Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Coughlin out in Jville

Coughlin out in Jville

The Browns Board
45 14 1.1k
  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #29

    Photo-by-Runyan-Cleveland-Muncipal-Stadi

  • I Icecube

    @bjh2130 said:

    Is that including their "home game" in London where they drew 85k? 

    IDK, can't find stats for London games, but have you watched those game? Sure don't look anything like 85k to me. Maybe 35. 

    That right there is 18k more than the browns stadium holds which pulls them within 8k.  Not too mention their stadium holds 15k more than the browns. So they had the opportunity to have 123k more fans attended their games yet only out did there browns by 26k in home numbers. Lastly I believe hoorta was pointing out when they  don't have a winning team (and the previous year they went to the conference champ) they don't draw. Even when they win they don't sell out lol. Granted they didn't have a great year last year but season tickets are bought in advance of the season and those numbers go off tickets sold not actually people in building. The tarps he is referencing is what makes it go from an 82k stadium to a 67k stadium. 

    I gave you the facts. They draw more attendance than Pitt, Cleveland and so forth. I totally don't buy the 85k London # but prove me wrong. 

    Seeing as how they have an opportunity to get more fans let's talk percentage of stadium filled. 81.3% for jags (not including London game because that's not a home game) 96.8% for the browns. 

    OK, I'll go through this one more time. Jags had to overbuild stadium for 2 things:

    1. They wanted to host a SB. (Did that)

    2. UF-GA games are  huge in Jville. Need 80k seats. 

    If any AFCN team had 80k seats, they'd never fill them. If they could, they would.  

    bjh2130B bjh2130 wrote on
    #30

    @icecube said:

    I gave you the facts. They draw more attendance than Pitt, Cleveland and so forth. I totally don't buy the 85k London # but prove me wrong. 

    Here you go they got credited with 85k because this was a "home game" -17k difference. Then in just their home opener because of the bigger stadium (yet still not sold out for a home opener of  a team that went to conference championship the year before) they got 77k -10k difference. A whopping total of 27k and they outdrew the browns by less than 26k. Keep coming with your facts and I'll keep responding with "no vaseline".

    Screenshot_20191223-091718_Chrome.jpg

    Screenshot_20191223-091517_Chrome.jpg

    Screenshot_20191223-091956_Chrome.jpg

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @hish747 said:

    Well, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US so that would account for a lot of support I would think.

    Actually there are several cities in Alaska that are larger area wise than Jacksonville 

    hish747H hish747 wrote on
    #31

    @the-gipper said:

    Actually there are several cities in Alaska that are larger area wise than Jacksonville 

    I was talking about the USA not rUSsiA😉

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #32

    Much like russia, you're not funny.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
    hish747H 1 Reply
    👍
  • hish747H hish747

    @icecube said:

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

    Well, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US so that would account for a lot of support I would think.

    I Icecube wrote on
    #33

    @hish747 said:

    Well, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US so that would account for a lot of support I would think.

    In land mass, which is a joke. The "city limits" span almost to the ocean (just on the west side of the intercostals). 

    Image result for intercostals jax beach

  • U Unsympathetic

    Much like russia, you're not funny.

    hish747H hish747 wrote on
    #34

    @unsympathetic said:

    Much like russia, you're not funny.

    Well, I thought it was very clever because it was both funny and terrifying at the same time. You know, because the USA is pretty much a part of Russia now.

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #35

    Not any better the second time around.  This isn't the political forum, take your BS elsewhere.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
    👍
  • hish747H hish747 wrote on
    #36

    I know the comrades disagree, but speech is still free...for the time being anyway.

  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #37

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
    Dutch OvenD hish747H 2 Replies
  • U Unsympathetic

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #38

    @unsympathetic said:

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    I always love when I see someone on here saying something along the lines of:

    "Keep the political BS off this forum".... when almost always it really means: "Keep your political thoughts that do not mesh with mine off this forum, because if you posted something political on this football forum that I agree with, I would let it pass without a word"... The exception is hoorta, who actually just wants all political talk to stay on the trainwreck that is the Political Forum of this board. 

    The GipperT 1 Reply
  • U Unsympathetic

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    hish747H hish747 wrote on
    #39

    @unsympathetic said:

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    @dutch-oven said:

    I always love when I see someone on here saying something along the lines of:

    "Keep the political BS off this forum".... when almost always it really means: "Keep your political thoughts that do not mesh with mine off this forum, because if you posted something political on this football forum that I agree with, I would let it pass without a word"... The exception is hoorta, who actually just wants all political talk to stay on the trainwreck that is the Political Forum of this board. 

    You're right Dutch, but believe it or not, I'm really not that interested in political talk. It started out as a joke but a humorless forum member was apparently too butt hurt to take it in the spirit of good natured camaraderie as opposed to comrade-ry.  See, I can't stop. But threatening someone's free speech while accusing them of threatening free speech?

    It's noT haRd to imagine who woUld eMPloy this tactic.

    U 1 Reply
    😂
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    @unsympathetic said:

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    I always love when I see someone on here saying something along the lines of:

    "Keep the political BS off this forum".... when almost always it really means: "Keep your political thoughts that do not mesh with mine off this forum, because if you posted something political on this football forum that I agree with, I would let it pass without a word"... The exception is hoorta, who actually just wants all political talk to stay on the trainwreck that is the Political Forum of this board. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #40

    @dutch-oven said:

    I always love when I see someone on here saying something along the lines of:

    "Keep the political BS off this forum".... when almost always it really means: "Keep your political thoughts that do not mesh with mine off this forum, because if you posted something political on this football forum that I agree with, I would let it pass without a word"... The exception is hoorta, who actually just wants all political talk to stay on the trainwreck that is the Political Forum of this board. 

    I will talk politics...if you pay me to do so.   I had learned my lesson to stay off the board for years until recently when I placed a non-partisan, lengthy analytical discussion of the current situation over there....a freebie.   And naturally  I was criticized for it being too long by most.  As I forgot that that forum is only at the bumper sticker level of comprehension.  Though, the one guy that did put some thought into things was calfox. Now, he went off on one of his rants.....but at least he puts some thoughts into his rants.

  • hish747H hish747

    @unsympathetic said:

    I agree, speech is threatened -- but only by you and your fellow idiots trying to smear everyone who disagrees with the lies you spew.

    Coughlin tried this method also, and he just got fired.

    @dutch-oven said:

    I always love when I see someone on here saying something along the lines of:

    "Keep the political BS off this forum".... when almost always it really means: "Keep your political thoughts that do not mesh with mine off this forum, because if you posted something political on this football forum that I agree with, I would let it pass without a word"... The exception is hoorta, who actually just wants all political talk to stay on the trainwreck that is the Political Forum of this board. 

    You're right Dutch, but believe it or not, I'm really not that interested in political talk. It started out as a joke but a humorless forum member was apparently too butt hurt to take it in the spirit of good natured camaraderie as opposed to comrade-ry.  See, I can't stop. But threatening someone's free speech while accusing them of threatening free speech?

    It's noT haRd to imagine who woUld eMPloy this tactic.

    U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #41

    @hish747 said:

    See, I can't stop

    Keep those projections coming -- you remain the only one making threats regarding speech.  

    You're entirely wrong regarding my politics - but hey, facts haven't stopped you so far!

    You, personally, support Russia much more than I do -- if Trump is a Russian, you just gave Russia the biggest military budget in the history of the world.  And you re-authorized the Patriot Act so that you can continue to give Russia the content of every conversation that occurs in the US.  And you're approving Trump's Russian judges faster than anyone I can remember in my lifetime.

    Russians aren't the ones who disagree with you -- you are, in fact, the Russian.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
  • U Unsympathetic

    @hish747 said:

    See, I can't stop

    Keep those projections coming -- you remain the only one making threats regarding speech.  

    You're entirely wrong regarding my politics - but hey, facts haven't stopped you so far!

    You, personally, support Russia much more than I do -- if Trump is a Russian, you just gave Russia the biggest military budget in the history of the world.  And you re-authorized the Patriot Act so that you can continue to give Russia the content of every conversation that occurs in the US.  And you're approving Trump's Russian judges faster than anyone I can remember in my lifetime.

    Russians aren't the ones who disagree with you -- you are, in fact, the Russian.

    hish747H hish747 wrote on
    #42

    @unsympathetic said:

    Keep those projections coming -- you remain the only one making threats regarding speech.  

     You're entirely wrong regarding my politics - but hey, facts haven't stopped you so far!

    You, personally, support Russia much more than I do -- if Trump is a Russian, you just gave Russia the biggest military budget in the history of the world.  And you re-authorized the Patriot Act so that you can continue to give Russia the content of every conversation that occurs in the US.  And you're approving Trump's Russian judges faster than anyone I can remember in my lifetime.

    Russians aren't the ones who disagree with you -- you are, in fact, the Russian.

    I take back what I said about you being humorless, this is the funniest post I've read in a long time.

  • jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on
    #43

    Uh-oh, looks like we have another Stegosaurus that's gone and slipped free of it's paddock and is roaming around the park...

    giphy-1.gif.e8c9fa17889b6837a7c76ff63ee3cbcc.gif

    "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
  • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

    Uh-oh, looks like we have another Stegosaurus that's gone and slipped free of it's paddock and is roaming around the park...

    giphy-1.gif.e8c9fa17889b6837a7c76ff63ee3cbcc.gif

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #44

    @jbluhm86 said:

    Uh-oh, looks like we have another Stegosaurus that's gone and slipped free of it's paddock and is roaming around the park...

    giphy-1.gif.e8c9fa17889b6837a7c76ff63ee3cbcc.gif

    Except you depicted a T-Rex.   Learn your dinosaurs!!  😆

  • S secondwave wrote on
    #45

    I'm surprised Toronto still doesn't have a team.

Log in to reply