Fox reporter asks important Hunter questions as Biden ducks
-
He lasted 47 years in politics and Trump lasted 4
Beijing Biden lost twice what has he done for the American people?
-
Face it, your guy lost and he lost to a hack.
True hacked voting machines, hacked mail in ballots, hacked vote counting areas....and much more!
-
He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies
He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie
I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.
Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.
He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.
History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies
He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie
more nonsense. Mexico has been paying for it, indirectly, with mobilizing their "army" to stop the influx.
and, repealing obaMAOcare, you need to look up the DEFINITION of "lie", instead of emotionally knee jerking
and twerking bs.
What is the definition of the word lie?Lie(noun) a falsehood uttered or acted for the purpose of deception; an intentional violation of truth; an untruth spoken with the intention to deceive. Lie(noun) a fiction; a fable; an untruth. Lie(noun) anything which misleads or disappoints.************************************************************************SO, MY INTENT, many of us - is to build the wall and make mexico pay for it. That isn't a lie -it's just hard to do directly.And MY INTENT in voting for PRES TRUMP, was also to repeal obaMaocare. That was not a lie, Pres Trump didn't lie -but the repeal must be accomplished by the House, which is infested with the contaminated brains of democrats.A goal not achieved is not a "lie". Having ZERO cooperation from the hater KKK/Nazi democrats in Congress.... causes problems with accomplishments.Saying your goal is a bill to send payments to Americans - and the House pads it with stupidass garbage, and refuses to vote on it until after the election?Corruption in the House - by dems - doesn't mean Pres Trump lied.Buy a dictionary. or, just type in a wood, and get a definition before you use it.But, emotional knee jerk wise - it makes you happy to slur with words in error, si? -
He probably should just lie, it worked for the last guy.
He probably should just lie, it worked for the last guy.
Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.
PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies
He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie
I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.
Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.
He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.
History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.
I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.
Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.
He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.
History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.
Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS.
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
Trump has falsely said 206 times that he passed the biggest tax cut in history. Even before his tax cut was crafted, he promised it would be the biggest in U.S. history — bigger than President Ronald Reagan’s in 1981. Reagan’s tax cut amounted to 2.9 percent of the gross domestic product, and none of the proposals under consideration came close to that level. Yet Trump persisted in this fiction even when the tax cut was eventually crafted to be the equivalent of 0.9 percent of gross domestic product, making it the eighth-largest tax cut in 100 years.
That fits the dictionary definition of a lie
-
I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.
Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.
He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.
History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.
Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS.
Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS.
Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?
and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.
Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.
-
Trump has falsely said 206 times that he passed the biggest tax cut in history. Even before his tax cut was crafted, he promised it would be the biggest in U.S. history — bigger than President Ronald Reagan’s in 1981. Reagan’s tax cut amounted to 2.9 percent of the gross domestic product, and none of the proposals under consideration came close to that level. Yet Trump persisted in this fiction even when the tax cut was eventually crafted to be the equivalent of 0.9 percent of gross domestic product, making it the eighth-largest tax cut in 100 years.
That fits the dictionary definition of a lie
Trump has falsely said 206 times that he passed the biggest tax cut in history. Even before his tax cut was crafted, he promised it would be the biggest in U.S. history — bigger than President Ronald Reagan’s in 1981. Reagan’s tax cut amounted to 2.9 percent of the gross domestic product, and none of the proposals under consideration came close to that level. Yet Trump persisted in this fiction even when the tax cut was eventually crafted to be the equivalent of 0.9 percent of gross domestic product, making it the eighth-largest tax cut in 100 years.
That fits the dictionary definition of a lie
wrong. IT's dishonest to establish a different criteria for judging. the same goes for last minute leftwing changes to benefit the democrats in the last election. The GDP fluctuates.
https://www.crfb.org/blogs/president-trumps-tax-cut-largest-history
"In nominal dollars, it would almost certainly be the largest in history. "
-
Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS.
Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?
and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.
Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.
Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?
and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.
Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.
So if a democrat breaks a promise, it’s a lie. But if a republican does it, it’s the democrats fault for not cooperating
-
I could go on listing Trump lies. But what’s the point? You will just twist it to your narrative
-
Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?
and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.
Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.
So if a democrat breaks a promise, it’s a lie. But if a republican does it, it’s the democrats fault for not cooperating
So if a democrat breaks a promise, it’s a lie. But if a republican does it, it’s the democrats fault for not cooperating
nonsense. Let me know how many of these obaMao lies are republicans' fault. I'll wait.
https://www.westernjournal.com/ten-of-barack-obamas-worst-lies/
-
He probably should just lie, it worked for the last guy.
Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.
PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please.
WSS
Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.
PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please.
WSS
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
-
Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.
PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please.
WSS
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
Mot Democrats do.
-
Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.
PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please.
WSS
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
hello........ didn't read the thread, right?
-
Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.
PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please.
WSS
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.
Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.
WSS
-
Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”. Just make sure you are only violating federal law
But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.
Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.
WSS
But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.
Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.
WSS
I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce. I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be. The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.
For the record I’m a Republican
-
But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.
Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.
WSS
I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce. I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be. The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.
For the record I’m a Republican
I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce. I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be. The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.
For the record I’m a Republican
Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.
And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA.
??
WSS
-
But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.
Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.
WSS
I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce. I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be. The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.
For the record I’m a Republican
For the record I’m a Republican
??
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce. I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be. The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.
For the record I’m a Republican
Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.
And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA.
??
WSS
Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.
And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA.
??
WSS
Expose, no it’s not illegal. Obtaining information from a foreign power and believing it to be true, using as a political tool, still not illegal. Employing a foreign power to “dig up” or provide information in a political opponent is illegal.
As I’ve said in the past, labels are meaningless. I look at each decision and try to make the most informed decision possible. My registered party does not require me to believe in everything the party supports. To blindly follow party politics is a dangerous path.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login