What Can Help the Browns
-
We tied Pittsburgh in the first game 2 years ago after we had like 8 turnovers. Joe Schobert made a pick or grabbed a fumble but couldn't finish it. We tried a FG but of course it was ocked or something. I don't really remember, just that we effed it up in typical fashion. We beat them last year when Mason Rudolph played, and then with 10 seconds left Myles Garrett swung a helmet at a player like a psycho and ruined our season because we can't even win correctly.
Right. Thanks for the correction.
This year has been a lot of fun, most fun I've had in years. It really hurt to see us lose to the fucking Jets because our QB is the only QB I've ever seen who can't do a fucking sneak.
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
Oh yeah, I remember. But to be fair, every other team runs that sneak just fine. I've literally NEVER seen a QB fumble it unless they're reaching over the top for a score and it gets swatted out. Baker has fumbled on a sneak multiple times, and don't forget the game a few weeks back where Baker fumbled it and ref blew it dead. No clue what the problem is, but it's bad.
-
We tied Pittsburgh in the first game 2 years ago after we had like 8 turnovers. Joe Schobert made a pick or grabbed a fumble but couldn't finish it. We tried a FG but of course it was ocked or something. I don't really remember, just that we effed it up in typical fashion. We beat them last year when Mason Rudolph played, and then with 10 seconds left Myles Garrett swung a helmet at a player like a psycho and ruined our season because we can't even win correctly.
Right. Thanks for the correction.
This year has been a lot of fun, most fun I've had in years. It really hurt to see us lose to the fucking Jets because our QB is the only QB I've ever seen who can't do a fucking sneak.
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
We had picked up two 3rd and 1 with that exact play earlier in the game. One of them going for 4 yards. Its not a bad play call it was poor execution that time.
-
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
Oh yeah, I remember. But to be fair, every other team runs that sneak just fine. I've literally NEVER seen a QB fumble it unless they're reaching over the top for a score and it gets swatted out. Baker has fumbled on a sneak multiple times, and don't forget the game a few weeks back where Baker fumbled it and ref blew it dead. No clue what the problem is, but it's bad.
Oh yeah, I remember. But to be fair, every other team runs that sneak just fine. I've literally NEVER seen a QB fumble it unless they're reaching over the top for a score and it gets swatted out. Baker has fumbled on a sneak multiple times, and don't forget the game a few weeks back where Baker fumbled it and ref blew it dead. No clue what the problem is, but it's bad.
I have....can you say "Butt Fumble"? ?
-
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
-
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
Or....it means that they think at this point the Browns are just a better team regardless....playing at home. Vegas has no sentimentality. If it announced that the Steeler plan to sit BR and others, expect the line to go even higher.
-
I don't think they think we are the better team, especially since we still don't know if we will get all the players back who sat this week.
-
BUT.....I believe we are the better team at full strength right now!
-
I don't think they think we are the better team, especially since we still don't know if we will get all the players back who sat this week.
I don't think they think we are the better team, especially since we still don't know if we will get all the players back who sat this week.
Well, wait....you surmise that the line is 7 because you think that they think the Steelers will sit their players......while the Browns play at full strength?
but...would they not also adjust the line if the thought the Browns were going to be playing without their WR corps, half their OL, most of the defensive backfield....and their MLB?
I would think this could actually be a situation where they would literally take the game off the board when a team has all those players out...or if there is so much speculation as to whether or not they will be out.
-
I don't think they think we are the better team, especially since we still don't know if we will get all the players back who sat this week.
Well, wait....you surmise that the line is 7 because you think that they think the Steelers will sit their players......while the Browns play at full strength?
but...would they not also adjust the line if the thought the Browns were going to be playing without their WR corps, half their OL, most of the defensive backfield....and their MLB?
I would think this could actually be a situation where they would literally take the game off the board when a team has all those players out...or if there is so much speculation as to whether or not they will be out.
Well, wait....you surmise that the line is 7 because you think that they think the Steelers will sit their players......while the Browns play at full strength?
but...would they not also adjust the line if the thought the Browns were going to be playing without their WR corps, half their OL, most of the defensive backfield....and their MLB?
I would think this could actually be a situation where they would literally take the game off the board when a team has all those players out...or if there is so much speculation as to whether or not they will be out.
Correct they could take it off the board.
I believe the early line posted has taken the following assumptions: Steeler players will rest, Browns WRs will be back.
All things equal we are not a -7 point favorite against the Steelers. Even at home, even in a sleet rain wind storm and their poor rushing attack.
-
Well, wait....you surmise that the line is 7 because you think that they think the Steelers will sit their players......while the Browns play at full strength?
but...would they not also adjust the line if the thought the Browns were going to be playing without their WR corps, half their OL, most of the defensive backfield....and their MLB?
I would think this could actually be a situation where they would literally take the game off the board when a team has all those players out...or if there is so much speculation as to whether or not they will be out.
Correct they could take it off the board.
I believe the early line posted has taken the following assumptions: Steeler players will rest, Browns WRs will be back.
All things equal we are not a -7 point favorite against the Steelers. Even at home, even in a sleet rain wind storm and their poor rushing attack.
Correct they could take it off the board.
I believe the early line posted has taken the following assumptions: Steeler players will rest, Browns WRs will be back.
All things equal we are not a -7 point favorite against the Steelers. Even at home, even in a sleet rain wind storm and their poor rushing attack.
Maybe the bookies have more confidence in the Browns than you do?
-
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
still not a guarantee w.........these are the browns....until proven otherwise, what can go wrong will go wrong......hope we can break that label....
-
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
Or....it means that they think at this point the Browns are just a better team regardless....playing at home. Vegas has no sentimentality. If it announced that the Steeler plan to sit BR and others, expect the line to go even higher.
Or....it means that they think at this point the Browns are just a better team regardless....playing at home. Vegas has no sentimentality. If it announced that the Steeler plan to sit BR and others, expect the line to go even higher.
Vegas does not think one team is better than the other. They predict that putting the line at -7 Cleveland will split the money evenly between the two sides with info available/speculated on right now. Much of the public speculation is the steelers are going to rest some players since being a 2 seed does not come with a bye in the playoffs. Again Vegas is predicting that half the betting public thinks the browns are 7 points better and half the betting public thinks no way the steelers lose by more than 7 points to the browns. Also Vegas line makers do get inside information before the betting public so i assume they do have a pretty good clue as to what he steelers will be doing as far as resting players or playing them.
-
The game has opened up with Cleveland as an early 7 point favorite which tells me one thing, Vegas expects the Steelers to sit their key starters. Vegas is usually pretty accurate.
still not a guarantee w.........these are the browns....until proven otherwise, what can go wrong will go wrong......hope we can break that label....
-
Or....it means that they think at this point the Browns are just a better team regardless....playing at home. Vegas has no sentimentality. If it announced that the Steeler plan to sit BR and others, expect the line to go even higher.
Vegas does not think one team is better than the other. They predict that putting the line at -7 Cleveland will split the money evenly between the two sides with info available/speculated on right now. Much of the public speculation is the steelers are going to rest some players since being a 2 seed does not come with a bye in the playoffs. Again Vegas is predicting that half the betting public thinks the browns are 7 points better and half the betting public thinks no way the steelers lose by more than 7 points to the browns. Also Vegas line makers do get inside information before the betting public so i assume they do have a pretty good clue as to what he steelers will be doing as far as resting players or playing them.
Vegas does not think one team is better than the other. They predict that putting the line at -7 Cleveland will split the money evenly between the two sides with info available/speculated on right now.
Ding ding dingiddy-fuckin' DING...
And every adjustment made to the opening line is based upon how the bets are flowing.
How many times do we have to state this?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Vegas does not think one team is better than the other. They predict that putting the line at -7 Cleveland will split the money evenly between the two sides with info available/speculated on right now.
Ding ding dingiddy-fuckin' DING...
And every adjustment made to the opening line is based upon how the bets are flowing.
How many times do we have to state this?
Ding ding dingiddy-fuckin' DING...
And every adjustment made to the opening line is based upon how the bets are flowing.
How many times do we have to state this?
Sure but the bets flow based on the conditions exist in a particular game. If a team starting quarterback is not going to be playing that will affect the way the money flows. Or if the team is playing without its entire wide receiver corps that would affect it too.
-
We tied Pittsburgh in the first game 2 years ago after we had like 8 turnovers. Joe Schobert made a pick or grabbed a fumble but couldn't finish it. We tried a FG but of course it was ocked or something. I don't really remember, just that we effed it up in typical fashion. We beat them last year when Mason Rudolph played, and then with 10 seconds left Myles Garrett swung a helmet at a player like a psycho and ruined our season because we can't even win correctly.
Right. Thanks for the correction.
This year has been a lot of fun, most fun I've had in years. It really hurt to see us lose to the fucking Jets because our QB is the only QB I've ever seen who can't do a fucking sneak.
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
OK, but honestly...that play should never have been called. Even give it to Janovich. Remember when Fullbacks used to run the ball on short yardage plays?
ya I do, good times
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login