Skip to content

Fox reporter asks important Hunter questions as Biden ducks

Political Discussion
41 8 450
  • Face it, your guy lost and he lost to a hack. 

    @browns149 said:

    Face it, your guy lost and he lost to a hack. 

    True hacked voting machines, hacked mail in ballots, hacked vote counting areas....and much more! 😉

  • @vambo said:

    How did he lie his way into office?

    He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies

    He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie

    @browns149 said:

    He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies

    He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie

    I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.

    Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.

    He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.

    History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.

  • @vambo said:

    How did he lie his way into office?

    He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies

    He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie

    @browns149 said:

    He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies

    He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie

    more nonsense. Mexico has been paying for it, indirectly, with mobilizing their "army" to stop the influx.

    and, repealing obaMAOcare, you need to look up the DEFINITION of "lie", instead of emotionally knee jerking

    and twerking bs.

    What is the definition of the word lie?
    Lie(noun) a falsehood uttered or acted for the purpose of deception; an intentional violation of truth; an untruth spoken with the intention to deceive. Lie(noun) a fiction; a fable; an untruth. Lie(noun) anything which misleads or disappoints.
     
    ************************************************************************
        SO, MY INTENT, many of us - is to build the wall and make mexico pay for it. That isn't a lie -
    it's just hard to do directly.
     
       And MY INTENT in voting for PRES TRUMP, was also to repeal obaMaocare. That was not a lie, Pres Trump didn't lie -
    but the repeal must be accomplished by the House, which is infested with the contaminated brains of democrats.
      
       A goal not achieved is not a "lie". Having ZERO cooperation from the hater KKK/Nazi democrats in Congress.... causes problems with accomplishments.
     
        Saying your goal is a bill to send payments to Americans - and the House pads it with stupidass garbage, and refuses to vote on it until after the election?
        Corruption in the House - by dems - doesn't mean Pres Trump lied.
     
        Buy a dictionary. or, just type in a wood, and get a definition before you use it.
    But, emotional knee jerk wise - it makes you happy to slur with words in error, si?
  • He probably should just lie, it worked for the last guy.

    @baconhound said:

    He probably should just lie, it worked for the last guy.

    Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.

    PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please. 

    WSS

  • @browns149 said:

    He said he would build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. 2 lies

    He said he repeal Obamacare. Yet another lie

    I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.

    Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.

    He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.

    History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.

    @canton-dawg said:

    I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.

    Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.

    He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.

    History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.

    Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS. 

  • Trump has falsely said 206 times that he passed the biggest tax cut in history. Even before his tax cut was crafted, he promised it would be the biggest in U.S. history — bigger than President Ronald Reagan’s in 1981. Reagan’s tax cut amounted to 2.9 percent of the gross domestic product, and none of the proposals under consideration came close to that level. Yet Trump persisted in this fiction even when the tax cut was eventually crafted to be the equivalent of 0.9 percent of gross domestic product, making it the eighth-largest tax cut in 100 years.

    That fits the dictionary definition of a lie

  • @canton-dawg said:

    I was told by that other guy, if I liked my doctor I could keep my doctor.

    Same guy said if I liked my plan, I could keep my plan.

    He also said my healthcare premiums wouldn’t go up.

    History proved he was a fucking liar on all 3 counts, and the dipshits in this country re-elected him.

    Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS. 

    @browns149 said:

    Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS. 

    Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?

    and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.

    Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.

  • Trump has falsely said 206 times that he passed the biggest tax cut in history. Even before his tax cut was crafted, he promised it would be the biggest in U.S. history — bigger than President Ronald Reagan’s in 1981. Reagan’s tax cut amounted to 2.9 percent of the gross domestic product, and none of the proposals under consideration came close to that level. Yet Trump persisted in this fiction even when the tax cut was eventually crafted to be the equivalent of 0.9 percent of gross domestic product, making it the eighth-largest tax cut in 100 years.

    That fits the dictionary definition of a lie

    @browns149 said:

    Trump has falsely said 206 times that he passed the biggest tax cut in history. Even before his tax cut was crafted, he promised it would be the biggest in U.S. history — bigger than President Ronald Reagan’s in 1981. Reagan’s tax cut amounted to 2.9 percent of the gross domestic product, and none of the proposals under consideration came close to that level. Yet Trump persisted in this fiction even when the tax cut was eventually crafted to be the equivalent of 0.9 percent of gross domestic product, making it the eighth-largest tax cut in 100 years.

    That fits the dictionary definition of a lie

    wrong. IT's dishonest to establish a different criteria for judging. the same goes for last minute leftwing changes to benefit the democrats in the last election. The GDP fluctuates.

    https://www.crfb.org/blogs/president-trumps-tax-cut-largest-history

    "In nominal dollars, it would almost certainly be the largest in history. "

  • @browns149 said:

    Just goes to prove my point. THEY ARE ALL LIARS. 

    Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?

    and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.

    Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?

    and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.

    Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.

    So if  a democrat breaks a promise, it’s a lie. But if a republican does it, it’s the democrats fault for not cooperating

  • I could go on listing Trump lies. But what’s the point? You will just twist it to your narrative

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Except where were you during eight years of obaMao/biden/higgardly/brennan/clapper/mueller/etc lies?

    and obaMao and biden BROKE all of their promises. They lied.

    Pres Trump KEPT HIS PROMISES. Go look it up. I have posted about it a lot.

    So if  a democrat breaks a promise, it’s a lie. But if a republican does it, it’s the democrats fault for not cooperating

    @browns149 said:

    So if  a democrat breaks a promise, it’s a lie. But if a republican does it, it’s the democrats fault for not cooperating

    nonsense. Let me know how many of these obaMao lies are republicans' fault. I'll wait.

    https://www.westernjournal.com/ten-of-barack-obamas-worst-lies/

  • @baconhound said:

    He probably should just lie, it worked for the last guy.

    Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.

    PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please. 

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.

    PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please. 

    WSS

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

  • @westside-steve said:

    Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.

    PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please. 

    WSS

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    @baconhound said:

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    Mot Democrats do. 😉

  • @westside-steve said:

    Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.

    PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please. 

    WSS

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    @baconhound said:

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    hello........ didn't read the thread, right?

  • @westside-steve said:

    Or we could have a full-scale investigation for the next four years and see where that goes.

    PS just for the record you don't think he's lying now? Please. 

    WSS

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    @baconhound said:

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.

    Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.

    WSS

  • @baconhound said:

    Investigate away, Trump is just laying the foundation for “Pardon Politics”.  Just make sure you are only violating federal law

    But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.

    Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.

    Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.

    WSS

    I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce.  I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be.  The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.

    For the record I’m a Republican 

  • @westside-steve said:

    But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.

    Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.

    WSS

    I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce.  I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be.  The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.

    For the record I’m a Republican 

    @baconhound said:

    I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce.  I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be.  The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.

    For the record I’m a Republican 

    Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.

    And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA. 

    ??

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    But you understand there won't be an investigation because you guys kept the House of Representatives. It's as simple as that. You're a smart guy I think you would have to admit the Russian collusion thing was a farce yet will the Democrats controlled house it lasted for years.

    Regardless I'm not sure that it is or should be illegal to expose the wrongdoings or the dirt of your opponent no matter where the information came from. On the other hand bribery and influence peddling by a public official is probably illegal.

    WSS

    I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce.  I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be.  The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.

    For the record I’m a Republican 

    @baconhound said:

    For the record I’m a Republican 

    ??

  • @baconhound said:

    I don’t think the Russian collusion was a farce.  I think it occurred but most politicians are smart enough to insulate themselves and the degree wasn’t what it was made out to be.  The attempted prosecution was a farce as those charges are rarely proven without audio/video evidence of the candidate participating.

    For the record I’m a Republican 

    Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.

    And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA. 

    ??

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.

    And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA. 

    ??

    WSS

    Expose, no it’s not illegal.  Obtaining information from a foreign power and believing it to be true, using as a political tool, still not illegal.  Employing a foreign power to “dig up” or provide information in a political opponent is illegal.

    As I’ve said in the past, labels are meaningless.  I look at each decision and try to make the most informed decision possible.  My registered party does not require me to believe in everything the party supports.  To blindly follow party politics is a dangerous path.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Actually that doesn't address my point really. Is it or should it be illegal to expose wrongdoing on the part of one's opponent, yes or no? I would smell a rat if it were alleged that the Trump Administration made up the information about Hillary's camp. But nobody makes that claim. As a matter of fact the only faked evidence was from Hillary's people. The documents that sparked the investigation in the first place. To an impartial Observer that should seem a lot worse.

    And by the way Michael Moore is a member in good standing of the NRA. 

    ??

    WSS

    Expose, no it’s not illegal.  Obtaining information from a foreign power and believing it to be true, using as a political tool, still not illegal.  Employing a foreign power to “dig up” or provide information in a political opponent is illegal.

    As I’ve said in the past, labels are meaningless.  I look at each decision and try to make the most informed decision possible.  My registered party does not require me to believe in everything the party supports.  To blindly follow party politics is a dangerous path.

    @baconhound said:

    Expose, no it’s not illegal.  Obtaining information from a foreign power and believing it to be true, using as a political tool, still not illegal.  Employing a foreign power to “dig up” or provide information in a political opponent is illegal.

    As I’ve said in the past, labels are meaningless.  I look at each decision and try to make the most informed decision possible.  My registered party does not require me to believe in everything the party supports.  To blindly follow party politics is a dangerous path.

        Some good points. The problem is, it was higardly clinton who paid for a fake dossier, it was obaMao/clinton people who lied to the FISA court, talked about setting up a backup get Pres Trump plan if he won (strzok/page reference), that was the only russian collusion that DID occur. The fact that it hasn't been prosecuted is a "fear the deep swamp" reaction.

    To blindly follow any party - good point. But it applies to both sides of the fence. There are several of those who refuse to talk about how biden's entire family is corrupt, about higgardly/dnc paying for the fake dossier, the fact that biden has never done anything good/great for AMERICA his entire career, would never talk about the obaMao/biden scandals.....

       I am a huge Pres Trump supporter - didn't have much use for him before he showed up in the primaries and I started listening to him and decided he was sincere.

       I support presidents who put American FIRST. Who KEEP THEIR PROMISES. obaMao broke every? promise he ever made.

    I don't know of any promise that Pres Trump broke - keeping in mind that replacing obaMaocare with a better package - he kept that promise to WORK on it - but it failed politically. Failure to get cooperation from the hostile deep swamp leftwing haters isn't a lie or a promise not kept - it was the inability to convince the left to stop being obstinate.

    The last four years of great successes has been ridiculed. I would have loved for obaMao to have kept a few of his promises - and would have appreciated it. But he didn't.