Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
115 Posts 15 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
    • 64k Posts
    • 8k Reputation
    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
    #16

    Speaking of Justice Ginsburg - most of us know that she was great friends with Justice Scalia.

    that is pretty cool.

    She also lamented the nasty proceeding of the last two rep - nominated judges.

    She says she wishes they could go back to how it was fair and bipartisan - that is how she got to

    become a Justice.

       She was a leftie legitimately - I just never agreed with her opinions legal opinions - she was apt to

    consider international law over our U.S. Constitutuion/Bill of Rights.

    That is dangerous.

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/04/29/scotus-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-laments-over-recent-dem-obstruction-in-senate

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #17

      https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2020/09/18/this-this-this-john-fund-explains-why-the-u-s-needs-a-full-complement-of-scotus-justices-for-election-day/

      ‘THIS THIS THIS’: John Fund explains why the U.S. needs a full complement of SCOTUS Justices for election day

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #18

        egad.

        If we ever try to replace Justice Ginsburg...they will WHAT?

        https://www.pacificpundit.com/2020/09/18/reza-aslan-former-cnn-hack-threatens-to-burn-the-entire-fcking-thing-down/

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • C calfoxwc

          @mld-woody said:

          You aren't bright, but that isn't your fault. 

          How many days out from the presidential election was Merrick Garland nominated by Obama? Did Mitch McConnell let that go through? Asking for a friend...

          Why is it you nearly always? try to rub your alleged engineering degree in people's faces?

          My question, under the circumstances was valid. That's from a long conversation with someone who used to live in Venezuela when it was a great place. He escaped with his life, giving up his coffee bean farm, after getting kidnapped twice, and threatened with his life, etc.

              You are extremely ignorant, and you emotionally and sickly knee jerk into personal attacks. I asked a simple question. Do you need it explained to you word for word?

          No personal attack, just a valid point. Why is how long it was... do you think Justices die on schedule, asswhole?

          THAT is how you became known as the forum's woodpecker - for good reason.

          MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
          • 33k Posts
          • 3k Reputation
          MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by MLD Woody
          #19

          @calfoxwc said:

          Why is it you nearly always? try to rub your alleged engineering degree in people's faces?

          My question, under the circumstances was valid. That's from a long conversation with someone who used to live in Venezuela when it was a great place. He escaped with his life, giving up his coffee bean farm, after getting kidnapped twice, and threatened with his life, etc.

              You are extremely ignorant, and you emotionally and sickly knee jerk into personal attacks. I asked a simple question. Do you need it explained to you word for word?

          No personal attack, just a valid point. Why is how long it was... do you think Justices die on schedule, asswhole?

          THAT is how you became known as the forum's woodpecker - for good reason.

          I never mentioned a degree. And "alleged"? Haha. I think you have your own issues there.

          You also gotta love you doing the thing where you personally attack someone and then say you didn't. Better than you claiming "self defense" or some nonsense. 

          You're sick obsession with me and that nickname is also your own personal problem.

          Again, you aren't bright. Thinking that replacing a liberal justice with another makes us venezuela is just stupid. It's the fear mongering you're fed and eat up on a daily basis. You believe it, because, as I said, you aren't bright. 

          You also completely slipped over the second part of that post. I imagine it is because your biased right wing "news" sites haven't told you what to say yet. By tomorrow they'll have some excuse for why it was ok to deny Obama's appointee 9 months out but not Trump's less than 2 months out. 

          I'm sure you'll be flooding this board with nonsense tomorrow morning from The Blaze and the like once you know the marching orders....

          Edit: never mind. Looks like you're already posting Blaze links. And your argument is.. fear mongering. Surprise there. Of course it would be something emotional. Or that she "should have retired a year or two ago"... Ok? That's the best excuse you have to be completely hypocritical? And yes, it is completely hypocritical. I know you always forget but all of your posts still exist on here. You thinking one thing when it's Trump and the opposite when it's Obama is stored on this forum. You have no spine or ideology. 

          Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
            • 39k Posts
            • 9k Reputation
            W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
            #20

            Yes despite the inevitable Democrat dirty tricks I hope the president is able to successfully place a Marshall conservative on the scotus.

            I expect some of this bullshit from the Liberals and the Democrats unfortunately we're seeing it from the fake conservatives. Meaning the guys that hate Trump but pretend that they would like to have a conservative president in the White House. Now they're going to fight hard for as liberal a justice as possible. Come on guys. Pretend whoever this nomination is came from Mike Pence. Or any other Republican you pretend to like. Or admit that you just turned liberal in your dotage.

            Depending a liberal Justice just to fuck with the president is a bad idea for the country.

            WSS

            www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • hoortaH hoorta

              @mld-woody said:

              You aren't bright, but that isn't your fault. 

              How many days out from the presidential election was Merrick Garland nominated by Obama? Did Mitch McConnell let that go through? Asking for a friend...

              Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by  MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate.  The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

              Canton Dawg Canton DawgC Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
              • 12k Posts
              • 7k Reputation
              Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
              #21

              @hoorta said:

              The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

              You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

              Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
              GorkaG ComeonmanC hoortaH 3 Replies Last reply
              😂
              Quote Reply
              • hoortaH hoorta

                @mld-woody said:

                You aren't bright, but that isn't your fault. 

                How many days out from the presidential election was Merrick Garland nominated by Obama? Did Mitch McConnell let that go through? Asking for a friend...

                Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by  MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate.  The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

                Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                • 39k Posts
                • 9k Reputation
                W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                #22

                @hoorta said:

                Exactly Woodster. Bet the ranch Republicans have a short attention span and try to nominate another conservative justice. And before I get attacked by  MAGAs, that's the #1 reason with a bullet why I voted for Trump in the first place. Any attempt by DT to pack the Court in a lame duck term will fly like a lead balloon in the Senate.  The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

                Nor should the Republicans forget the filthy and unfounded smear tactics against Kavanaugh. And no Garland wasn't a lunatic.

                WSS

                www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                1 Reply Last reply
                👍
                Quote Reply
                • Kvoethe KvoetheK Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 924 Reputation
                  KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Not a fan...but she put in sime work.  RIP

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                    • 28k Posts
                    • 6k Reputation
                    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                     

                    Donald J. Trump
                     
                     
                     
                    Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
                    Image may contain: text
                     
                     
                     
                    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                    GorkaG 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

                       

                      Donald J. Trump
                       
                       
                       
                      Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
                      Image may contain: text
                       
                       
                       
                      Gorka GorkaG Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In Week One Done One Month Later Very Popular
                      • 4k Posts
                      • 2k Reputation
                      GorkaG Gorka wrote on last edited by Gorka
                      #25

                      @diehardbrownsfan said:

                       

                      Donald J. Trump
                       
                       
                       
                      Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
                      Image may contain: text
                       
                       
                       

                      Can't wait to see how CNN will make it's own interpretation in order to bash Trump.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg

                        @hoorta said:

                        The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

                        You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                        Gorka GorkaG Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In Week One Done One Month Later Very Popular
                        • 4k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        GorkaG Gorka wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        @canton-dawg said:

                        You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                        I knew he had to be wrong on something.

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • GorkaG Gorka

                          @canton-dawg said:

                          You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                          I knew he had to be wrong on something.

                          calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                          • 64k Posts
                          • 8k Reputation
                          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          @gorka said:

                          I knew he had to be wrong on something.

                          He's wrong about a lot. Emotional kneejerksies does that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg

                            @hoorta said:

                            The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

                            You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                            Comeonman ComeonmanC Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                            • 2k Posts
                            • 359 Reputation
                            ComeonmanC Comeonman wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            @canton-dawg said:

                            You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                            I actually thought the same still applied. Forgot McConnell changed the rules in ‘17

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • Kvoethe KvoetheK Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 3k Posts
                              • 924 Reputation
                              KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote on last edited by Kvoethe
                              #29

                              The next supreme court battle will be ruthless.(Rimshot)

                              If Trump can find a black female conservative to take her place the libs heads will fall off.  They hopefully can survive the hell of all the questions about what they wrote in their high school yeabook. 

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              😂
                              Quote Reply
                              • MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                                • 33k Posts
                                • 3k Reputation
                                MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?

                                Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?

                                Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                                W GorkaG 2 Replies Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                  • 64k Posts
                                  • 8k Reputation
                                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  I agree with folks who believe it will be a highly, highly qualified woman. Would they dare "Kavanaugh" a woman?

                                  I'm not so sure they won't try. and if they vote against a woman for the Supreme Court...

                                  well, that would lose a whole LOT of votes for sleepy not all there joe hoboken harris.

                                  Yes, hold a vote before the election. Need a full court for all the frivolous lawsuits already being

                                  set up all over America.

                                     BTW, the reason to go ahead and have a vote, what the left refuses to admit - is to protect our Constitution/Bill of Rights.

                                  by George Soros.

                                  (oops, am I allowed to say george soros ?)

                                  see, biden and harris have openly bragged and gloated about the leftwing soros-funded attorneys in our judicial system.

                                  the dems appointed leftwing radicals who thought more of liberal causes and cherry-picked international law (Justice Ginsburg has referred to that in the past, defying our Constitution/Bill of Rights).

                                     In defense of true AMERICAN justice - it is important now, to get a Pres Trump appointed nominee voted on.

                                  The decision to go global law and toss away our Constitution/Bill of Rights or defend American Liberty and Justice for all...

                                  is at stake.

                                      Presidents take an oath to defend us....obaMao broke that promise with his nominees.

                                  America First judge to the Supreme Court immediately. To KEEP THE PROMISE to defend our Constitution/Bill of Rights, way of life, and put America first.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                    • 28k Posts
                                    • 6k Reputation
                                    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    The dems would definitely Kavanaugh a woman.  The will stop at nothing to undermine this President.

                                    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                      So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?

                                      Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?

                                      Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                      • 39k Posts
                                      • 9k Reputation
                                      W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @mld-woody said:

                                      So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?

                                      Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?

                                      To answer your question, no. That's how politics works though. And the Republicans have the Senate right now.

                                      Also Obama was a lame duck? Does that help?

                                      WSS

                                      www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      👍
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                                        So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?

                                        Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?

                                        Gorka GorkaG Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In Week One Done One Month Later Very Popular
                                        • 4k Posts
                                        • 2k Reputation
                                        GorkaG Gorka wrote on last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @mld-woody said:

                                        So how can you want Trump to nominate and confirm a justice right away less than 2 months out from election but also previously fought against Obama doing the same 9 months out?

                                        Is there any way you can completely change your tune without obviously being a partisan hypocritical biased hack?

                                        For one thing Trump isn't a lame duck.

                                        Secondly with Obama it was a Republican Senate. Republican Senates are generally in line with Republican presidents, and generally oppose Demonrat presidents.

                                        Thats the way the game is played and the Republicans have the ball.

                                         I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem if everything was reversed.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg

                                          @hoorta said:

                                          The Democrats aren't about to forget the Garland gambit- there's no way in hell Mitch and his pals are going to get 60+ yes votes before January... 

                                          You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                                          hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 20k Posts
                                          • 5k Reputation
                                          hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @canton-dawg said:

                                          You’re spreading more nonsense, the Senate only needs 51 votes.

                                          Yeah, I read it wrong, that was apparently a % that need to get it out of the Judiciary committee to a floor vote. 

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate