Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87
-
You're just a stupid liberal
And I'm all for nuking this place
Why nuk it? If you don't like it, don't come here. Simple.
Why nuk it? If you don't like it, don't come here. Simple.
I’m surprised he hasn’t left for Canada, nobody in America likes a limp wristed bird boy.
-
I was going to post a Washington Post article but you have to subscribe to open it up. The gist of it was if McConnell pushes through Supreme Court nomination Biden should pack the court. That was pretty much the headline. I hope McConnell pushes through a marshall conservative. I have no doubt Joe Biden and his band of rats will pack the courts and a way. Because if he wins there's not much doubt they will take the Senate and retain the house.
WSS
-
It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom....
You're just a stupid liberal
And I'm all for nuking this place
You're just a stupid liberal
Redundant
-
-
It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom....
And you see it that way because you're a liberal now. Or a Trump hater which causes you to accept the liberal point of view. What you guys want is a liberal mr. T. You won't find a more reasonable moderator than myself. You just want to punish those who don't agree with you. And a handful of the board liberals just love that kind of shit.
WSS
And you see it that way because you're a liberal now. Or a Trump hater which causes you to accept the liberal point of view. What you guys want is a liberal mr. T. You won't find a more reasonable moderator than myself. You just want to punish those who don't agree with you. And a handful of the board liberals just love that kind of shit.
WSS
yep, you betcha.
-
You're just a stupid liberal
And I'm all for nuking this place
Because you're not man enough to avoid it. Kind of like the assholes who pretend to he cares about safety but insists on going to placess where people don't wear masks just so he can bitch.
WSS
Because you're not man enough to avoid it. Kind of like the assholes who pretend to he cares about safety but insists on going to placess where people don't wear masks just so he can bitch.
WSS
double yep.
-
You're just a stupid liberal
And I'm all for nuking this place
Why nuk it? If you don't like it, don't come here. Simple.
Why nuk it? If you don't like it, don't come here. Simple.
it's the liberal desperation for victimization.
and it is NOT being disagreed with. It's being an antagonistic
jerk to get negative ("victimization") response, so they can then
complain about it.
Very strange, and disingenuous.
-
Why nuk it? If you don't like it, don't come here. Simple.
I’m surprised he hasn’t left for Canada, nobody in America likes a limp wristed bird boy.
I’m surprised he hasn’t left for Canada, nobody in America likes a limp wristed bird boy.
It's complicated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodpecker
The majority of woodpeckers are sedentary but there are a few examples of migratory species such as the rufous-bellied woodpecker and yellow-bellied sapsucker,[14] and the Eurasian wryneck breeds in Europe and west Asia and migrates to the Sahel in Africa in the winter.[15] More northerly populations of Lewis's woodpecker, northern flicker, Williamson's sapsucker, red-breasted sapsucker and red-naped sapsucker all move southwards in the fall in North America.[14] Most woodpecker movements can be described as dispersive, such as when young birds seek territories after fledging, or eruptive, to escape harsh weather conditions. Several species are altitudinal migrants, for example the grey-capped woodpecker, which moves to lowlands from hills during the winter months. The woodpeckers that do migrate do so during the day.[2]
https://www.audubon.org/news/listen-woodpeckers-making-their-winter-homes-fall
It turns out that some woodpecker species stay year round in the region where they nest, while others migrate south in winter. Those that remain through the colder months – well, it’s safe to say they’re not nesting now. No, these fall excavators are chiseling out roosting cavities, snug hollows where they’ll shelter during the cold nights of fall and winter.
Many woodpeckers roost in such cavities, usually by themselves. Even the young, once they’re fledged, have to find their own winter quarters.
With woodpeckers, once the nights turn cold, it’s every bird for itself, for they are rarely accepted by any other kind of bird - they are too antagonistic, ignorant and helpless for other bird species to bother with....
-
I disagree with you, but I don't think you're an idiot.
Imagine that.
Almost like certain people are called morons here because they are, in fact, morons... but because their political views differ
It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom....
It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
You mean guys like Neo? I clearly understand why you would respect him.
They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
You wish that's what is happening. We don't consider hate a POV. We don't consider lies a POV. You, Tex, and Woody pretty have the monopoly on those, thus your liberal friends would have nothing new to offer by posting here.
Case in point. Neo came here and offered nothing other than the same trash you do, only worse.
There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom....
Thats not it. What is really going on here is you're insistence that we fully agree with you. Anything less is unacceptable. We support Trump and you fuckers can't stand it.
-
It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
You mean guys like Neo? I clearly understand why you would respect him.
They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
You wish that's what is happening. We don't consider hate a POV. We don't consider lies a POV. You, Tex, and Woody pretty have the monopoly on those, thus your liberal friends would have nothing new to offer by posting here.
Case in point. Neo came here and offered nothing other than the same trash you do, only worse.
There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom....
Thats not it. What is really going on here is you're insistence that we fully agree with you. Anything less is unacceptable. We support Trump and you fuckers can't stand it.
2 hours ago, hoorta said:It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB.
You mean guys like Neo? I clearly understand why you would respect him.
They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here....
You wish that's what is happening. We don't consider hate a POV. We don't consider lies a POV. You, Tex, and Woody pretty have the monopoly on those, thus your liberal friends would have nothing new to offer by posting here.
There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom....
Thats not it. What is really going on here is you're insistence that we fully agree with you. Anything less is unacceptable. We support Trump and you fuckers can't stand it.
-
-
Why does my name keep coming up? I was only interested in two topics on the political forum, Rittenhouse and masks. I've spoke my mind about them now I'm done. You don't have to like my point of view, I could care less if you do. Looks like I got under somebody's skin. Well I'll just dedicate this to you.
-
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
-
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
And I'll quote Cal
Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist
during the next rep president era. Let the people decide
what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.
What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?
-
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
And I'll quote Cal
Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist
during the next rep president era. Let the people decide
what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.
What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?
What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?
It never went anywhere.
Obamao was a lame duck. with a REPUBLICAN SENATE. Justice Scalia died in 2016.
So, the people decided to not let obamao lame duck a nominee into the Supreme Court.
Now, we have a REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT with a REPUBLICAN SENATE.
Therefore, the people HAVE DECIDED.
and Pres Trump is NOT A LAME DUCK president.
lame duck[ˈˌlām ˈdək]
NOUN-
NORTH AMERICANan official (especially the president) in the final period of office, after the election of a successor."as a lame duck, the president had nothing to lose by approving the deal" ·
-
an ineffectual or unsuccessful person or thing.
-
-
-
From Washington Examiner:
Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020’s race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.
-
THANK GOD PRES TRUMP and VP PENCE ARE LEADING AMERICA TO GREATNESS.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login