Apology accepted
-
The hottest period on record occurred in the 1930’s when CO2 emissions were only a fraction of what they are today.
Must’ve been the horse farts.
Sorry- I've got a different explanation The Dust Bowl. Ever wonder why it's so freaking hot in the Sahara Desert? Or you miss that there's world wide warming, and what's happening in the USA is being amplified in the polar regions?
Doesn't surprise me at all that anti environment Trump's followers march right behind him.... Thinking Global Warming is a bunch of hooey and CO2 levels have nothing to do with it. Let me take you on a trip to Venus with an atmosphere of 96% carbon dioxide and a surface temperature hot enough to melt lead as Exhibit A of the Greenhouse effect run amok. With an Earthlike atmosphere, I don't doubt we'd already have a few guys living at the planets poles where the temperature would probably be under 100 on most days...
Sorry- I've got a different explanation The Dust Bowl.
The Dust Bowl?
Have you ever stopped to think what caused the dust bowl?
The heat and drought for nearly a decade caused the dust bowl, not the other way around.
That’s like the tail wagging the dog.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
truth is, for years, Hoorta, I have said the one aspect of "mmgw" I agree with - is the destruction of the virgin rain forests.
Too bad you didn't get a climate degree. and I've been talking about the fraud of "mmgw" for many years.
See, that is BEFORE Pres Trump. He's only been pres for not even four years. Do the math.
You can slobber all over the paris accord and the kyoto treaty, but they were garbage.
Here is a HUGE problem with the climbing CO2 rates. And your little woodpecker can attest to the fact that I've brought it up many, many years ago.
Climate change: Study warns Earth’s rainforest carbon ...
Climate change: 30-year rainforest study finds Earth's carbon sinks are nearing collapse
CLIMATE CHANGE is decimating the planet's ability to remove carbon from the atmosphere by shrinking intact rainforests in the Amazon and Africa, a climate expert has told Express.co.uk.
Mar 04, 2020 · Tropical rainforests play a critical role in regulating climate change by drawing carbon dioxide from the air in a process known as carbon sequestration. …
Climate change: Rainforest absorption of CO2 becoming ... - US
Jan 26, 2014 · News > Science Climate change: Rainforest absorption of CO2 becoming erratic. For each 1C rise in temperature, tropical regions now release about …
Author: Steve Connor
Shit- tell me something I didn't already know Cal.... Of course destroying the tropical forest carbon sinks is a big problem....
Shit- tell me something I didn't already know Cal.... Of course destroying the tropical forest carbon sinks is a big problem....
if you knew that, you should have understood my point - but no, you went dumb ass reply.
-
The Dust Bowl?
Have you ever stopped to think what caused the dust bowl?
The heat and drought for nearly a decade caused the dust bowl, not the other way around.
That’s like the tail wagging the dog.
And without any ground radiation of water vapor and really low atmospheric humidity- it caused the temperatures to skyrocket. Hence the spike in your graph... I wasn't saying what caused the Dust Bowl- the Dust bowl was the cause of the temperature spike. I know it's sort of hard to understand....
-
-
Don't worry Cal- there's plenty of dumb ass climate denial around here to go around....
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
-
The Dust Bowl?
Have you ever stopped to think what caused the dust bowl?
The heat and drought for nearly a decade caused the dust bowl, not the other way around.
That’s like the tail wagging the dog.
And without any ground radiation of water vapor and really low atmospheric humidity- it caused the temperatures to skyrocket. Hence the spike in your graph... I wasn't saying what caused the Dust Bowl- the Dust bowl was the cause of the temperature spike. I know it's sort of hard to understand....
And without any ground radiation of water vapor and really low atmospheric humidity- it caused the temperatures to skyrocket. Hence the spike in your graph... I wasn't saying what caused the Dust Bowl- the Dust bowl was the cause of the temperature spike. I know it's sort of hard to understand....
They were both caused by stagnant Rossby waves.
-
Don't worry Cal- there's plenty of dumb ass climate denial around here to go around....
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
Other way around Cal- those saying it isn't happening are the ones in denial. My POV is sure- man made causes aren't the only reason the planet is warming up- but it sure is a contributing factor. I'm not like the crackhead total greenies who want zero carbon emissions, that's impractical. Solar energy? Wind Farms? OK, but save the Eagles- who only look down, and have been taken out by those turbines- and they are eyesores...
Electric cars arent going to catch on until they have the range of a regular car, and how many people are going to be willing to wait around for a recharge on a cross country trip? Now if you're into rocket science, in theory you can build a car powered by liquid hydrogen (or even compressed hydrogen gas) with water as the end product- but be careful with that -400F gas tank, not to mention the explosion hazard.
If you read the article I originally posted- the author does make sense that thawing permafrost will eventually create a feedback loop with methane gas being released as it thaws. And you can't deny an all-time temperature record of 100 degrees+ was just set north of the Arctic Circle. Is that significant? Maybe. Yeah- I did have to look up the record, and I knew it can get mighty hot in the Arctic and sub arctic with near 24 hours of continuous daylight and low humidity. Fairbanks hit 99 degrees, 102 years ago. OTOH, in the last five years Alaska has had their five warmest years ever- consecutively.
-
@hoorta you're wasting your time.
Look through every other climate change thread for proof.
-
@hoorta you're wasting your time.
Look through every other climate change thread for proof.
@hoorta you're wasting your time.
Look through every other climate change thread for proof.
Yeah- just like Trump is the most wonderful president ever.
-
People are NOT anti science
People are anti liars
And from this, science is not immune.
Far too often people of science manipulate their data to fit their particular agenda. Or even worse, to fit the agenda of those financing their research.
I love science! without political agendas.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
nah - there isn't denial, there is just truth that would set you mmgw wonks free, but your emotional knee jerking won't let it happen. Pro-"man made global warming" is such a farce - you all had to change the name to "climate change". The earth was supposed to flood over by 1977. LOL
Other way around Cal- those saying it isn't happening are the ones in denial. My POV is sure- man made causes aren't the only reason the planet is warming up- but it sure is a contributing factor. I'm not like the crackhead total greenies who want zero carbon emissions, that's impractical. Solar energy? Wind Farms? OK, but save the Eagles- who only look down, and have been taken out by those turbines- and they are eyesores...
Electric cars arent going to catch on until they have the range of a regular car, and how many people are going to be willing to wait around for a recharge on a cross country trip? Now if you're into rocket science, in theory you can build a car powered by liquid hydrogen (or even compressed hydrogen gas) with water as the end product- but be careful with that -400F gas tank, not to mention the explosion hazard.
If you read the article I originally posted- the author does make sense that thawing permafrost will eventually create a feedback loop with methane gas being released as it thaws. And you can't deny an all-time temperature record of 100 degrees+ was just set north of the Arctic Circle. Is that significant? Maybe. Yeah- I did have to look up the record, and I knew it can get mighty hot in the Arctic and sub arctic with near 24 hours of continuous daylight and low humidity. Fairbanks hit 99 degrees, 102 years ago. OTOH, in the last five years Alaska has had their five warmest years ever- consecutively.
Other way around Cal- those saying it isn't happening are the ones in denial. My POV is sure- man made causes aren't the only reason the planet is warming up- but it sure is a contributing factor. I'm not like the crackhead total greenies who want zero carbon emissions, that's impractical. Solar energy? Wind Farms? OK, but save the Eagles- who only look down, and have been taken out by those turbines- and they are eyesores...
Electric cars arent going to catch on until they have the range of a regular car, and how many people are going to be willing to wait around for a recharge on a cross country trip? Now if you're into rocket science, in theory you can build a car powered by liquid hydrogen (or even compressed hydrogen gas) with water as the end product- but be careful with that -400F gas tank, not to mention the explosion hazard.
If you read the article I originally posted- the author does make sense that thawing permafrost will eventually create a feedback loop with methane gas being released as it thaws. And you can't deny an all-time temperature record of 100 degrees+ was just set north of the Arctic Circle. Is that significant? Maybe. Yeah- I did have to look up the record, and I knew it can get mighty hot in the Arctic and sub arctic with near 24 hours of continuous daylight and low humidity. Fairbanks hit 99 degrees, 102 years ago. OTOH, in the last five years Alaska has had their five warmest years ever- consecutively.
A. Everybody knows climate changes. It's changing. But SUV's, and fines...and fees.... and the earth flooding by 1977, and all the money al gore has made on the subject....how high/low we set our thermostats, not being allowed to have a campfire, cows farting, farming fines/fees, "mmgw" extra costs for every and any reason the left can make up... you can stick all that political and financial crap somewhere and shove it.
The united nations official even ADMITTED ...that global REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH was never going to happen unless mmgw was globally accepted.
yeah, "mmgw" is so critical we're all going to be flooded out, blah blah blah...and guess what? CHINA and INDIA, two of the worst, are NOT BOUND by that worthless kyoto treaty.
Countries in Africa, Asia, etc... underdeveloped...guess what? they can SELL carbon credits "they don't use".... to rich countries !
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH !!!!!
it's about redistribution of wealth globally.
-
so, Hoorta, how does it feel to "know" man made global warming was real, until it was found out to be a fraud with UN ulterior motives, so obviously, that they changed the name to "climate change"
May the farce be with you - until you read on:
The UN Makes it Official: Global Warming Hysteria Is All ...
https://www.foxnews.com › opinion › the-un-makes-it...
For years, climate realists around the world have been warning the international community that the entire man-made global warming myth and resulting hysteria is all a scheme to redistribute wealth...
Author: Noel Sheppard
Global Warming: A Scheme To Redistribute Wealth ...
https://www.lewrockwell.com › 2019 › 12 › no_author › ...
Dec 05, 2019 · As the “science” behind man-made global warming has been increasingly discredited, the story has changed. Now it’s not about saving the environment but about redistributing wealth, says a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Top Scientist: UN “Climate Finance” Is Subsidy for Kleptocracy
https://www.thenewamerican.com › tech › environment › ...
Jan 26, 2016 · PARIS — The international wealth-redistribution schemes of the United Nations, justified under the guise of battling alleged man-made global warming, are …
-
furthermore:
The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important ...
Jan 22, 2013 · Viewed from an even larger perspective, the global warming rubric has provided an ideal platform to accomplish exactly what Chavez has in mind…to enable the U.N. to advance large transformational...
-
but WAIT ! There's MORE !
U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare ...
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man's stewardship of the environment.But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now ...
-
News - Global warming: Fake News From the Start ...
https://www.heartland.org › news-opinion › news › global...
Dec 20, 2017 · President Trump must now end America’s participation in the fake science and fake news of manmade global warming. To do this, he must withdraw the U.S. from further involvement with all U.N. global warming programs, especially the IPCC, as well as the agency that now directs it – the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
[PDF]
More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man ...
https://www.amherst.edu › media › view › 400467 › original › ...
the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report -- updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism
-
Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse ...
https://www.epw.senate.gov › public › index.cfm › press...
Global warming author and economist Hans H.J. Labohm started out as a man-made global warming believer but he later switched his view after conducting climate research. Labohm wrote on August 19, 2006, “I started as a anthropogenic global warming believer, then I read the [UN’s IPCC] Summary for Policymakers and the research of prominent ...
-
the fake mmgw theory keeps coming around like a plague of locusts.
Read this, Hoorta, and it's ok if you sing the "I'm So Sorry Song".
and stop slobbering all over your al gore is god poster.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
-
@hoorta. That'll show you. He found an economist that'll show the truth. What's better than a climatologist talking about the climate? An economist without a single peer reviewed paper on climate change, duh!
The best is when Cal and others actually post something from a legitimate source, like NASA, thinking it backs then up but in reality they couldn't be further from the truth.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
Cal believes it, it must be true. Fake news, fake global warming, fake, fake, fake. Unless it's far right wing, then it's straight Gospel.
Just to point out the irony you or using the Woodpecker as a reference. I'll just leave it at that. ?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login