Supreme Court dismisses bid led by Texas attorney general to overturn the presidential election results, blocking Trump’s legal path to reverse his loss
-
Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis respond to Friday’s SCOTUS decision
-
Trump Legal Team Responds to SCOTUS Texas Decision, Outlines Their Next Steps
"
“So the answer to that is to bring the case in the district court by the president, by some of the electors, alleging some of the same facts where there would be standing, and therefore get a hearing,” he said. [….]
“Originally we thought about this as possibly four or five separate cases. So that’s the option we’re going to have to go to. There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court,” Giuliani said.
“We’re not finished, believe me,” he said at the end of the interview with a laugh.
It’s also important to note that we don’t know the SCOTUS vote in the Texas matter, since it wasn’t stated. We know there were obviously at least five, enough to reject taking up the matter. Justices Alito and Thomas made a statement that they would have taken it up.
"
Trump Legal Team Responds to SCOTUS Texas Decision, Outlines Their Next Steps
"
“So the answer to that is to bring the case in the district court by the president, by some of the electors, alleging some of the same facts where there would be standing, and therefore get a hearing,” he said. [….]
“Originally we thought about this as possibly four or five separate cases. So that’s the option we’re going to have to go to. There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court,” Giuliani said.
“We’re not finished, believe me,” he said at the end of the interview with a laugh. (AS LONG AS TRUMP IS STILL PAYING ME, I'M LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK
)
It’s also important to note that we don’t know the SCOTUS vote in the Texas matter, since it wasn’t stated. We know there were obviously at least five, enough to reject taking up the matter. Justices Alito and Thomas made a statement that they would have taken it up.
"
Red State, Dead State....
Yawn- just more D-Nile by the Trumpistas.... Funny how Texas claimed Pennsylvania changed their rules- when TEXAS did the same thing. District Court? Too late- Ghool-liani is ignoring the Safe Harbor provision- that any additional appeal(s) at this late date will summarily get laughed out of court. And he's actually a lawyer?
They really have NO, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH "next steps" of any legal consequence. Oh, there will be some theater January in Congress when Trump's lackeys dispute the actual Electoral Votes- when Lackey Pence has them counted- but on a straight line party vote in the House- it's going nowhere.
Facts- a terrible thing to the Trumpistas....
-
Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis respond to Friday’s SCOTUS decision
Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis respond to Friday’s SCOTUS decision
-
weird.
the lefties on the board don't understand the difference between lack of standing, and overruling on the merit.......
and abortion.
and everything else.
They just do not get it - too busy emotionally knee jerking themselves in the face....
-
weird.
the lefties on the board don't understand the difference between lack of standing, and overruling on the merit.......
and abortion.
and everything else.
They just do not get it - too busy emotionally knee jerking themselves in the face....
weird.
the lefties on the board don't understand the difference between lack of standing, and overruling on the merit.......
and abortion.
and everything else.
They just do not get it - too busy emotionally knee jerking themselves in the face....
Weird the guy who predicted the SC would take up his cult leader's case was wrong, but he keeps on posting as if he know what he is talking about.
-
weird.
the lefties on the board don't understand the difference between lack of standing, and overruling on the merit.......
and abortion.
and everything else.
They just do not get it - too busy emotionally knee jerking themselves in the face....
Weird the guy who predicted the SC would take up his cult leader's case was wrong, but he keeps on posting as if he know what he is talking about.
Weird the guy who predicted the SC would take up his cult leader's case was wrong, but he keeps on posting as if he know what he is talking about.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/12/us/politics/republicans-trump-supreme-court-.html
Yep, seems like the ones who demonstrated outside the Supreme Court have a better understanding than cal. SCOTUS did a double shutdown of the crazy trumpy lawsuits this past week. The demonstrators get it, but not cal.
-
-
Sort of like the 700 page nothing burger Kayleigh handed Leslie Stahl? Lots of stacks of paper there.... They could just as well be Amazon inventory reports.
Even Trump told Wood to knock it off.
-
YOU SHOUD, BECAUSE HE DID. CAN I GET YOU A CRYING TOWEL? THE % LOSS WASN'T ENOUGH. JOE STILL GOT PLENTY OF BLACK AND HISPANIC VOTES. OTOH, CARE TO TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED WITH SUBURBAN WOMEN AND WHITE COLLAR WORKERS WHO DESERTED TRUMP IN DROVES? TRUMP LOSING A GOOD PERCENTAGE OF HIS NON COLLEGE EDUCATED WHITE GUYS? OR LINCOLN PROJECT REPUBLICANS WHO WERE DISGUSTED BY ORANGIE'S BULLSHIT? DIDN'T THINK SO.
-
This just in from Texas from a very excellent Trump voting source. See it really ain't over.?
Begin forwarded message:
AUSTIN—The state of Texas is preparing to send 1,000 electors to the electoral college since the Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution doesn’t matter anymore.The move, first reported on TheDonald.win will all but ensure that President Trump is reelected despite our declaration that Kanye West won the disputed presidential election.Typically, Texas would receive 38 electoral college votes, but the Supreme Court has ruled that states can do whatever they want with regard to electoral votes since other states have no standing to contest them.“We’re going to send 1,000 electors and they’re going to vote for President Trump because we need to compensate for the lawless swing states that are voting for Biden based on clearly fraudulent votes,” Texas Governor Greg Abbott said.The electors are set to vote today December 14.President Trump was supportive of the move.“You all may go to Hell and I will go to Texas,” Trump said. -
This just in from Texas from a very excellent Trump voting source. See it really ain't over.?
Begin forwarded message:
AUSTIN—The state of Texas is preparing to send 1,000 electors to the electoral college since the Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution doesn’t matter anymore.The move, first reported on TheDonald.win will all but ensure that President Trump is reelected despite our declaration that Kanye West won the disputed presidential election.Typically, Texas would receive 38 electoral college votes, but the Supreme Court has ruled that states can do whatever they want with regard to electoral votes since other states have no standing to contest them.“We’re going to send 1,000 electors and they’re going to vote for President Trump because we need to compensate for the lawless swing states that are voting for Biden based on clearly fraudulent votes,” Texas Governor Greg Abbott said.The electors are set to vote today December 14.President Trump was supportive of the move.“You all may go to Hell and I will go to Texas,” Trump said.President Trump was supportive of the move.“You all may go to Hell and I will go to Texas,” Trump said.You might be confusing the president with another real American Davy Crockett.
You remember him, the King of the Wild Frontier.
WSS
-
President Trump was supportive of the move.“You all may go to Hell and I will go to Texas,” Trump said.
You might be confusing the president with another real American Davy Crockett.
You remember him, the King of the Wild Frontier.
WSS
You might be confusing the president with another real American Davy Crockett.
You remember him, the King of the Wild Frontier.
WSS
Actually I was thinking of that and in fact sent that Crockett quote back to my friend who sent me this with the comment that he ? would likely meet the same destiny near the Alamo.?
In some attic in Texas somewhere there is probably still one of those coonskin caps made popular in the 50s.
BTW interesting little factoid from history. Meriwether Lewis wore a coonskin cap during the Lewis & Clark expedition.
-
A recount of illegal ballots gets the same result?
with no signature verified again?
who woulda thunk it?
golly gee.
-
And once again just for grins SCOTUS speaks out today.
-
A recount of illegal ballots gets the same result?
with no signature verified again?
who woulda thunk it?
golly gee.
A recount of illegal ballots gets the same result?
with no signature verified again?
who woulda thunk it?
golly gee.
Gotta pull the illegal ballot stunt out of the hat again, huh? Already told you once- those signature were verified. But that's not enough for conspiracy theorists. Just keep counting them until you get the result you want. They're only illegal votes if they don't have Trump's name on it. Of course Trump's lawyers want you to think the picture of those stacks of paper in a warehouse are actually fake ballots, and not Amazon invoices or something similar.
I thunk you're out of excuses that have been tossed out of court over 50 times...
Phony election claim- phony lawyers. No wonder some of Trump's legal team abruptly quit in Pennsylvania- they were legitimately concerned they'd get disbarred if they kept up the charade….
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-12-14/trumps-election-lawyers-should-be-disbarred
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login