Skip to content

Happy Impeachment Day!

Political Discussion
131 20 3.4k
  • @gorka said:

    Yes, there are libtards amongst us that are asking this...

    hillary-presd.jpg

    Why don't you ask this idiot you ignorant slut.

    idiot.jpg

    @gorka said:

    Why don't you ask this idiot you ignorant slut.

    idiot.jpg

  • @calfoxwc said:

    He got elected because he spoke like a REAL AMERICAN, and not a globalist leftwing scumbucket sombeitch like obamao and the rest of his organized slime mafia.

    But tell us how you really feel Cal...   😁 😁 😁 

    He got elected because  that leftwing scumbucket sombeitch Hillary was an even worse option- but you apparently haven't figured it out yet. 

    As some have pointed out- Trump's position on a lot of issues can change like Ohio weather.... 

    @hoorta said:

    But tell us how you really feel Cal...   😁 😁 😁 

    He got elected because  that leftwing scumbucket sombeitch Hillary was an even worse option- but you apparently haven't figured it out yet. 

    As some have pointed out- Trump's position on a lot of issues can change like Ohio weather.... 

    well, good point - personally, the guy I want to be president is Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.  I just see that there is no more America democratic political party any more. Whoever they muster to run, is a slut, and of course, the republican will be the better option.

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    Why I still stand by 45

    https://www.christianpost.com/voice/why-i-still-stand-by-45-president-trump.html?fbclid=IwAR08ukTUMrRCHirZlXdpddZXLisEQxY7Rhj9aQ22XJBGAjSGHf0ALIiK4TE

    I wish I could have written that opinion that eloquently. The left hates Pres Trump, primarily, because their utopian socialist emotionalism LOST in 2016, and will lose bigtime in 2020. This whole fake impeachment was their only recourse to reach the emotional leftist base.

    All that Pres Trump is doing wonderfully for America,  is ignored. Their emotions rule, and free stuff/entitlement, and a mass feeling of fake elitism makes them "happy".

  • @hoorta said:

    But tell us how you really feel Cal...   😁 😁 😁 

    He got elected because  that leftwing scumbucket sombeitch Hillary was an even worse option- but you apparently haven't figured it out yet. 

    As some have pointed out- Trump's position on a lot of issues can change like Ohio weather.... 

    well, good point - personally, the guy I want to be president is Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.  I just see that there is no more America democratic political party any more. Whoever they muster to run, is a slut, and of course, the republican will be the better option.

    @calfoxwc said:

    well, good point - personally, the guy I want to be president is Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.  I just see that there is no more America democratic political party any more. Whoever they muster to run, is a slut, and of course, the republican will be the better option.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    🙂 If it makes you feel any better- Biden is the only Democrat that stands a chance against Trump. I hope the American electorate will be smart enough to figure out Bernie and Warren are pedaling outright socialism with massive tax increases to pay for it. 

    @calfoxwc said:

    I wish I could have written that opinion that eloquently. The left hates Pres Trump, primarily, because their utopian socialist emotionalism LOST in 2016, and will lose bigtime in 2020. This whole fake impeachment was their only recourse to reach the emotional leftist base.

    All that Pres Trump is doing wonderfully for America,  is ignored. Their emotions rule, and free stuff/entitlement, and a mass feeling of fake elitism makes them "happy".

    Been thinking about this Cal, and correct me if I'm wrong. the Democrats sure didn't go after Bush I or Bush II nearly as hard. The reason they hate from my POV (not a good term) Trump is because they view him as an unhinged nut. Someone- forgot exactly who- broke down Donald's 6 page spew to Pelosi, that there were plenty of lies, misstatements, and exaggerations. 

    As to the Republicans and Trump winning big time come November- don't get cocky. Don't forget- with the worst possible candidate (well short of Bernie that you know who sabotaged) - Hillary, the Democrats still won the popular vote against The Donald. He took the Electoral College with razor thin majorities in a couple of key states. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    well, good point - personally, the guy I want to be president is Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.  I just see that there is no more America democratic political party any more. Whoever they muster to run, is a slut, and of course, the republican will be the better option.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    🙂 If it makes you feel any better- Biden is the only Democrat that stands a chance against Trump. I hope the American electorate will be smart enough to figure out Bernie and Warren are pedaling outright socialism with massive tax increases to pay for it. 

    @calfoxwc said:

    I wish I could have written that opinion that eloquently. The left hates Pres Trump, primarily, because their utopian socialist emotionalism LOST in 2016, and will lose bigtime in 2020. This whole fake impeachment was their only recourse to reach the emotional leftist base.

    All that Pres Trump is doing wonderfully for America,  is ignored. Their emotions rule, and free stuff/entitlement, and a mass feeling of fake elitism makes them "happy".

    Been thinking about this Cal, and correct me if I'm wrong. the Democrats sure didn't go after Bush I or Bush II nearly as hard. The reason they hate from my POV (not a good term) Trump is because they view him as an unhinged nut. Someone- forgot exactly who- broke down Donald's 6 page spew to Pelosi, that there were plenty of lies, misstatements, and exaggerations. 

    As to the Republicans and Trump winning big time come November- don't get cocky. Don't forget- with the worst possible candidate (well short of Bernie that you know who sabotaged) - Hillary, the Democrats still won the popular vote against The Donald. He took the Electoral College with razor thin majorities in a couple of key states. 

    @hoorta said:

    As to the Republicans and Trump winning big time come November- don't get cocky. Don't forget- with the worst possible candidate (well short of Bernie that you know who sabotaged) - Hillary, the Democrats still won the popular vote against The Donald. He took the Electoral College with razor thin majorities in a couple of key states. 

      Well, certainly true. Pres Trump is keeping his promises. He didn't have to enter this destructive fray - it's out of control. I don't excuse Trump's character flaws, occasional offensive tweets. America needs a pres to stand up to all the corruption. For years, I, like many Americans, have wondered why the hell nothing changes with carter/clinton/bush/obamao.... the inner cities still reek of poverty, taxes are still too damn high and our national debt won't stop growing, and attacks on our freedoms keep increasing, and NOBODY stops the freaking destructive mass illegal immigration and the critically serious growth of foreign gangs in our country...and on and on.

       Finally, we see the deep corrupt state in action - locked in for decades bureaucrats who believe they own and run America, not the Supreme Court or the President, or even Congress. It's serious - and plenty of dumb conspiracy theories arise to ineptly try to explain it.

       but now, false accusations and false witnesses and now a bogus fake impeachment, and mccabe/brennan/comey/strzok/page/rice/veldman sp?/clinesmith, valerie jarret, obamao, ....the whole list of ofthem = some are already proven to have lied to Congress...

    it's a fight to avoid globalism, and loss of sovereignty - look at the EU - Britain fell into the same trap - now they desperately voted in conservatives because after a national vote in favor of brexit, the left has tried to stop them.

      It's right down to obaMao going around the world condemning us. America. Americans. seriously?

    Our Constitution/Bill of Rights is the Shining Document in history. It guarantees us our freedoms from tyranny and loss of sovereignty. Permanently. the last election - true - it was close. But ONLY because of the giant inner cities in certain states.

    If you check out the map below, you'll see. and flooding illegals to these cities - with destitute/totally dependent on gov welfare are planned to buoy up the sagging democratic huge welfare state voting numbers. That is why the left is desperate to get them the vote.

       and, this why the left desperately entertains getting rid of the electoral college. Look at all the red who elected Pres Trump.

    1280px-2016_Nationwide_US_presidential_c

  • @calfoxwc said:

    He got elected because he spoke like a REAL AMERICAN, and not a globalist leftwing scumbucket sombeitch like obamao and the rest of his organized slime mafia.

    But tell us how you really feel Cal...   😁 😁 😁 

    He got elected because  that leftwing scumbucket sombeitch Hillary was an even worse option- but you apparently haven't figured it out yet. 

    As some have pointed out- Trump's position on a lot of issues can change like Ohio weather.... 

    @hoorta said:

    But tell us how you really feel Cal...   😁 😁 😁 

    He got elected because  that leftwing scumbucket sombeitch Hillary was an even worse option- but you apparently haven't figured it out yet. 

    As some have pointed out- Trump's position on a lot of issues can change like Ohio weather.... 

    And there's much you apparently haven't figured out.

    As hard as you try to make yourself believe that Hillary being an awful candidate was the primary reason Trump got elected, it was not.

    As part of the low info liberal crowd you may not have  been aware of the thousands upon thousands that showed up at Trumps presidential campaign rallies. These crowd levels were unprecedented, never seen before in a presidential campaign. But how would you have known by watching CNN.

    They were not there because Hillary sucked, they were there because for the first time in American history a blunt, plain spoken non politician was running for president who they believed could make America great again. And obviously their prognosis was correct.

    They were there because of the disconnect democrats had for the working class. Democrats amongst you more concerned about issues such as men who think that they are women being allowed to use the little girls room, gay marriage, reparations for slavery, free shit for everyone...

    Trumps election was the repudiation of Obama and his policies and the rejection of any democrat whos aim was to carry on Obamas legacy, be it Hillary or anyone else.

    ….and if you're also not aware, these mega rallies continue to this day.

  • Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

  • Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    @mld-woody said:

    Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    Maps like that are just a good example of why the US needs to be broken up into several countries. There are distinct value, economic, etc differences between areas of the country. The South would be for the most part fucked because they are a drain on federal funds but they can deal.

  • Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    @mld-woody said:

    Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    Go learn something somewhere. People live in those square miles, stupid.The point is, the big city areas voted for the left welfare state, and most of the entire country voted for our terrific PRESIDENT.

    If you ever get old enough to vote, if they let you out of your special room, voting is done by districts. That is a map of DISTRICTS. Ask yourself why most of the entire board knows you never add anything legit to any conversation.

    posi-lock_t-sq_07_2_1_1_1.jpg

  • Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    @mld-woody said:

    Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    That map is exactly why many democrats want to do away with the electoral college. Not all though. Recently the dems passed an amendment in Nevada getting rid of the electoral college and when it went to the dem governor of Nevada for his signature signing it into law he refused to sign it saying it was bad for the state of Nevada. And he is right . Smaller states like Nevada are the reason the founders of our country came up with the electoral college. 

    https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/maine-and-nevada-show-why-the-electoral-college-helps-small-states

  • There are ways to change the current system without screwing small states. But it's a big change, and people don't like change. Hell, we have an entire political party that's basically just against change. I don't expect anything to happen any time soon. But it's a newer idea that I think those in the younger generation can see. 

    And Cal, it's good to see you completely missed the point. I'm not surprised. No shit people live in the red areas of a lot of square miles. The point is that map doesn't represent voters exactly. It just shows it in square miles. A few thousand people spread across North Dakota are going to look like more than 100,000 in a major city. I know you just see red and your brain shuts off. I get you'll just blindly follow your party. But shit, why that map isn't a good representation of voters isn't that difficult to understand

  • Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    @mld-woody said:

    Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    There are ways to change the current system without screwing small states. But it's a big change, and people don't like change. Hell, we have an entire political party that's basically just against change. I don't expect anything to happen any time soon. But it's a newer idea that I think those in the younger generation can see. 

    And Cal, it's good to see you completely missed the point. I'm not surprised. No shit people live in the red areas of a lot of square miles. The point is that map doesn't represent voters exactly. It just shows it in square miles. A few thousand people spread across North Dakota are going to look like more than 100,000 in a major city. I know you just see red and your brain shuts off. I get you'll just blindly follow your party. But shit, why that map isn't a good representation of voters isn't that difficult to understand

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    See those small squares in each of the states? Those are counties.

    Overall Trump won approximately 2,600 counties to Clinton’s 500, or about 84% of the geographic United States. However, Clinton won 88 of of the 100 largest counties (including Washington D.C.). Without these 100 largest counties she would have lost by 11.5 million votes.

    That's all Cal was trying to say. There is nothing "low intelligence" about posting this map.

    What kind of change do you have in mind? The Obama kind of hope and change?

  • @mld-woody said:

    Showing that map and going "See! Red!" has to be one of the lowest intelligence level things repeatedly posted on here, and that's saying something. Last time I checked a president was elected by people*, not square miles. I know you and others here are easily tricked by data and numbers but come on, this one should be easy.

    *Well not really, because the electoral college is outdated and broken

    Maps like that are just a good example of why the US needs to be broken up into several countries. There are distinct value, economic, etc differences between areas of the country. The South would be for the most part fucked because they are a drain on federal funds but they can deal.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Maps like that are just a good example of why the US needs to be broken up into several countries. There are distinct value, economic, etc differences between areas of the country. The South would be for the most part fucked because they are a drain on federal funds but they can deal.

    Deal what? Makes no sense. Incidentally, the US is already broken up into countries. 50 of them, each with their own leaders and laws. Each with equal say so in the election of the president thanks to the genius of the Founders.

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Maps like that are just a good example of why the US needs to be broken up into several countries. There are distinct value, economic, etc differences between areas of the country. The South would be for the most part fucked because they are a drain on federal funds but they can deal.

    Deal what? Makes no sense. Incidentally, the US is already broken up into countries. 50 of them, each with their own leaders and laws. Each with equal say so in the election of the president thanks to the genius of the Founders.

    @gorka said:

    Deal what? Makes no sense. Incidentally, the US is already broken up into countries. 50 of them, each with their own leaders and laws. Each with equal say so in the election of the president thanks to the genius of the Founders.

    They can adapt and learn how to produce products that other newly minted countries would want from them. As it stands, they are a drain.

    The states aren’t 50 independent countries. They have one unified president. Have a state decide they want to defy federal law and see if the alphabet federal law enforcement orgs don’t come in and start arresting folks. 

  • @gorka said:

    Deal what? Makes no sense. Incidentally, the US is already broken up into countries. 50 of them, each with their own leaders and laws. Each with equal say so in the election of the president thanks to the genius of the Founders.

    They can adapt and learn how to produce products that other newly minted countries would want from them. As it stands, they are a drain.

    The states aren’t 50 independent countries. They have one unified president. Have a state decide they want to defy federal law and see if the alphabet federal law enforcement orgs don’t come in and start arresting folks. 

    @logicisforsquares said:

    They can adapt and learn how to produce products that other newly minted countries would want from them. As it stands, they are a drain.

    The states aren’t 50 independent countries. They have one unified president. Have a state decide they want to defy federal law and see if the alphabet federal law enforcement orgs don’t come in and start arresting folks. 

     I didn't say they were entirely independent, otherwise things like succession would be a non issue and irrelevant.

     "State"  however is another word for independent country,  the State of Israel for example.  America is composed  of 50 states that are united. These United States have their own laws and leaders and are guaranteed states rights. In this way they are independent, otherwise states would be called "provinces". This by design by the Founders so as to prevent a one man makes all the rules monarchy as was in England.

    States are guaranteed equal say in the election of a president. The founders shunned at the idea that a popular vote would decide a presidential election.  Considered it mob rule among a host of other really good reasons.

  • And while certain factors bemoan the mistaken idea that the executive branch is getting more and more power I think you're completely overlooking the fact that states are quickly losing whatever autonomy they ever had.

    WSS

  • And while certain factors bemoan the mistaken idea that the executive branch is getting more and more power I think you're completely overlooking the fact that states are quickly losing whatever autonomy they ever had.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And while certain factors bemoan the mistaken idea that the executive branch is getting more and more power I think you're completely overlooking the fact that states are quickly losing whatever autonomy they ever had.

    WSS

    Bingo. States rights are going the way of the buffalo and getting superseded more and more by overreaching federal law. 

  • @westside-steve said:

    And while certain factors bemoan the mistaken idea that the executive branch is getting more and more power I think you're completely overlooking the fact that states are quickly losing whatever autonomy they ever had.

    WSS

    Bingo. States rights are going the way of the buffalo and getting superseded more and more by overreaching federal law. 

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Bingo. States rights are going the way of the buffalo and getting superseded more and more by overreaching federal law. 

    And as much as I loved Ronald Reagan I have to assign him some of the blame for strong-arming Ohio into the 21 year old drinking law which put thousands of rock and roll musicians and clubs out of business.

    WSS

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Bingo. States rights are going the way of the buffalo and getting superseded more and more by overreaching federal law. 

    And as much as I loved Ronald Reagan I have to assign him some of the blame for strong-arming Ohio into the 21 year old drinking law which put thousands of rock and roll musicians and clubs out of business.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And as much as I loved Ronald Reagan I have to assign him some of the blame for strong-arming Ohio into the 21 year old drinking law which put thousands of rock and roll musicians and clubs out of business.

    WSS

    Didn’t they threaten to withhold federal highways money to force states into the agreement?