Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Midweek speculations

Midweek speculations

The Browns Board
25 9 576 1

  • No way pitt takes on Wentz.. Wentz may "want" to start and that's cute, but there is noplace for him. My serious guess is that he's the backup next year at Phi because of his albatross of a contract and after that he's out of the league.  He's just not skilled at football.

    So many good young QB's right now, and more coming in..

    Chicago would be insane to waste more seasons with Mitch.

    Panthers may draft a QB - but PJ Walker could also be good if given a legit shot.

    The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
  • U Unsympathetic

    No way pitt takes on Wentz.. Wentz may "want" to start and that's cute, but there is noplace for him. My serious guess is that he's the backup next year at Phi because of his albatross of a contract and after that he's out of the league.  He's just not skilled at football.

    So many good young QB's right now, and more coming in..

    Chicago would be insane to waste more seasons with Mitch.

    Panthers may draft a QB - but PJ Walker could also be good if given a legit shot.

    @unsympathetic said:

    No way pitt takes on Wentz.. Wentz may "want" to start and that's cute, but there is noplace for him. My serious guess is that he's the backup next year at Phi because of his albatross of a contract and after that he's out of the league.  He's just not skilled at football.

    So many good young QB's right now, and more coming in..

    Chicago would be insane to waste more seasons with Mitch.

    Panthers may draft a QB - but PJ Walker could also be good if given a legit shot.

    Regarding Wentz. The Eagles are stuck with him next year,  with a dead money number on the high side of $50 million.  No team in their right mind will be willing to pick him up in a trade,  been frequently injured,  and confidence is shot.

    Regarding  Mitch. Boy was I ever wrong there. He's got career  backup written all over him.  The Bears wasted a lot of draft capital on him. 

    Whoopsie Chicago you could have had Mahomes or DeSean Watson. With 20/20 hindsight,  I think most  Browns fans would trade Myles Garrett for Mahomes straight up.

    👍

  • Just to comment on the Jets.  I stick with Darnold, trade the pick for multiple picks, and dump that idiot of a coach.  Has Darnold been put in a favorable situation?

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    👍 ❤
  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    Just to comment on the Jets.  I stick with Darnold, trade the pick for multiple picks, and dump that idiot of a coach.  Has Darnold been put in a favorable situation?

    @ballpeen said:

    Just to comment on the Jets.  I stick with Darnold, trade the pick for multiple picks, and dump that idiot of a coach.  Has Darnold been put in a favorable situation?

    While I think Darnold so far is just a big oaf... He needs a team built around him... But I'm still not sold...

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~

  • Regarding  Mitch. Boy was I ever wrong there. He's got career  backup written all over him.  The Bears wasted a lot of draft capital on him. 

    Well....to be factual,  the Bears are like  5-2 with Mitch as their starter this year. 2-5 without him in there.   And Foles has been pretty bad when put in there.  Had they played MT the whole way, maybe they would be in position for the playoffs. As it is they are on the outside looking in,  though they are just one game from being in.  

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    Regarding  Mitch. Boy was I ever wrong there. He's got career  backup written all over him.  The Bears wasted a lot of draft capital on him. 

    Well....to be factual,  the Bears are like  5-2 with Mitch as their starter this year. 2-5 without him in there.   And Foles has been pretty bad when put in there.  Had they played MT the whole way, maybe they would be in position for the playoffs. As it is they are on the outside looking in,  though they are just one game from being in.  

    @the-gipper said:

    Regarding  Mitch. Boy was I ever wrong there. He's got career  backup written all over him.  The Bears wasted a lot of draft capital on him. 

    Well....to be factual,  the Bears are like  5-2 with Mitch as their starter this year. 2-5 without him in there.   And Foles has been pretty bad when put in there.  Had they played MT the whole way, maybe they would be in position for the playoffs. As it is they are on the outside looking in,  though they are just one game from being in.  

    Of course I'm pulling for the Cleveland guy. But as you posted, why would  they bring in Foles if they weren't 100% sold on Mitch? 

    I sure wouldn't trade Baker straight up for Mitch either.  

  • hoortaH hoorta

    @the-gipper said:

    Regarding  Mitch. Boy was I ever wrong there. He's got career  backup written all over him.  The Bears wasted a lot of draft capital on him. 

    Well....to be factual,  the Bears are like  5-2 with Mitch as their starter this year. 2-5 without him in there.   And Foles has been pretty bad when put in there.  Had they played MT the whole way, maybe they would be in position for the playoffs. As it is they are on the outside looking in,  though they are just one game from being in.  

    Of course I'm pulling for the Cleveland guy. But as you posted, why would  they bring in Foles if they weren't 100% sold on Mitch? 

    I sure wouldn't trade Baker straight up for Mitch either.  

    @hoorta said:

    Of course I'm pulling for the Cleveland guy. But as you posted, why would  they bring in Foles if they weren't 100% sold on Mitch? 

    I sure wouldn't trade Baker straight up for Mitch either.  

    The only guy I would consider trading for is Patrick Mahomes... I think Baker has done plenty to warrant being the Browns franchise QB for the next 10-12 years..

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~

  • I know its proper, but does speculation really need an "s" to be plural?

    Can we get a ruling from Mrs. Ag?

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    T The GipperT 2 Replies
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    I know its proper, but does speculation really need an "s" to be plural?

    Can we get a ruling from Mrs. Ag?

    @tour2ma said:

    I know its proper, but does speculation really need an "s" to be plural?

    Can we get a ruling from Mrs. Ag?

    Here's my ruling courtesy of google.?

    https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-plural-of/speculation.html#:~:text=The noun speculation can be countable or uncountable.,types of speculations or a collection of speculations.

  • So it's a tie? 😉

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    😂
  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

    I know its proper, but does speculation really need an "s" to be plural?

    Can we get a ruling from Mrs. Ag?

    @tour2ma said:

    I know its proper, but does speculation really need an "s" to be plural?

    Can we get a ruling from Mrs. Ag?

    Yes, and is that really what you have to contribute here?

Log in to reply