look at why the EU fined them 5 fucking billion dollars....it ain't cause google loves them some bill and Hillary. 

  • And the problem with Google getting a 5 billion dollar fine is this:

    Billion-dollar fines can't stop Google and Facebook. That's peanuts for them

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/26/google-facebook-regulation-ftc-settlement

  • Posting a bunch of articles from right wing sources means nothing. 

    There was a study posted, but it seems very flawed. What else?

  • @mld-woody said:

    And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?

    yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...

    @clevfan4life said:

    yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...

    So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?  

  • @clevfan4life said:

    yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...

    So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?  

    @htownbrown said:

    So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?  

    It isn't good data...

  • @htownbrown said:

    So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?  

    It isn't good data...

    @mld-woody said:

    It isn't good data...

    Well of course not, it isn't from The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live!

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    It isn't good data...

    Well of course not, it isn't from The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live!

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Well of course not, it isn't from The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live!

    WSS

    No I read the study (or at least the three pages I could). It isn't good data.

    If you want to tell me otherwise, go ahead. Tell me how 21 is an accurate sample size. Go on. Show me some statistics. 

  • @clevfan4life said:

    yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...

    So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?  

    @htownbrown said:

    So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?  

    theres certainly a conflict of interest with a guy who sued tgem and claimed they ruined his reputation......right?

  • oh boy, now thetes this..   

    "Epstein himself says Trump was wrong about his findings. Epstein did find "bias" in Google search results, but he says there is no evidence Google "manipulated" the results to favor Clinton."