breaking news, trumps kind of a dickish cocksucking asshole...
-
The point Trump wants to make (which he's tweeting out immediately after watching Fix talk about it ....) is that Google influenced undecided voters.
That study only followed 21 undecided voters. They even said the "bias rate" for undecided voters was left. Though they don't really go into detail on how they determined bias.
And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?
The point Trump wants to make (which he's tweeting out immediately after watching Fix talk about it ....) is that Google influenced undecided voters.
That study only followed 21 undecided voters. They even said the "bias rate" for undecided voters was left. Though they don't really go into detail on how they determined bias.
And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?
Rating: 6.9/10 - 1,202 votesChad Gracia at an event for The Russian Woodpecker (2015) The Russian .... The film focuses on the little-known love affair of the terrorist Fanny Kaplan with ... -
FORMER GOOGLE ENGINEER: How Google Discriminates Against Conservatives
https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/19/wacker-google-discriminates
so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...
"Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"
so here we are again, group A claiming discrimination because group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage
so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...
"Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"
so here we are again, group A claiming discrimination because group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage
Too many whistle blowers have come out to expose the bias at Google to discount what they are saying. Some have sacrificed their own jobs to get the message out. Some have remained anonymous to keep from being fired.
-
-
so i read this article almost to conclusion and no where did the author provide a shred of evudence toward the assertion googles algorithm discriminates against conservatives. But then nesr the end i came across this gem...
"Google does not build products for “every single demographic.” Instead, it selectively builds products for demographics with “sensitive characteristics.”"
so here we are again, group A claiming discrimination because group B got slightly preferential treatment that didnt impact group A one iota. I guess some queer authors books got putvto the front of google searches for queer related material...instead of some author who writes about god hating fags. If u were to google "god hates fags" tgat author would still come up but if ur searching for normal material related to the lbgt community it doesnt....and conservatives are naturally outraged. Good i hope u all stroke out and die from all the rage
Too many whistle blowers have come out to expose the bias at Google to discount what they are saying. Some have sacrificed their own jobs to get the message out. Some have remained anonymous to keep from being fired.
Too many whistle blowers have come out to expose the bias at Google to discount what they are saying. Some have sacrificed their own jobs to get the message out. Some have remained anonymous to keep from being fired.
but I wanna see the proof of it. Look im not an expert in software code or nothin, but I know enough about how search engines work that I can tell ur previous article was "highly" bereft of some kind of concrete evidence that shows algorithmic manipulation "SPECIFICALLY" to the detriment of conservatives. One of my best friends works on precisely this stuff but with amazon...and he's no liberal, he's a libertarian. And we BOTH hate googles guts. But even he was like I don't see the backing for this claim. Knowing what I know about google, keeping conservative horseshit from the top of their search lists is the least of my gripes with them. They're far more dangerous than this stupid little bullshit. Go look at why the EU fined them 5 fucking billion dollars....it ain't cause google loves them some bill and Hillary.
-
And the problem with Google getting a 5 billion dollar fine is this:
Billion-dollar fines can't stop Google and Facebook. That's peanuts for them
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/26/google-facebook-regulation-ftc-settlement
-
Posting a bunch of articles from right wing sources means nothing.
There was a study posted, but it seems very flawed. What else?
-
And didn't the guy that ran this already have a beef with Google?
yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...
yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...
So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” -
yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...
So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?
So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?
It isn't good data...
-
So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?
It isn't good data...
It isn't good data...
Well of course not, it isn't from The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live!
WSS
-
It isn't good data...
Well of course not, it isn't from The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live!
WSS
Well of course not, it isn't from The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live!
WSS
No I read the study (or at least the three pages I could). It isn't good data.
If you want to tell me otherwise, go ahead. Tell me how 21 is an accurate sample size. Go on. Show me some statistics.
-
yep....his site was infecting peoples pc's with spy/malware. Them he got pissed st google cause tgey blocked his page with a virus warning......lije they're supposed to. Apparently he said google should have come to him first before they slapped thst warning....apparently not understsnding googles #1 priority is to their customers. So they're gonna send u a notice that ur page is laden with russian spyware. The google AI shuts it down...
So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?
So he and the other guy fudged this data because they're critics of google?
theres certainly a conflict of interest with a guy who sued tgem and claimed they ruined his reputation......right?
-
oh boy, now thetes this..
"Epstein himself says Trump was wrong about his findings. Epstein did find "bias" in Google search results, but he says there is no evidence Google "manipulated" the results to favor Clinton."
-
oh boy, now thetes this..
"Epstein himself says Trump was wrong about his findings. Epstein did find "bias" in Google search results, but he says there is no evidence Google "manipulated" the results to favor Clinton."
oh boy, now thetes this..
"Epstein himself says Trump was wrong about his findings. Epstein did find "bias" in Google search results, but he says there is no evidence Google "manipulated" the results to favor Clinton."
The fact that the bias exists should be a little bit of evidence shouldn't it? I mean coverage that is purposely slatted to harm candidate X necessarily helps candidate Y.
WSS
-
oh boy, now thetes this..
"Epstein himself says Trump was wrong about his findings. Epstein did find "bias" in Google search results, but he says there is no evidence Google "manipulated" the results to favor Clinton."
The fact that the bias exists should be a little bit of evidence shouldn't it? I mean coverage that is purposely slatted to harm candidate X necessarily helps candidate Y.
WSS
The fact that the bias exists should be a little bit of evidence shouldn't it? I mean coverage that is purposely slatted to harm candidate X necessarily helps candidate Y.
WSS
Again ... There isn't good data to conclude bias even exists. It seems like a very flawed study.
I know as a moderator you're letting alts and trolls then this board into a cesspool but at least just read that study
-
We need to seize the means of production from those capitalist pig dogs at Google so they don’t do this again!
-
The fact that the bias exists should be a little bit of evidence shouldn't it? I mean coverage that is purposely slatted to harm candidate X necessarily helps candidate Y.
WSS
Again ... There isn't good data to conclude bias even exists. It seems like a very flawed study.
I know as a moderator you're letting alts and trolls then this board into a cesspool but at least just read that study
Again ... There isn't good data to conclude bias even exists. It seems like a very flawed study.
I know as a moderator you're letting alts and trolls then this board into a cesspool but at least just read that study
I don't think there are any alts. If there were, and there are ways for the administration to find that out, I'd be happy to boot them. But not merely because you can't formulate a response to them, okay? Or just because you whine about people not following your own personal political bias. Understand? ( I don't think you believe it either really unless you're just too stupid to realize the difference between Styles, which may well be true. Just more typical Woody.)
And according to your buddy and the post are referred to this Epstein actually said there was bias but just couldn't conclude a Smoking Gun. So you are saying there is no bias? Or what? Which part of that post do you think is bullshit and which part are you on board with?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
We need to seize the means of production from those capitalist pig dogs at Google so they don’t do this again!
We need to seize the means of production from those capitalist pig dogs at Google so they don’t do this again!
I get your point but I don't think you realize the magnitude of the problem and the power of big tech without any oversight:
"The world has never seen anything like Google. The world has never seen anything like Facebook.
When pundits, legislators, and regulators propose interventions to curb the excesses of these companies, they invariably reach back in time for patterns to guide them. They try to compare a mid-20th-century US telephone company like AT&T to a global collection of servers and algorithms that delivers links and advertisements to billions of people who are trying to find driving directions, weather forecasts, or to settle bar bets. They imagine – foolishly – that “data are the new oil” and compare John Rockerfeller’s Standard Oil monopoly of the late 19th century to a social networking service that allows 2.4 billion people to upload text, video, and images about their lives and politics.
Nothing in human history has reached 2.4 billion people, roughly one out of every three living humans, with the regularity and influence of Facebook. The only company close to that influence is Google, which controls YouTube and its nearly 2 billion regular users. Both of these companies have developed advertising platforms that deliver carefully targeted messages more effectively and efficiently than anything else in the world. Alphabet in 2018 generated $136.8bn in revenue. Facebook in 2018 earned nearly $56bnin revenue. Alphabet and Facebook are among the five highest capitalized companies in the history of the world."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/26/google-facebook-regulation-ftc-settlement
-
-
Build new products and apps. No one is stopping anyone from doing that. Conservative backers could do it but they are too lazy or know fellow conservatives won’t migrate. Simple as that. Create what you want.
-
Build new products and apps. No one is stopping anyone from doing that. Conservative backers could do it but they are too lazy or know fellow conservatives won’t migrate. Simple as that. Create what you want.
Build new products and apps. No one is stopping anyone from doing that. Conservative backers could do it but they are too lazy or know fellow conservatives won’t migrate. Simple as that. Create what you want.
Big tech has gotten so huge it is not as simple as that. New start ups can't compete. Big tech will either buy them out or if they won't sell big tech will clone their products. In the meantime they wield tremendous amounts of power and influence with no oversight. Power and influence the world has never seen before.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login