Skip to content

Browns sign safety Andrew Sandejo

The Browns Board
69 19 2.5k 1
  • Browns going 'prove it' and will probably target promising rookies to ease them into the role(s).

  • don't know a damn thing about him

    bio anyone ?

    and damn another 1 year deal

    @atom said:

    don't know a damn thing about him

    bio anyone ?

    and damn another 1 year deal

    Maybe its a "Moneyball" thing. 

    Isn't that what the A's did with baseball players?  Get a lot of guys on 1 year prove it deals? 

  • Experienced Lives Matter

    "ELM"

  • @atom said:

    don't know a damn thing about him

    bio anyone ?

    and damn another 1 year deal

    Maybe its a "Moneyball" thing. 

    Isn't that what the A's did with baseball players?  Get a lot of guys on 1 year prove it deals? 

    @the-gipper said:

    Maybe its a "Moneyball" thing. 

    Isn't that what the A's did with baseball players?  Get a lot of guys on 1 year prove it deals? 

    honestly i do not have the slightest idea

  • Yeah the A’s notorious for this. They can’t afford to be locked down to underperforming contracts because they are a small market team.

    Like this for the Browns. Gives them the opportunity to not overreach for need in the draft and take BPA. Also, they can possibly strike gold on a player or two. It seems this off-season they have been taking underperforming former high round picks. 

  • Yeah the A’s notorious for this. They can’t afford to be locked down to underperforming contracts because they are a small market team.

    Like this for the Browns. Gives them the opportunity to not overreach for need in the draft and take BPA. Also, they can possibly strike gold on a player or two. It seems this off-season they have been taking underperforming former high round picks. 

    @browns23 said:

    Yeah the A’s notorious for this. They can’t afford to be locked down to underperforming contracts because they are a small market team.

    Like this for the Browns. Gives them the opportunity to not overreach for need in the draft and take BPA. Also, they can possibly strike gold on a player or two. It seems this off-season they have been taking underperforming former high round picks. 

    And, if they don't work out:  Sayonara.

  • Well...I said that we were going to need at least 2-3 safeties....and we got 2 now, right?   

    And what IS the status of Randall?

    Did he sign somewhere? 

    @the-gipper said:

    Well...I said that we were going to need at least 2-3 safeties....and we got 2 now, right?  

    At least 2 suffices as 3>2...

    @the-gipper said:

    Maybe its a "Moneyball" thing. 

    Isn't that what the A's did with baseball players?  Get a lot of guys on 1 year prove it deals? 

    No...

    Moneyball used Bill James' analytics to ID under-valued players. Then they locked those players up for as long as was reasonable considering their age. They believed in their system enough to commit to multi-year deal believing the odds were that most they signed were going to succeed. They knew that when they were right that the player's would succeed to the point that they would be unaffordable when it came time to renew their contract.

    Helps, if you read the book...

  • Lots of 1 yr deals.  By mid-season, if they like some of these guys, then hopefully they get them signed up for longer periods of time.

    At least it looks like we'll be able to field a team next season though (except for LB'er at the moment).

  • @the-gipper said:

    Well...I said that we were going to need at least 2-3 safeties....and we got 2 now, right?  

    At least 2 suffices as 3>2...

    @the-gipper said:

    Maybe its a "Moneyball" thing. 

    Isn't that what the A's did with baseball players?  Get a lot of guys on 1 year prove it deals? 

    No...

    Moneyball used Bill James' analytics to ID under-valued players. Then they locked those players up for as long as was reasonable considering their age. They believed in their system enough to commit to multi-year deal believing the odds were that most they signed were going to succeed. They knew that when they were right that the player's would succeed to the point that they would be unaffordable when it came time to renew their contract.

    Helps, if you read the book...

    @tour2ma said:

    At least 2 suffices as 3>2...

    No...

    Moneyball used Bill James' analytics to ID under-valued players. Then they locked those players up for as long as was reasonable considering their age. They believed in their system enough to commit to multi-year deal believing the odds were that most they signed were going to succeed. They new that when they were right that the player's would succeed to the point that they would be unaffordable when it came time to renew their contract.

    Helps, if you read the book...

    I didn't read it. Just saw the movie.   It is why I asked the question.  But it does sound at least partial Moneyball.  It seems, maybe, that these guys signed to one year deals are those that their analytics identify as  under-valued players?   For whatever reason then, with these guys, they varied from it by only going with one year deals.   They didn't do the same with Hooper, Keenum, Conklin though. Was it because they were NOT viewed as "Under-valued" players? 

  • Well...I said that we were going to need at least 2-3 safeties....and we got 2 now, right?   

    And what IS the status of Randall?

    Did he sign somewhere? 

    @the-gipper said:

    Well...I said that we were going to need at least 2-3 safeties....and we got 2 now, right?   

    And what IS the status of Randall?

    Did he sign somewhere? 

    After this past year I'll personally pack Randall's bags out of town.   

  • Sendejo rhymes with , "Pendejo".. I like it... good signing..

  • So many holes being filled. Before the draft. This is nice. Welcome to Cleveland, Sendejo!

    Are these safety signings a sign of

    “build it and they will come.” ?

    Do these guys see an opportunity for a bigger contract by coming here?

  • Sendejo rhymes with , "Pendejo".. I like it... good signing..

    @nickers said:

    Sendejo rhymes with , "Pendejo".. I like it... good signing..

    Asshole!!

    No, I wasn't calling you that nick....just interpreting!! 😁

  • So many holes being filled. Before the draft. This is nice. Welcome to Cleveland, Sendejo!

    Are these safety signings a sign of

    “build it and they will come.” ?

    Do these guys see an opportunity for a bigger contract by coming here?

    @clevelandwantsplayoffs said:

    Do these guys see an opportunity for a bigger contract by coming here?

    Your take seems right to me...

    I'd guess ours was the best offer they saw, and they we're willing to bet on themselves and use us to springboard to the big bucks in another round of FA in 2021.

  • @nickers said:

    Sendejo rhymes with , "Pendejo".. I like it... good signing..

    Asshole!!

    No, I wasn't calling you that nick....just interpreting!! 😁

    @the-gipper said:

    Asshole!!

    No, I wasn't calling you that nick....just interpreting!! 😁

    I know your Honor...?.. All good.. And stay safe.. We all need to pull together and eradicate this COVID-19 ..

  • I'd forgotten Sandejo was a Rice grad... For a long time Rice was good to produce a Pro per class... at least on average... but it's been while. Covington was the last and that's been a few years ago. Still... pretty good for a smallish school with very high academic standards.

    I did not realize Andrew was as old as he is, so this time we've added an old injury history. He's not posted a complete season since he became a full-time starter in 2015. Prior to that he was part-time starter.

    He will definitely increase the brain power in the DB room... but...

    Sendejo has been primarily a SS, just like Joseph... so Andrew moves to FS where he's had a handful of starts all of which were on years-younger legs?

    Darren?

  • I'd forgotten Sandejo was a Rice grad... For a long time Rice was good to produce a Pro per class... at least on average... but it's been while. Covington was the last and that's been a few years ago. Still... pretty good for a smallish school with very high academic standards.

    I did not realize Andrew was as old as he is, so this time we've added an old injury history. He's not posted a complete season since he became a full-time starter in 2015. Prior to that he was part-time starter.

    He will definitely increase the brain power in the DB room... but...

    Sendejo has been primarily a SS, just like Joseph... so Andrew moves to FS where he's had a handful of starts all of which were on years-younger legs?

    Darren?

    @tour2ma said:

    I'd forgotten Sandejo was a Rice grad... For a long time Rice was good to produce a Pro per class... at least on average... but it's been while. Covington was the last and that's been a few years ago. Still... pretty good for a smallish school with very high academic standards.

    I did not realize Andrew was as old as he is, so this time we've added an old injury history. He's not posted a complete season since he became a full-time starter in 2015. Prior to that he was part-time starter.

    He will definitely increase the brain power in the DB room... but...

    Sendejo has been primarily a SS, just like Joseph... so Andrew moves to FS where he's had a handful of starts all of which were on years-younger legs?

    Darren?

    A rice grad .....does he have an Uncle Ben ?

  • Boo...

    So where do you see Sandejo playing?

  • Sendejo rhymes with , "Pendejo".. I like it... good signing..

    @nickers said:

    Sendejo rhymes with , "Pendejo".. I like it... good signing..

    And cheap rhymes with keep.  Hey ain't my cuddin also said "YOU LIKE THAT!"

  • @tour2ma said:

    At least 2 suffices as 3>2...

    No...

    Moneyball used Bill James' analytics to ID under-valued players. Then they locked those players up for as long as was reasonable considering their age. They believed in their system enough to commit to multi-year deal believing the odds were that most they signed were going to succeed. They new that when they were right that the player's would succeed to the point that they would be unaffordable when it came time to renew their contract.

    Helps, if you read the book...

    I didn't read it. Just saw the movie.   It is why I asked the question.  But it does sound at least partial Moneyball.  It seems, maybe, that these guys signed to one year deals are those that their analytics identify as  under-valued players?   For whatever reason then, with these guys, they varied from it by only going with one year deals.   They didn't do the same with Hooper, Keenum, Conklin though. Was it because they were NOT viewed as "Under-valued" players? 

    @the-gipper said:

    I didn't read it. Just saw the movie.   It is why I asked the question.  But it does sound at least partial Moneyball.  It seems, maybe, that these guys signed to one year deals are those that their analytics identify as  under-valued players?   For whatever reason then, with these guys, they varied from it by only going with one year deals.   They didn't do the same with Hooper, Keenum, Conklin though. Was it because they were NOT viewed as "Under-valued" players? 

    Don't overthink it.  Bare cupboards lead to grocery list leads to how much can I buy (also bearing in mind there's 31 other teams shopping).   Or, you can apply the rules of grocery shopping during Corona Virus era principles.  While one is overthinking - someone else is buying the toilet paper he needs.  In other words, know what you want and make it happen.  Let's not turn this into a 10 page back and forth debate about Money Ball.

    We know that not all of these guys will work which is why they're getting a 1 year contract. Having said that, vets can be valuable at helping younger players with preparation on the practice field and in the film room if you get the right guys not to be confused with the Kenny Britts and Dwayne Bowes. And, if some of these guys have better luck with injuries - they can be very helpful on game day.  The 1st year we signed Robinson, who woulda thought he'd be the LT protecting the blind side of a rookie QB breaking the rookie record for TD passes?  We also had a rookie RB averaging over 5 yards a carry...  As we saw, Robinson wasn't a long term solution - but for 1 season the panic about life after Joe Thomas subsided.   Now we have a chance to draft a LT at #10 overall.