The "It's-later-than-you-think" 2021 Mock Draft Thread
-
Here is who one mock draft has them taking. What do all you "draft experts" say about this possible choice? :
22
6'4"253 lbsHere is who one mock draft has them taking. What do all you "draft experts" say about this possible choice? :
22
6'4"253 lbsNot opposed at all.
I usually don’t like Notre Dame guys but Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah, OLB, Notre Dame caught my attention this year.
Seems like the type of athlete that can chase Lamar too. -
Here is who one mock draft has them taking. What do all you "draft experts" say about this possible choice? :
22
6'4"253 lbsNot opposed at all.
I usually don’t like Notre Dame guys but Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah, OLB, Notre Dame caught my attention this year.
Seems like the type of athlete that can chase Lamar too.Seems like the type of athlete that can chase Lamar too
Maybe, but it'd be better to have someone who could actually catch LJ...
-
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
-
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
And I won't charge you for my earlier opinion that.....despite all of the mocks post-Northwestern that still had him in the Top 5, I said that he WOULD slip down to like 9-10.....because...just as you see here, other than Jags who will take Trevor, none of the other teams before 9-10 are really in the market for a QB.
BUT....I may charge you for my opinion that Zack Wilson of BYU may be taken over Fields....not because Fields would be devalued, but because, I think, Wilson's draft prospect evaluations may skyrocket.
-
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
I see no reason for the Broncos to take a questionable QB when they already have a good one in Lock. Waste of a pick when they need more help in the OL.
-
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
I see no reason for the Broncos to take a questionable QB when they already have a good one in Lock. Waste of a pick when they need more help in the OL.
when they already have a good one in Lock.
You and John Elway might be the only one's to think that.
-
The nice thing about me, Gip... I don't even charge for the premium opinions I provide.
I see no reason for the Broncos to take a questionable QB when they already have a good one in Lock. Waste of a pick when they need more help in the OL.
I see no reason for the Broncos to take a questionable QB when they already have a good one in Lock. Waste of a pick when they need more help in the OL.
Well......I think few would agree with you that the prospects for Lock are better than those for Fields.
Do the "experts on here agree with that?
-
when they already have a good one in Lock.
You and John Elway might be the only one's to think that.
-
when they already have a good one in Lock.
You and John Elway might be the only one's to think that.
Pu
You and John Elway might be the only one's to think that.
Maybe John knows the real problem is in the OL.
-
Pu
Maybe John knows the real problem is in the OL.
Well I'm sure Denver fans hope Elway is better at identifying OL talent than he is QB talent.
Because he's taken 3 top 50 picks on a QB in the last 7 years.
-
Pu
Maybe John knows the real problem is in the OL.
Well I'm sure Denver fans hope Elway is better at identifying OL talent than he is QB talent.
Because he's taken 3 top 50 picks on a QB in the last 7 years.
Well I'm sure Denver fans hope Elway is better at identifying OL talent than he is QB talent.
Because he's taken 3 top 50 picks on a QB in the last 7 years.
And taking Fields would be exactly the same IMO. Time to do exactly what the Browns did. Fix that OL immediately and use the #1 pick on a good one like we did. When you put a decent QB behind it who isn't running for his life every other play, then maybe you can see what he really looks like. Lock has shown me enough to believe he will be good behind an OL that gives him time to really go through progressions.
-
Well I'm sure Denver fans hope Elway is better at identifying OL talent than he is QB talent.
Because he's taken 3 top 50 picks on a QB in the last 7 years.
And taking Fields would be exactly the same IMO. Time to do exactly what the Browns did. Fix that OL immediately and use the #1 pick on a good one like we did. When you put a decent QB behind it who isn't running for his life every other play, then maybe you can see what he really looks like. Lock has shown me enough to believe he will be good behind an OL that gives him time to really go through progressions.
And taking Fields would be exactly the same IMO. Time to do exactly what the Browns did. Fix that OL immediately and use the #1 pick on a good one like we did. When you put a decent QB behind it who isn't running for his life every other play, then maybe you can see what he really looks like. Lock has shown me enough to believe he will be good behind an OL that gives him time to really go through progressions.
I don't think Lock is viewed with the same potential as Baker Mayfield was when we all knew that the Browns were in desperate need of a LT when we drafted Wills. Is he?
-
Call me an OSU homer..Fields may play well or put out a few more bad clips this Friday. I think he’s actually going to play a little more relaxed this Friday.
But I strongly believe he will put on a show during his workouts with his arm, his legs and his mind and he will be a top prospect this draft.
There have been enough flashes of potential in the past season and a half.
-
when they already have a good one in Lock.
You and John Elway might be the only one's to think that.
You and John Elway might be the only one's to think that.
Nah... I, too, think Lock has a chance of making it. He's certainly the best Elway pick to date.
Of course given his other picks... Lynch and the Brockmeister... that ain't saying much.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Nah... I, too, think Lock has a chance of making it. He's certainly the best Elway pick to date.
Of course given his other picks... Lynch and the Brockmeister... that ain't saying much.
The question at hand is do you think that the Broncos should take Justin Fields if he is available when they draft? Or stick with Lock?
-
Nah... I, too, think Lock has a chance of making it. He's certainly the best Elway pick to date.
Of course given his other picks... Lynch and the Brockmeister... that ain't saying much.
Bingo.
While it's a small sample size, some of the Denver games I've watched this year... Lock has made some absolutely unforgivable throws. High school level shit.
And taking Fields would be exactly the same IMO. Time to do exactly what the Browns did. Fix that OL immediately and use the #1 pick on a good one like we did. When you put a decent QB behind it who isn't running for his life every other play, then maybe you can see what he really looks like. Lock has shown me enough to believe he will be good behind an OL that gives him time to really go through progressions.
As for their Oline? They have one of the rising young LT"s in the NFL, a decent pair of guard play (Glasglow is pretty good) and then Demar Dotson, who I don't know much about but PFF has graded him as "starting" level for the season. PFF and I have our spats but I don't recall Dotson being rolled when I watched them. What I do remember is their center be straight trash. And...... Yep, PFF seems to hate him. So at least individual grades seem about eye to eye today. Then again, a terrible center can make or break a line. So I'm not willing to discount what you're saying. Only to point out that if your QB play is elevated by the players around him and not vice versa, then is it really your long-term QB?
Call me an OSU homer..Fields may play well or put out a few more bad clips this Friday. I think he’s actually going to play a little more relaxed this Friday.
But I strongly believe he will put on a show during his workouts with his arm, his legs and his mind and he will be a top prospect this draft.
There have been enough flashes of potential in the past season and a half.
If Fields flops v Clemson or puts some shakes tape, he would do best to come back for another year IMHO. Make your run at the Heisman and Natty fresh with all the chemistry and development that we haven't seen since Troy to Teddy and Gonzo. I can't even begin to stress how rare it is for me to say that as well. A potential 1st round pick? The last time I said a Buckeye should stay was.....Thaddeus Gipson? Maybe? But he wasn't being hyped as a 1st rounder either. So I have to dig deep and say it was a two-fer with Ashton Youboty and Donte' Whitner. The 2006 defense with 2 extra capable DB's instead of trotting out Jamario O'Neal and Yao Smith =( Might not have shit the bed against *ichigan and UF that year.
If Fields struggles and gets drafted on the strength of a scripted workout..? Then congrats, some GM is making the same mistake that has been done hundreds of times before him.
edit: Especially in what will most likely be a very crowded QB class.
-
Nah... I, too, think Lock has a chance of making it. He's certainly the best Elway pick to date.
Of course given his other picks... Lynch and the Brockmeister... that ain't saying much.
Bingo.
While it's a small sample size, some of the Denver games I've watched this year... Lock has made some absolutely unforgivable throws. High school level shit.
And taking Fields would be exactly the same IMO. Time to do exactly what the Browns did. Fix that OL immediately and use the #1 pick on a good one like we did. When you put a decent QB behind it who isn't running for his life every other play, then maybe you can see what he really looks like. Lock has shown me enough to believe he will be good behind an OL that gives him time to really go through progressions.
As for their Oline? They have one of the rising young LT"s in the NFL, a decent pair of guard play (Glasglow is pretty good) and then Demar Dotson, who I don't know much about but PFF has graded him as "starting" level for the season. PFF and I have our spats but I don't recall Dotson being rolled when I watched them. What I do remember is their center be straight trash. And...... Yep, PFF seems to hate him. So at least individual grades seem about eye to eye today. Then again, a terrible center can make or break a line. So I'm not willing to discount what you're saying. Only to point out that if your QB play is elevated by the players around him and not vice versa, then is it really your long-term QB?
Call me an OSU homer..Fields may play well or put out a few more bad clips this Friday. I think he’s actually going to play a little more relaxed this Friday.
But I strongly believe he will put on a show during his workouts with his arm, his legs and his mind and he will be a top prospect this draft.
There have been enough flashes of potential in the past season and a half.
If Fields flops v Clemson or puts some shakes tape, he would do best to come back for another year IMHO. Make your run at the Heisman and Natty fresh with all the chemistry and development that we haven't seen since Troy to Teddy and Gonzo. I can't even begin to stress how rare it is for me to say that as well. A potential 1st round pick? The last time I said a Buckeye should stay was.....Thaddeus Gipson? Maybe? But he wasn't being hyped as a 1st rounder either. So I have to dig deep and say it was a two-fer with Ashton Youboty and Donte' Whitner. The 2006 defense with 2 extra capable DB's instead of trotting out Jamario O'Neal and Yao Smith =( Might not have shit the bed against *ichigan and UF that year.
If Fields struggles and gets drafted on the strength of a scripted workout..? Then congrats, some GM is making the same mistake that has been done hundreds of times before him.
edit: Especially in what will most likely be a very crowded QB class.
As for their Oline? They have one of the rising young LT"s in the NFL, a decent pair of guard play (Glasglow is pretty good) and then Demar Dotson, who I don't know much about but PFF has graded him as "starting" level for the season. PFF and I have our spats but I don't recall Dotson being rolled when I watched them. What I do remember is their center be straight trash. And...... Yep, PFF seems to hate him. So at least individual grades seem about eye to eye today. Then again, a terrible center can make or break a line. So I'm not willing to discount what you're saying.
Only to point out that if your QB play is elevated by the players around him and not vice versa, then is it really your long-term QB?
I think PFF's OL grading is pretty good... at least that was my experience when once-upon-a-time I graded our OL. And, yes, Glasgow is a building block. Really liked him when a scouted him a few drafts ago.
Your QB question is a good one.
My answer is: Yes... until a better one comes along. Goes with my philosophy of you always need to be looking for your next QB. Only the intensity (and price you are willing to pay) vary.
It's why you take a Day 3 QB (or sign a UDFA) close to every year. There's almost always a "dark-horse" out there who has a shot. It's how NE came across TB12. It's like panning for gold.
It's why a Philly spends a 2nd on a Hurts when they have a Wentz.
Even explains a team taking two QBs in the same draft (WSH 2012... RG3 and Cousins).
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Nah... I, too, think Lock has a chance of making it. He's certainly the best Elway pick to date.
Of course given his other picks... Lynch and the Brockmeister... that ain't saying much.
Bingo.
While it's a small sample size, some of the Denver games I've watched this year... Lock has made some absolutely unforgivable throws. High school level shit.
And taking Fields would be exactly the same IMO. Time to do exactly what the Browns did. Fix that OL immediately and use the #1 pick on a good one like we did. When you put a decent QB behind it who isn't running for his life every other play, then maybe you can see what he really looks like. Lock has shown me enough to believe he will be good behind an OL that gives him time to really go through progressions.
As for their Oline? They have one of the rising young LT"s in the NFL, a decent pair of guard play (Glasglow is pretty good) and then Demar Dotson, who I don't know much about but PFF has graded him as "starting" level for the season. PFF and I have our spats but I don't recall Dotson being rolled when I watched them. What I do remember is their center be straight trash. And...... Yep, PFF seems to hate him. So at least individual grades seem about eye to eye today. Then again, a terrible center can make or break a line. So I'm not willing to discount what you're saying. Only to point out that if your QB play is elevated by the players around him and not vice versa, then is it really your long-term QB?
Call me an OSU homer..Fields may play well or put out a few more bad clips this Friday. I think he’s actually going to play a little more relaxed this Friday.
But I strongly believe he will put on a show during his workouts with his arm, his legs and his mind and he will be a top prospect this draft.
There have been enough flashes of potential in the past season and a half.
If Fields flops v Clemson or puts some shakes tape, he would do best to come back for another year IMHO. Make your run at the Heisman and Natty fresh with all the chemistry and development that we haven't seen since Troy to Teddy and Gonzo. I can't even begin to stress how rare it is for me to say that as well. A potential 1st round pick? The last time I said a Buckeye should stay was.....Thaddeus Gipson? Maybe? But he wasn't being hyped as a 1st rounder either. So I have to dig deep and say it was a two-fer with Ashton Youboty and Donte' Whitner. The 2006 defense with 2 extra capable DB's instead of trotting out Jamario O'Neal and Yao Smith =( Might not have shit the bed against *ichigan and UF that year.
If Fields struggles and gets drafted on the strength of a scripted workout..? Then congrats, some GM is making the same mistake that has been done hundreds of times before him.
edit: Especially in what will most likely be a very crowded QB class.
Bingo.
While it's a small sample size, some of the Denver games I've watched this year... Lock has made some absolutely unforgivable throws. High school level shit.
As for their Oline? They have one of the rising young LT"s in the NFL, a decent pair of guard play (Glasglow is pretty good) and then Demar Dotson, who I don't know much about but PFF has graded him as "starting" level for the season. PFF and I have our spats but I don't recall Dotson being rolled when I watched them. What I do remember is their center be straight trash. And...... Yep, PFF seems to hate him. So at least individual grades seem about eye to eye today. Then again, a terrible center can make or break a line. So I'm not willing to discount what you're saying. Only to point out that if your QB play is elevated by the players around him and not vice versa, then is it really your long-term QB?
If Fields flops v Clemson or puts some shakes tape, he would do best to come back for another year IMHO. Make your run at the Heisman and Natty fresh with all the chemistry and development that we haven't seen since Troy to Teddy and Gonzo. I can't even begin to stress how rare it is for me to say that as well. A potential 1st round pick? The last time I said a Buckeye should stay was.....Thaddeus Gipson? Maybe? But he wasn't being hyped as a 1st rounder either. So I have to dig deep and say it was a two-fer with Ashton Youboty and Donte' Whitner. The 2006 defense with 2 extra capable DB's instead of trotting out Jamario O'Neal and Yao Smith =( Might not have shit the bed against *ichigan and UF that year.
If Fields struggles and gets drafted on the strength of a scripted workout..? Then congrats, some GM is making the same mistake that has been done hundreds of times before him.
edit: Especially in what will most likely be a very crowded QB class.
He went from a guy that was careful (‘19 season) with the ball to a guy that was reckless at times in The pursuit of Heisman and making up for lost time due to the BigTen botch job of the season. I’m Making the excuse because I saw enough of ‘19 to make the excuse. ‘19 season - 41 TDs 3 INTs which included the Clemson game and a play that unfortunately defined his season an INT at the expense of the WR taking the wrong turn.
‘20 hasn’t been god awful. It’s been suspect and questionable at times. If you recall he had at one time 12 TDs and 11 Incompletions over the first 3 games.I don’t know enough about the position to claim he’s a lock at the next level. His ball placement at times has been fabulous. He’s made some anticipatory throws well. I think arm strength checks out well. He’s got the size. But He holds the ball too long (sounds like our guy), he moves VERY well which is weapon for some lucky team. He forced the issue more times than most would like this year. He doesn’t look completely out of place under center. He seems like a hard worker and he’s played though injury (knee last year).
Not a Patrick Mahomes comparison here but I’d consider him in the Top 10 sit him for most of the first year and play him at the end like the Chiefs did with Mahomes. Fields has 20 career starts - he’s not fully there yet which makes his skill set too enticing - he has tools that can be greatly enhanced with more snaps.
-
As for their Oline? They have one of the rising young LT"s in the NFL, a decent pair of guard play (Glasglow is pretty good) and then Demar Dotson, who I don't know much about but PFF has graded him as "starting" level for the season. PFF and I have our spats but I don't recall Dotson being rolled when I watched them. What I do remember is their center be straight trash. And...... Yep, PFF seems to hate him. So at least individual grades seem about eye to eye today. Then again, a terrible center can make or break a line. So I'm not willing to discount what you're saying.
Only to point out that if your QB play is elevated by the players around him and not vice versa, then is it really your long-term QB?
I think PFF's OL grading is pretty good... at least that was my experience when once-upon-a-time I graded our OL. And, yes, Glasgow is a building block. Really liked him when a scouted him a few drafts ago.
Your QB question is a good one.
My answer is: Yes... until a better one comes along. Goes with my philosophy of you always need to be looking for your next QB. Only the intensity (and price you are willing to pay) vary.
It's why you take a Day 3 QB (or sign a UDFA) close to every year. There's almost always a "dark-horse" out there who has a shot. It's how NE came across TB12. It's like panning for gold.
It's why a Philly spends a 2nd on a Hurts when they have a Wentz.
Even explains a team taking two QBs in the same draft (WSH 2012... RG3 and Cousins).
I think PFF's OL grading is pretty good... at least that was my experience when once-upon-a-time I graded our OL. And, yes, Glasgow is a building block. Really liked him when a scouted him a few drafts ago.
Your QB question is a good one.
My answer is: Yes... until a better one comes along. Goes with my philosophy of you always need to be looking for your next QB. Only the intensity (and price you are willing to pay) vary.
It's why you take a Day 3 QB (or sign a UDFA) close to every year. There's almost always a "dark-horse" out there who has a shot. It's how NE came across TB12. It's like panning for gold.
It's why a Philly spends a 2nd on a Hurts when they have a Wentz.
Even explains a team taking two QBs in the same draft (WSH 2012... RG3 and Cousins).
Exactly. So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.
I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point. And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good. However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields) because that really doesn't strike me as a winning strategy. At which point when Lawrence is picked #1, teams will have to basically convince themselves they love the next guy. How many times have we see this in the last decade alone? Gabbert, Bortles, Weeden, Manziel, Lynch, etc etc.
-
I think PFF's OL grading is pretty good... at least that was my experience when once-upon-a-time I graded our OL. And, yes, Glasgow is a building block. Really liked him when a scouted him a few drafts ago.
Your QB question is a good one.
My answer is: Yes... until a better one comes along. Goes with my philosophy of you always need to be looking for your next QB. Only the intensity (and price you are willing to pay) vary.
It's why you take a Day 3 QB (or sign a UDFA) close to every year. There's almost always a "dark-horse" out there who has a shot. It's how NE came across TB12. It's like panning for gold.
It's why a Philly spends a 2nd on a Hurts when they have a Wentz.
Even explains a team taking two QBs in the same draft (WSH 2012... RG3 and Cousins).
Exactly. So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.
I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point. And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good. However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields) because that really doesn't strike me as a winning strategy. At which point when Lawrence is picked #1, teams will have to basically convince themselves they love the next guy. How many times have we see this in the last decade alone? Gabbert, Bortles, Weeden, Manziel, Lynch, etc etc.
Exactly. So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.
I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point. And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good. However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields) because that really doesn't strike me as a winning strategy. At which point when Lawrence is picked #1, teams will have to basically convince themselves they love the next guy. How many times have we see this in the last decade alone? Gabbert, Bortles, Weeden, Manziel, Lynch, etc etc.
Or this could be 1983 or 2004 with multiple great QBs. I think we are due.
I think Lock is part of the reason the Broncos haven’t taken off. Reviews are mixed so far - is that fair?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login