Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87
-
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
-
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
And I'll quote Cal
Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist
during the next rep president era. Let the people decide
what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.
What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?
-
"When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination, and either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is elevated to the Supreme Court," Obama said in February 2016, just days after Scalia's death.
"Historically, this has not been viewed as a question," he continued. "There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the constitutional text."
And I'll quote Cal
Forget him - wait and get a pro-Constitutionalist
during the next rep president era. Let the people decide
what kind of Justice replaces Scalia.
What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?
What happened to "let the people decide" Cal?
It never went anywhere.
Obamao was a lame duck. with a REPUBLICAN SENATE. Justice Scalia died in 2016.
So, the people decided to not let obamao lame duck a nominee into the Supreme Court.
Now, we have a REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT with a REPUBLICAN SENATE.
Therefore, the people HAVE DECIDED.
and Pres Trump is NOT A LAME DUCK president.
lame duck[ˈˌlām ˈdək]
NOUN-
NORTH AMERICANan official (especially the president) in the final period of office, after the election of a successor."as a lame duck, the president had nothing to lose by approving the deal" ·
-
an ineffectual or unsuccessful person or thing.
-
-
-
From Washington Examiner:
Marquette University released the survey results on Saturday that showed 67% of adults believed the Senate should hold a hearing if a vacancy occurred during 2020’s race, with only 32% opposition — and similar strong numbers across Republicans, Democrats, and independents, who supported holding confirmation hearings at 68-31%, 63-37%, and 71-28% respectively. The poll was completed three days before the death of Ginsburg, the 87-year-old liberal icon who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed in 1993. Ginsburg earned praise from Democrats and Republicans upon news of her death.
-
THANK GOD PRES TRUMP and VP PENCE ARE LEADING AMERICA TO GREATNESS.
-
-
Your delusions and mental gymnastics are equal parts hilarious and disturbing
-
Your delusions and mental gymnastics are equal parts hilarious and disturbing
get counseling, woodpecker. You are disturbed you betcha.
Read and STFU.
Democrats, media grossly misrepresent the 'McConnell Rule.' Here's why it doesn't apply now.
-
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
The democrats orchestrated a hoax in order to remove a president from office. Where was your head then?
-
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
"scary female people"
-
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
It's revisionist history to try and not seem incredibly hypocritical.
Anyone that doesn't have their head up the ass of a political party can see that
"scary female people"
"scary female people"
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sorry Woodrow. You staked your claim; told us you're voting for Joe Biden.
But, to coin a phrase, that's typical Woody. Bitching when you were called a liberal even though you said you were a Bernie Sanders supporter (the most liberal candidate in decades.)
If the shoe fits just man up and wear it.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
"scary female people"
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
Imagine accurately calling out a republican presidential candidate as a con man during the primaries, and then, because you have no spine or value system, completely and irrationally slobbering over him for four years....
Imagine calling out that con then being it's biggest sucker
How sad
-
Elections have consequences. That's why you people , the Democrats since you are now a Biden guy, forced through Obamacare without waiting for the next election to see if the House and Senate would flip.
Maybe you complained loudly about that if so I don't remember it.
WSS
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
Sigh
Sure, I've somehow become a democrat these last four years and I guess you've become an idiot. If Trump has one of those two effects on people I'll take mine.
But you'll just continue living in your own fantasy land so what's the point? Too many posters here just choose to ignore reality.
In 2016, Ginsburg said Senate should hold SCOTUS confirmation hearing during election year
Ginsburg remarked in 2016 that 'nothing in the Constitution' precludes 11th hour nomination.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-in-2016-ginsburg-senate-election-year-vacancy
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login