Myles Garrett Reinstated
-
Favorite villains? Gip's sensibilities?
You guys think you have problems?
Apparently after over 27,000 posts now I have to diagram my sentences for Sebastian...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Favorite villains? Gip's sensibilities?
You guys think you have problems?
Apparently after over 27,000 posts now I have to diagram my sentences for Sebastian...
-
Missed a few days on this thread and missed a lot. Good arguments up in here.
I kinda agree with a point Nickers made. Garrett has to let it go. He can’t allow a guy like Rudolph to have that power over him. Sticks and stones is a really early lesson in life. I’m all for the bigots of the world being put in their place, but step one is to not make it easy on them. Words are easy.
I have an experience to share. Mid 90s, l’m in college, and someone rigged a computer lab to read racial slurs across banks of computers. There was outrage. Protests ensued. State highways were blocked from passage for vehicles.
It turns out it was an African American student who did it. A letdown ensued. Why do such a thing?
And l don’t know that answer, but l do know we all left our shells for a bit and did things we wouldn’t normally do. It was rainy and cold that day. Even unconfident me brazenly put my jacket around an underdressed girl l didn’t even know and it went surprisingly well. And that’s just a microcosm. The envelope was pushed that day. Conversations were had for weeks and months afterward, just like this one.
We get to push this from our periphery, hash it out, and hopefully arrive at a better place than where we started. That’s what matters.
Missed a few days on this thread and missed a lot. Good arguments up in here.
I kinda agree with a point Nickers made. Garrett has to let it go. He can’t allow a guy like Rudolph to have that power over him. Sticks and stones is a really early lesson in life. I’m all for the bigots of the world being put in their place, but step one is to not make it easy on them. Words are easy.
I have an experience to share. Mid 90s, l’m in college, and someone rigged a computer lab to read racial slurs across banks of computers. There was outrage. Protests ensued. State highways were blocked from passage for vehicles.
It turns out it was an African American student who did it. A letdown ensued. Why do such a thing?
And l don’t know that answer, but l do know we all left our shells for a bit and did things we wouldn’t normally do. It was rainy and cold that day. Even unconfident me brazenly put my jacket around an underdressed girl l didn’t even know and it went surprisingly well. And that’s just a microcosm. The envelope was pushed that day. Conversations were had for weeks and months afterward, just like this one.
We get to push this from our periphery, hash it out, and hopefully arrive at a better place than where we started. That’s what matters.
So in the first paragraph you believe that Rudolf uttered a racial slur, then in the second paragraph you state that an African American faked racial slurs.
Take a fucking stand.
-
@gorka said:
Eager to defend? Put a lid on the conjecture bullshit for once. I really wished he had said it.
Why are you so eager to defend Myles? Because he's a Brown? Go ahead spit it out Gipper. His dick I mean.
Eager to defend? Not necessarily. Not if I do not believe it is not warranted. Here I believe it is warranted. I am the one person here whose profession it is to determine the truth/facts from evidence that is presented before me. (though, perhaps Russ...ballpeen, had a similar profession).
And based on the evidence I have seen, I could certainly NOT say that Garrett is telling the truth beyond a reasonable doubt. There would likely be no decision either way. I do believe though that there is a slight preponderance of the evidence that would tend to have me believe Garrett is being truthful.
Of course, the setting in which all this information has been gathered in this matter is NOT the proper setting to determine this case. Bring them before me in a court setting. Swear them in under penalty of perjury. Then have them testify, and allow all those factors I have listed above come into play.....plus one other factor: their demeanor when testifying can perhaps lead to a determination of credibility. I won't try to explain that to you. It is something you perhaps attain a feel for after 30 years.
-
Missed a few days on this thread and missed a lot. Good arguments up in here.
I kinda agree with a point Nickers made. Garrett has to let it go. He can’t allow a guy like Rudolph to have that power over him. Sticks and stones is a really early lesson in life. I’m all for the bigots of the world being put in their place, but step one is to not make it easy on them. Words are easy.
I have an experience to share. Mid 90s, l’m in college, and someone rigged a computer lab to read racial slurs across banks of computers. There was outrage. Protests ensued. State highways were blocked from passage for vehicles.
It turns out it was an African American student who did it. A letdown ensued. Why do such a thing?
And l don’t know that answer, but l do know we all left our shells for a bit and did things we wouldn’t normally do. It was rainy and cold that day. Even unconfident me brazenly put my jacket around an underdressed girl l didn’t even know and it went surprisingly well. And that’s just a microcosm. The envelope was pushed that day. Conversations were had for weeks and months afterward, just like this one.
We get to push this from our periphery, hash it out, and hopefully arrive at a better place than where we started. That’s what matters.
So in the first paragraph you believe that Rudolf uttered a racial slur, then in the second paragraph you state that an African American faked racial slurs.
Take a fucking stand.
So in the first paragraph you believe that Rudolf uttered a racial slur, then in the second paragraph you state that an African American faked racial slurs.
Take a fucking stand.
You’re doing that thing where throwing information onto the internet is “taking a stand”. There was no stand taken there. It was just a personal experience l shared relative to the topic at hand meant to show that shit happens.
You’re missing out on next level conversation with your online behavior here. An antagonistic approach just brings antagonists. Why not engage in common ground more often?
-
@gorka said:
That was cute...but we all aware of what the owner does to squealers there dutch.
They tell DieHard he's banned for 30 days?
They tell DieHard he's banned for 30 days?
Originally it was a permaban, but the owner and Zombo had hearts thank goodness.?
-
So in the first paragraph you believe that Rudolf uttered a racial slur, then in the second paragraph you state that an African American faked racial slurs.
Take a fucking stand.
You’re doing that thing where throwing information onto the internet is “taking a stand”. There was no stand taken there. It was just a personal experience l shared relative to the topic at hand meant to show that shit happens.
You’re missing out on next level conversation with your online behavior here. An antagonistic approach just brings antagonists. Why not engage in common ground more often?
You’re doing that thing where throwing information onto the internet is “taking a stand”. There was no stand taken there. It was just a personal experience l shared relative to the topic at hand meant to show that shit happens.
You’re missing out on next level conversation with your online behavior here. An antagonistic approach just brings antagonists. Why not engage in common ground more often?
Because he's a troll. When this thread originally died down, he was nowhere to be seen on the Browns forum. Myles gets reinstated, sticks to his story that Rudolph called him the n-bomb, and Gorka comes flying on here to save his great white dope.
This thread is the only reason he's on here, so he can scream, shout, whine and cry about how the white man is getting beaten down.
I mean, this dude NEEDS TO BE HEARD REGARDING THIS ONE TOPIC SO BAD. He needs to validate Rudolph so bad, he can taste it.
-
You’re doing that thing where throwing information onto the internet is “taking a stand”. There was no stand taken there. It was just a personal experience l shared relative to the topic at hand meant to show that shit happens.
You’re missing out on next level conversation with your online behavior here. An antagonistic approach just brings antagonists. Why not engage in common ground more often?
Because he's a troll. When this thread originally died down, he was nowhere to be seen on the Browns forum. Myles gets reinstated, sticks to his story that Rudolph called him the n-bomb, and Gorka comes flying on here to save his great white dope.
This thread is the only reason he's on here, so he can scream, shout, whine and cry about how the white man is getting beaten down.
I mean, this dude NEEDS TO BE HEARD REGARDING THIS ONE TOPIC SO BAD. He needs to validate Rudolph so bad, he can taste it.
Because he's a troll. When this thread originally died down, he was nowhere to be seen on the Browns forum. Myles gets reinstated, sticks to his story that Rudolph called him the n-bomb, and Gorka comes flying on here to save his great white dope.
This thread is the only reason he's on here, so he can scream, shout, whine and cry about how the white man is getting beaten down.
I mean, this dude NEEDS TO BE HEARD REGARDING THIS ONE TOPIC SO BAD. He needs to validate Rudolph so bad, he can taste it.
But the white man did get beat down, no?
-
Because he's a troll. When this thread originally died down, he was nowhere to be seen on the Browns forum. Myles gets reinstated, sticks to his story that Rudolph called him the n-bomb, and Gorka comes flying on here to save his great white dope.
This thread is the only reason he's on here, so he can scream, shout, whine and cry about how the white man is getting beaten down.
I mean, this dude NEEDS TO BE HEARD REGARDING THIS ONE TOPIC SO BAD. He needs to validate Rudolph so bad, he can taste it.
But the white man did get beat down, no?
But the white man did get beat down, no?
? Well, I guess in this situation he did!
-
You could always just click on the "Report Post" link.
Actually, I'd like that- it would get some of the guys who can't grow up and resort to personal attacks permanently kicked off.....
Well yeah, but that is what I meant by squealing. Even if it confidential, I could never bring myself to click on it.
I prefer rubbing these peoples noses in their own poop.
But Hoorta ruins the all the fun. LOL
You're damn right I'll ruin all the fun. Looky, looky how smart I can name call. I AM NOT IMPRESSED- AT ALL. I'm locking the thread- because obviously some guys aren't paying attention. Next comes warning points- trust me, I see anymore name calling- it's going to happen and that means you too Gipper....
That is true... maybe the owner of this board would be more sympathetic to his plight....
Nope, Kathy doesn't have time for BS- and I'm tired of this kiddie name calling too. Take it as a final warning. One of the options for assigning points is "abusive behavior", another is being a douchebag. There's 3 guys who posted in this thread who qualify IMHO.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login