Apology accepted
-
-
Don't worry Cal- there's plenty of dumb ass climate denial around here to go around....
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
-
The Dust Bowl?
Have you ever stopped to think what caused the dust bowl?
The heat and drought for nearly a decade caused the dust bowl, not the other way around.
That’s like the tail wagging the dog.
And without any ground radiation of water vapor and really low atmospheric humidity- it caused the temperatures to skyrocket. Hence the spike in your graph... I wasn't saying what caused the Dust Bowl- the Dust bowl was the cause of the temperature spike. I know it's sort of hard to understand....
And without any ground radiation of water vapor and really low atmospheric humidity- it caused the temperatures to skyrocket. Hence the spike in your graph... I wasn't saying what caused the Dust Bowl- the Dust bowl was the cause of the temperature spike. I know it's sort of hard to understand....
They were both caused by stagnant Rossby waves.
-
Don't worry Cal- there's plenty of dumb ass climate denial around here to go around....
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
Other way around Cal- those saying it isn't happening are the ones in denial. My POV is sure- man made causes aren't the only reason the planet is warming up- but it sure is a contributing factor. I'm not like the crackhead total greenies who want zero carbon emissions, that's impractical. Solar energy? Wind Farms? OK, but save the Eagles- who only look down, and have been taken out by those turbines- and they are eyesores...
Electric cars arent going to catch on until they have the range of a regular car, and how many people are going to be willing to wait around for a recharge on a cross country trip? Now if you're into rocket science, in theory you can build a car powered by liquid hydrogen (or even compressed hydrogen gas) with water as the end product- but be careful with that -400F gas tank, not to mention the explosion hazard.
If you read the article I originally posted- the author does make sense that thawing permafrost will eventually create a feedback loop with methane gas being released as it thaws. And you can't deny an all-time temperature record of 100 degrees+ was just set north of the Arctic Circle. Is that significant? Maybe. Yeah- I did have to look up the record, and I knew it can get mighty hot in the Arctic and sub arctic with near 24 hours of continuous daylight and low humidity. Fairbanks hit 99 degrees, 102 years ago. OTOH, in the last five years Alaska has had their five warmest years ever- consecutively.
-
@hoorta you're wasting your time.
Look through every other climate change thread for proof.
-
@hoorta you're wasting your time.
Look through every other climate change thread for proof.
@hoorta you're wasting your time.
Look through every other climate change thread for proof.
Yeah- just like Trump is the most wonderful president ever.
-
People are NOT anti science
People are anti liars
And from this, science is not immune.
Far too often people of science manipulate their data to fit their particular agenda. Or even worse, to fit the agenda of those financing their research.
I love science! without political agendas.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
Other way around Cal- those saying it isn't happening are the ones in denial. My POV is sure- man made causes aren't the only reason the planet is warming up- but it sure is a contributing factor. I'm not like the crackhead total greenies who want zero carbon emissions, that's impractical. Solar energy? Wind Farms? OK, but save the Eagles- who only look down, and have been taken out by those turbines- and they are eyesores...
Electric cars arent going to catch on until they have the range of a regular car, and how many people are going to be willing to wait around for a recharge on a cross country trip? Now if you're into rocket science, in theory you can build a car powered by liquid hydrogen (or even compressed hydrogen gas) with water as the end product- but be careful with that -400F gas tank, not to mention the explosion hazard.
If you read the article I originally posted- the author does make sense that thawing permafrost will eventually create a feedback loop with methane gas being released as it thaws. And you can't deny an all-time temperature record of 100 degrees+ was just set north of the Arctic Circle. Is that significant? Maybe. Yeah- I did have to look up the record, and I knew it can get mighty hot in the Arctic and sub arctic with near 24 hours of continuous daylight and low humidity. Fairbanks hit 99 degrees, 102 years ago. OTOH, in the last five years Alaska has had their five warmest years ever- consecutively.
Other way around Cal- those saying it isn't happening are the ones in denial. My POV is sure- man made causes aren't the only reason the planet is warming up- but it sure is a contributing factor. I'm not like the crackhead total greenies who want zero carbon emissions, that's impractical. Solar energy? Wind Farms? OK, but save the Eagles- who only look down, and have been taken out by those turbines- and they are eyesores...
Electric cars arent going to catch on until they have the range of a regular car, and how many people are going to be willing to wait around for a recharge on a cross country trip? Now if you're into rocket science, in theory you can build a car powered by liquid hydrogen (or even compressed hydrogen gas) with water as the end product- but be careful with that -400F gas tank, not to mention the explosion hazard.
If you read the article I originally posted- the author does make sense that thawing permafrost will eventually create a feedback loop with methane gas being released as it thaws. And you can't deny an all-time temperature record of 100 degrees+ was just set north of the Arctic Circle. Is that significant? Maybe. Yeah- I did have to look up the record, and I knew it can get mighty hot in the Arctic and sub arctic with near 24 hours of continuous daylight and low humidity. Fairbanks hit 99 degrees, 102 years ago. OTOH, in the last five years Alaska has had their five warmest years ever- consecutively.
A. Everybody knows climate changes. It's changing. But SUV's, and fines...and fees.... and the earth flooding by 1977, and all the money al gore has made on the subject....how high/low we set our thermostats, not being allowed to have a campfire, cows farting, farming fines/fees, "mmgw" extra costs for every and any reason the left can make up... you can stick all that political and financial crap somewhere and shove it.
The united nations official even ADMITTED ...that global REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH was never going to happen unless mmgw was globally accepted.
yeah, "mmgw" is so critical we're all going to be flooded out, blah blah blah...and guess what? CHINA and INDIA, two of the worst, are NOT BOUND by that worthless kyoto treaty.
Countries in Africa, Asia, etc... underdeveloped...guess what? they can SELL carbon credits "they don't use".... to rich countries !
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH !!!!!
it's about redistribution of wealth globally.
-
so, Hoorta, how does it feel to "know" man made global warming was real, until it was found out to be a fraud with UN ulterior motives, so obviously, that they changed the name to "climate change"
May the farce be with you - until you read on:
The UN Makes it Official: Global Warming Hysteria Is All ...
https://www.foxnews.com › opinion › the-un-makes-it...
For years, climate realists around the world have been warning the international community that the entire man-made global warming myth and resulting hysteria is all a scheme to redistribute wealth...
Author: Noel Sheppard
Global Warming: A Scheme To Redistribute Wealth ...
https://www.lewrockwell.com › 2019 › 12 › no_author › ...
Dec 05, 2019 · As the “science” behind man-made global warming has been increasingly discredited, the story has changed. Now it’s not about saving the environment but about redistributing wealth, says a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Top Scientist: UN “Climate Finance” Is Subsidy for Kleptocracy
https://www.thenewamerican.com › tech › environment › ...
Jan 26, 2016 · PARIS — The international wealth-redistribution schemes of the United Nations, justified under the guise of battling alleged man-made global warming, are …
-
furthermore:
The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important ...
Jan 22, 2013 · Viewed from an even larger perspective, the global warming rubric has provided an ideal platform to accomplish exactly what Chavez has in mind…to enable the U.N. to advance large transformational...
-
but WAIT ! There's MORE !
U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare ...
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man's stewardship of the environment.But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now ...
-
News - Global warming: Fake News From the Start ...
https://www.heartland.org › news-opinion › news › global...
Dec 20, 2017 · President Trump must now end America’s participation in the fake science and fake news of manmade global warming. To do this, he must withdraw the U.S. from further involvement with all U.N. global warming programs, especially the IPCC, as well as the agency that now directs it – the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
[PDF]
More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man ...
https://www.amherst.edu › media › view › 400467 › original › ...
the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report -- updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism
-
Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse ...
https://www.epw.senate.gov › public › index.cfm › press...
Global warming author and economist Hans H.J. Labohm started out as a man-made global warming believer but he later switched his view after conducting climate research. Labohm wrote on August 19, 2006, “I started as a anthropogenic global warming believer, then I read the [UN’s IPCC] Summary for Policymakers and the research of prominent ...
-
the fake mmgw theory keeps coming around like a plague of locusts.
Read this, Hoorta, and it's ok if you sing the "I'm So Sorry Song".
and stop slobbering all over your al gore is god poster.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
Why, you'd think Hoorta is thinking about growing feathers.
Here's some truth for ya -
https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/michael-shellenberger-climate-scare
'It's just unconscionable': Acclaimed environmentalist explains his STUNNING apology for 'climate scare'
'Apocalyptic environmentalism' has become a TOXIC religion
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
what part of the UN admitting mmgw is to redistribute wealth globally? the beginning, middle or end?
liberals believe in falsehoods that make them FEEL IMPORTANT and FEEL GOOD.
what part of a thousand scientists saying "HOLD ON A FRICKIN MINUTE HERE" don't you get?
or..
don't FEEL like getting.
Liberals do that. That must mean that Hoorta.......
never mind.
Here's a nice article about your daily swimmin hole:
Nile - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nile
The Nile is a major north-flowing river in northeastern Africa, and is the longest river in Africa and the disputed longest river in the world, as the Brazilian government says that the Amazon River is longer than the Nile.
-
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
Aw, now I got Cal riled up. He might have a brain hemorrhage if I posted Robert Reich's Op-ed "Trump's 25 point plan to get reelected." (More like 25 reasons you shouldn't vote for Trump.)
I did tell Woody in a PM before I posted that environmental article, the response would be predictable.
The problem is, as one of my friends said in a brilliant op-ed piece- doesn't matter if you're left or right as a "news outlet". FOX, CNN. Hannity, Tucker, Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper. A lot of what they're doing is spewing opinions as being facts. You can take the same event and spin it however you like, Trump's Bible waving being a good example. And if you don't like what the other side is saying, claim those facts are just opinions. Is the covid death count being padded, or under reported? Or God forbid, mostly accurate?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login