Skip to content

Biden's minion says: ‘Don’t be Surprised when Buildings are on Fire’ if Derek Chauvin Isn’t Convicted

Political Discussion
41 9 1.5k 1
  • That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

  • image.thumb.png.ac3f5cb399e74ac01866337823f749c5.png

  • That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

  • That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

    @hoorta said:

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

    Because you're, apparently, in possession of an extra chromosome I won't bother arguing the obvious, that pointing out the state's case is not good isn't the same as sticking up for the defendant. 

    And as for racist, if it's racist to point out facts you should take that up with the new yorker and Eric holder. Tell him what a racist he is. 

    And by the way, fuck you. If I had the respect of an individual such as yourself I don't know that I could respect myself. 

  • Democrats voted unanimously against the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery.
    On April 9, 1866, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was enacted into law. The bill was sponsored by Illinois Republican Senator Lyman Trumbull to "eliminate the discriminatory badge of slavery" from former slaves.
    Zero Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The bill was vetoed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, but the Republican-controlled Congress voted to override the veto.
    The law declared that anyone born in the United States were also citizens regardless of race or previous condition of servitude and entitled to the privileges of citizenship. The term "badge of slavery" was used to describe Jim Crow laws.
    The bill was a temporary solution until the passage of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution two years later.
    Most Democrats voted against the 14th Amendment, granting newly-freed slaves citizenship. Republicans then codified the equal protection tenets of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 into the language of the 14th Amendment, effectively turning the 14th Amendment into a padlock of sorts, making it almost impossible for any future Democrat-majority Congress to repeal the Civil Rights Act of 1866 or otherwise take away the citizenship of African Americans. These are the great lengths that.
    Republicans went to secure Black Americans’ freedom and ensure that no one could ever take away their citizenship.
  • @hoorta said:

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

    Because you're, apparently, in possession of an extra chromosome I won't bother arguing the obvious, that pointing out the state's case is not good isn't the same as sticking up for the defendant. 

    And as for racist, if it's racist to point out facts you should take that up with the new yorker and Eric holder. Tell him what a racist he is. 

    And by the way, fuck you. If I had the respect of an individual such as yourself I don't know that I could respect myself. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Because you're, apparently, in possession of an extra chromosome I won't bother arguing the obvious, that pointing out the state's case is not good isn't the same as sticking up for the defendant. 

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

  • May be an image of text that says 'Due to personal reasons l'll be drinking again this weekend. PanetBeer.net'

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Because you're, apparently, in possession of an extra chromosome I won't bother arguing the obvious, that pointing out the state's case is not good isn't the same as sticking up for the defendant. 

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

    @hoorta said:

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

     Don't know what the beef is about. Looks like involuntary manslaughter should be pretty easy. Murder one not so much.

     Did Floyd deserve it? Nope.  But he did deserve it more than the people on this list. 

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-2019-statistics-on-law-enforcement-officers-killed-in-the-line-of-duty

    And not one city not 1 suburb not even a township went up in flames.

     But unlike the voter fraud this one was at least investigated.

    WSS

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Because you're, apparently, in possession of an extra chromosome I won't bother arguing the obvious, that pointing out the state's case is not good isn't the same as sticking up for the defendant. 

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

    @hoorta said:

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

    If you can't breathe how the hell can you say it?  And for nine minutes?

  • Reasonable Doubt: Floyd's Drug Use And Dealer Trip Up Prosecutors

  • MASSIVE Backfire Against Prosecutor May Have Just Gotten Derek Chauvin Acquitted In Floyd Trial

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Because you're, apparently, in possession of an extra chromosome I won't bother arguing the obvious, that pointing out the state's case is not good isn't the same as sticking up for the defendant. 

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

    @hoorta said:

    States case not good? You're living in LaLa land. No need to elaborate, believe whatever you want to. Unless you're law enforcement or a lawyer, your opinion carries no more weight than mine. I'll defer to one of my friends opinions who's a retired police sergeant. 

    EDIT: OK, I will elaborate. Its so weak the City already shelled out $27 million (excessive IMHO) to settle even before the trial started? There's that little 9 minute video with Floyd yelling "I can't breathe". as evidence.- Expert testimony saying Chauvin had his entire weight on his back, not an approved restraint technique either. Let someone put his entire weight on your chest for ten minutes, and tell me how it feels.

    Why did you have to kneel on a handcuffed guy for nine fucking minutes with three other cops around to help you? Why didn't you get off of the guy when the paramedics showed ? I'll leave you guys to your delusions- just like Trump's fraud claims- I'll make a cameo when the sentence gets announced. 

    And- he's not going to be convicted because the jury is afraid of a riot- he's going to be convicted because he acted like a thug with a badge. Yeah, George Floyd wasn't a model citizen, but he didn't deserve to die for trying to pass a phony $20 bill either. 

    2021-04-11_122615.thumb.jpg.e3255aa06f6f7b9705cd3014cd293698.jpg

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    That is a very gpod piece by the new yorker when they were apparently credible where one eric holder admits black people are not objective jurors

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

    @hoorta said:

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old are those people, 160 +/-  years old?

  • @hoorta said:

    Racist much?   BTW- anyone who's going to stick up for Derek Chauvin will lose any respect from me. Right back at ya. 

    BTW Cisco- there's been PLENTY of testimony at the trial from expert witnesses- that DC FAR exceeded what would be considered "reasonable force" to restrain Floyd.  

    Regarding black jurors- Nah- they're all dumb former slaves, and members of BLM.  

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old are those people, 160 +/-  years old?

    @ballpeen said:

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old is that person, 160 +/-  years old?

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

  • @ballpeen said:

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old is that person, 160 +/-  years old?

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    @hoorta said:

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    You've been say that for months and yet here you are ...talk about credibility!?

  • @ballpeen said:

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old is that person, 160 +/-  years old?

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    @hoorta said:

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    Hoorta translation:

    tenor.gif?itemid=13174130

  • @ballpeen said:

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old is that person, 160 +/-  years old?

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    @hoorta said:

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

  • @hoorta said:

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    You've been say that for months and yet here you are ...talk about credibility!?

    @vambo said:

    You've been say that for months and yet here you are ...talk about credibility!?

    Bye-bye troll boy....   I need a break from the crap that gets spewed here every day.  I should put your sorry ass on ignore, but as a Mod, can't do so.  

  • @ballpeen said:

    Wait, there are former slaves still alive?  I didn't know that.  How old is that person, 160 +/-  years old?

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

    @hoorta said:

    😁 OK, ya got me there- descendants of slaves. 

     Like you me vanbo ball peen Cal the woodpecker and everybody else on this board?

    Vambo is playing the defense's card- as I already said they would- "create reasonable doubt"....  That will be for the jury to decide. How one OJ Simpson got off, but there won't be a civil trial, as the City of Minneapolis already paid up. Time will tell, until then- I'm outta here, they can enjoy their right wing rants and conspiracies to their heart's content.  

     Like it or not OJ was found not guilty by a fair and square court of law.  Whether you like him or not or whether or not you support the law the subsequent persecution was outrageous. They wouldn't have done that to anybody else.  Just one reason I think our legal system sucks.

    I can't imagine that a reasonable doubt is going to make much difference in this officers trial.

    WSS