Skip to content

1 theory on why Baker is struggling

The Browns Board
44 20 1.7k
  • I’ve watched some of Arizona games. 

    Man their defense might be as bad as their OLine. 

    Ravens beat them by 6. 

    Fins are a complete disaster. 

    KC destroyed the Ravens for a half, then their defense phoned in the 4th quarter.

    Fins -32nd ranked defense.

    Cards- 30th

    KC - 24th

    If anybody believes that Baltimore’s offense which is ranked 1st in the league is really that good, let me know. I have some great stuff to sell you.

    @hx214 said:

    I’ve watched some of Arizona games. 

    Man their defense might be as bad as their OLine. 

    Ravens beat them by 6. 

    Fins are a complete disaster. 

    KC destroyed the Ravens for a half, then their defense phoned in the 4th quarter.

    Fins -32nd ranked defense.

    Cards- 30th

    KC - 24th

    If anybody believes that Baltimore’s offense which is ranked 1st in the league is really that good, let me know. I have some great stuff to sell you.

    fuck the ravens

  • OK, upon further mulling it over and reading the responses to this post..................

    1.) Name the QBs who hit the NFL without a speed bump and had no trials and tribulations early in their career. Hmmmmmmm. Dan Marino....and................ummmmmm...to a degree Ben Roethlisberger....and.........Cam? But let's also consider, having a good rookie year but faltering soon after doesn't count as having no rough patches early. Cam and RG3 started off with a bang but both had some poor stretches soon after. In other words, Baker struggling is no worse than how Elways, Peyton Manning, Aikman, Favre, Bradshaw, and so on started off. Basically the vast majority of Hall of Famers started off sucking. 

    2.) As has been established, Freddie has never attained even a coordinator position and he is now the architect of our O?  What shows you that he is even competent at structuring and assimilating an O system? I'm not trying to rip the guy, but let's look at the facts here.  Other than getting along with Baker after they fired the huge clowns (Hue and Todd) what qualification did Freddie have on his resume? Running backs coach? Not anywhere near the same thing. OC Monkens, by the way, has a pretty darn good record as an offensive coach himself. I have no idea why he isn't calling the plays; the # of head coaches who are adept at being the head coach AND calling the plays (Shanahan, Reid) is few. And since Freddie has done neither, why take on both roles? It makes no sense, and it may be such a problem that this team won't reach its potential until that is changed. 

    3.) I am growing a little tired of the "let Baker be Baker, he gets fired up with trash talk, it fuels him, so he should keep doing it," talk. There is a time and place. And if the NFL has proven anything in its past, it is that no player is so powerful and skilled, that being overly cocky is wise. If you put a bullseye on your head, you will be beat the frick up, especially today. Everyone is so big, strong and fast, that if you pop off, you are going to pay. This isn't the Big 12. You can run your mouth and grab your crotch there if you are good enough. If you give these NFL beasts extra incentive to lump you up, they will. Baker has overcome every obstacle on the field in his life with cockiness and verve, but he really may want to keep a little of his fire inside instead of alway running his cake hole. I hope he doesn't learn this the hard way.

  • OK, upon further mulling it over and reading the responses to this post..................

    1.) Name the QBs who hit the NFL without a speed bump and had no trials and tribulations early in their career. Hmmmmmmm. Dan Marino....and................ummmmmm...to a degree Ben Roethlisberger....and.........Cam? But let's also consider, having a good rookie year but faltering soon after doesn't count as having no rough patches early. Cam and RG3 started off with a bang but both had some poor stretches soon after. In other words, Baker struggling is no worse than how Elways, Peyton Manning, Aikman, Favre, Bradshaw, and so on started off. Basically the vast majority of Hall of Famers started off sucking. 

    2.) As has been established, Freddie has never attained even a coordinator position and he is now the architect of our O?  What shows you that he is even competent at structuring and assimilating an O system? I'm not trying to rip the guy, but let's look at the facts here.  Other than getting along with Baker after they fired the huge clowns (Hue and Todd) what qualification did Freddie have on his resume? Running backs coach? Not anywhere near the same thing. OC Monkens, by the way, has a pretty darn good record as an offensive coach himself. I have no idea why he isn't calling the plays; the # of head coaches who are adept at being the head coach AND calling the plays (Shanahan, Reid) is few. And since Freddie has done neither, why take on both roles? It makes no sense, and it may be such a problem that this team won't reach its potential until that is changed. 

    3.) I am growing a little tired of the "let Baker be Baker, he gets fired up with trash talk, it fuels him, so he should keep doing it," talk. There is a time and place. And if the NFL has proven anything in its past, it is that no player is so powerful and skilled, that being overly cocky is wise. If you put a bullseye on your head, you will be beat the frick up, especially today. Everyone is so big, strong and fast, that if you pop off, you are going to pay. This isn't the Big 12. You can run your mouth and grab your crotch there if you are good enough. If you give these NFL beasts extra incentive to lump you up, they will. Baker has overcome every obstacle on the field in his life with cockiness and verve, but he really may want to keep a little of his fire inside instead of alway running his cake hole. I hope he doesn't learn this the hard way.

    @icecube said:

    Freddie has never attained even a coordinator position and he is now the architect of our O? 

    Here's the thing, Freddie was largely credited with substantially turning around our offense, but more importantly our QUARTERBACK. Baker was doing OK, especially as a rookie, but he downright took OFF after Freddie took over. And when I say took over, the kid started setting records. In addition to production, Baker literally didn't get sacked or hardly TOUCHED for like 8 games. I've never seen anything like it. Our offense was innovative, creative, and unpredictable. So what's wrong NOW? 

    As always, I'm glad you asked! Let me set the ground rules. This is NOT a doom and gloom post, I don't want to be known as that guy. Have I been critical? Yes, but it's not without merit. The differences this year have to do with personnel grouping. Last season Baker was at his best in "12 personnel", which is a 2 TE set. This was mostly done to protect, but also used the extra TE as a blocker for running plays. 

    So what are running mostly this year? Surely we'd run 12 personnel again this year, right? The same grouping that enabled our QB to set rookie records? Wrong. We're mostly running "11 personnel", which as you know is a single TE and, 1 RB, and 1 3 WRs. We're also running many longer routes running deeper down the field, and this is a mystery as we're struggling to protect. 

    Why aren't we running two TE sets this year? A lot of it has to do with our personnel. Obviously losing Njoku hurt, but TE was probably one of our weakest position groupings on the roster. For some reason, we cut or traded Devalve, Orson Charles, and Darren Fells. None of these 3 were ever going to be considered "good" but at least they knew the offense, and at least they sort of knew how to block. 

    We need to sign a blocking TE, and we need to do it NOW. Pharaoh Brown is borderline worthless, and blocking TEs are easier to find than receiving ones. We have to make a move and get back to what Baker knows. 

  • Take away all of the ridiculous, absurd and ludicrous off season hype and expectations, and I would think that every single person here would be absolutely stoked with a chance to get to 2-2 with a share of the division lead all while beating the ratturds in less than 24hrs.

    Some of you need to stop reading, listening to and watching "sports talk" shit shows and remember that this team is still measured in months when talking about how long they are removed from being a 1-31 team.

    If they put together 4 good quarters of football tomorrow, then I look forward to clicking on the several "Browns are going to the SB" threads............. 

  • Fells agains???

    Oy vey...

    @tour2ma said:

    Fells agains???

    Oy vey...

    We got a glimpse of Fells in Hard Knocks last year, and he was distinctly portrayed as an effective player and a teacher of men. It’s not too far off the mark to assume he really is that guy, which would be good for this team and particularly the TE room right now. I get his numbers may lack in his new digs, but they are new digs, and it’s not unreasonable to think he might be flourishing with us right now with the current situation we are in with TE.

  • Take away all of the ridiculous, absurd and ludicrous off season hype and expectations, and I would think that every single person here would be absolutely stoked with a chance to get to 2-2 with a share of the division lead all while beating the ratturds in less than 24hrs.

    Some of you need to stop reading, listening to and watching "sports talk" shit shows and remember that this team is still measured in months when talking about how long they are removed from being a 1-31 team.

    If they put together 4 good quarters of football tomorrow, then I look forward to clicking on the several "Browns are going to the SB" threads............. 

    @d-bone said:

    Take away all of the ridiculous, absurd and ludicrous off season hype and expectations, and I would think that every single person here would be absolutely stoked with a chance to get to 2-2 with a share of the division lead all while beating the ratturds in less than 24hrs.

    Some of you need to stop reading, listening to and watching "sports talk" shit shows and remember that this team is still measured in months when talking about how long they are removed from being a 1-31 team.

    If they put together 4 good quarters of football tomorrow, then I look forward to clicking on the several "Browns are going to the SB" threads............. 

    For some of us "sports talk shows" are an intrical part of the entire entertainment value of being a sports fan to begin with. Why cut out an entire piece of one of our prime sources of entertainment? Of course, if it makes your life more enjoyable to eliminate that out of your life, then you do you and stop watching and listening to such media. Personally, I love hearing debate regarding sports - especially NFL stuff. To me, there is nothing better than switching on the radio for sports talk when I'm driving, even if it's not about my team (I live near J-ville, so it's mostly Jag talk here, although national shows are also played). 

  • he sucks ?

  • @icecube said:

    Freddie has never attained even a coordinator position and he is now the architect of our O? 

    Here's the thing, Freddie was largely credited with substantially turning around our offense, but more importantly our QUARTERBACK. Baker was doing OK, especially as a rookie, but he downright took OFF after Freddie took over. And when I say took over, the kid started setting records. In addition to production, Baker literally didn't get sacked or hardly TOUCHED for like 8 games. I've never seen anything like it. Our offense was innovative, creative, and unpredictable. So what's wrong NOW? 

    As always, I'm glad you asked! Let me set the ground rules. This is NOT a doom and gloom post, I don't want to be known as that guy. Have I been critical? Yes, but it's not without merit. The differences this year have to do with personnel grouping. Last season Baker was at his best in "12 personnel", which is a 2 TE set. This was mostly done to protect, but also used the extra TE as a blocker for running plays. 

    So what are running mostly this year? Surely we'd run 12 personnel again this year, right? The same grouping that enabled our QB to set rookie records? Wrong. We're mostly running "11 personnel", which as you know is a single TE and, 1 RB, and 1 3 WRs. We're also running many longer routes running deeper down the field, and this is a mystery as we're struggling to protect. 

    Why aren't we running two TE sets this year? A lot of it has to do with our personnel. Obviously losing Njoku hurt, but TE was probably one of our weakest position groupings on the roster. For some reason, we cut or traded Devalve, Orson Charles, and Darren Fells. None of these 3 were ever going to be considered "good" but at least they knew the offense, and at least they sort of knew how to block. 

    We need to sign a blocking TE, and we need to do it NOW. Pharaoh Brown is borderline worthless, and blocking TEs are easier to find than receiving ones. We have to make a move and get back to what Baker knows. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Pharaoh Brown is borderline worthless

    Is he worthy of such optimism?  

    NE used to play Mike Vrabel as an extra TE in the red zone and short yardage situations when their TE inventory was low.  Is Bill Belichick the only coach on the planet that doesn't think it's rocket science to give someone on his defense a very doable role at TE?   

    We don't have anyone with a TE frame on our defense that could fill this role or H-Back/FB?      It isn't like we're overworking Chad Thomas, Genard Avery, or Ricky Ticky Takitaki. Daniel Ekuale has a decent frame with the athleticism of a DE.   We could even put Drew Forbes out there as a 2nd TE and use him primarily as an extra blocker.  I'm sure he could learn a very short route or 2 in the process.  Again, the alternative is Pharaoh Brown...

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    Pharaoh Brown is borderline worthless

    Is he worthy of such optimism?  

    NE used to play Mike Vrabel as an extra TE in the red zone and short yardage situations when their TE inventory was low.  Is Bill Belichick the only coach on the planet that doesn't think it's rocket science to give someone on his defense a very doable role at TE?   

    We don't have anyone with a TE frame on our defense that could fill this role or H-Back/FB?      It isn't like we're overworking Chad Thomas, Genard Avery, or Ricky Ticky Takitaki. Daniel Ekuale has a decent frame with the athleticism of a DE.   We could even put Drew Forbes out there as a 2nd TE and use him primarily as an extra blocker.  I'm sure he could learn a very short route or 2 in the process.  Again, the alternative is Pharaoh Brown...

    @flugel said:

    Is he worthy of such optimism?  

    LOL, I know he's pretty rough. 

    But I will try to sprinkle in a bit of good news. Ricky Seal-Jones was a gigantic WR recruit, 5 star prospect, and has converted to TE. He can definitely make plays down the field, and while he wont block anyone, he's definitely a threat to catch passes, long passes too. Wouldn't surprise me if he had himself a decent day. I thought he was on his way to producing last week, as he caught a gorgeous ball early from Baker for around 15 yards, but I don't think we heard from him again. 

  • Take away all of the ridiculous, absurd and ludicrous off season hype and expectations, and I would think that every single person here would be absolutely stoked with a chance to get to 2-2 with a share of the division lead all while beating the ratturds in less than 24hrs.

    Some of you need to stop reading, listening to and watching "sports talk" shit shows and remember that this team is still measured in months when talking about how long they are removed from being a 1-31 team.

    If they put together 4 good quarters of football tomorrow, then I look forward to clicking on the several "Browns are going to the SB" threads............. 

    @d-bone said:

    If they put together 4 good quarters of football tomorrow, then I look forward to clicking on the several "Browns are going to the SB" threads............. 

    I don’t....?

  • @d-bone said:

    If they put together 4 good quarters of football tomorrow, then I look forward to clicking on the several "Browns are going to the SB" threads............. 

    I don’t....?

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    I don’t....?

    Oh God, I would LOVE to click on those links! ?

    It's funny, this is the biggest game we've had in quite a while. The last game of the quarter, a chance to claim 1st place in division, and most importantly, a chance to get back on track. Seriously, can you think of two more different narratives of we win vs lose? It would literally be "going to the playoffs" vs "let's start discussing the draft". And the scary thing is...both might be RIGHT. That's how important this game is, and also why so many Browns fans were so distraught last week. 

    You really can't say a loss doesn't destroy our chances (for the most part) cuz beating the Seahawks, Patriots, 49's, and the 85 Bears won't be easy. Does it literally crush us? Nah, not really, but IF we lose we MUST SCORE POINTS. The one thing that just can't happen is us crapping the bed on offense because that's going to continue the awful narratives of our coach and QB sucking and we desperately need to move beyond that. 

    COME ON BROWNIES! 

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    Pharaoh Brown is borderline worthless

    Is he worthy of such optimism?  

    NE used to play Mike Vrabel as an extra TE in the red zone and short yardage situations when their TE inventory was low.  Is Bill Belichick the only coach on the planet that doesn't think it's rocket science to give someone on his defense a very doable role at TE?   

    We don't have anyone with a TE frame on our defense that could fill this role or H-Back/FB?      It isn't like we're overworking Chad Thomas, Genard Avery, or Ricky Ticky Takitaki. Daniel Ekuale has a decent frame with the athleticism of a DE.   We could even put Drew Forbes out there as a 2nd TE and use him primarily as an extra blocker.  I'm sure he could learn a very short route or 2 in the process.  Again, the alternative is Pharaoh Brown...

    @flugel said:

    Is he worthy of such optimism?  

    NE used to play Mike Vrabel as an extra TE in the red zone and short yardage situations when their TE inventory was low.  Is Bill Belichick the only coach on the planet that doesn't think it's rocket science to give someone on his defense a very doable role at TE?   

    We don't have anyone with a TE frame on our defense that could fill this role or H-Back/FB?      It isn't like we're overworking Chad Thomas, Genard Avery, or Ricky Ticky Takitaki. Daniel Ekuale has a decent frame with the athleticism of a DE.   We could even put Drew Forbes out there as a 2nd TE and use him primarily as an extra blocker.  I'm sure he could learn a very short route or 2 in the process.  Again, the alternative is Pharaoh Brown...

    IMHO, Pharaoh should be where most other Pharaohs are......buried in a desert MANY miles from Cleveland.

    Mike

  • @flugel said:

    Is he worthy of such optimism?  

    NE used to play Mike Vrabel as an extra TE in the red zone and short yardage situations when their TE inventory was low.  Is Bill Belichick the only coach on the planet that doesn't think it's rocket science to give someone on his defense a very doable role at TE?   

    We don't have anyone with a TE frame on our defense that could fill this role or H-Back/FB?      It isn't like we're overworking Chad Thomas, Genard Avery, or Ricky Ticky Takitaki. Daniel Ekuale has a decent frame with the athleticism of a DE.   We could even put Drew Forbes out there as a 2nd TE and use him primarily as an extra blocker.  I'm sure he could learn a very short route or 2 in the process.  Again, the alternative is Pharaoh Brown...

    IMHO, Pharaoh should be where most other Pharaohs are......buried in a desert MANY miles from Cleveland.

    Mike

    @canton-mike said:

    IMHO, Pharaoh should be where most other Pharaohs are......buried in a desert MANY miles from Cleveland.

    Mike

    Speakin' of deserts, y'all hear 'bout the Ag who joined  the French Foreign Legion? He joined up to see the world, but got posted to some shithole country where the ole Sgt Maj picked him up and rode him on their old camel Sara back to the outpost some 50 miles into the desert. 'Bout a week went by and our dear Ag friend finally asked the ole Sgt Maj what troops did for sex that far out. The ole Sgt Maj points over to the corral and tells him they always used Sara. The Ag thinks to himself that'll never happen but 'bout a week more goes by when the ole Sgt Maj is making his nightly rounds when low and behold he spots in his flashlight beam our pour Ag on a step stool up behind ole Sara. "What the hell are you doin'?" he asks. "Well you told me everybody uses Sara Sgt Maj." "Well sure we do you idiot, to ride the 50 miles back to the whorehouse in town!"??

  • @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    I don’t....?

    Oh God, I would LOVE to click on those links! ?

    It's funny, this is the biggest game we've had in quite a while. The last game of the quarter, a chance to claim 1st place in division, and most importantly, a chance to get back on track. Seriously, can you think of two more different narratives of we win vs lose? It would literally be "going to the playoffs" vs "let's start discussing the draft". And the scary thing is...both might be RIGHT. That's how important this game is, and also why so many Browns fans were so distraught last week. 

    You really can't say a loss doesn't destroy our chances (for the most part) cuz beating the Seahawks, Patriots, 49's, and the 85 Bears won't be easy. Does it literally crush us? Nah, not really, but IF we lose we MUST SCORE POINTS. The one thing that just can't happen is us crapping the bed on offense because that's going to continue the awful narratives of our coach and QB sucking and we desperately need to move beyond that. 

    COME ON BROWNIES! 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    You really can't say a loss doesn't destroy our chances

    A loss today absolutely does not "destroy" our playoff chances. Nor would 3 added losses to SF, SEA and NE.

    What 4 more losses would do is make the only plausible route into the playoffs via a Wildcard slot and that means we will likely need the help of others. In other words... we would no longer control our own destiny.

    However, if we were to win out then we finish 10-6... and a look at the schedule says that is plausible.

    • While Denver in Denver won't be a cakewalk, it is winnable.
    • BUF, PTG and MIA in CLE.... all winnable.
    • PTG in PTG? Heinz is a tough place for anyone, let alone us, to beat the Steelers. Circle this date... it's pivotal... and it concerns me the most.
    • The final, 4-week run is CIN, @ AZ, BLT and @ CIN.

    Three of the final four look like locks. After today we'll know more about how to feel about the BLT rematch.

  • @jiggins7919 said:

    You really can't say a loss doesn't destroy our chances

    A loss today absolutely does not "destroy" our playoff chances. Nor would 3 added losses to SF, SEA and NE.

    What 4 more losses would do is make the only plausible route into the playoffs via a Wildcard slot and that means we will likely need the help of others. In other words... we would no longer control our own destiny.

    However, if we were to win out then we finish 10-6... and a look at the schedule says that is plausible.

    • While Denver in Denver won't be a cakewalk, it is winnable.
    • BUF, PTG and MIA in CLE.... all winnable.
    • PTG in PTG? Heinz is a tough place for anyone, let alone us, to beat the Steelers. Circle this date... it's pivotal... and it concerns me the most.
    • The final, 4-week run is CIN, @ AZ, BLT and @ CIN.

    Three of the final four look like locks. After today we'll know more about how to feel about the BLT rematch.

    @tour2ma said:

    A loss today absolutely does not "destroy" our playoff chances. Nor would 3 added losses to SF, SEA and NE.

    What 4 more losses would do is make the only plausible route into the playoffs via a Wildcard slot and that means we will likely need the help of others. In other words... we would no longer control our own destiny.

    However, if we were to win out then we finish 10-6... and a look at the schedule says that is plausible.

    • While Denver in Denver won't be a cakewalk, it is winnable.
    • BUF, PTG and MIA in CLE.... all winnable.
    • PTG in PTG? Heinz is a tough place for anyone, let alone us, to beat the Steelers. Circle this date... it's pivotal... and it concerns me the most.
    • The final, 4-week run is CIN, @ AZ, BLT and @ CIN.

    Three of the final four look like locks. After today we'll know more about how to feel about the BLT rematch.

    And in a general sense Cincinnati regardless of how bad or good both of our teams are often turns out to be a tough match.

    WSS

  • Sophomore slump...happens to everyone...move it along...nothing to see here.

    Its very simple why he struggles...that stupid shotgun crap.

  • This thread isn't aging well. Pharoah brown played a great game

  • @tour2ma said:

    A loss today absolutely does not "destroy" our playoff chances. Nor would 3 added losses to SF, SEA and NE.

    What 4 more losses would do is make the only plausible route into the playoffs via a Wildcard slot and that means we will likely need the help of others. In other words... we would no longer control our own destiny.

    However, if we were to win out then we finish 10-6... and a look at the schedule says that is plausible.

    • While Denver in Denver won't be a cakewalk, it is winnable.
    • BUF, PTG and MIA in CLE.... all winnable.
    • PTG in PTG? Heinz is a tough place for anyone, let alone us, to beat the Steelers. Circle this date... it's pivotal... and it concerns me the most.
    • The final, 4-week run is CIN, @ AZ, BLT and @ CIN.

    Three of the final four look like locks. After today we'll know more about how to feel about the BLT rematch.

    And in a general sense Cincinnati regardless of how bad or good both of our teams are often turns out to be a tough match.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And in a general sense Cincinnati regardless of how bad or good both of our teams are often turns out to be a tough match.

    Certainly has been the case when they were "up" and we not so much...

    Been too long for me to remember the reverse.

  • This thread isn't aging well. Pharoah brown played a great game

    @choco said:

    This thread isn't aging well. Pharoah brown played a great game

    He damn sure did.  It's not often easy for a good blocker to stand out, but let me tell you, if there was an important run, you could almost always find Brown laying the wood on someone.  I want to say it was our garbage TD with Hilliard that he planted someone and then flexed....loved it.  

    In terms of us playing Cincy, I really wish we played them NOW, LOL.  They look bad, and what's better, their OL looks REALLY bad.  Unfortunately for us we have to travel all of the way across the country for a late Monday night game, but hey, you gotta play who is on the schedule, and I see no reason we can't give the 49's hell.  I could see a situation where we get down early and have to stage a late 4th quarter comeback...but we can definitely win.

    This could also be a game where our vertical passing game comes alive.  You guys notice that we really haven't gone deep that much this year?  I think we've shortened some of our routes due to concerns surrounding pass blocking, and I know for a fact we ran a bunch of deep routes against the Titans.  Sadly, Baker didn't have time to pull the trigger which really stunk because OBJ was running completely free no less than 3 or 4 times.  Extremely frustrating, especially when the game was so close.  The Baltimore game taught us an important lesson about how much attention OBJ receives, and while you still have to make an effort to get your best horse in the race, Baker showed tremendous maturity in finding other targets and not locking in on such a tantalizing talent.

    What we're missing is Breshad Perriman, and I think we're feeling his absence a bit more than expected.  Obviously being without Calloway doesn't help, but it's no secret that our vertical passing game has been all but dead.  Other than the OBJ double-reverse bomb (I'm still mad he didn't run it, and I'm more mad Ratley couldn't put his hands on it better, LOLOL), we haven't gone deep.  No max-protect rollout plays, no flea-flickers (thank God, lol), and no straight up shots down the field.  OBJ is certainly capable of taking the top off the defense, but that's awful tough to do when he's got the entire secondary's attention.  I really expect to see Calloway given at least two chances down the field, and I also expect Seals-Jones to get a chance or two deep down the seam.  Baker throws an extremely accurate deep ball, and it's time to unleash it this week (as long as they have a safety valve in case of pressure).

  • @westside-steve said:

    And in a general sense Cincinnati regardless of how bad or good both of our teams are often turns out to be a tough match.

    Certainly has been the case when they were "up" and we not so much...

    Been too long for me to remember the reverse.

    @tour2ma said:

    Certainly has been the case when they were "up" and we not so much...

    Been too long for me to remember the reverse.

    2007

    Fucking hell.