PSA
-
Tim Couch Pulls Out deserves a special thanks for his comments on this thread. Thank you, Tim.
-
Think about this. In 2 of the 3 games that you are using as your examples he averaged 3.79 and 3.85. That is not good. Using his career YPC isn't a very good strategy either. A lot of those yards were in garbage time or as a 3rd down back and are inflated. Take a look at the numbers of players like K. Faulk or Sproles to see what happens when an ill equipped RB tries to carry the load. Their YPC goes from mid 5s to mid 3s.
All those games were wins buddy. Plus we had absolutely no passing game to speak of. Yet he helped us win those games. He is not Sproles or K. Faulk. He can carry the load. Hillis is the guy who is a gimmick.
All those games were wins buddy. Plus we had absolutely no passing game to speak of. Yet he helped us win those games. He is not Sproles or K. Faulk. He can carry the load. Hillis is the guy who is a gimmick.
YOU ARE THE ONLY GUY ON THIS BOARD THAT DESERVES A CHANCE TO SPEAK, XXXX HILLIS HE'S GARBAGE JEROME IS AN HAS BEEN THE ANSWER FOR A LONG TIME NOW
-
Our most effective running was done last year when we gave Harrison 20+ carries. The results do not lie. You cant expect a 40 yard gain on every play, but you have to get him his carries. Plus he didn't fumble the ball twice on 9 carries. That is unacceptable. And I'm willing to bet i do know more than Mangini about personnel decisions. Football is not rocket science, basic engineering or even chess. It is not that difficult to understand, and you do not need special intelligence or a university degree to coach football.
Yes, that was our most effective running. And once again, that running was against Jacksonville, Oakland, and Kansas City. Those teams finished 19th, 28th, and 31st in rush defense in the league, respectively.
And don't flatter yourself. People are so quick to belittle Mangini, but he's an NFL head coach. He's making six figures on Sundays, and you're stuck at home bitching about him online. If you honestly believe you can do better, then by all means go up to Berea and sit in on a practice. Offer your two cents.
There are millions of men in America who think they can coach better than the pros. They're called armchair quarterbacks, and you're just one of them.
Yes, that was our most effective running. And once again, that running was against Jacksonville, Oakland, and Kansas City. Those teams finished 19th, 28th, and 31st in rush defense in the league, respectively.
And don't flatter yourself. People are so quick to belittle Mangini, but he's an NFL head coach. He's making six figures on Sundays, and you're stuck at home bitching about him online. If you honestly believe you can do better, then by all means go up to Berea and sit in on a practice. Offer your two cents.
There are millions of men in America who think they can coach better than the pros. They're called armchair quarterbacks, and you're just one of them.
And I do believe Tampa was horrible against the run last year. They allowed 4.8 YPC. So why not run Jerome Harrison at least 20 times. And there plenty of people who could handle personnel better than Mangini. Getting into pro coaching is all about connections, not how smart you are. A smart person would never have jacked up the QB situation last year the way Mangini did. There are hundreds of people who knew that was a bad idea, yet they aren't getting paid big money. There's a reason we hire sports columnists to second guess sports coaches, because its not complicated. On the other hand when is the last time you read a newspaper column criticizing design calculations for a jet fighter. Never. Because most people don't have that expertise. Stop acting like football is complicated.
-
Yes, that was our most effective running. And once again, that running was against Jacksonville, Oakland, and Kansas City. Those teams finished 19th, 28th, and 31st in rush defense in the league, respectively.
And don't flatter yourself. People are so quick to belittle Mangini, but he's an NFL head coach. He's making six figures on Sundays, and you're stuck at home bitching about him online. If you honestly believe you can do better, then by all means go up to Berea and sit in on a practice. Offer your two cents.
There are millions of men in America who think they can coach better than the pros. They're called armchair quarterbacks, and you're just one of them.
And I do believe Tampa was horrible against the run last year. They allowed 4.8 YPC. So why not run Jerome Harrison at least 20 times. And there plenty of people who could handle personnel better than Mangini. Getting into pro coaching is all about connections, not how smart you are. A smart person would never have jacked up the QB situation last year the way Mangini did. There are hundreds of people who knew that was a bad idea, yet they aren't getting paid big money. There's a reason we hire sports columnists to second guess sports coaches, because its not complicated. On the other hand when is the last time you read a newspaper column criticizing design calculations for a jet fighter. Never. Because most people don't have that expertise. Stop acting like football is complicated.
And I do believe Tampa was horrible against the run last year. They allowed 4.8 YPC. So why not run Jerome Harrison at least 20 times. And there plenty of people who could handle personnel better than Mangini. Getting into pro coaching is all about connections, not how smart you are. A smart person would never have jacked up the QB situation last year the way Mangini did. There are hundreds of people who knew that was a bad idea, yet they aren't getting paid big money. There's a reason we hire sports columnists to second guess sports coaches, because its not complicated. On the other hand when is the last time you read a newspaper column criticizing design calculations for a jet fighter. Never. Because most people don't have that expertise. Stop acting like football is complicated.
I never once acted like football is complicated. You're just acting like you're the next boy genius, when in reality you're just an armchair quarterback. Believe it or not, I'm quite well learned in football, and I know that you are severely underestimating what it takes to run a professional football team. If you think it's all sunshine and giggles, go right ahead and be my guest. It's not rocket science, but it's not just looking at a guy and saying "Hey, you're fast. You had yards against shit teams. I like you, you be the starter."
Giving Jerome the rock 20 times against Tampa Bay could have given him 200 yards. Or, which is more likely, it would have given him around 60 yards.
Hindsight is 20/20. Stop acting like you're a xxxxing genius.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Yes, that was our most effective running. And once again, that running was against Jacksonville, Oakland, and Kansas City. Those teams finished 19th, 28th, and 31st in rush defense in the league, respectively.
And don't flatter yourself. People are so quick to belittle Mangini, but he's an NFL head coach. He's making six figures on Sundays, and you're stuck at home bitching about him online. If you honestly believe you can do better, then by all means go up to Berea and sit in on a practice. Offer your two cents.
There are millions of men in America who think they can coach better than the pros. They're called armchair quarterbacks, and you're just one of them.
And I do believe Tampa was horrible against the run last year. They allowed 4.8 YPC. So why not run Jerome Harrison at least 20 times. And there plenty of people who could handle personnel better than Mangini. Getting into pro coaching is all about connections, not how smart you are. A smart person would never have jacked up the QB situation last year the way Mangini did. There are hundreds of people who knew that was a bad idea, yet they aren't getting paid big money. There's a reason we hire sports columnists to second guess sports coaches, because its not complicated. On the other hand when is the last time you read a newspaper column criticizing design calculations for a jet fighter. Never. Because most people don't have that expertise. Stop acting like football is complicated.
And I do believe Tampa was horrible against the run last year. They allowed 4.8 YPC. So why not run Jerome Harrison at least 20 times. And there plenty of people who could handle personnel better than Mangini. Getting into pro coaching is all about connections, not how smart you are. A smart person would never have jacked up the QB situation last year the way Mangini did. There are hundreds of people who knew that was a bad idea, yet they aren't getting paid big money. There's a reason we hire sports columnists to second guess sports coaches, because its not complicated. On the other hand when is the last time you read a newspaper column criticizing design calculations for a jet fighter. Never. Because most people don't have that expertise. Stop acting like football is complicated.
Well you can say uncomplicated if you wish- but mind bogglingly detailed. Each player gets critiqued on every freaking play, and opponents are scouted for the slightest tendencies that will give you an advantage. Probably isn't a HC in the NFL that doesn't put in a minimum 16 hour day, seven days a week during the season. Those guys earn their money.
-
And I do believe Tampa was horrible against the run last year. They allowed 4.8 YPC. So why not run Jerome Harrison at least 20 times. And there plenty of people who could handle personnel better than Mangini. Getting into pro coaching is all about connections, not how smart you are. A smart person would never have jacked up the QB situation last year the way Mangini did. There are hundreds of people who knew that was a bad idea, yet they aren't getting paid big money. There's a reason we hire sports columnists to second guess sports coaches, because its not complicated. On the other hand when is the last time you read a newspaper column criticizing design calculations for a jet fighter. Never. Because most people don't have that expertise. Stop acting like football is complicated.
I never once acted like football is complicated. You're just acting like you're the next boy genius, when in reality you're just an armchair quarterback. Believe it or not, I'm quite well learned in football, and I know that you are severely underestimating what it takes to run a professional football team. If you think it's all sunshine and giggles, go right ahead and be my guest. It's not rocket science, but it's not just looking at a guy and saying "Hey, you're fast. You had yards against shit teams. I like you, you be the starter."
Giving Jerome the rock 20 times against Tampa Bay could have given him 200 yards. Or, which is more likely, it would have given him around 60 yards.
Hindsight is 20/20. Stop acting like you're a xxxxing genius.
I never once acted like football is complicated. You're just acting like you're the next boy genius, when in reality you're just an armchair quarterback. Believe it or not, I'm quite well learned in football, and I know that you are severely underestimating what it takes to run a professional football team. If you think it's all sunshine and giggles, go right ahead and be my guest. It's not rocket science, but it's not just looking at a guy and saying "Hey, you're fast. You had yards against shit teams. I like you, you be the starter."
Giving Jerome the rock 20 times against Tampa Bay could have given him 200 yards. Or, which is more likely, it would have given him around 60 yards.
Hindsight is 20/20. Stop acting like you're a xxxxing genius.
He had 9 carries for 52 yards. If you do the math that's better than 5.0 YPC. So what makes you think he would carry 20 times for 60 yards. You don't seem to be well learned in football to me buddy. Last time i checked 5 YPC is pretty good. So why not give him the ball more? Making football more complicated than what it has to be is why Coaches fail. It's not that difficult.
-
I never once acted like football is complicated. You're just acting like you're the next boy genius, when in reality you're just an armchair quarterback. Believe it or not, I'm quite well learned in football, and I know that you are severely underestimating what it takes to run a professional football team. If you think it's all sunshine and giggles, go right ahead and be my guest. It's not rocket science, but it's not just looking at a guy and saying "Hey, you're fast. You had yards against shit teams. I like you, you be the starter."
Giving Jerome the rock 20 times against Tampa Bay could have given him 200 yards. Or, which is more likely, it would have given him around 60 yards.
Hindsight is 20/20. Stop acting like you're a xxxxing genius.
He had 9 carries for 52 yards. If you do the math that's better than 5.0 YPC. So what makes you think he would carry 20 times for 60 yards. You don't seem to be well learned in football to me buddy. Last time i checked 5 YPC is pretty good. So why not give him the ball more? Making football more complicated than what it has to be is why Coaches fail. It's not that difficult.
He had 9 carries for 52 yards. If you do the math that's better than 5.0 YPC. So what makes you think he would carry 20 times for 60 yards. You don't seem to be well learned in football to me buddy. Last time i checked 5 YPC is pretty good. So why not give him the ball more? Making football more complicated than what it has to be is why Coaches fail. It's not that difficult.
And one of those runs was a 40 yard run. Take that run out, and he's got 8 carries for 12 yards. He got stuffed the entire day, except for one lucky run he broke. Whereas Hillis was picking up yards every time he touched the ball. He didn't break open for any real big gains, but he moved the chains. And that's what you want when you're up by only a score in the second half. Ball control offense, look it up.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
He had 9 carries for 52 yards. If you do the math that's better than 5.0 YPC. So what makes you think he would carry 20 times for 60 yards. You don't seem to be well learned in football to me buddy. Last time i checked 5 YPC is pretty good. So why not give him the ball more? Making football more complicated than what it has to be is why Coaches fail. It's not that difficult.
And one of those runs was a 40 yard run. Take that run out, and he's got 8 carries for 12 yards. He got stuffed the entire day, except for one lucky run he broke. Whereas Hillis was picking up yards every time he touched the ball. He didn't break open for any real big gains, but he moved the chains. And that's what you want when you're up by only a score in the second half. Ball control offense, look it up.
And one of those runs was a 40 yard run. Take that run out, and he's got 8 carries for 12 yards. He got stuffed the entire day, except for one lucky run he broke. Whereas Hillis was picking up yards every time he touched the ball. He didn't break open for any real big gains, but he moved the chains. And that's what you want when you're up by only a score in the second half. Ball control offense, look it up.
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
-
And one of those runs was a 40 yard run. Take that run out, and he's got 8 carries for 12 yards. He got stuffed the entire day, except for one lucky run he broke. Whereas Hillis was picking up yards every time he touched the ball. He didn't break open for any real big gains, but he moved the chains. And that's what you want when you're up by only a score in the second half. Ball control offense, look it up.
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
Not trying to take blame off Hillis for fumbling but his fumbles were caused by two great hits, just sayin.
If anything cost us the game it was the INT before halftime. We're up 14 - 3 going in at half and we were moving the ball. That INT swung momentum and the Bucs didn't look back.
-
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
Not trying to take blame off Hillis for fumbling but his fumbles were caused by two great hits, just sayin.
If anything cost us the game it was the INT before halftime. We're up 14 - 3 going in at half and we were moving the ball. That INT swung momentum and the Bucs didn't look back.
Not trying to take blame off Hillis for fumbling but his fumbles were caused by two great hits, just sayin.
If anything cost us the game it was the INT before halftime. We're up 14 - 3 going in at half and we were moving the ball. That INT swung momentum and the Bucs didn't look back.
While they both were big, the fumble was the back breaker.
-
And one of those runs was a 40 yard run. Take that run out, and he's got 8 carries for 12 yards. He got stuffed the entire day, except for one lucky run he broke. Whereas Hillis was picking up yards every time he touched the ball. He didn't break open for any real big gains, but he moved the chains. And that's what you want when you're up by only a score in the second half. Ball control offense, look it up.
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
And Harrison would have fumbled the ball just like Hillis did. I don't understand why people are so quick to blame him for fumbling, yet are reluctant to give credit to the guy who caused the fumble. It's not like he just dropped the ball, Tampa Bay had players putting their hat on the ball. Nobody would have held onto that ball, Harrison included.
And the fumble certainly didn't cost us the game. No one play determines a game. Once again, hindsight is 20/20. If Harrison isn't getting carries, even though he's this supposed God you claim he is, there must be another reason.
I hate supposed fans who put players before the team. They're called homers, and they're all douchebags.
-
Your a moron. Hillis had two fumbles, including one that cost us the game. Fumbling isn't part of ball control offense sir. Harrison had no trouble moving the chains while averaging 30+ carries with no passing game to speak of. When has Hillis shown he can do that? And even guys like Chris Johnson don't break long ones every time. He had half of his yards on one play against the Raiders. You have to give running backs their carries for them to be effective.
And Harrison would have fumbled the ball just like Hillis did. I don't understand why people are so quick to blame him for fumbling, yet are reluctant to give credit to the guy who caused the fumble. It's not like he just dropped the ball, Tampa Bay had players putting their hat on the ball. Nobody would have held onto that ball, Harrison included.
And the fumble certainly didn't cost us the game. No one play determines a game. Once again, hindsight is 20/20. If Harrison isn't getting carries, even though he's this supposed God you claim he is, there must be another reason.
I hate supposed fans who put players before the team. They're called homers, and they're all douchebags.
And Harrison would have fumbled the ball just like Hillis did. I don't understand why people are so quick to blame him for fumbling, yet are reluctant to give credit to the guy who caused the fumble. It's not like he just dropped the ball, Tampa Bay had players putting their hat on the ball. Nobody would have held onto that ball, Harrison included.
And the fumble certainly didn't cost us the game. No one play determines a game. Once again, hindsight is 20/20. If Harrison isn't getting carries, even though he's this supposed God you claim he is, there must be another reason.
I hate supposed fans who put players before the team. They're called homers, and they're all douchebags.
Your a idiot because you don't make sense. There's no excuse for fumbling twice in a game. I don't think Hillis would be making excuses for it either. And you were probably one of the people yelling about Harrison's supposed fumbling problem in the preseason. And i don't put players before the team. all I'm saying is that we should play our best guy. Harrison has proven already that he is the best player. Give him his carries and we will stand a better chance of winning. 3 wins in a row last year against Buc caliber teams despite no passing game proves my point.
-
Harrison DID have a fumble problem in preseason.
Harrison put up some absolutely awesome numbers the oast four games of last season -- not the least of which was approximately 30 carries per game. And you want him to carry the ball that much for at least 18 games? Ver unrealistic!
I don't understand your hatred for Hillis. He fumbled twice in a game. He manned up and took the heat for those fumbles. What else do you want him to do? Come apologize to you personally? You are acting like he fumbled just to ruin your day. I promise, he did not seek you out personally.
While you are worshipping at the shrine of Jerome, how will YOU respond if Harrison were revisited by the fufmble bug? Are you going to throw him under the bus? They are both on the team. Why do you have to hate one and worship the other?
-
And Harrison would have fumbled the ball just like Hillis did. I don't understand why people are so quick to blame him for fumbling, yet are reluctant to give credit to the guy who caused the fumble. It's not like he just dropped the ball, Tampa Bay had players putting their hat on the ball. Nobody would have held onto that ball, Harrison included.
And the fumble certainly didn't cost us the game. No one play determines a game. Once again, hindsight is 20/20. If Harrison isn't getting carries, even though he's this supposed God you claim he is, there must be another reason.
I hate supposed fans who put players before the team. They're called homers, and they're all douchebags.
Your a idiot because you don't make sense. There's no excuse for fumbling twice in a game. I don't think Hillis would be making excuses for it either. And you were probably one of the people yelling about Harrison's supposed fumbling problem in the preseason. And i don't put players before the team. all I'm saying is that we should play our best guy. Harrison has proven already that he is the best player. Give him his carries and we will stand a better chance of winning. 3 wins in a row last year against Buc caliber teams despite no passing game proves my point.
Your a idiot because you don't make sense. There's no excuse for fumbling twice in a game. I don't think Hillis would be making excuses for it either. And you were probably one of the people yelling about Harrison's supposed fumbling problem in the preseason. And i don't put players before the team. all I'm saying is that we should play our best guy. Harrison has proven already that he is the best player. Give him his carries and we will stand a better chance of winning. 3 wins in a row last year against Buc caliber teams despite no passing game proves my point.
Look, Holmgren and Heckert aren't armchair quarterbacks. If they were so confident Harrison was "THE MAN" what's your explanation for them trading up to get Hardesty, or even bothering to bring in Hillis in the first place? They're idiots too, and you're not?
As to fumbling twice in a game- you can do that if your name is Adrian Peterson. And regards to Hillis' fumbles- I have to agree with the other posters- one couldn't clearly be seen- but the second was a direct result of a helmet right on the ball. not Hillis, not Harrison, not anyone can maintain ball control when that happens.
Sure, Harrison had some great games last year. That was last year. If you want to extrapolate if we had fed him the ball 30 times against the Bucs and give him 180 yards, fine. I can as easily say his 30 carries would net 80 yards- if I use your Chris Johnson logic of the one big run. 2.6 won't win you many games.
-
Harrison DID have a fumble problem in preseason.
Harrison put up some absolutely awesome numbers the oast four games of last season -- not the least of which was approximately 30 carries per game. And you want him to carry the ball that much for at least 18 games? Ver unrealistic!
I don't understand your hatred for Hillis. He fumbled twice in a game. He manned up and took the heat for those fumbles. What else do you want him to do? Come apologize to you personally? You are acting like he fumbled just to ruin your day. I promise, he did not seek you out personally.
While you are worshipping at the shrine of Jerome, how will YOU respond if Harrison were revisited by the fufmble bug? Are you going to throw him under the bus? They are both on the team. Why do you have to hate one and worship the other?
Harrison DID have a fumble problem in preseason.
Harrison put up some absolutely awesome numbers the oast four games of last season -- not the least of which was approximately 30 carries per game. And you want him to carry the ball that much for at least 18 games? Ver unrealistic!
I don't understand your hatred for Hillis. He fumbled twice in a game. He manned up and took the heat for those fumbles. What else do you want him to do? Come apologize to you personally? You are acting like he fumbled just to ruin your day. I promise, he did not seek you out personally.
While you are worshipping at the shrine of Jerome, how will YOU respond if Harrison were revisited by the fufmble bug? Are you going to throw him under the bus? They are both on the team. Why do you have to hate one and worship the other?
Hey Retard. Harrison fumbled had only 2 fumbles last year. Preseason means nothing. He has only fumbled 3 times in his careers. He is our best option at RB and should be getting most of the carries.
-
Your a idiot because you don't make sense. There's no excuse for fumbling twice in a game. I don't think Hillis would be making excuses for it either. And you were probably one of the people yelling about Harrison's supposed fumbling problem in the preseason. And i don't put players before the team. all I'm saying is that we should play our best guy. Harrison has proven already that he is the best player. Give him his carries and we will stand a better chance of winning. 3 wins in a row last year against Buc caliber teams despite no passing game proves my point.
Look, Holmgren and Heckert aren't armchair quarterbacks. If they were so confident Harrison was "THE MAN" what's your explanation for them trading up to get Hardesty, or even bothering to bring in Hillis in the first place? They're idiots too, and you're not?
As to fumbling twice in a game- you can do that if your name is Adrian Peterson. And regards to Hillis' fumbles- I have to agree with the other posters- one couldn't clearly be seen- but the second was a direct result of a helmet right on the ball. not Hillis, not Harrison, not anyone can maintain ball control when that happens.
Sure, Harrison had some great games last year. That was last year. If you want to extrapolate if we had fed him the ball 30 times against the Bucs and give him 180 yards, fine. I can as easily say his 30 carries would net 80 yards- if I use your Chris Johnson logic of the one big run. 2.6 won't win you many games.
Look, Holmgren and Heckert aren't armchair quarterbacks. If they were so confident Harrison was "THE MAN" what's your explanation for them trading up to get Hardesty, or even bothering to bring in Hillis in the first place? They're idiots too, and you're not?
As to fumbling twice in a game- you can do that if your name is Adrian Peterson. And regards to Hillis' fumbles- I have to agree with the other posters- one couldn't clearly be seen- but the second was a direct result of a helmet right on the ball. not Hillis, not Harrison, not anyone can maintain ball control when that happens.
Sure, Harrison had some great games last year. That was last year. If you want to extrapolate if we had fed him the ball 30 times against the Bucs and give him 180 yards, fine. I can as easily say his 30 carries would net 80 yards- if I use your Chris Johnson logic of the one big run. 2.6 won't win you many games.
Trading draft picks to get a guy with a storied injury history in college was stupid. Especially since Hardesty was not some sort of Heisman candidate. Maybe the pick will pay off. But overall I don't feel he was worth the risk.
-
There's no point trying to argue with the homer, Hawg.
They don't see reason when it's staring them right in the face. Quote stats all you want, but you can bet that Holmgren and Co. puts the best player on the field every game.
Here's a ridiculous stat you can start throwing in people's faces, since Harrison is your God.
The Cleveland Browns are 2-0 in games where Harrison has had a touchdown run of at least 71 yards.
-
The one aspect of giving Harrision more touches would be the fact he's one of the few actual play-makers on our team. Ultimately though, the coaching staff felt in this game, Hillis was the better choice to run between the tackles. On one angle, i like this approach as we are moving away from a "we are going to do it this way just to do it this way" approach, on another hand, there seems to be perhaps a bit of overthinking element to it all. (which i think Mangini tends to do)
To me, i say you play your weapons. I want more Cribs, more Harrision and anyone else you think can make plays for your team. If other guys prove they can break off big plays, get them on the field. Perhaps over-simplified but i still think it is a truth. Hillis, to his credit, showed some skills and i was impressed. The fumbles took away from the performance but as a fan, i'm glad to have him as a Brown. Lastly, i've got to agree to those who say Mangini has a bit of a bug up his butt about Jerome. Just seems like he isn't going to go out of his way to make sure he gets on the field to me. (plus all the praise Monterio was getting -rightfully so- and very few pos-mens for Harrision) I have a feeling Jerome Harrison isn't in Coach Mangini or Holgrem or Heckerts plans , longterm-wise.
-
I think I need to be clear that I love Hillis. He is one of the hardest runners I have ever seen. I am glad he is on our team. I just believe that Harrison has done more to show that he deserves the bulk of the carries, at least 20 a game. This will definitely help our team win.
-
I think I need to be clear that I love Hillis. He is one of the hardest runners I have ever seen. I am glad he is on our team. I just believe that Harrison has done more to show that he deserves the bulk of the carries, at least 20 a game. This will definitely help our team win.
I think I need to be clear that I love Hillis. He is one of the hardest runners I have ever seen. I am glad he is on our team. I just believe that Harrison has done more to show that he deserves the bulk of the carries, at least 20 a game. This will definitely help our team win.
I can agree with some of that. Harrison has done a great deal for this team. He's proven he needs to be utilized more. And I think he will be. But when he isn't drawn up in the gameplan, I think it's for good reason.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login