Browns Biggest Draft Needs, Post Free Agency
-
- 1a. Thomas at #10
- 1b. Jones possibly as low as #20.
- 2. Peart (RT) in Round 2... Conklin to LT.
Reminder that if you take Wills then you now have two RTs to compete for LT. Doesn't concern me as I think Conklin flips easily, but then you've drafted a RT in round one... and that is something I can't do.
-
Posted elsewhere... seems even more appropriate here.
Totals:
- Becton - 3
- Jones - 0
- Thomas - 5
- Wills - 1
- Wirfs - 0
Mock Draft Roundup: How did Browns' free agent signings affect picks by Mel Kiper Jr., other analysts
Andrew GribbleIn less than a week, rosters around the NFL have changed in dramatic fashion. The Browns, of course, are no different thanks to the addition of six new players (and counting).
All the moving and shaking around the league has caused some major changes in the projections analysts are making in their latest mock drafts. We're here for you to track just how much those predictions have changed when it comes to what the Browns are going to do with the No. 10 pick.
Of Note: Kiper says he likes the addition of RT Jack Conklin but stresses the Browns still have a glaring need at LT.
Of Note: Casserly has Thomas sandwiched between Clemson LB Isaiah Simmons and Alabama LT Jedrick Wills Jr.
Of Note: Thomas would be the fourth LT selected in the top 10 in Wilson's mock.
Of Note: White's the third in this group to see the Browns taking Thomas over Wills.
Of Note: The Browns would be picking Becton over Thomas in this scenario.
Of Note: Reid writes he doesn't think a team has fared better in free agency than the Browns.
Of Note: Farrar writes the combination of Becton and Conklin at the tackle positions "would be a massive upgrade over what the Browns presented last season."
Of Note: The Browns would be making Thomas the third tackle selected in the draft behind Becton and Tristan Wirfs.
Of Note: The Browns would be picking Wills over Thomas in this projection.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
7 CBS pickers: 4 Thomas and one each Becton, Wills and Wirfs.
-
Some of which is based upon who they think will be there at 10 for us...
... but having looked at them all I have to scratch my head... especially with Becton.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Some of which is based upon who they think will be there at 10 for us...
... but having looked at them all I have to scratch my head... especially with Becton.
Some of which is based upon who they think will be there at 10 for us...
... but having looked at them all I have to scratch my head... especially with Becton.
By that do you mean that you don't think any of them as a group are worthy of the #10 pick?
Wonder if we could do well waiting to round 2....to pick 42. A guy like Austin Jackson USC?
-
Some of which is based upon who they think will be there at 10 for us...
... but having looked at them all I have to scratch my head... especially with Becton.
By that do you mean that you don't think any of them as a group are worthy of the #10 pick?
Wonder if we could do well waiting to round 2....to pick 42. A guy like Austin Jackson USC?
By that do you mean that you don't think any of them as a group are worthy of the #10 pick?
Wonder if we could do well waiting to round 2....to pick 42. A guy like Austin Jackson USC?
No..
The first line of comment was simply reflecting Ag's tally... put another way many mocks pick other OTs for teams above us with OT need leaving Thomas to fall to us.
This understanding is key to the 2nd line which basically says: I've looked at them all and cannot understand how Thomas is not the consensus top OT.
I've been trumpeting Thomas at 10 repeatedly... with Jones as the best alternative.
Jackson... no... not at 42 or on Day 2.
The most promising OT prospect outside of Day 1 I see is Peart (UConn). In a pinch, if I'm shut out of the OTs in Round 1, then I take him in Round 2
If gun to head I had to take a prospect on Day 3? Lucas Niang (TCU) has possibilities.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
By that do you mean that you don't think any of them as a group are worthy of the #10 pick?
Wonder if we could do well waiting to round 2....to pick 42. A guy like Austin Jackson USC?
No..
The first line of comment was simply reflecting Ag's tally... put another way many mocks pick other OTs for teams above us with OT need leaving Thomas to fall to us.
This understanding is key to the 2nd line which basically says: I've looked at them all and cannot understand how Thomas is not the consensus top OT.
I've been trumpeting Thomas at 10 repeatedly... with Jones as the best alternative.
Jackson... no... not at 42 or on Day 2.
The most promising OT prospect outside of Day 1 I see is Peart (UConn). In a pinch, if I'm shut out of the OTs in Round 1, then I take him in Round 2
If gun to head I had to take a prospect on Day 3? Lucas Niang (TCU) has possibilities.
I've been trumpeting Thomas at 10 repeatedly... with Jones as the best alternative.
I've been all set at a)Thomas or b.) Wills at #10...
Are you saying you'd pass on Wirfs solidifying RG or upgrade Hub at RT? Conk to LT..
And you'd also pass on Becton at #10? am still in shock at what Becton ran..his 1.77 split ?, was just a few ticks over Wirfs at 1.69..Wills,Thomas & Jones all in 1.80's..
Is Trading back to say pick #15? Can ya take Josh Jones there? with a wing under 80" & arms barely under 34"?
Another shocker to me is the Overall size wing of Becton 83 2/8.. Thomas & Wills sit at 83 4/8ths...
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
I'm excited at the prospect of having a good OLine again.
The tackle position should be fixed as of... whenever the Draft happens.
-
I'm excited at the prospect of having a good OLine again.
The tackle position should be fixed as of... whenever the Draft happens.
I'm excited at the prospect of having a good OLine again.
The tackle position should be fixed as of... whenever the Draft happens.
Of course, a good question is: Will getting a LOT with the #10 pick actually "fix" that position. Unless that person is the rare Joe Thomas type, any rookie would still have a lot to learn, and the play would be questionable until he proves it.
-
I've been trumpeting Thomas at 10 repeatedly... with Jones as the best alternative.
I've been all set at a)Thomas or b.) Wills at #10...
Are you saying you'd pass on Wirfs solidifying RG or upgrade Hub at RT? Conk to LT..
And you'd also pass on Becton at #10? am still in shock at what Becton ran..his 1.77 split ?, was just a few ticks over Wirfs at 1.69..Wills,Thomas & Jones all in 1.80's..
Is Trading back to say pick #15? Can ya take Josh Jones there? with a wing under 80" & arms barely under 34"?
Another shocker to me is the Overall size wing of Becton 83 2/8.. Thomas & Wills sit at 83 4/8ths...
- I've been all set at a)Thomas or b.) Wills at #10...
- Are you saying you'd pass on Wirfs solidifying RG or upgrade Hub at RT? Conk to LT..
- And you'd also pass on Becton at #10? am still in shock at what Becton ran..his 1.77 split ?, was just a few ticks over Wirfs at 1.69..Wills,Thomas & Jones all in 1.80's..
- Is Trading back to say pick #15? Can ya take Josh Jones there? with a wing under 80" & arms barely under 34"?
- Another shocker to me is the Overall size wing of Becton 83 2/8.. Thomas & Wills sit at 83 4/8ths...
- Wills was my initial #1 and he's still acceptable, but to take him you have to know one of your two RTs can flip to LT. While I know you and I believe Conk can do that, it's still a wrinkle to consider. It's why Jones and Peart have both leap-frogged Wills in my value scenarios. Jones because I know he can play LT. Peart because I know he can play RT and he costs me a lot less to try Conk at LT.
- I'd pass on Wirfs in a heartbeat. I don't need to spend a #1 to fix RG. While back I posted a PFF article on the impact of passing rounds on success at every Offensive position. IOL (OG + Center) was the flattest line of all. You can find quality IOL starters throughout the draft... and this one is a great example IMO.
- Becton? Again... I'd pass in a heartbeat. Is the potential there? Maybe... but then it was supposedly in a great athlete named Greg Robinson as well. As is Becton's a top-heavy mess with no tech.
- Jones lasts until 15 in almost every scenario I can think of excepting if there is an early OT run starting with NYG at #4. Conversely if the first OT off the board doesn't go until AZ at #8, then Jones may fall to the bottom of the first... but in that case Thomas is likely there at #10 for us unless NYJ wants him enough to trade up from 11 for him.
- Wills' span surprised me because the other two looked much bigger on tape. But its not a matter of how wide... but what they do with the width... At least that's what she said.
Someone here posted weeks ago about some Sr. Bowl scout (IIRC) of some note saying Thomas and Jones were the class of this class. I'd love to compare notes with whomever that was...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
- I've been all set at a)Thomas or b.) Wills at #10...
- Are you saying you'd pass on Wirfs solidifying RG or upgrade Hub at RT? Conk to LT..
- And you'd also pass on Becton at #10? am still in shock at what Becton ran..his 1.77 split ?, was just a few ticks over Wirfs at 1.69..Wills,Thomas & Jones all in 1.80's..
- Is Trading back to say pick #15? Can ya take Josh Jones there? with a wing under 80" & arms barely under 34"?
- Another shocker to me is the Overall size wing of Becton 83 2/8.. Thomas & Wills sit at 83 4/8ths...
- Wills was my initial #1 and he's still acceptable, but to take him you have to know one of your two RTs can flip to LT. While I know you and I believe Conk can do that, it's still a wrinkle to consider. It's why Jones and Peart have both leap-frogged Wills in my value scenarios. Jones because I know he can play LT. Peart because I know he can play RT and he costs me a lot less to try Conk at LT.
- I'd pass on Wirfs in a heartbeat. I don't need to spend a #1 to fix RG. While back I posted a PFF article on the impact of passing rounds on success at every Offensive position. IOL (OG + Center) was the flattest line of all. You can find quality IOL starters throughout the draft... and this one is a great example IMO.
- Becton? Again... I'd pass in a heartbeat. Is the potential there? Maybe... but then it was supposedly in a great athlete named Greg Robinson as well. As is Becton's a top-heavy mess with no tech.
- Jones lasts until 15 in almost every scenario I can think of excepting if there is an early OT run starting with NYG at #4. Conversely if the first OT off the board doesn't go until AZ at #8, then Jones may fall to the bottom of the first... but in that case Thomas is likely there at #10 for us unless NYJ wants him enough to trade up from 11 for him.
- Wills' span surprised me because the other two looked much bigger on tape. But its not a matter of how wide... but what they do with the width... At least that's what she said.
Someone here posted weeks ago about some Sr. Bowl scout (IIRC) of some note saying Thomas and Jones were the class of this class. I'd love to compare notes with whomever that was...
- It's why Jones and Peart have both leap-frogged Wills in my value scenarios. Jones because I know he can play LT. Peart because I know he can play RT and he costs me a lot less to try Conk at LT.
- I'd pass on Wirfs in a heartbeat. I don't need to spend a #1 to fix RG.
- Becton? Again... I'd pass in a heartbeat. Is the potential there? Maybe... but then it was supposedly in a great athlete named Greg Robinson as well. As is Becton's a top-heavy mess with no tech
Always enjoy having a Hog-Molly advisor to lean on, on this board.. Use'guys always seem to find the longer nuts & bolts in the tool box, us average Joe's like me can't find...
in short, Give us Andrew Thomas at #10 to scare the lake pigeons off the field... or
on draft night we will be Counting Crows till Mr. Jones
i might look like Bob Dylan before draft night round 1 is over
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login