I can't believe Julio Jones isn't being considered for our first round pick
-
Jones ran a 4.39 at the combine, 4.48 for A.J. Green. If he wasn't in the discussion he will be now.
-
Jones ran a 4.39 at the combine, 4.48 for A.J. Green. If he wasn't in the discussion he will be now.
Jones ran a 4.39 at the combine, 4.48 for A.J. Green. If he wasn't in the discussion he will be now.
If we take Jones at 6, then we might as well fire the whole FO and start over. Again.
-
Jones ran a 4.39 at the combine, 4.48 for A.J. Green. If he wasn't in the discussion he will be now.
If we take Jones at 6, then we might as well fire the whole FO and start over. Again.
If we take Jones at 6, then we might as well fire the whole FO and start over. Again.
I agree, we need DL. DL will be the pick GUARANTEED. We won't pick a WR first 3 rounds. We were a run first offense that targeted the TE on passing downs, with the WCO the receivers will be the primary targets. Next year when Robo and MoMass have breakout season's you'll forget you ever wanted to draft Green
-
If we take Jones at 6, then we might as well fire the whole FO and start over. Again.
I agree, we need DL. DL will be the pick GUARANTEED. We won't pick a WR first 3 rounds. We were a run first offense that targeted the TE on passing downs, with the WCO the receivers will be the primary targets. Next year when Robo and MoMass have breakout season's you'll forget you ever wanted to draft Green
I agree, we need DL. DL will be the pick GUARANTEED. We won't pick a WR first 3 rounds. We were a run first offense that targeted the TE on passing downs, with the WCO the receivers will be the primary targets. Next year when Robo and MoMass have breakout season's you'll forget you ever wanted to draft Green
We targeted the TE because our WRs are horrible. The thought that Robo and Mass would make me forget about anyone , let alone Green is comical.
-
I agree, we need DL. DL will be the pick GUARANTEED. We won't pick a WR first 3 rounds. We were a run first offense that targeted the TE on passing downs, with the WCO the receivers will be the primary targets. Next year when Robo and MoMass have breakout season's you'll forget you ever wanted to draft Green
We targeted the TE because our WRs are horrible. The thought that Robo and Mass would make me forget about anyone , let alone Green is comical.
We targeted the TE because our WRs are horrible. The thought that Robo and Mass would make me forget about anyone Green is comical.
We target the TE because's that's what Mangini believed in. The primary focus on passing downs were TE's and RB's. That's a fact, you can go listen to interview's form Eric, Colt or Holmgren. This is the main reason Holmgren was frustrated with the offense.
-
We targeted the TE because our WRs are horrible. The thought that Robo and Mass would make me forget about anyone Green is comical.
We target the TE because's that's what Mangini believed in. The primary focus on passing downs were TE's and RB's. That's a fact, you can go listen to interview's form Eric, Colt or Holmgren. This is the main reason Holmgren was frustrated with the offense.
We target the TE because's that's what Mangini believed in. The primary focus on passing downs were TE's and RB's. That's a fact, you can go listen to interview's form Eric, Colt or Holmgren. This is the main reason Holmgren was frustrated with the offense.
I agree. We still don't know whether or not our current WRs can do the job. All too often, solid players become lost in the wrong system. That's why we will get a much better picture of where we are this season (IF there is a season). The staff has been built from & for the same offensive & defensive systems. We may just have a diamond in the rough already here! We'll see.
Mike
-
We target the TE because's that's what Mangini believed in. The primary focus on passing downs were TE's and RB's. That's a fact, you can go listen to interview's form Eric, Colt or Holmgren. This is the main reason Holmgren was frustrated with the offense.
I agree. We still don't know whether or not our current WRs can do the job. All too often, solid players become lost in the wrong system. That's why we will get a much better picture of where we are this season (IF there is a season). The staff has been built from & for the same offensive & defensive systems. We may just have a diamond in the rough already here! We'll see.
Mike
I agree. We still don't know whether or not our current WRs can do the job. All too often, solid players become lost in the wrong system. That's why we will get a much better picture of where we are this season (IF there is a season). The staff has been built from & for the same offensive & defensive systems. We may just have a diamond in the rough already here! We'll see.
Mike
While I suppose it is possible that Robo and MoMass could round into form (3rd year seems to be the magic year for WRs), you couldn't pass up Green if he luckily falls to 6 based on what those two have shown thus far.
-
I agree. We still don't know whether or not our current WRs can do the job. All too often, solid players become lost in the wrong system. That's why we will get a much better picture of where we are this season (IF there is a season). The staff has been built from & for the same offensive & defensive systems. We may just have a diamond in the rough already here! We'll see.
Mike
While I suppose it is possible that Robo and MoMass could round into form (3rd year seems to be the magic year for WRs), you couldn't pass up Green if he luckily falls to 6 based on what those two have shown thus far.
While I suppose it is possible that Robo and MoMass could round into form (3rd year seems to be the magic year for WRs), you couldn't pass up Green if he luckily falls to 6 based on what those two have shown thus far.
I don't disagree with you, but we may (as Fans) get surprised come draft day because we aren't seeing what our FO & Coaching staff are seeing. What we see as an apparent need, they may not & what we see as an area of lesser need, they may see as a great need. Free agency may be a factor as well (depending on WHEN that happens). Time will tell.
Mike
-
Wouldn't it be something if AJ Green is at 6, and instead of Goodell saying the Cleveland Browns at no. 6 select AJ Green from Georgia, he says the Cleveland Browns at no 6 select Julio Jones from Alabama. It'd be funny.
-
Wouldn't it be something if AJ Green is at 6, and instead of Goodell saying the Cleveland Browns at no. 6 select AJ Green from Georgia, he says the Cleveland Browns at no 6 select Julio Jones from Alabama. It'd be funny.
Wouldn't it be something if AJ Green is at 6, and instead of Goodell saying the Cleveland Browns at no. 6 select AJ Green from Georgia, he says the Cleveland Browns at no 6 select Julio Jones from Alabama. It'd be funny.
My inside source said the Browns are locked in on JJ Watt
-
Wouldn't it be something if AJ Green is at 6, and instead of Goodell saying the Cleveland Browns at no. 6 select AJ Green from Georgia, he says the Cleveland Browns at no 6 select Julio Jones from Alabama. It'd be funny.
My inside source said the Browns are locked in on JJ Watt
My inside source said the Browns are locked in on JJ Watt
Yeah yeah.... your inside source. I smell Bullshit!
-
My inside source said the Browns are locked in on JJ Watt
Yeah yeah.... your inside source. I smell Bullshit!
Yeah yeah.... your inside source. I smell Bullshit!
Your catching on!!
-
-
if the browns take a wr at #6, he has to be one with the complete package. from what i've heard, jones isn't consistent enough with catching the ball. if that's the case, i hope we pass on him that early in the draft.
-
if the browns take a wr at #6, he has to be one with the complete package. from what i've heard, jones isn't consistent enough with catching the ball. if that's the case, i hope we pass on him that early in the draft.
if the browns take a wr at #6, he has to be one with the complete package. from what i've heard, jones isn't consistent enough with catching the ball. if that's the case, i hope we pass on him that early in the draft.
Julio fixed his catching problem last season. His coaches noticed that he was always looking to run before he caught the ball. Last year, he changed a lot. Became a heck of a lot more consistent with catching.
-
if the browns take a wr at #6, he has to be one with the complete package. from what i've heard, jones isn't consistent enough with catching the ball. if that's the case, i hope we pass on him that early in the draft.
Julio fixed his catching problem last season. His coaches noticed that he was always looking to run before he caught the ball. Last year, he changed a lot. Became a heck of a lot more consistent with catching.
Julio fixed his catching problem last season. His coaches noticed that he was always looking to run before he caught the ball. Last year, he changed a lot. Became a heck of a lot more consistent with catching.
Thats not true. Where did you get this?
We must not have been watching the same Alabama games. He's an average catcher at best, a great strider as opposed to a quick one, imo. He'd be a great pickup as a 13+ pick, definitely not at #6.
-
Julio fixed his catching problem last season. His coaches noticed that he was always looking to run before he caught the ball. Last year, he changed a lot. Became a heck of a lot more consistent with catching.
Thats not true. Where did you get this?
We must not have been watching the same Alabama games. He's an average catcher at best, a great strider as opposed to a quick one, imo. He'd be a great pickup as a 13+ pick, definitely not at #6.
Thats not true. Where did you get this?
We must not have been watching the same Alabama games. He's an average catcher at best, a great strider as opposed to a quick one, imo. He'd be a great pickup as a 13+ pick, definitely not at #6.
If we want Julio Jones, then that's who we'll get but we have to get him before the rams do...
-
My inside source said the Browns are locked in on JJ Watt
Yeah yeah.... your inside source. I smell Bullshit!
Yeah yeah.... your inside source. I smell Bullshit!
He was making fun of you dumbass.
-
For the guy who said sanz was not quick he posted the second fastest 3 cone drill and 3rd fastest 20 yard shuttle. While I agree he is not fast he is a quick shifty route runner. I'm not saying the browns should draft him but I think whoever gets him in the later rounds will get a heck of a football player.
-
Julio fixed his catching problem last season. His coaches noticed that he was always looking to run before he caught the ball. Last year, he changed a lot. Became a heck of a lot more consistent with catching.
Thats not true. Where did you get this?
We must not have been watching the same Alabama games. He's an average catcher at best, a great strider as opposed to a quick one, imo. He'd be a great pickup as a 13+ pick, definitely not at #6.
Thats not true. Where did you get this?
We must not have been watching the same Alabama games. He's an average catcher at best, a great strider as opposed to a quick one, imo. He'd be a great pickup as a 13+ pick, definitely not at #6.
i keep hearing julio has catching issues. i don't think the browns would pick him at #6. at #6 the browns need an impact player and not some inconsistent wr.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login