HC/GM/Position Coach tracker
-
Nah Pete. Your proposed rule would put teams searching for new coaches at an extreme disadvantage. Assuming that they weren't interested in someone involved in the playoffs. Say the Browns really want Saleh. They're probably going to have to wait until after the Super Bowl to hire him. The combine is just three weeks after. Not a lot of time to get organized.
Combine prep is more the purview of GMs and Scouts than HCs and their staff.
That said... teams who did not make the playoffs should get get the jump on HC and staff selection... same as they get earlier picks in the Draft.
...not a MAJOR rush, but you'd want to hire coordinators and assistants before all of the good ones are snatched away from you.
We're blessed to have so few HC openings this go 'round, but even in normal times the weight of getting the HC right is so much greater than having a deeper staff pool. And that pool is huge when you look in the college ranks as well as NFL retreads.
Most of the candidates know the key staffers they'd want... and have likely chatted with them about "hypothetical opportunities". Hell... they are asked about what their staffs might look like in the interview process.
Then add that staff turnover of those that weren't ready for prime time is not uncommon... especially at the position coach level... and there's always time for course correction.
Combine prep is more the purview of GMs and Scouts than HCs and their staff.
That said... teams who did not make the playoffs should get get the jump on HC and staff selection... same as they get earlier picks in the Draft.
but we don't have a GM yet Tour- at least one with the title. They had better keep Wolf around for that purpose, at least until after the draft. And the new HC had better be on board with whatever the scouting staff has in their reports.. The combine is at least 6 weeks away- but the grunts have been doing groundwork for months....
-
Updated post #2 as Jim Schwartz confirmed interviewed...The Hiring Crew, flies to Minnesota to interview Kevin Stefanski Thursday... Starting to see some coaching Staff fillings..Here's some noted guys off the market...
Skins- DC- Jack Delrio//Ken Zampese QB coach///Scott Turner OC
Dallas-DL Coach- Jim Tomsula
-
Combine prep is more the purview of GMs and Scouts than HCs and their staff.
That said... teams who did not make the playoffs should get get the jump on HC and staff selection... same as they get earlier picks in the Draft.
but we don't have a GM yet Tour- at least one with the title. They had better keep Wolf around for that purpose, at least until after the draft. And the new HC had better be on board with whatever the scouting staff has in their reports.. The combine is at least 6 weeks away- but the grunts have been doing groundwork for months....
but we don't have a GM yet Tour- at least one with the title. They had better keep Wolf around for that purpose, at least until after the draft.
And the new HC had better be on board with whatever the scouting staff has in their reports..
Why? I'd be shocked if the average Coordinator or position coach had any more of a well-founded notion as to who they'd want to draft at a given position than you or I. These guys have FULL time jobs, h... up to 80 hours a week full. I doubt they watch more than a single College game a week... and then likely their alma mater's.
GM... schme-em... We have plenty of organized scouting (see below) plus a dozen or so assistant scouts...
Mike Cetta Director, Scouting
Steve Malin Director, College Scouting
Dan Saganey Director, Pro Scouting
Glenn Cook Assistant Director, Scouting
Jimmy Noel Assistant Director, Pro Scouting
Adam Al-Khayyal Scout
Zach Ayers Scout
Colton Chapple Scout
Sam DeLuca Scout
Matt Donahoe Scout
Gerald McCully Scout
Max Paulus Scout
-
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
-
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
I have no problems with the Swartz the DC, I wish we had him as DC. I have some concerns with Swartz the HC...
-
Jim Schwartz would be cool. We could rattle off lines from Spaceballs. It’ll be fun!
-
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
I have no problems with the Swartz the DC, I wish we had him as DC. I have some concerns with Swartz the HC...
-
Why didnt Kubiak get an interview? Is he not interested in a head coaching position because he is obviously the best coach out there.
With that said Schwartz is easily my 2nd favorite candidate. I really dont care for the list of guys we brought in for interviews
-
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
How many times just this past season did the Browns defense give up 30 points? Let me check...... I see that it was 6 times....including each of the last 3 games.
-
Jim Schwartz would be cool. We could rattle off lines from Spaceballs. It’ll be fun!
Jim Schwartz would be cool. We could rattle off lines from Spaceballs. It’ll be fun!
All of them left over from when we had Mitch Schwartz here.
-
Jim Schwartz would be cool. We could rattle off lines from Spaceballs. It’ll be fun!
Jim Schwartz would be cool. We could rattle off lines from Spaceballs. It’ll be fun!
LOL, "May the Schwartz be with you". That was one funny movie.
-
A couple interesting stats regarding Jim Schwartz while DC in Philly:
In his 4 years as Eagles DC in regular season/playoffs:
16.1 points/game at home- FEWEST in NFL
20.4 points/game - 5th fewest in NFL
Jim Schwartz, third down rankings:
2019: 5
2018: 8
2017: 3
Jim Schwartz's defenses have allowed over 30 points just 8 times since 2016. That is in 70 games.
I have no problems with the Swartz the DC, I wish we had him as DC. I have some concerns with Swartz the HC...
English is not my first language, stop asking me why do I edit my posts
We just wish it was your third language...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Jim Schwartz would be cool. We could rattle off lines from Spaceballs. It’ll be fun!
LOL, "May the Schwartz be with you". That was one funny movie.
-
We just wish it was your third language...
Until some years ago... It was. Now I think my English is better than my Basque.
-
Until some years ago... It was. Now I think my English is better than my Basque.
Your English is good. Don’t let anyone tell you different. It’s a living language that changes like any other living language. Understanding is all that matters.
Off topic alert, but one of the most interesting classes l ever took at school was the history of the English language.
Way back when, like BC, England was run by the Celts. Then the Romans came and kicked their asses and took over. Then the Germanic tribes came and kicked the Romans’ asses and took over. Then the French Normans came over and kicked asses snd took over. And then the Anglo Saxons kicked their asses and took over.
I might have the order mixed up, and may have left some conquests out, but basically England was occupied by people of varying cultural backgrounds for hundred plus year stretches at a time within the last 2000 years, and modern day English has become a bastardization of Latin, German, French and Greek, plus over 1000 years of tweaking since then.
Once you conquer a country, there’s nothing left to do other that live and breed, so intermingling of people and languages happens.
That’s why the smart kids in the spelling bee ask the origin of the word. Because it matters in spelling and pronunciation.
Whereas Spanish is basically a direct descendent of Latin. Easier to learn. Vowels for the most part consistently sound the same way.
Also, l like Saleh. He’s my dude. Team Saleh!
-
Until some years ago... It was. Now I think my English is better than my Basque.
lol...
Meanwhile back at the thread...
Anyone else listening to Joe Judge's intro presser? Damned impressive...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Until some years ago... It was. Now I think my English is better than my Basque.
Your English is good. Don’t let anyone tell you different. It’s a living language that changes like any other living language. Understanding is all that matters.
Off topic alert, but one of the most interesting classes l ever took at school was the history of the English language.
Way back when, like BC, England was run by the Celts. Then the Romans came and kicked their asses and took over. Then the Germanic tribes came and kicked the Romans’ asses and took over. Then the French Normans came over and kicked asses snd took over. And then the Anglo Saxons kicked their asses and took over.
I might have the order mixed up, and may have left some conquests out, but basically England was occupied by people of varying cultural backgrounds for hundred plus year stretches at a time within the last 2000 years, and modern day English has become a bastardization of Latin, German, French and Greek, plus over 1000 years of tweaking since then.
Once you conquer a country, there’s nothing left to do other that live and breed, so intermingling of people and languages happens.
That’s why the smart kids in the spelling bee ask the origin of the word. Because it matters in spelling and pronunciation.
Whereas Spanish is basically a direct descendent of Latin. Easier to learn. Vowels for the most part consistently sound the same way.
Also, l like Saleh. He’s my dude. Team Saleh!
Your English is good. Don’t let anyone tell you different. It’s a living language that changes like any other living language. Understanding is all that matters.
Off topic alert, but one of the most interesting classes l ever took at school was the history of the English language.
Way back when, like BC, England was run by the Celts. Then the Romans came and kicked their asses and took over. Then the Germanic tribes came and kicked the Romans’ asses and took over. Then the French Normans came over and kicked asses snd took over. And then the Anglo Saxons kicked their asses and took over.
Uhh, you got that mixed up some. The Celts never "ran" England.....Celts are the Scots and Irish. The people there pre Rome were "Britons", not Celts. Today the Britons, essentially are the Welsh . After the Romans left Britain (I would not say their asses were kicked...they just left when Rome was deteriorating) , it was the Anglo-Saxons that invaded Britain (they were the Germanic tribes you speak of). Then actually came the Danes/Norse who came close to conquering all of Britain (the 4 kingdoms: Wessex/Northumbria/East Anglia/Mercia). They had the entirety of those kingdoms except for some swampland in Somerset...when King Alfred fought back...and his heirs took over and eventually England was form circa mid 900s. Then in 1066 the Normans made their conquest. But while the Normans did prevail....ultimately they became assimilated to the "English" ways. There has been no "conquest" of Britain since 1066. (political/military...though American culture had made a conquest to a great extent....in the 20th century)
I might have the order mixed up, and may have left some conquests out, but basically England was occupied by people of varying cultural backgrounds for hundred plus year stretches at a time within the last 2000 years, and modern day English has become a bastardization of Latin, German, French and Greek, plus over 1000 years of tweaking since then.
You got the order mixed up, see above, but I think you are pretty spot on regarding the language.
Once you conquer a country, there’s nothing left to do other that live and breed, so intermingling of people and languages happens.
That’s why the smart kids in the spelling bee ask the origin of the word. Because it matters in spelling and pronunciation.
Yes and yes.
Whereas Spanish is basically a direct descendent of Latin. Easier to learn. Vowels for the most part consistently sound the same way.
Also, l like Saleh. He’s my dude. Team Saleh!
-
Your English is good. Don’t let anyone tell you different. It’s a living language that changes like any other living language. Understanding is all that matters.
Off topic alert, but one of the most interesting classes l ever took at school was the history of the English language.
Way back when, like BC, England was run by the Celts. Then the Romans came and kicked their asses and took over. Then the Germanic tribes came and kicked the Romans’ asses and took over. Then the French Normans came over and kicked asses snd took over. And then the Anglo Saxons kicked their asses and took over.
Uhh, you got that mixed up some. The Celts never "ran" England.....Celts are the Scots and Irish. The people there pre Rome were "Britons", not Celts. Today the Britons, essentially are the Welsh . After the Romans left Britain (I would not say their asses were kicked...they just left when Rome was deteriorating) , it was the Anglo-Saxons that invaded Britain (they were the Germanic tribes you speak of). Then actually came the Danes/Norse who came close to conquering all of Britain (the 4 kingdoms: Wessex/Northumbria/East Anglia/Mercia). They had the entirety of those kingdoms except for some swampland in Somerset...when King Alfred fought back...and his heirs took over and eventually England was form circa mid 900s. Then in 1066 the Normans made their conquest. But while the Normans did prevail....ultimately they became assimilated to the "English" ways. There has been no "conquest" of Britain since 1066. (political/military...though American culture had made a conquest to a great extent....in the 20th century)
I might have the order mixed up, and may have left some conquests out, but basically England was occupied by people of varying cultural backgrounds for hundred plus year stretches at a time within the last 2000 years, and modern day English has become a bastardization of Latin, German, French and Greek, plus over 1000 years of tweaking since then.
You got the order mixed up, see above, but I think you are pretty spot on regarding the language.
Once you conquer a country, there’s nothing left to do other that live and breed, so intermingling of people and languages happens.
That’s why the smart kids in the spelling bee ask the origin of the word. Because it matters in spelling and pronunciation.
Yes and yes.
Whereas Spanish is basically a direct descendent of Latin. Easier to learn. Vowels for the most part consistently sound the same way.
Also, l like Saleh. He’s my dude. Team Saleh!
Yes! King Alfred! I was trying to think of his name but forgot. But yes, once he took his stand and took England back over is when the conquering of England ceased.
You may be mistaken about the Celts running England in BC though. I remember distinctly in the class that whoever took England from the Celts (I think it was the Romans) kicked their ass SO bad that they all fled to Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. There was little intermingling of cultures afterwards.
It was a fun fact that within modern day English there are fewer than a dozen words of Celtic origin.
-
Until some years ago... It was. Now I think my English is better than my Basque.
Your English is good. Don’t let anyone tell you different. It’s a living language that changes like any other living language. Understanding is all that matters.
Off topic alert, but one of the most interesting classes l ever took at school was the history of the English language.
Way back when, like BC, England was run by the Celts. Then the Romans came and kicked their asses and took over. Then the Germanic tribes came and kicked the Romans’ asses and took over. Then the French Normans came over and kicked asses snd took over. And then the Anglo Saxons kicked their asses and took over.
I might have the order mixed up, and may have left some conquests out, but basically England was occupied by people of varying cultural backgrounds for hundred plus year stretches at a time within the last 2000 years, and modern day English has become a bastardization of Latin, German, French and Greek, plus over 1000 years of tweaking since then.
Once you conquer a country, there’s nothing left to do other that live and breed, so intermingling of people and languages happens.
That’s why the smart kids in the spelling bee ask the origin of the word. Because it matters in spelling and pronunciation.
Whereas Spanish is basically a direct descendent of Latin. Easier to learn. Vowels for the most part consistently sound the same way.
Also, l like Saleh. He’s my dude. Team Saleh!
Your English is good. Don’t let anyone tell you different. It’s a living language that changes like any other living language. Understanding is all that matters.
Off topic alert, but one of the most interesting classes l ever took at school was the history of the English language.
Way back when, like BC, England was run by the Celts. Then the Romans came and kicked their asses and took over. Then the Germanic tribes came and kicked the Romans’ asses and took over. Then the French Normans came over and kicked asses snd took over. And then the Anglo Saxons kicked their asses and took over.
I might have the order mixed up, and may have left some conquests out, but basically England was occupied by people of varying cultural backgrounds for hundred plus year stretches at a time within the last 2000 years, and modern day English has become a bastardization of Latin, German, French and Greek, plus over 1000 years of tweaking since then.
Once you conquer a country, there’s nothing left to do other that live and breed, so intermingling of people and languages happens.
That’s why the smart kids in the spelling bee ask the origin of the word. Because it matters in spelling and pronunciation.
Whereas Spanish is basically a direct descendent of Latin. Easier to learn. Vowels for the most part consistently sound the same way.
Also, l like Saleh. He’s my dude. Team Saleh!
I agree Nero's English is better than a lot of guys who have it as their native language. I don't know if they do it anymore, but wow- has English evolved over the last 1,000+ years. I hated Shakespeare's plays because the language was already weird. LOL, alarums = alarms. Go back to Chaucer's Canterbury tales and its barely recognizable. Farther back to Old English Beowulf- Our HS English teacher taught himself to speak it, and its' essentially a foreign language, totally unintelligible. .
True on Spanish being a descendant of Latin. Had to take a year of Latin in HS- and hated it. Spanish was totally different, I took it all four years in HS, and another year in college- I was one course short of a minor in it. Ha our senior assignment was reading Don Quijote and Lazarillo deTormes in the original 16th century Spanish- like equal to Shakespearean English. But if you don't use it, you lose it. My listening (you're talking too fast) and speaking (now what's that word?) are pretty well shot, but I can still hack my way reading through a newspaper in Spanish...
-
Yes! King Alfred! I was trying to think of his name but forgot. But yes, once he took his stand and took England back over is when the conquering of England ceased.
You may be mistaken about the Celts running England in BC though. I remember distinctly in the class that whoever took England from the Celts (I think it was the Romans) kicked their ass SO bad that they all fled to Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. There was little intermingling of cultures afterwards.
It was a fun fact that within modern day English there are fewer than a dozen words of Celtic origin.
Yes! King Alfred! I was trying to think of his name but forgot. But yes, once he took his stand and took England back over is when the conquering of England ceased.
You may be mistaken about the Celts running England in BC though. I remember distinctly in the class that whoever took England from the Celts (I think it was the Romans) kicked their ass SO bad that they all fled to Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. There was little intermingling of cultures afterwards.
It was a fun fact that within modern day English there are fewer than a dozen words of Celtic origin.
Well, I suspect that there was a lot of genetic similarity between the Celts and the Britons, such that you could call them Celtic Britons. But I think ultimately there was a bifurcation between the Britons and Celts. The people that Rome conquered were these Celtic Britons. But after Rome left, and the Saxons invaded, it was the Britons, not the Celts (Scotch/Irish)...who were vanquished. These Britons then basically were left to settle, as I said, in Wales, and in Cornwall, and in Brittany in current day France.
If there was a King Arthur...(and there was a personage of legend that the stories were based on) .he may have been actually the Warlord of the Britons (and not the King of Britain). He fought, and during his time, he won the battle against the Saxon invasion, but after he was gone his cause was lost.
It is a theory that the Britons, some having had to exile in Brittany.....which then later was part of and allied with the Normans, that the Norman invasion/conquest could actually be seen as a "reconquest" by the "rightful" people of the land of Briton. That William the Conqueror was the reincarnated embodiment of King Arthur (or, at least his symbolic if not actual heir). In other words, from the tale's name for Arthur: The Once and Future King.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login