Group asks President to impose martial law, hold new election
-
WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT!!!"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
-
the point was made, though, that this election was rigged by the left. That is a FACT.
It's also a fact that realistically, nothing can stop them from benefitting. Pandora's box has been opened,
and later on, the damage to America will be very obvious.
WKD: These 3 Countries Tried Socialism. Here's What ...
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/wkd-these-3...
Oct 20, 2019 · After decades of ever-declining economic growth and ever-rising unemployment, all three countries abandoned socialism and turned toward capitalism and the free market.
Socialism: The Failed Idea That Never Dies
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rainerzitelmann/2020/...
Mar 16, 2020 · This is the stage at which intellectuals claim that the country in question—for example the Soviet Union, Maoist China, or now also Venezuela—was never “really” a socialist country.
the point was made, though, that this election was rigged by the left. That is a FACT.
Emotional knee jerky by an unconstitutional American. SCOTUS disagrees, so live with Democracy for a change.
-
-
WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT!!!WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO FIGHT!!!
Dear President (for now) Trump. You swore an oath to "preserve protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States against all threats, foreign and domestic". Guess that doesn't mean much to you now- if it ever did. Sign off on very unconstitutional martial law for a new election? Just because your immense ego is hurt because you lost an election?
I had to look up Pinochet- but if the shoe fits- wear it Donnie. Look in a mirror Cheetos- right now YOU ARE the biggest threat to the Constitution of the United States, and that's truly scary. MHO.
-
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America - American Thinker
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/...
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America. By John Eidson. The century-long attempt to kill capitalism in America gained a dramatic head of steam in the 1960s with the rapid ascendency of ...
**************************************************
So, we MUST fight the corruption of our elections, our Constitution/Bill of Rights, and if you aren't all in with that,
you are pretty much a traitor to your own country, and surely you should just go live in venezuela.
-
-
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America - American Thinker
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/...
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America. By John Eidson. The century-long attempt to kill capitalism in America gained a dramatic head of steam in the 1960s with the rapid ascendency of ...
**************************************************
So, we MUST fight the corruption of our elections, our Constitution/Bill of Rights, and if you aren't all in with that,
you are pretty much a traitor to your own country, and surely you should just go live in venezuela.
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America - American Thinker
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/...
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America. By John Eidson. The century-long attempt to kill capitalism in America gained a dramatic head of steam in the 1960s with the rapid ascendency of ...
**************************************************
So, we MUST fight the corruption of our elections, our Constitution/Bill of Rights, and if you aren't all in with that,
you are pretty much a traitor to your own country, and surely you should just go live in venezuela.
Funny you can actually site Chavez, but have no insight into the playbook he set up that DJT tried to use. Stack the court and steal the election.
EDIT-and you are obviously NOT all-in on the Constitution.
-
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America - American Thinker
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/...
Why the Left Really Wants to Kill America. By John Eidson. The century-long attempt to kill capitalism in America gained a dramatic head of steam in the 1960s with the rapid ascendency of ...
**************************************************
So, we MUST fight the corruption of our elections, our Constitution/Bill of Rights, and if you aren't all in with that,
you are pretty much a traitor to your own country, and surely you should just go live in venezuela.
Funny you can actually site Chavez, but have no insight into the playbook he set up that DJT tried to use. Stack the court and steal the election.
EDIT-and you are obviously NOT all-in on the Constitution.
Funny you can actually site Chavez, but have no insight into the playbook he set up that DJT tried to use. Stack the court and steal the election.
EDIT-and you are obviously NOT all-in on the Constitution.
oh, please, go look up what "stack the court" means. Every president who filled an EMPTY LEGIT SPOT on the court was stacking the court?
Why don't the meaning of words matter to you irrational haters? Go the freak look up the HUNDREDS OF GREAT THINGS PRES TRUMP and PENCE ACCOMPLISHED for AMERICA.
and, name one legit way I'm not all in on the Constitution. You can't, imaginary wonder fighting with windmills.
-
The democrats want to stack the court. How did Trump know a SC Justice would die a month or so before the election. He did the same thing the democrats would have done under Obama if they had majority in the Senate. You guys sure stretch the truth.
-
If they'll cheat in front of the entire world, imagine what they'll do behind our backs.
Our musical works to date http://www.arielsatticmusic.com/ -
Funny you can actually site Chavez, but have no insight into the playbook he set up that DJT tried to use. Stack the court and steal the election.
EDIT-and you are obviously NOT all-in on the Constitution.
oh, please, go look up what "stack the court" means. Every president who filled an EMPTY LEGIT SPOT on the court was stacking the court?
Why don't the meaning of words matter to you irrational haters? Go the freak look up the HUNDREDS OF GREAT THINGS PRES TRUMP and PENCE ACCOMPLISHED for AMERICA.
and, name one legit way I'm not all in on the Constitution. You can't, imaginary wonder fighting with windmills.
and, name one legit way I'm not all in on the Constitution. You can't, imaginary wonder fighting with windmills.
You will not abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court. That by definition makes you against the Constitutional authority granted them as the 3rd power within our Constitutional government. You believe in authoritarianism, not Constitutional government, because you don't like how this all turned out against that Liar whom you still think should be there for another 4 years. He lost. The Supreme Court agrees he lost. But you do not. Logic then says you do not believe in the Constitution.
-
and, name one legit way I'm not all in on the Constitution. You can't, imaginary wonder fighting with windmills.
You will not abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court. That by definition makes you against the Constitutional authority granted them as the 3rd power within our Constitutional government. You believe in authoritarianism, not Constitutional government, because you don't like how this all turned out against that Liar whom you still think should be there for another 4 years. He lost. The Supreme Court agrees he lost. But you do not. Logic then says you do not believe in the Constitution.
You will not abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court. That by definition makes you against the Constitutional authority granted them as the 3rd power within our Constitutional government. You believe in authoritarianism, not Constitutional government, because you don't like how this all turned out against that Liar whom you still think should be there for another 4 years. He lost. The Supreme Court agrees he lost. But you do not. Logic then says you do not believe in the Constitution.
one more time, (are you proud of being dense? is it on purpose...or you can't help it?)
The court did NOT DECIDE. They just didn't HEAR it based on STANDING.
That MEANS that it had nothing to do with the MERITS of the case.
Being happy with the widespread fraud seems very, very cowardly to me. and marxist/communist. That
is what marxists/communists do.
What the guilty states did, was UNCONSTIUTUTIONAL per experts.
You ain't one of em, so go whittle on a toothpick with a rock.
-
You will not abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court. That by definition makes you against the Constitutional authority granted them as the 3rd power within our Constitutional government. You believe in authoritarianism, not Constitutional government, because you don't like how this all turned out against that Liar whom you still think should be there for another 4 years. He lost. The Supreme Court agrees he lost. But you do not. Logic then says you do not believe in the Constitution.
one more time, (are you proud of being dense? is it on purpose...or you can't help it?)
The court did NOT DECIDE. They just didn't HEAR it based on STANDING.
That MEANS that it had nothing to do with the MERITS of the case.
Being happy with the widespread fraud seems very, very cowardly to me. and marxist/communist. That
is what marxists/communists do.
What the guilty states did, was UNCONSTIUTUTIONAL per experts.
You ain't one of em, so go whittle on a toothpick with a rock.
one more time, (are you proud of being dense? is it on purpose...or you can't help it?)
The court did NOT DECIDE. They just didn't HEAR it based on STANDING.
That MEANS that it had nothing to do with the MERITS of the case.
Being happy with the widespread fraud seems very, very cowardly to me. and marxist/communist. That
is what marxists/communists do.
What the guilty states did, was UNCONSTIUTUTIONAL per experts.
You ain't one of em, so go whittle on a toothpick with a rock.
One more time. When the Supreme Court thinks lower courts got it right they vote NOT TO HEAR the case. They let the lower court decisions stand if they agree with them. You need a course in how SCOTUS works. If 4 or more think a lower court made a mistake, they will hear the case and make a full court decision. If none think it has merit, they just send that little "denied" note.
EDIT: Do you really think that if at least 4 members thought that there was widespread voter fraud which decided the election wrongly which the lower courts ruled improperly they would actually choose not to hear the case? If you believe that then you truly have no hope whatsoever. Of course they would hear the case.
-
go read the decision. IT was based on STANDING. Go look up the word. I did. Your infantile rationalization doesn't validate the meaning of real words.
You can go look up the definitions of words online. If you don't know how, don't ask woodpecker because he doesn't know either.
Standing is a matter that is not relevant to merit. You can have plenty of merit, but if you don't have standing, they won't hear a case.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login