Apology accepted
-
furthermore:
The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important ...
Jan 22, 2013 · Viewed from an even larger perspective, the global warming rubric has provided an ideal platform to accomplish exactly what Chavez has in mind…to enable the U.N. to advance large transformational...
-
but WAIT ! There's MORE !
U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare ...
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man's stewardship of the environment.But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now ...
-
News - Global warming: Fake News From the Start ...
https://www.heartland.org › news-opinion › news › global...
Dec 20, 2017 · President Trump must now end America’s participation in the fake science and fake news of manmade global warming. To do this, he must withdraw the U.S. from further involvement with all U.N. global warming programs, especially the IPCC, as well as the agency that now directs it – the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
[PDF]
More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man ...
https://www.amherst.edu › media › view › 400467 › original › ...
the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report -- updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism
-
Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse ...
https://www.epw.senate.gov › public › index.cfm › press...
Global warming author and economist Hans H.J. Labohm started out as a man-made global warming believer but he later switched his view after conducting climate research. Labohm wrote on August 19, 2006, “I started as a anthropogenic global warming believer, then I read the [UN’s IPCC] Summary for Policymakers and the research of prominent ...
-
the fake mmgw theory keeps coming around like a plague of locusts.
Read this, Hoorta, and it's ok if you sing the "I'm So Sorry Song".
and stop slobbering all over your al gore is god poster.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
-
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
Why, you'd think Hoorta is thinking about growing feathers.
Here's some truth for ya -
https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/michael-shellenberger-climate-scare
'It's just unconscionable': Acclaimed environmentalist explains his STUNNING apology for 'climate scare'
'Apocalyptic environmentalism' has become a TOXIC religion
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
what part of the UN admitting mmgw is to redistribute wealth globally? the beginning, middle or end?
liberals believe in falsehoods that make them FEEL IMPORTANT and FEEL GOOD.
what part of a thousand scientists saying "HOLD ON A FRICKIN MINUTE HERE" don't you get?
or..
don't FEEL like getting.
Liberals do that. That must mean that Hoorta.......
never mind.
Here's a nice article about your daily swimmin hole:
Nile - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nile
The Nile is a major north-flowing river in northeastern Africa, and is the longest river in Africa and the disputed longest river in the world, as the Brazilian government says that the Amazon River is longer than the Nile.
-
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
Aw, now I got Cal riled up. He might have a brain hemorrhage if I posted Robert Reich's Op-ed "Trump's 25 point plan to get reelected." (More like 25 reasons you shouldn't vote for Trump.)
I did tell Woody in a PM before I posted that environmental article, the response would be predictable.
The problem is, as one of my friends said in a brilliant op-ed piece- doesn't matter if you're left or right as a "news outlet". FOX, CNN. Hannity, Tucker, Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper. A lot of what they're doing is spewing opinions as being facts. You can take the same event and spin it however you like, Trump's Bible waving being a good example. And if you don't like what the other side is saying, claim those facts are just opinions. Is the covid death count being padded, or under reported? Or God forbid, mostly accurate?
-
lol. I"m not riled up. I gave you facts on mmgw. You choose to illegal mexican alien hat dance around them by diverting the subject to not voting for Pres Trump !
You should be embarrassed bigtime.
It's nice you pm your little woodpecker before you post. Like I said, I've been fighting this silly battle over the fraud that is manmadegooberwarning for years. The longer it goes on, the more evidence keeps coming in that it's a farce.
-
BTW, woodpecker's nanny - you go read up on the kyoto treaty and paris accord.
'it was all about huge sums of money - redistributed.
You betcha it's a farce.
You and I both have seen glaciers calving. But I don't stupidly buy into America giving up billions/trillions of dollars to other countries because of it.
4 Reasons Trump Was Right to Pull Out of the Paris Agreement
https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/4...
The Paris Agreement was c ostly and ineffective. The Paris Agreement is highly costly and would …
The agreement w asted taxpayer money. In climate negotiations leading up to the Paris …
Withdrawal is a d emonstration of leadership. The media is making a big to-do about the fact that …
Withdrawal is good for American energy competitiveness. Some proponents of the Paris Agreement …
-
Dropping out of the agreement will let the U.S. avoid several deleterious effects of the agreement.
- Goodbye to ‘American Last.’ The Paris agreement was basically an attempt to halt climate change on the honor system. Its only legal requirements were for signatories to announce goals and report progress, with no international enforcement mechanism. As a result, it was likely that the United States and wealthy European nations would have adopted and implemented severe climate change rules while many of the world’s governments would avoid doing anything that would slow their own economies. The agreement basically made the U.S. economy and Europe’s strongest economies sacrificial lambs to the cause of climate change.
- Industrial Carnage. The regulations necessary to implement the Paris agreement would have cost the U.S. industrial sector 1.1 million jobs, according to a study commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. These job losses would center in cement, iron and steel, and petroleum refining. Industrial output would decline sharply.
- Hollowing Out Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. The industrial carnage would have been concentrated on four states, according to the Chamber of Commerce study. Michigan’s GDP would shrink by 0.8 percent and employment would contract by 74,000 jobs. Missouri’s GDP would shrink by 1 percent. Ohio’s GDP would contract 1.2 percent. Pennsylvania’s GDP would decline by 1.8 percent and the state would lose 140,000 jobs.
- Smashing Small Businesses, Helping Big Business. Big businesses in America strongly backed the Paris climate deal. In fact, the backers of the climate deal reads like a “who’s who” of big American businesses: Apple, General Electric, Intel, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, General Mills, Walmart, DuPont, Unilever, and Johnson & Johnson. These business giants can more easily cope with costly regulations than their smaller competitors and many would, in fact, find business opportunities from the changes required. But smaller businesses and traditional start-ups would likely be hurt by the increased costs of compliance and rising energy costs.
- Making America Poorer Again. A Heritage Foundation study found that the Paris agreement would have increased the electricity costs of an American family of four by between 13 percent and 20 percent annually. It forecast a loss of income of $20,000 by 2035. In other words, American families would be paying more while making less.
- Much Poorer. The overall effect of the agreement would have been to reduce U.S. GDP by over $2.5 trillion and eliminate 400,000 jobs by 2035, according to Heritage’s study. This would exacerbate problems with government funding and deficits, make Social Security solvency more challenging, and increase reliance on government’s spending to support households.
The Paris deal was, in short, a disaster for America and a nothing-burger for climate.
-
https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/why-president-bush-right-abandon-the-kyoto-protocol
oh, the reason it failed?
because WE did NOT want to fund it with 350 billion ? while ruining our economy while all the developing nations were not bound by it. Like china and india. etc etc etc etc.
it would have been stupid to go with it.
UN redistribution of wealth again.
-
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
Aw, now I got Cal riled up. He might have a brain hemorrhage if I posted Robert Reich's Op-ed "Trump's 25 point plan to get reelected." (More like 25 reasons you shouldn't vote for Trump.)
I did tell Woody in a PM before I posted that environmental article, the response would be predictable.
The problem is, as one of my friends said in a brilliant op-ed piece- doesn't matter if you're left or right as a "news outlet". FOX, CNN. Hannity, Tucker, Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper. A lot of what they're doing is spewing opinions as being facts. You can take the same event and spin it however you like, Trump's Bible waving being a good example. And if you don't like what the other side is saying, claim those facts are just opinions. Is the covid death count being padded, or under reported? Or God forbid, mostly accurate?
-
Yup my point went right over your head... How hard did you have to search to find that one? and in case you're wondering I though Clinton was pretty much scum too.... At least he apologized for his little affair. Trump? Crickets.....
-
well, that was a good bit of eloquent, profound silent response from Hoorta
about the failed redirection of America's wealth to poor countries kyoto loco and paris discord treaties.
Silence is golden - it means the liberal pointy of viewie can't handle the truth.
as usual.
-
Yup my point went right over your head... How hard did you have to search to find that one? and in case you're wondering I though Clinton was pretty much scum too.... At least he apologized for his little affair. Trump? Crickets.....
Yup my point went right over your head... How hard did you have to search to find that one? and in case you're wondering I though Clinton was pretty much scum too.... At least he apologized for his little affair. Trump? Crickets.....
Hell, at this point Bill is probably more of a Christian than Trump...
(That'll get em going)
Also, I wonder how much tear gas and rubber bullets Clinton needed before he could take that photo?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
