What are the chances Greedy turns out?
-
Today, you have guys that range anywhere from 6'3"-6'6" like AJ Green, Mike Evans, D.K. Metcalf, Larry Fitzgerald, Julio Jones, Allen Robinson II, Michael Thomas, Alshon Jeffery, Courtland Sutton, Tyrell Williams, Kenny Gollady, DJ Chark Jr, Chris Conley, Devin Funchess, DeVante Parker, Robby Anderson - just to name a hand full...
That being said, the best WR in recent years was 5-10 Antonio Brown (before he went insane). He smoked all those fools.
That being said, the best WR in recent years was 5-10 Antonio Brown (before he went insane).
1 exception to the rule doesn't mean teams are wrong for wanting corners bigger than 5'9" tall today. Will there be an exception to the rule? Isn't there always? However, secondaries have to defend a lot of size with speed and catch radius on the perimeter today. For example, Pittsburgh just drafted a big, fast WR out of Notre Dame (Chase Claypool) built like a TE at 6'4" for the reasons I spoke of. I say that to say this, Pittsburgh drafted Claypool in the 2nd round while they didn't draft Antonio Brown until round 6.
-
That being said, the best WR in recent years was 5-10 Antonio Brown (before he went insane).
1 exception to the rule doesn't mean teams are wrong for wanting corners bigger than 5'9" tall today. Will there be an exception to the rule? Isn't there always? However, secondaries have to defend a lot of size with speed and catch radius on the perimeter today. For example, Pittsburgh just drafted a big, fast WR out of Notre Dame (Chase Claypool) built like a TE at 6'4" for the reasons I spoke of. I say that to say this, Pittsburgh drafted Claypool in the 2nd round while they didn't draft Antonio Brown until round 6.
1 exception to the rule doesn't mean teams are wrong for wanting corners bigger than 5'9" tall today. Will there be an exception to the rule? Isn't there always? However, secondaries have to defend a lot of size with speed and catch radius on the perimeter today. For example, Pittsburgh just drafted a big, fast WR out of Notre Dame (Chase Claypool) built like a TE at 6'4" for the reasons I spoke of. I say that to say this, Pittsburgh drafted Claypool in the 2nd round while they didn't draft Antonio Brown until round 6.
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
-
1 exception to the rule doesn't mean teams are wrong for wanting corners bigger than 5'9" tall today. Will there be an exception to the rule? Isn't there always? However, secondaries have to defend a lot of size with speed and catch radius on the perimeter today. For example, Pittsburgh just drafted a big, fast WR out of Notre Dame (Chase Claypool) built like a TE at 6'4" for the reasons I spoke of. I say that to say this, Pittsburgh drafted Claypool in the 2nd round while they didn't draft Antonio Brown until round 6.
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
Isn't that about the same as Peeps? (looking at this...not quite....but not that far off. Claypool seems more Tight End.
Donovan Peoples-Jones NFL Combine Stats
Wide Receiver | Michigan | Big Ten Conference | Division I-FBS
Player Info
First Name: Donovan Last Name: Peoples-Jones Nickname: Position: Wide Receiver College: Michigan Draft Class: 2020 Draft Age: N/A Measurables
Height: 74 inches Weight: 208 pounds BMI: 27.35 Arm Length: 33.50 inches Hand Size: 10.13 inches Wingspan: 79.250 inches Birthdate: (N/A) NFL Combine Scores
40 Yard Dash: 4.48 seconds 40 Yard (MPH): 18.26 (MPH) 20 Yard Split: 2.63 seconds 10 Yard Split: 1.59 seconds Bench Press: (N/A) reps (225 lb) Wonderlic: (N/A) (0-50) QB Ball Velocity: (N/A) (MPH) Vertical Leap: 44.5 inches Broad Jump: (N/A) inches 20 Yd Shuttle: (N/A) seconds Three Cone: (N/A) seconds Shuttle Split: (N/A) seconds 60 Yd Shuttle: (N/A) seconds Four Square: (N/A) seconds -
Chase Claypool NFL Combine Stats
Wide Receiver | Notre Dame | Atlantic Coast Conference | Division I-FBS
Player Info
First Name: Chase Last Name: Claypool Nickname: Position: Wide Receiver College: Notre Dame Draft Class: 2020 Draft Age: N/A Measurables
Height: 76 inches Weight: 229 pounds BMI: 28.55 Arm Length: 32.50 inches Hand Size: 9.88 inches Wingspan: 80.000 inches Birthdate: (N/A) NFL Combine Scores
40 Yard Dash: 4.42 seconds 40 Yard (MPH): 18.51 (MPH) 20 Yard Split: 2.57 seconds 10 Yard Split: 1.56 seconds Bench Press: 19 reps (225 lb) Wonderlic: (N/A) (0-50) QB Ball Velocity: (N/A) (MPH) Vertical Leap: 40.5 inches Broad Jump: 126 inches 20 Yd Shuttle: (N/A) seconds Three Cone: (N/A) seconds Shuttle Split: (N/A) seconds 60 Yd Shuttle: (N/A) seconds Four Square: (N/A) seconds -
Claypool is taller.......but speed is about the same.......also...his arms are shorter than Peeps, his hands are smaller, he can't jump as high...4 inches difference.....does that make up for the two inches that Claypool is taller? Claypool 21 pounds heavier per this.
The .06 difference in speed is neglible. (unless you are running the Olympics). Wingspan the same really.
But, then Claypool was drafted #49, and Sunshine Superman taken #187. ....138 spots behind .
Maybe a better comparison would be between Claypool and Njoku?
-
Perhaps the thing to do here concerning Greedy Williams is to see who he likely would be matching up against mostly as the projected #2 CB on this team. #2 receivers for Browns opponents
Steelers: James Washington
Ravens: Myles Boykin
Bengals: Tee Higgins
Washington Football Team: Terry McLaurin or Kelvin Harmon
Cowboys: Michael Gallup
Colts: Michael Pittman Jr
Raiders: Henry Suggs or Tyrell Williams
Texans: Will Fuller
Eagles: DeSean Jackson
Jags: DJ Chark
Titans: AJ Brown or Adam Humpries.
So....where would Greedy excel and where do you think he would be overmatched?
-
1 exception to the rule doesn't mean teams are wrong for wanting corners bigger than 5'9" tall today. Will there be an exception to the rule? Isn't there always? However, secondaries have to defend a lot of size with speed and catch radius on the perimeter today. For example, Pittsburgh just drafted a big, fast WR out of Notre Dame (Chase Claypool) built like a TE at 6'4" for the reasons I spoke of. I say that to say this, Pittsburgh drafted Claypool in the 2nd round while they didn't draft Antonio Brown until round 6.
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
I told you he was fast. You're getting what I want you to see Ice. Seattle's Metcalf has the same frame - same quicks which makes asking a 5'9" corner (since this discussion centered around Minnifield (from a hands on bump and run scheme). I put up a volume of big WRs that can run. Not only that, one of the last times Gronk was healthy enough to suit up against us - they put him out wide so we'd put a corner on him (hoping to see an 8 year old trying to cover his daddy). Or, how about when Minnesota put a 6'4" Randy Moss in the slot as a rookie where he faced a lot of shorter corners he could outrun and outjump? Check out the stats that compiled to remind us this was no longer our fathers' NFL...
One of my first replies in this thread brought up a 2 time All American talent Antoine Winfield in a match-up vrs Michigan State's Plexico Burress. OSU rathoused MSU in the first half of that game. Then, MSU exploited the size differential of Plexico Burress 6'6" vrs 5'9" Winfield (regardless of his elite skillset). Aside from the height difference, now you factor in the huge catch radius advantage Burress enjoyed to understand Nick Saban's path to erasing the huge deficit and ruining any shot the Buckeyes had at a National Championship that year. The Buckeyes never really adjusted to this; because it was actually an adjustment Saban implemented that shifted the momentum and the entire complexion of the game. This was a lot like asking a point guard to stop Shaq from scoring. Not gonna happen regardless of how talented the point guard is/was.
To your point, that didn't stop Winfield from going on to enjoy a successful NFL career. IMO, what made Winfield special was he was one of the best open field tacklers on the planet aside from his ability to cover. When I watched him play, my football wood factor went from balsa to sequoia...
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
Claypool is taller.......but speed is about the same.......also...his arms are shorter than Peeps, his hands are smaller, he can't jump as high...4 inches difference.....does that make up for the two inches that Claypool is taller? Claypool 21 pounds heavier per this.
The .06 difference in speed is neglible. (unless you are running the Olympics). Wingspan the same really.
But, then Claypool was drafted #49, and Sunshine Superman taken #187. ....138 spots behind .
Maybe a better comparison would be between Claypool and Njoku?
Claypool is taller.......but speed is about the same.......also...his arms are shorter than Peeps, his hands are smaller, he can't jump as high...4 inches difference.....does that make up for the two inches that Claypool is taller? Claypool 21 pounds heavier per this.
The .06 difference in speed is neglible. (unless you are running the Olympics). Wingspan the same really.
But, then Claypool was drafted #49, and Sunshine Superman taken #187. ....138 spots behind .
Maybe a better comparison would be between Claypool and Njoku?
As much as it pains me to say this - Pittsburgh's tradition of finding successful WRs in the draft dating back to Swann and Stallworth up through today is as good as it gets.
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
I told you he was fast. You're getting what I want you to see Ice. Seattle's Metcalf has the same frame - same quicks which makes asking a 5'9" corner (since this discussion centered around Minnifield (from a hands on bump and run scheme). I put up a volume of big WRs that can run. Not only that, one of the last times Gronk was healthy enough to suit up against us - they put him out wide so we'd put a corner on him (hoping to see an 8 year old trying to cover his daddy). Or, how about when Minnesota put a 6'4" Randy Moss in the slot as a rookie where he faced a lot of shorter corners he could outrun and outjump? Check out the stats that compiled to remind us this was no longer our fathers' NFL...
One of my first replies in this thread brought up a 2 time All American talent Antoine Winfield in a match-up vrs Michigan State's Plexico Burress. OSU rathoused MSU in the first half of that game. Then, MSU exploited the size differential of Plexico Burress 6'6" vrs 5'9" Winfield (regardless of his elite skillset). Aside from the height difference, now you factor in the huge catch radius advantage Burress enjoyed to understand Nick Saban's path to erasing the huge deficit and ruining any shot the Buckeyes had at a National Championship that year. The Buckeyes never really adjusted to this; because it was actually an adjustment Saban implemented that shifted the momentum and the entire complexion of the game. This was a lot like asking a point guard to stop Shaq from scoring. Not gonna happen regardless of how talented the point guard is/was.
To your point, that didn't stop Winfield from going on to enjoy a successful NFL career. IMO, what made Winfield special was he was one of the best open field tacklers on the planet aside from his ability to cover. When I watched him play, my football wood factor went from balsa to sequoia...
Seattle's Metcalf has the same frame -
I put up a volume of big WRs that can run. Not only that, one of the last times Gronk was healthy enough to suit up against us - they put him out wide so we'd put a corner on him (hoping to see an 8 year old trying to cover his daddy).
to remind us this was no longer our fathers' NFL...
and one game in New England... TJ Ward was a 5'10", built like a brick Safety, that made Belicheck his one day bitch for doing the same with Gronk.. Whoops-zie!
-
Claypool is taller.......but speed is about the same.......also...his arms are shorter than Peeps, his hands are smaller, he can't jump as high...4 inches difference.....does that make up for the two inches that Claypool is taller? Claypool 21 pounds heavier per this.
The .06 difference in speed is neglible. (unless you are running the Olympics). Wingspan the same really.
But, then Claypool was drafted #49, and Sunshine Superman taken #187. ....138 spots behind .
Maybe a better comparison would be between Claypool and Njoku?
As much as it pains me to say this - Pittsburgh's tradition of finding successful WRs in the draft dating back to Swann and Stallworth up through today is as good as it gets.
As much as it pains me to say this - Pittsburgh's tradition of finding successful WRs in the draft dating back to Swann and Stallworth up through today is as good as it gets.
Well, maybe. Though I would not say that the Brown's by any means take a back seat there, at least historically. The Browns duo of Warfield and Collins IMO...is better than Stallworth and Swann. (Its just that the Steelers did win those 4 titles with them). But look at the stats....Browns duo wins that.
And to be honest, I feel that Josh Gordon was more innately talented than Antonio Brown....its just that A.Brown was able to go longer in his career than Gordon before they both went full Retard on us.
And right now....in my opinion our receiving corps is vastly superior to the Steelers.
And, of course, if you want to go way back, the Browns had a HOF duo in Lavelli and Speedie. Steelers never had anything of the sort.
In the 80s the Browns clearly had the better WR corps.
Now, between say 1990 and 2010....I would not pretend that the Browns had better.
-
Claypool is not only 6-4, 240, but he runs a 4.42 forty. That's a scary combination. Think a bigger, faster Shannon Sharpe.
My point with AB is that you STILL don't need to be tall to be really good.
I told you he was fast. You're getting what I want you to see Ice. Seattle's Metcalf has the same frame - same quicks which makes asking a 5'9" corner (since this discussion centered around Minnifield (from a hands on bump and run scheme). I put up a volume of big WRs that can run. Not only that, one of the last times Gronk was healthy enough to suit up against us - they put him out wide so we'd put a corner on him (hoping to see an 8 year old trying to cover his daddy). Or, how about when Minnesota put a 6'4" Randy Moss in the slot as a rookie where he faced a lot of shorter corners he could outrun and outjump? Check out the stats that compiled to remind us this was no longer our fathers' NFL...
One of my first replies in this thread brought up a 2 time All American talent Antoine Winfield in a match-up vrs Michigan State's Plexico Burress. OSU rathoused MSU in the first half of that game. Then, MSU exploited the size differential of Plexico Burress 6'6" vrs 5'9" Winfield (regardless of his elite skillset). Aside from the height difference, now you factor in the huge catch radius advantage Burress enjoyed to understand Nick Saban's path to erasing the huge deficit and ruining any shot the Buckeyes had at a National Championship that year. The Buckeyes never really adjusted to this; because it was actually an adjustment Saban implemented that shifted the momentum and the entire complexion of the game. This was a lot like asking a point guard to stop Shaq from scoring. Not gonna happen regardless of how talented the point guard is/was.
To your point, that didn't stop Winfield from going on to enjoy a successful NFL career. IMO, what made Winfield special was he was one of the best open field tacklers on the planet aside from his ability to cover. When I watched him play, my football wood factor went from balsa to sequoia...
I told you he was fast. You're getting what I want you to see Ice. Seattle's Metcalf has the same frame - same quicks which makes asking a 5'9" corner (since this discussion centered around Minnifield (from a hands on bump and run scheme). I put up a volume of big WRs that can run. Not only that, one of the last times Gronk was healthy enough to suit up against us - they put him out wide so we'd put a corner on him (hoping to see an 8 year old trying to cover his daddy). Or, how about when Minnesota put a 6'4" Randy Moss in the slot as a rookie where he faced a lot of shorter corners he could outrun and outjump? Check out the stats that compiled to remind us this was no longer our fathers' NFL...
One of my first replies in this thread brought up a 2 time All American talent Antoine Winfield in a match-up vrs Michigan State's Plexico Burress. OSU rathoused MSU in the first half of that game. Then, MSU exploited the size differential of Plexico Burress 6'6" vrs 5'9" Winfield (regardless of his elite skillset). Aside from the height difference, now you factor in the huge catch radius advantage Burress enjoyed to understand Nick Saban's path to erasing the huge deficit and ruining any shot the Buckeyes had at a National Championship that year. The Buckeyes never really adjusted to this; because it was actually an adjustment Saban implemented that shifted the momentum and the entire complexion of the game. This was a lot like asking a point guard to stop Shaq from scoring. Not gonna happen....
To your point, that didn't stop Winfield from going on to enjoy a successful NFL career. IMO, what made Winfield special was he was one of the best open field tacklers on the planet aside from his ability to cover. When I watched him play, my football wood factor went from balsa to sequoia...
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said - yes, a tall WR is a nice luxury. It is ONE of the factors.
And I'd still take Minni or Darrell Green on my team any day, right now. The were like fly paper.
-
I told you he was fast. You're getting what I want you to see Ice. Seattle's Metcalf has the same frame - same quicks which makes asking a 5'9" corner (since this discussion centered around Minnifield (from a hands on bump and run scheme). I put up a volume of big WRs that can run. Not only that, one of the last times Gronk was healthy enough to suit up against us - they put him out wide so we'd put a corner on him (hoping to see an 8 year old trying to cover his daddy). Or, how about when Minnesota put a 6'4" Randy Moss in the slot as a rookie where he faced a lot of shorter corners he could outrun and outjump? Check out the stats that compiled to remind us this was no longer our fathers' NFL...
One of my first replies in this thread brought up a 2 time All American talent Antoine Winfield in a match-up vrs Michigan State's Plexico Burress. OSU rathoused MSU in the first half of that game. Then, MSU exploited the size differential of Plexico Burress 6'6" vrs 5'9" Winfield (regardless of his elite skillset). Aside from the height difference, now you factor in the huge catch radius advantage Burress enjoyed to understand Nick Saban's path to erasing the huge deficit and ruining any shot the Buckeyes had at a National Championship that year. The Buckeyes never really adjusted to this; because it was actually an adjustment Saban implemented that shifted the momentum and the entire complexion of the game. This was a lot like asking a point guard to stop Shaq from scoring. Not gonna happen....
To your point, that didn't stop Winfield from going on to enjoy a successful NFL career. IMO, what made Winfield special was he was one of the best open field tacklers on the planet aside from his ability to cover. When I watched him play, my football wood factor went from balsa to sequoia...
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said - yes, a tall WR is a nice luxury. It is ONE of the factors.
And I'd still take Minni or Darrell Green on my team any day, right now. The were like fly paper.
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said - yes, a tall WR is a nice luxury. It is ONE of the factors.
And I'd still take Minni or Darrell Green on my team any day, right now. The were like fly paper.
I know. And I'm glad you appreciate Minnifield's talent enough for the confidence you have in him as an All Era kind of guy. You're probably right that there would be a spot for him somewhere in a secondary today. At the same position with the same success on the perimeter? I just think he'd find far tougher sledding against the higher volume of taller/heavier WRs outside of the bump and run scheme he previously thrived in (without a Hanford Dixon frequently responsible for covering the opponent's #1 WR). Aside from how many decades ago he played, that's a lot of changes. None of this means I didn't like what he did for us 30-35 years ago without an elite pass rush. And I think that's what Tia was referring o at the top of page 2 when he didn't think anyone paying attention to NFL trends/era changes required further explanation. My guess is Minni's size would have him cover the slot; but it's not that easy to press guys lining up off the line of scrimmage - especially the speedsters with ideal change of direction. Or, he could be what the next generation of Antoine Winfield will be at 5'9" tall - a Safety first with certain packages assigning him to a 3rd down corner role (slot assignment or zone). Whatever...
Darrell Green was the NFL's fastest man with great agility/hips; so he'd still be able to play in this era somewhere in the secondary.
FWIW, rumor had it that Hanford Dixon was frequently but unofficially clocked in the 4.2s down at So Miss before we drafted him 22nd overall in the 1st round.
-
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said - yes, a tall WR is a nice luxury. It is ONE of the factors.
And I'd still take Minni or Darrell Green on my team any day, right now. The were like fly paper.
I know. And I'm glad you appreciate Minnifield's talent enough for the confidence you have in him as an All Era kind of guy. You're probably right that there would be a spot for him somewhere in a secondary today. At the same position with the same success on the perimeter? I just think he'd find far tougher sledding against the higher volume of taller/heavier WRs outside of the bump and run scheme he previously thrived in (without a Hanford Dixon frequently responsible for covering the opponent's #1 WR). Aside from how many decades ago he played, that's a lot of changes. None of this means I didn't like what he did for us 30-35 years ago without an elite pass rush. And I think that's what Tia was referring o at the top of page 2 when he didn't think anyone paying attention to NFL trends/era changes required further explanation. My guess is Minni's size would have him cover the slot; but it's not that easy to press guys lining up off the line of scrimmage - especially the speedsters with ideal change of direction. Or, he could be what the next generation of Antoine Winfield will be at 5'9" tall - a Safety first with certain packages assigning him to a 3rd down corner role (slot assignment or zone). Whatever...
Darrell Green was the NFL's fastest man with great agility/hips; so he'd still be able to play in this era somewhere in the secondary.
FWIW, rumor had it that Hanford Dixon was frequently but unofficially clocked in the 4.2s down at So Miss before we drafted him 22nd overall in the 1st round.
I know. And I'm glad you appreciate Minnifield's talent enough for the confidence you have in him as an All Era kind of guy. You're probably right that there would be a spot for him somewhere in a secondary today. At the same position with the same success on the perimeter? I just think he'd find far tougher sledding against the higher volume of taller/heavier WRs outside of the bump and run scheme he previously thrived in (without a Hanford Dixon frequently responsible for covering the opponent's #1 WR). Aside from how many decades ago he played, that's a lot of changes. None of this means I didn't like what he did for us 30-35 years ago without an elite pass rush. And I think that's what Tia was referring o at the top of page 2 when he didn't think anyone paying attention to NFL trends/era changes required further explanation. My guess is Minni's size would have him cover the slot; but it's not that easy to press guys lining up off the line of scrimmage - especially the speedsters with ideal change of direction. Or, he could be what the next generation of Antoine Winfield will be at 5'9" tall - a Safety first with certain packages assigning him to a 3rd down corner role (slot assignment or zone). Whatever...
Darrell Green was the NFL's fastest man with great agility/hips; so he'd still be able to play in this era somewhere in the secondary.
FWIW, rumor had it that Hanford Dixon was frequently but unofficially clocked in the 4.2s down at So Miss before we drafted him 22nd overall in the 1st round.
4.2's is sick speed. That's Deion level speed there. I tried to find Minni highlights and nothing comes up! All they have is Minni AND Dixon vids, I know it was a long time ago, but geez man. I thought you could find anything on youtube!
-
I know. And I'm glad you appreciate Minnifield's talent enough for the confidence you have in him as an All Era kind of guy. You're probably right that there would be a spot for him somewhere in a secondary today. At the same position with the same success on the perimeter? I just think he'd find far tougher sledding against the higher volume of taller/heavier WRs outside of the bump and run scheme he previously thrived in (without a Hanford Dixon frequently responsible for covering the opponent's #1 WR). Aside from how many decades ago he played, that's a lot of changes. None of this means I didn't like what he did for us 30-35 years ago without an elite pass rush. And I think that's what Tia was referring o at the top of page 2 when he didn't think anyone paying attention to NFL trends/era changes required further explanation. My guess is Minni's size would have him cover the slot; but it's not that easy to press guys lining up off the line of scrimmage - especially the speedsters with ideal change of direction. Or, he could be what the next generation of Antoine Winfield will be at 5'9" tall - a Safety first with certain packages assigning him to a 3rd down corner role (slot assignment or zone). Whatever...
Darrell Green was the NFL's fastest man with great agility/hips; so he'd still be able to play in this era somewhere in the secondary.
FWIW, rumor had it that Hanford Dixon was frequently but unofficially clocked in the 4.2s down at So Miss before we drafted him 22nd overall in the 1st round.
4.2's is sick speed. That's Deion level speed there. I tried to find Minni highlights and nothing comes up! All they have is Minni AND Dixon vids, I know it was a long time ago, but geez man. I thought you could find anything on youtube!
4.2's is sick speed. That's Deion level speed there. I tried to find Minni highlights and nothing comes up! All they have is Minni AND Dixon vids, I know it was a long time ago, but geez man. I thought you could find anything on youtube!
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
-
4.2's is sick speed. That's Deion level speed there. I tried to find Minni highlights and nothing comes up! All they have is Minni AND Dixon vids, I know it was a long time ago, but geez man. I thought you could find anything on youtube!
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
That's probably why he said "It was reported in college he ran 4.2s" instead of actually stating it as fact.
-
4.2's is sick speed. That's Deion level speed there. I tried to find Minni highlights and nothing comes up! All they have is Minni AND Dixon vids, I know it was a long time ago, but geez man. I thought you could find anything on youtube!
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
Considering Paul Brown allegedly came up with it, I would guess so. Probably wasn't well-known info, though.
-
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
That's probably why he said "It was reported in college he ran 4.2s" instead of actually stating it as fact.
That's probably why he said "It was reported in college he ran 4.2s" instead of actually stating it as fact.
Thanks Ice! Yeah, I said "FWIW, rumor had it that Hanford Dixon was frequently but unofficially clocked in the 4.2s down at So Miss before we drafted him 22nd overall in the 1st round." The NFL combines didn't start up until 1982; and they moved to Indy in 1987. I don't know what they did for official times back then beyond NFL teams doing the "we shall see for ourselves with the stop watch." My guess? If he ran in the 4.2s for anybody - he would have been drafted before we got to him at #22 overall.
-
I am not sure they were testing 40 times back in the 80s. Were they?
Considering Paul Brown allegedly came up with it, I would guess so. Probably wasn't well-known info, though.
Considering Paul Brown allegedly came up with it, I would guess so. Probably wasn't well-known info, though.
I couldn't tell if Gips was busting my balls or not. But yeah, I thought I've read the same thing about Paul Browns' advanced scouting technology well before everyone wanted to give Tom Landry all the credit for doing a lot of the things Brown had already been doing in the 40s, 50s and 60s.
-
Considering Paul Brown allegedly came up with it, I would guess so. Probably wasn't well-known info, though.
I couldn't tell if Gips was busting my balls or not. But yeah, I thought I've read the same thing about Paul Browns' advanced scouting technology well before everyone wanted to give Tom Landry all the credit for doing a lot of the things Brown had already been doing in the 40s, 50s and 60s.
I couldn't tell if Gips was busting my balls or not. But yeah, I thought I've read the same thing about Paul Browns' advanced scouting technology well before everyone wanted to give Tom Landry all the credit for doing a lot of the things Brown had already been doing in the 40s, 50s and 60s.
No, not busting your balls at all. I just don't ever recall seeing 40 times from only as far back as the 80s. At one point we had tried to see if there were 40 times available for Jim Brown, but could not find anything. If you know where we can get 40 times for players from the 80s....Dixon, Minnifield, Kosar!! Slaughter, etc. let us know.
-
Neither one of those guys ran 4.2 40's. Maybe 4.5 or a little higher.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login