Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Hadnot

Hadnot

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
34 Posts 19 Posters 2.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Gips GipsG
    • 3k Posts
    • 34 Reputation
    GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Gawd this club needs more youth on the lines...looks like hadnot hasnot again...he was coming on strong then kaboom its all over tucker will likely be hurt before or shortly after preseason begins.../sigh 🙁

    We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 3k Posts
      • 127 Reputation
      Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Hadnot looked to be in way better shape this year.

      This is a hit, make no bones about it.

      Is a pig's ass pork?
      R 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Riffer XR Riffer X

        Hadnot looked to be in way better shape this year.

        This is a hit, make no bones about it.

        RestinPeace R
        • 526 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        R RestinPeace wrote on last edited by
        #19

        @riffer-x said:

        Hadnot looked to be in way better shape this year.

        This is a hit, make no bones about it.

        Yep, it hurts and hurts some more.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Thaak ThaakT
          • 1k Posts
          • 26 Reputation
          ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
          #20

          Looks like he only tore his MCL so could conceivably be back for week one.

          Dan in FloridaD 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • ThaakT Thaak

            Looks like he only tore his MCL so could conceivably be back for week one.

            Dan in Florida Dan in FloridaD
            • 437 Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            Dan in FloridaD Dan in Florida wrote on last edited by Dan in Florida
            #21

            @thaak said:

            Looks like he only tore his MCL so could conceivably be back for week one.

            This should CHEER UP "RestInPeace"...he seemed so bummed about it. 😁

            I'm sticking with Mangini & Amber
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • ? Guest

              Yeah, Hadnot was playing left guard with the second team. Today's starting right side consisted of Womack at RG and Tucker at RT.

              After Hadnot got hurt, Isaac Sowells replaced him at LG. He was promptly beaten for a would-be-sack by Louis Leonard.

              Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 11k Posts
              • 6k Reputation
              FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
              #22

              Aloysius said:

              After Hadnot got hurt, Isaac Sowells replaced him at LG. He was promptly beaten for a would-be-sack by Louis Leonard.

              Thanks for the update Alo!

              Gee, there's a surprise - Sowells got beat. It's amazing how long we've held a roster spot for such a candyass like Isuuc. I don't even think this kid would have been drafted if Savage's speed reading skills noticed the word "soft" in some scouting reports.

              - Tom F.

              I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Thaak ThaakT
                • 1k Posts
                • 26 Reputation
                ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
                #23

                um... I beat ya to it Shep

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Sez.EJ S
                  • 859 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  S Sez.EJ wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  This is AWESOME news. Hadnot has to be so so relieved. I'm relieved as well. Let's pray for a fast and full recovery.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • listercat listercatL
                    • 588 Posts
                    • 6 Reputation
                    listercatL listercat wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    This could be very very good news

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 3k Posts
                      • 127 Reputation
                      Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Shit bed, I had written him off.

                      At first, I was thinking it could maybe just be an MCL, then the supposed diagnosis came out and I gave up hope. This is huge news.

                      Is a pig's ass pork?
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • listercat listercatL
                        • 588 Posts
                        • 6 Reputation
                        listercatL listercat wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        A stout O line is essential in the AFC North...again very very good news

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Vegasdogg V
                          • 1k Posts
                          • 2 Reputation
                          V Vegasdogg wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          So an MCL tear is something that can be rehabbed and it heals without surgery?

                          "I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
                          Riffer XR 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • V Vegasdogg

                            So an MCL tear is something that can be rehabbed and it heals without surgery?

                            Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 3k Posts
                            • 127 Reputation
                            Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            @vegasdogg said:

                            So an MCL tear is something that can be rehabbed and it heals without surgery?

                            Yes the Medial Collateral generally doesn't require surgery. It's generally a let the injury heal and then rehab it.

                            IMO, it generally leads to more knee problems but it is definitely not as severe as an ACL.

                            I'm guessing week 4 for Hadnot to return.

                            Is a pig's ass pork?
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • OconRecon OconReconO Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 1k Posts
                              • 2 Reputation
                              OconReconO OconRecon wrote on last edited by OconRecon
                              #30

                              Right, MCL's heal on their own. It's more akin to an ankle sprain. The ligaments are stretched and partially torn, but heal up fine. MCL's tend to take longer than ankle sprains however.

                              With the use of MRI's, we've also learned severe ligament sprains of the knee also involve a bone bruise. Again, this heals up on it's own, but cements the healing in the 4-6 week range.

                              This is great news. 4 weeks at the soonest. 8 weeks max.

                              Riffer XR 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • OconReconO OconRecon

                                Right, MCL's heal on their own. It's more akin to an ankle sprain. The ligaments are stretched and partially torn, but heal up fine. MCL's tend to take longer than ankle sprains however.

                                With the use of MRI's, we've also learned severe ligament sprains of the knee also involve a bone bruise. Again, this heals up on it's own, but cements the healing in the 4-6 week range.

                                This is great news. 4 weeks at the soonest. 8 weeks max.

                                Riffer X Riffer XR Very Popular Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 3k Posts
                                • 127 Reputation
                                Riffer XR Riffer X wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                @oconrecon said:

                                Right, MCL's heal on their own. It's more akin to an ankle sprain. The ligaments are stretched and partially torn, but heal up fine. MCL's tend to take longer than ankle sprains however.

                                With the use of MRI's, we've also learned severe ligament sprains of the knee also involve a bone bruise. Again, this heals us on it's own, but cements the healing in the 4-6 week range.

                                This is great news. 4 weeks at the soonest. 8 weeks max.

                                Thanks Ocon for the doctor's perspective. I think realistically it will be week 4 since I believe he would have to wait until then to play unless he can go week one.

                                It's best to give him plenty of time since we should have plenty of depth early on.

                                Does this bode well fro Fraley?

                                Is a pig's ass pork?
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • playerjdd P
                                  • 360 Posts
                                  • 1 Reputation
                                  P playerjdd wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  i got a feeling we are keeping fraley anyways, mack is a rook and needs a good backup. This is excellent news on hadnot. He probably wont start but at least he will be a strong backup and might even start later in the season.

                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Gips GipsG
                                    • 3k Posts
                                    • 34 Reputation
                                    GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    Either way hadnot hasnot and will most likely be on the pine wasting a spot within a few regular games right along with tucker and womack..😉

                                    We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • P playerjdd

                                      i got a feeling we are keeping fraley anyways, mack is a rook and needs a good backup. This is excellent news on hadnot. He probably wont start but at least he will be a strong backup and might even start later in the season.

                                      Aloysius ?
                                      • Posts
                                      • 0 Reputation
                                      ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      @playerjdd said:

                                      i got a feeling we are keeping fraley anyways, mack is a rook and needs a good backup.

                                      I agree. Fraley's a decent backup & a great sounding board for Mack.

                                      Also, it seems like George Foster hasn't done anything to earn a roster spot. If Tucker serves as a the backup for both spots on the right side, the need for another backup tackle is a little less serious. So we could afford to keep Fraley over Foster as our eighth o-lineman.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply

                                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                      Register Login
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      Theme
                                      • System
                                      • Light
                                      • Dark
                                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Forums
                                      • Recent
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Donate