Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. So whats wrong with Baker?

So whats wrong with Baker?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
106 Posts 29 Posters 3.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 20k Posts
    • 5k Reputation
    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #1

    The article is too big to cut and paste here, but like that line in the Alice's Restaurant song you'll get the circles, arrows and videos from multiple angles with commentary on how badly Baker screwed up on numerous plays. If this guy saw it, you can bet the ranch the coaches saw it, and I have to wonder how other guys on the offense are reacting to it... Everything he was doing right last year, looks like he's doing wrong. I don't have the explanation why...

    Warning to Jiggins: This link may make you ill.  🙂  

    https://247sports.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/Article/OBR-Film-Room-Baker-Mayfield-one-read-QB-Fact-or-Fiction-136729182/?utm_source=247Sports Newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_campaign=191011_115012_Cleveland Browns&utm_content=Image&liveconnect=CA-1F-A7-07-02-43-35-CA-71-7D-7D-AF-89-03-3E-6C191011_115012ClevelandBrowns

    1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    Quote Reply
    • Icecube I Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 2k Posts
      • 436 Reputation
      I Icecube wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I think this is all true, but it's also all correctable. Perhaps it is due to coaching as well. Freddie took all the credit, but the OLD OL coach may have been right, as another post pointed out. 

      Baker may break out of this slump any game. Maybe this week? 

      mjp28M 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • I Icecube

        I think this is all true, but it's also all correctable. Perhaps it is due to coaching as well. Freddie took all the credit, but the OLD OL coach may have been right, as another post pointed out. 

        Baker may break out of this slump any game. Maybe this week? 

        mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
        • 18k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @icecube said:

        *****  Baker may break out of this slump any game. Maybe this week? *****

        If it's going to happen at all this would be the week for Mayfield + the receiving corp + the maligned OL + the Chubb led running game + the "play callers" and everyone else to get their crap together.

        The national media don't give the BROWNS a chance in hell to win this game, a classic underdog don't give a crap home trap.

        It's now or never a 2-4 record and a week off to stew about it followed by a week 8 trip to Foxborough to meet the Superbowl favorite Patriots might end any playoff aspirations.

        Can it be a bigger must win game?????  I don't think so.   😕

        GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
          • 28k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
          #4

          If we lose and Baker sucks again, its going to get ugly in Cleveland.....

          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 9k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I'm quite certain that most of his problem stems from a lack of faith in his offensive line to give him protection long enough to go through his progressions properly.

            Now, you can quote PFF #'s regarding a clean pocket for him if you want to......but that doesn't matter....what matters is whether BAKER believes he'll get the time.  I mean, how much faith would YOU have in Robinson, Kush & Hubbard?

            Last season he faced a lot of weaker defenses.  THIS year he's been facing pretty tough defenses.  And it LOOKS it.

            BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
            1 Reply Last reply
            👍
            Quote Reply
            • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
              • 13k Posts
              • 5k Reputation
              tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I'm starting to (re) develop issues with Bakers eyes sans play action.  This was a problem that showed up in some of his film while at Oklahoma and I remember mentioning it.   

              It's a 50/50 in my mind.  I think the pre-snap, having his eyes in the right place, can be severely improved and likely should be.    Post snap, moving from primary, to secondary to outlet... I don't think Baker 'Can't'* do that.   However the time that this Oline affords him doesn't match his processing speed.      It's possible his post snap mental progressions pick up their tempo the more familiar he becomes with the expanded playbook, NFL looks and time with his receivers.    His internal clock seems to be a great deal faster when coming off of play action, something a couple of us have noted.    But my concern, somewhat similar to the concern I had for Kizer when he was here, was the speed of his eyes and diagnosing what was in front of him when he wasn't given the benefit of moving defenders that play action/Chubb can give.  

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • MDDawg M Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 860 Posts
                • 351 Reputation
                M MDDawg wrote on last edited by MDDawg
                #7

                It appears as if the replacement of Zeitler with Kush had a bigger impact than expected. The guys on Surviving the Season podcast observed that teams with short QBs eg Saints and Seahawks (Drew Brees and Russell Wilson) have excellent guards. These guards ensure the throwing lanes that are absolutely necessary for shorter QBs success are kept open. This season our  throwing lanes have shrunk evidenced by Baker’s batted passes of 7 so far when he had 9 all last season. Have you seen Baker climb the pocket this season, which he used to do with aplomb last year? Dorsey failed to pay attention to detail here and it’s even more egregious since we’re hardly getting much production from Olivier Vernon. 

                1 Reply Last reply
                ❤
                Quote Reply
                • jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 883 Reputation
                  jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  QB School on YouTube did an excellent breakdown on Baker's troubles. Pretty much put most of the blame on Kitchens and poor offensive scheming:

                  "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                  hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                  👍
                  Quote Reply
                  • Canton Mike Canton MikeC
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 2k Reputation
                    Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by Canton Mike
                    #9

                    I am still considering starting Baker in my FL tomorrow. 2 reasons:

                    1) Higgins....If he plays, HUGE difference in all WR production. If he doesn't, I may play Goff or Stafford.

                    2) Baker....I still believe in the kid & refuse to give up on him although Higgins presence on field will impact my decision.

                    Mike

                    IN DORSEY I TRUST
                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    👍
                    Quote Reply
                    • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

                      I am still considering starting Baker in my FL tomorrow. 2 reasons:

                      1) Higgins....If he plays, HUGE difference in all WR production. If he doesn't, I may play Goff or Stafford.

                      2) Baker....I still believe in the kid & refuse to give up on him although Higgins presence on field will impact my decision.

                      Mike

                      TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 23k Posts
                      • 6k Reputation
                      T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @canton-mike said:

                      I am still considering starting Baker in my FL tomorrow. 2 reasons:

                      1) Higgins....If he plays, HUGE difference in all WR production. If he doesn't, I may play Goff or Stafford.

                      2) Baker....I still believe in the kid & refuse to give up on him although Higgins presence on field will impact my decision.

                      Mike

                      I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                      Canton MikeC jiggins7919J 2 Replies Last reply
                      👍
                      Quote Reply
                      • T TexasAg1969

                        @canton-mike said:

                        I am still considering starting Baker in my FL tomorrow. 2 reasons:

                        1) Higgins....If he plays, HUGE difference in all WR production. If he doesn't, I may play Goff or Stafford.

                        2) Baker....I still believe in the kid & refuse to give up on him although Higgins presence on field will impact my decision.

                        Mike

                        I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                        Canton Mike Canton MikeC
                        • 4k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @texasag1969 said:

                        I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                        Bill,

                        The fact they all have tough games is what drives me to start my Browns' guy, but if Higgins is inactive, that may sway me to one of the others. I guess I'll know tomorrow am.

                        Mike

                        IN DORSEY I TRUST
                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Canton MikeC Canton Mike

                          @texasag1969 said:

                          I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                          Bill,

                          The fact they all have tough games is what drives me to start my Browns' guy, but if Higgins is inactive, that may sway me to one of the others. I guess I'll know tomorrow am.

                          Mike

                          TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 23k Posts
                          • 6k Reputation
                          T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @canton-mike said:

                          Bill,

                          The fact they all have tough games is what drives me to start my Browns' guy, but if Higgins is inactive, that may sway me to one of the others. I guess I'll know tomorrow am.

                          Mike

                          I have an equally tough choice with Rivers coming off one of his worst career games ever and Bridgewater (Brees stand-in) coming off his best game ever having to go over to Jax this week. But since Rivers is at home against a QB depleted Pitt, I'll stick with him most likely.  At least I started with max points plus a defensive TD out of the NE D already.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 11k Posts
                            • 4k Reputation
                            gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
                            #13

                            Here's just a opinion on why am thinking Bake gets on track this week...

                            1) Dandy f'n Dolton= Sea-418 yards* 2 Td's..Rudolph=Sea-12 of 19-2 Tds...Twatwater=Sea.-19 of 27-2 Td's..Kyler Murray=Sea.-22 of 32-241 yards..Goff=Sea-29 of 49=395 yards* 1 td.. 

                            2) Sea. has been stout against the run in all 5 games played..Am talking like 34 yards to Cinn..And holding Rams/Pitt/ Saints? all gaining only 80-89 total rushing yards.. Chubb will need to bang hard in this one..Hawks bang anything that moves..   

                            Here's a few things that jump out at me on tape..

                            A.) Not sure if Bake is having a play call duel with Freddie? Freddie gets 15 seconds in Bakes helmet. Bake flips his wrist band open for line sight check out plays.. Could be as simple as Bake "Stop over thinking it"

                            B.) Titans & 49'er may have the largest wingspan munsters up front (Bills another) that we can't handle with a hodgepodge OL and a barely 6 ft. QB. Add Bake trying to fake pump a window open? adds to holding the ball to long & bails out of crushing pockets..

                            C.) These rushing munster fronts are allowing 6-7 to cover..the math is easy to see this with 3 WR's now running fire drill routes to Bakes strong side..Right?

                            D.) OBJ & Landry should not be seen 20 yards down field running routes 5 yards apart.. oh but they are..

                            In Ending, Am not* telling any of you's nothing you have not already seen for yourselves..But with Callaway now in his right spot & a hopeful Holly_wood Higgy sightings... I got Bake toasting the Hawks for over 300 yards & 2 TD's. Add a Chubb score...and Shucks, how bout this Kicker winning us a Game with some defense? .. Scoreboard- Good guys-27 Hawks fly back home with 20.. 

                            Bake.. just as pre-draft..Have that sit down again with Russ sometime this week..Topic: playing behind a questionable OL?..It really can't hurt even at your speed 😉  

                            Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • T TexasAg1969

                              @canton-mike said:

                              I am still considering starting Baker in my FL tomorrow. 2 reasons:

                              1) Higgins....If he plays, HUGE difference in all WR production. If he doesn't, I may play Goff or Stafford.

                              2) Baker....I still believe in the kid & refuse to give up on him although Higgins presence on field will impact my decision.

                              Mike

                              I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                              jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 5k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @texasag1969 said:

                              I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                              I can't start Baker until we see improvement, but the primary reason I wouldn't start him is his lack of production in the red zone. He's literally made the wrong guess on 90% (made that up) of his red zone reads. I said "guesses" because we all see him predetermining where to throw it. When you add in the fact he's not making ANY TD throws over 20 yards, you're getting the unenviable combination of no red zone production OR deep play touchdowns. Hard pass. 

                              Can this this change? Hell yes. But I have to see it, and I'm betting it will coincide with Kareem Hunt returning. 

                              T M 2 Replies Last reply
                              👍
                              Quote Reply
                              • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                                QB School on YouTube did an excellent breakdown on Baker's troubles. Pretty much put most of the blame on Kitchens and poor offensive scheming:

                                hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 20k Posts
                                • 5k Reputation
                                hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @jbluhm86 said:

                                QB School on YouTube did an excellent breakdown on Baker's troubles. Pretty much put most of the blame on Kitchens and poor offensive scheming:

                                What I  took  away  from that  film  session was Baker too often  was looking for the  home run, plenty of  times  he had  Landry  wide open  for a  dump  off pass. 

                                And when  he forced  the end zone  throw  into  coverage, OBJ was wide open. 🙁

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply
                                • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                                  @texasag1969 said:

                                  I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                                  I can't start Baker until we see improvement, but the primary reason I wouldn't start him is his lack of production in the red zone. He's literally made the wrong guess on 90% (made that up) of his red zone reads. I said "guesses" because we all see him predetermining where to throw it. When you add in the fact he's not making ANY TD throws over 20 yards, you're getting the unenviable combination of no red zone production OR deep play touchdowns. Hard pass. 

                                  Can this this change? Hell yes. But I have to see it, and I'm betting it will coincide with Kareem Hunt returning. 

                                  TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 23k Posts
                                  • 6k Reputation
                                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @jiggins7919 said:

                                  I can't start Baker until we see improvement, but the primary reason I wouldn't start him is his lack of production in the red zone. He's literally made the wrong guess on 90% (made that up) of his red zone reads. I said "guesses" because we all see him predetermining where to throw it. When you add in the fact he's not making ANY TD throws over 20 yards, you're getting the unenviable combination of no red zone production OR deep play touchdowns. Hard pass. 

                                  Can this this change? Hell yes. But I have to see it, and I'm betting it will coincide with Kareem Hunt returning. 

                                  Totally agree. Hunt is a red zone dragon and PA off him will work very well. I like Chubb as the workhorse a lot, but Hunt is just a special kind of player inside the 10.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                                    @texasag1969 said:

                                    I would not start Baker until you see signs of an overall "fix" to the way they are running the offense. So far there are no signs of it. But then again the other two have difficult games, one with SF's front 4 and the other @ GB. Tough decision Mike. Got a 3 sided coin?

                                    I can't start Baker until we see improvement, but the primary reason I wouldn't start him is his lack of production in the red zone. He's literally made the wrong guess on 90% (made that up) of his red zone reads. I said "guesses" because we all see him predetermining where to throw it. When you add in the fact he's not making ANY TD throws over 20 yards, you're getting the unenviable combination of no red zone production OR deep play touchdowns. Hard pass. 

                                    Can this this change? Hell yes. But I have to see it, and I'm betting it will coincide with Kareem Hunt returning. 

                                    MDDawg M Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 860 Posts
                                    • 351 Reputation
                                    M MDDawg wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @jiggins7919 said:

                                    I can't start Baker until we see improvement, but the primary reason I wouldn't start him is his lack of production in the red zone. He's literally made the wrong guess on 90% (made that up) of his red zone reads. I said "guesses" because we all see him predetermining where to throw it. When you add in the fact he's not making ANY TD throws over 20 yards, you're getting the unenviable combination of no red zone production OR deep play touchdowns. Hard pass. 

                                    Can this this change? Hell yes. But I have to see it, and I'm betting it will coincide with Kareem Hunt returning. 

                                    Also agree plus I don't know how he can predetermine to throw to frikking stone hands Demetrius Harris. I'll keep on repeating it, replacing Darren Fells and Orson Charles with Harris and Brown was another big mistake by Dorsey especially after he weakened the Oline by trading Zeitler.

                                    jiggins7919J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • M MDDawg

                                      @jiggins7919 said:

                                      I can't start Baker until we see improvement, but the primary reason I wouldn't start him is his lack of production in the red zone. He's literally made the wrong guess on 90% (made that up) of his red zone reads. I said "guesses" because we all see him predetermining where to throw it. When you add in the fact he's not making ANY TD throws over 20 yards, you're getting the unenviable combination of no red zone production OR deep play touchdowns. Hard pass. 

                                      Can this this change? Hell yes. But I have to see it, and I'm betting it will coincide with Kareem Hunt returning. 

                                      Also agree plus I don't know how he can predetermine to throw to frikking stone hands Demetrius Harris. I'll keep on repeating it, replacing Darren Fells and Orson Charles with Harris and Brown was another big mistake by Dorsey especially after he weakened the Oline by trading Zeitler.

                                      jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 5k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @mddawg said:

                                      Also agree plus I don't know how he can predetermine to throw to frikking stone hands Demetrius Harris. I'll keep on repeating it, replacing Darren Fells and Orson Charles with Harris and Brown was another big mistake by Dorsey especially after he weakened the Oline by trading Zeitler.

                                      This. ALL of this! And don't forget that he also targeted Pharaoh Brown once, Calloway twice, and did I mention Demetrius Harris?! Also, he totally guessed against the Ravens off an RPO, but the pass was batted down at the line by a DL. Had it not been, it was a pick-6 because a Raven was waiting for it. 

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • hish747 hish747H Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 269 Posts
                                        • 110 Reputation
                                        hish747H hish747 wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Agree. It's the crappy offensive scheming. Those who blame this on the loss of Zeitler, check out how his new team is doing from a QB pressure point of view. Daniel Jones is maybe the only other QB who's been under more pressure than Mayfield.

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 2k Posts
                                          • 390 Reputation
                                          CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFSC CLEVELANDwantsPLAYOFFS wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Callaway is returning back to the X position which is natural position, where he took his preseason and practice reps. Higgins being in the Z. 

                                          Things will hopefully be somewhat back to the norm.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          👍
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate