Skip to content

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87

Political Discussion
115 15 1.4k
  • @mld-woody said:

    I disagree with you, but I don't think you're an idiot. 

    Imagine that.

    Almost like certain people are called morons here because they are, in fact, morons... but because their political views differ 

    It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here.... 

    There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom.... 

    @hoorta said:

    It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here.... 

    You mean guys like Neo? I clearly understand why you would respect him.

    They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here.... 

    You wish that's what is happening.  We don't consider hate a POV. We don't consider lies a POV.  You, Tex, and Woody pretty have the monopoly on those,  thus your liberal friends would have nothing new to offer by posting here.

    Case in point. Neo came here and offered nothing other than the same trash you do, only worse.

    There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom.... 

    Thats not it. What is really going on here is you're insistence that we fully agree with you. Anything less is unacceptable. We support Trump and you  fuckers can't stand it.

  • @hoorta said:

    It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB. They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here.... 

    You mean guys like Neo? I clearly understand why you would respect him.

    They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here.... 

    You wish that's what is happening.  We don't consider hate a POV. We don't consider lies a POV.  You, Tex, and Woody pretty have the monopoly on those,  thus your liberal friends would have nothing new to offer by posting here.

    Case in point. Neo came here and offered nothing other than the same trash you do, only worse.

    There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom.... 

    Thats not it. What is really going on here is you're insistence that we fully agree with you. Anything less is unacceptable. We support Trump and you  fuckers can't stand it.

    @gorka said:

      2 hours ago, hoorta said:

    It's what I got in a few PMs from some guys with a liberal POV I respect over on TBB.

    You mean guys like Neo? I clearly understand why you would respect him.

    They have no interest in venturing over here to deal with the moronity (is that a word?) that goes on constantly here.... 

    You wish that's what is happening.  We don't consider hate a POV. We don't consider lies a POV.  You, Tex, and Woody pretty have the monopoly on those,  thus your liberal friends would have nothing new to offer by posting here.

    There's only one overriding POV here on the poli board, and if you don't agree with it, by golly you're a moron- for not seeing the true light of Conservative Rightdom.... 

    Thats not it. What is really going on here is you're insistence that we fully agree with you. Anything less is unacceptable. We support Trump and you  fuckers can't stand it.

    RI2020SP.png,,&width=378&trim=true

  • Why does my name keep coming up? I was only interested in two topics on the political forum, Rittenhouse and masks. I've spoke my mind about them now I'm done. You don't have to like my point of view, I could care less if you do. Looks like I got under somebody's skin. Well I'll just dedicate this to you.

  • "When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.

    "Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."

  • "When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.

    "Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."

    @calfoxwc said:

    "When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.

    "Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."

    And I'll quote Cal

    /topic/39872

    Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist

    during the next rep president era. Let the people decide

    what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.

    What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?

  • @calfoxwc said:

    "When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.

    "Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."

    And I'll quote Cal

    /topic/39872

    Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist

    during the next rep president era. Let the people decide

    what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.

    What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?

    @mld-woody said:

    What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?

    It never went anywhere.

    Obamao was a lame duck. with a REPUBLICAN SENATE. Justice Scalia died in 2016.

    So, the people decided to not let obamao lame duck a nominee into the Supreme Court.

    Now, we have a REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT with a REPUBLICAN SENATE.

    Therefore, the people HAVE DECIDED.

    and Pres Trump is NOT A LAME DUCK president.

    lame duck

    [ˈˌlām ˈdək]

    NOUN
    1. NORTH AMERICAN
      an official (especially the president) in the final period of office, after the election of a successor.
      "as a lame duck, the president had nothing to lose by approving the deal" ·
      • an ineffectual or unsuccessful person or thing.
  • From Washington Examiner:

    Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020’s race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.

  • THANK GOD PRES TRUMP and VP PENCE ARE LEADING AMERICA TO GREATNESS.

  • PRESIDENT TRUMP IS STRONG ON CHINA

  • Your delusions and mental gymnastics are equal parts hilarious and disturbing

  • Your delusions and mental gymnastics are equal parts hilarious and disturbing

    @mld-woody said:

    Your delusions and mental gymnastics are equal parts hilarious and disturbing

    get counseling, woodpecker. You are disturbed you betcha.

    Read and STFU.

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/democrats-media-grossly-misrepresent-the-mcconnell-rule-so-what-exactly-is-it

    Democrats, media grossly misrepresent the 'McConnell Rule.' Here's why it doesn't apply now.

  • It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

  • It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    @mld-woody said:

    It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.

    Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.

    WSS

  • It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    @mld-woody said:

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    The democrats orchestrated a hoax in order to remove a president from office. Where was your head then?

  • It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    @mld-woody said:

    It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    "scary female people"

  • @mld-woody said:

    It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical. 

    Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that

    Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.

    Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.

    Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.

    WSS

    Sigh

    Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine. 

    But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.