Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87
-
Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate. The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January...
I think you’re right about the votes. I was against it when Obama wanted to put one in right before an election and I’m against Trump doing it.
I think you’re right about the votes. I was against it when Obama wanted to put one in right before an election and I’m against Trump doing it.
Except in this case - look what they did to Kavanaugh - they tried to destroy him, his family, his career, with fake witnesses and
vile attacks in the leftwing media (pretty much an oxymoron when talking about the msm).
Liberal activism = MAKING lefty law, instead of interpreting adherence to our U.S. CONSTITUTION/BILL OF RIGHTS.
and that isn't wrong. The politics have gotten so evil and corrupt and vicious, the democrats are no more - it's more resembling the nazi party pre-WWII.
For the sake of our entire country and way of life - ALL judges must be originalists. or we are doomed to repeat world history.
We are in a fight for our way of life and liberty. Look at the democrat run cities - burning down - violence, murders, assasinations of children and police.
Of course Pres Trump should nominate another originalist. That is never a problem with me, regardless of the time frame.
Justice Ginsburg should have retired a year or two ago - so there.
-
Speaking of Justice Ginsburg - most of us know that she was great friends with Justice Scalia.
that is pretty cool.
She also lamented the nasty proceeding of the last two rep - nominated judges.
She says she wishes they could go back to how it was fair and bipartisan - that is how she got to
become a Justice.
She was a leftie legitimately - I just never agreed with her opinions legal opinions - she was apt to
consider international law over our U.S. Constitutuion/Bill of Rights.
That is dangerous.
-
‘THIS THIS THIS’: John Fund explains why the U.S. needs a full complement of SCOTUS Justices for election day
-
egad.
If we ever try to replace Justice Ginsburg...they will WHAT?
-
You aren't bright, but that isn't your fault.
How many days out from the presidential election was Merrick Garland nominated by Obama? Did Mitch McConnell let that go through? Asking for a friend...
Why is it you nearly always? try to rub your alleged engineering degree in people's faces?
My question, under the circumstances was valid. That's from a long conversation with someone who used to live in Venezuela when it was a great place. He escaped with his life, giving up his coffee bean farm, after getting kidnapped twice, and threatened with his life, etc.
You are extremely ignorant, and you emotionally and sickly knee jerk into personal attacks. I asked a simple question. Do you need it explained to you word for word?
No personal attack, just a valid point. Why is how long it was... do you think Justices die on schedule, asswhole?
THAT is how you became known as the forum's woodpecker - for good reason.
Why is it you nearly always? try to rub your alleged engineering degree in people's faces?
My question, under the circumstances was valid. That's from a long conversation with someone who used to live in Venezuela when it was a great place. He escaped with his life, giving up his coffee bean farm, after getting kidnapped twice, and threatened with his life, etc.
You are extremely ignorant, and you emotionally and sickly knee jerk into personal attacks. I asked a simple question. Do you need it explained to you word for word?
No personal attack, just a valid point. Why is how long it was... do you think Justices die on schedule, asswhole?
THAT is how you became known as the forum's woodpecker - for good reason.
I never mentioned a degree. And "alleged"? Haha. I think you have your own issues there.
You also gotta love you doing the thing where you personally attack someone and then say you didn't. Better than you claiming "self defense" or some nonsense.
You're sick obsession with me and that nickname is also your own personal problem.
Again, you aren't bright. Thinking that replacing a liberal justice with another makes us venezuela is just stupid. It's the fear mongering you're fed and eat up on a daily basis. You believe it, because, as I said, you aren't bright.
You also completely slipped over the second part of that post. I imagine it is because your biased right wing "news" sites haven't told you what to say yet. By tomorrow they'll have some excuse for why it was ok to deny Obama's appointee 9 months out but not Trump's less than 2 months out.
I'm sure you'll be flooding this board with nonsense tomorrow morning from The Blaze and the like once you know the marching orders....
Edit: never mind. Looks like you're already posting Blaze links. And your argument is.. fear mongering. Surprise there. Of course it would be something emotional. Or that she "should have retired a year or two ago"... Ok? That's the best excuse you have to be completely hypocritical? And yes, it is completely hypocritical. I know you always forget but all of your posts still exist on here. You thinking one thing when it's Trump and the opposite when it's Obama is stored on this forum. You have no spine or ideology.
-
Yes despite the inevitable Democrat dirty tricks I hope the president is able to successfully place a Marshall conservative on the scotus.
I expect some of this bullshit from the Liberals and the Democrats unfortunately we're seeing it from the fake conservatives. Meaning the guys that hate Trump but pretend that they would like to have a conservative president in the White House. Now they're going to fight hard for as liberal a justice as possible. Come on guys. Pretend whoever this nomination is came from Mike Pence. Or any other Republican you pretend to like. Or admit that you just turned liberal in your dotage.
Depending a liberal Justice just to fuck with the president is a bad idea for the country.
WSS
-
You aren't bright, but that isn't your fault.
How many days out from the presidential election was Merrick Garland nominated by Obama? Did Mitch McConnell let that go through? Asking for a friend...
Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate. The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January...
The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January...
You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
You aren't bright, but that isn't your fault.
How many days out from the presidential election was Merrick Garland nominated by Obama? Did Mitch McConnell let that go through? Asking for a friend...
Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate. The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January...
Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate. The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January...
Nor should the Republicans forget the filthy and unfounded smear tactics against Kavanaugh. And no Garland wasn't a lunatic.
WSS
-
Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
-
Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Can't wait to see how CNN will make it's own interpretation in order to bash Trump.
-
You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.
I knew he had to be wrong on something.
-
You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.
I knew he had to be wrong on something.
-
You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.
I actually thought the same still applied. Forgot McConnell changed the rules in ‘17
-
The next supreme court battle will be ruthless.(Rimshot)
If Trump can find a black female conservative to take her place the libs heads will fall off. They hopefully can survive the hell of all the questions about what they wrote in their high school yeabook.
-
So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?
Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I agree with folks who believe it will be a highly, highly qualified woman. Would they dare "Kavanaugh" a woman?
I'm not so sure they won't try. and if they vote against a woman for the Supreme Court...
well, that would lose a whole LOT of votes for sleepy not all there joe hoboken harris.
Yes, hold a vote before the election. Need a full court for all the frivolous lawsuits already being
set up all over America.
BTW, the reason to go ahead and have a vote, what the left refuses to admit - is to protect our Constitution/Bill of Rights.
by George Soros.
(oops, am I allowed to say george soros ?)
see, biden and harris have openly bragged and gloated about the leftwing soros-funded attorneys in our judicial system.
the dems appointed leftwing radicals who thought more of liberal causes and cherry-picked international law (Justice Ginsburg has referred to that in the past, defying our Constitution/Bill of Rights).
In defense of true AMERICAN justice - it is important now, to get a Pres Trump appointed nominee voted on.
The decision to go global law and toss away our Constitution/Bill of Rights or defend American Liberty and Justice for all...
is at stake.
Presidents take an oath to defend us....obaMao broke that promise with his nominees.
America First judge to the Supreme Court immediately. To KEEP THE PROMISE to defend our Constitution/Bill of Rights, way of life, and put America first.
-
The dems would definitely Kavanaugh a woman. The will stop at nothing to undermine this President.
-
So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?
Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?
So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?
Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?
To answer your question, no. That's how politics works though. And the Republicans have the Senate right now.
Also Obama was a lame duck? Does that help?
WSS
-
So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?
Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?
So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?
Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?
For one thing Trump isn't a lame duck.
Secondly with Obama it was a Republican Senate. Republican Senates are generally in line with Republican presidents, and generally oppose Demonrat presidents.
Thats the way the game is played and the Republicans have the ball.
I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem if everything was reversed.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login