Skip to content

***Ravens VS Browns Gameday Thread***

The Browns Board
199 36 4.9k 1
  • .................... Imagine if Freddie would've handed the ball to Chubb - all 4 times if needed, against the Rams on that final 1st and goal series.

  • sorry if this was posted already:

  • humphries was holding etc OBJ a lot of the game.

    Check it out - Kitchens says they plan to follow up on the officiating.

    https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/ravens/bs-sp-ravens-humphrey-beckham-browns-kitchens-20191001-qwiecexvhzgs7b6quwomcdnqgy-story.html

  • For those who did not see it the game against the Ravens replays on NFL Network (Ch. 212 Direct TV) tonight at midnight EDT, 11 pm CDT.

  • But it's minus the Toyota Halftime Show! ?

    At least it's not MNF's fabulous Genesis Halftime Show that's missing...

  • .................... Imagine if Freddie would've handed the ball to Chubb - all 4 times if needed, against the Rams on that final 1st and goal series.

    @d-bone said:

    .................... Imagine if Freddie would've handed the ball to Chubb - all 4 times if needed, against the Rams on that final 1st and goal series.

    Smart coaches learn  from  their  mistakes, I  doubt  Freddie  makes  that one again.

  • @gunz41 said:

    Saquon says boo!!!!

    Saquon Barkley would have been a terrible choice for us considering what we got in that draft. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Saquon Barkley would have been a terrible choice for us considering what we got in that draft. 

    I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. But saying Chubb and Michel were the top 2 backs I would say Saquon would certainly be in that conversation too

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Saquon Barkley would have been a terrible choice for us considering what we got in that draft. 

    I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. But saying Chubb and Michel were the top 2 backs I would say Saquon would certainly be in that conversation too

    @gunz41 said:

    I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. But saying Chubb and Michel were the top 2 backs I would say Saquon would certainly be in that conversation too

    Top two that appeared available to us. SB was going well before them, but we needed a decent RB. They were the top two where we were choosing, but NE took Michel before he reached us. Prior to his injury Chubb really was the better of the two. All I can say is he appears fully healed now for sure. And ironically Michel has been injured a lot his first two years.

  • @gunz41 said:

    I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. But saying Chubb and Michel were the top 2 backs I would say Saquon would certainly be in that conversation too

    Top two that appeared available to us. SB was going well before them, but we needed a decent RB. They were the top two where we were choosing, but NE took Michel before he reached us. Prior to his injury Chubb really was the better of the two. All I can say is he appears fully healed now for sure. And ironically Michel has been injured a lot his first two years.

    @texasag1969 said:

     All I can say is he appears fully healed now for sure. And ironically Michel has been injured a lot his first two years.

    adding in same concern at time they were all drafted...Chubb had less fumbles in college than any of them/touch including Guice...as of 2 year pros= Michel has 2...Barkley 1....Chubb ZERO...

  • @gunz41 said:

    I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. But saying Chubb and Michel were the top 2 backs I would say Saquon would certainly be in that conversation too

    Top two that appeared available to us. SB was going well before them, but we needed a decent RB. They were the top two where we were choosing, but NE took Michel before he reached us. Prior to his injury Chubb really was the better of the two. All I can say is he appears fully healed now for sure. And ironically Michel has been injured a lot his first two years.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Top two that appeared available to us. SB was going well before them, but we needed a decent RB. They were the top two where we were choosing, but NE took Michel before he reached us. Prior to his injury Chubb really was the better of the two. All I can say is he appears fully healed now for sure. And ironically Michel has been injured a lot his first two years.

    That isn't what you said, but that makes sense. And Michel wasn't available then.

    I honestly thought you just forgot about Barkley