Skip to content

James Harrison

The Browns Board
155 25 6.6k
  • homo is just here to start trouble, and argue stupidly.

    he's ? a worthless bigmouth visitor to the board.

  • homo is just here to start trouble, and argue stupidly.

    he's ? a worthless bigmouth visitor to the board.

    @calfoxwc said:

    homo is just here to start trouble, and argue stupidly.

    he's ? a worthless bigmouth visitor to the board.

    Already tired of getting ripped apart on the Political board? There are 5 or 6 guys on this message board that fail on all facets of intelligent argument. You're the ring leader.

  • There's no ripping. That's just you thinking you're as mean as James Harrison, the street punk

    who can only be a player when he cheapshots.

    You're boring, and take a poll - not many of us are impressed with one word you've ever posted.

    Didn't you have to go to summer school, before you could advance this fall to the 4th grade?

  • There's no ripping. That's just you thinking you're as mean as James Harrison, the street punk

    who can only be a player when he cheapshots.

    You're boring, and take a poll - not many of us are impressed with one word you've ever posted.

    Didn't you have to go to summer school, before you could advance this fall to the 4th grade?

    @calfoxwc said:

    There's no ripping. That's just you thinking you're as mean as James Harrison, the street punk

    who can only be a player when he cheapshots.

    You're boring, and take a poll - not many of us are impressed with one word you've ever posted.

    Didn't you have to go to summer school, before you could advance this fall to the 4th grade?

    Oooooooooooooooooooooo it burns, it burns.

  • Grinder said:

    we see that you have had experience with that.

    Oh Grinder, you kidder you.

  • Grinder said:

    we see that you have had experience with that.

    Oh Grinder, you kidder you.

    Homotron said:

    Oh Grinder, you kidder you.

    Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack.

  • Homotron said:

    Oh Grinder, you kidder you.

    Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack.

    @the-gipper said:

    Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack.

    I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack.

    I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground.

    Homotron said:

    I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground.

    I bet you do, hence your name. I bet you love listning to all kinds of guys moaning.

  • Homotron said:

    I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground.

    I bet you do, hence your name. I bet you love listning to all kinds of guys moaning.

    @manbearpig said:

    I bet you do, hence your name. I bet you love listning to all kinds of guys moaning.

    Oh FOR sure. Got me dead to rights. 🙄

  • and in this corner.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzz..............zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • mikeyP72 said:

    Remember, Shittsburgh is the new San Francisco, and damn proud.

    Great for the city whether you agree with it or not. Not everyone is closed minded and ridiculous. Only going to bring more commerce to a currently thriving city.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yep, that is what the HGH will do for ya. Quack.

    I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground.

    Homotron said:

    I personally get a kick out of all the groaning McCoy is doing while he pulls himself off the ground.

    Quack

  • mikeyP72 said:

    Remember, Shittsburgh is the new San Francisco, and damn proud.

    Great for the city whether you agree with it or not. Not everyone is closed minded and ridiculous. Only going to bring more commerce to a currently thriving city.

    Homotron said:

    Great for the city whether you agree with it or not. Not everyone is closed minded and ridiculous. Only going to bring more commerce to a currently thriving city.

    That's just fine. More power to you.

    FYI, as far as "Major League" markets go, both Cleveland and Pittsburgh, believe it or not, are in much better shape than most markets....if you go by Unemployment figures.

    The following "Major League" U.S. markets all had unemployment figures WORSE than Cleveland did as of May 2011:

    Indianapolis

    Dallas

    Milwaukee

    New Orleans

    Phoenix

    Houston

    Jacksonville

    New York

    Kansas City

    Philadelphia

    Cincinnatti

    Denver

    Portland

    St. Louis

    San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose

    Seattle

    San Francisco

    Chicago

    Orlando

    Memphis

    Los Angeles

    Miami

    Detroit

    Sacramento

    Atlanta

    Charlotte

    Tampa

    Raleigh

    The ONLY "Major League" markets to have unemployment figures that were better than Cleveland are:

    Oklahoma City

    Minneapolis/St. Paul

    Boston

    Pittsburgh

    Green Bay

    Buffalo

    Salt Lake City

    San Antonio

    Columbus

    Baltimore

    Source: US Department Bureau of Labor

  • Homotron said:

    Great for the city whether you agree with it or not. Not everyone is closed minded and ridiculous. Only going to bring more commerce to a currently thriving city.

    That's just fine. More power to you.

    FYI, as far as "Major League" markets go, both Cleveland and Pittsburgh, believe it or not, are in much better shape than most markets....if you go by Unemployment figures.

    The following "Major League" U.S. markets all had unemployment figures WORSE than Cleveland did as of May 2011:

    Indianapolis

    Dallas

    Milwaukee

    New Orleans

    Phoenix

    Houston

    Jacksonville

    New York

    Kansas City

    Philadelphia

    Cincinnatti

    Denver

    Portland

    St. Louis

    San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose

    Seattle

    San Francisco

    Chicago

    Orlando

    Memphis

    Los Angeles

    Miami

    Detroit

    Sacramento

    Atlanta

    Charlotte

    Tampa

    Raleigh

    The ONLY "Major League" markets to have unemployment figures that were better than Cleveland are:

    Oklahoma City

    Minneapolis/St. Paul

    Boston

    Pittsburgh

    Green Bay

    Buffalo

    Salt Lake City

    San Antonio

    Columbus

    Baltimore

    Source: US Department Bureau of Labor

    @the-gipper said:

    That's just fine. More power to you.

    FYI, as far as "Major League" markets go, both Cleveland and Pittsburgh, believe it or not, are in much better shape than most markets....if you go by Unemployment figures.

    The following "Major League" U.S. markets all had unemployment figures WORSE than Cleveland did as of May 2011:

    Indianapolis

    Dallas

    Milwaukee

    New Orleans

    Phoenix

    Houston

    Jacksonville

    New York

    Kansas City

    Philadelphia

    Cincinnatti

    Denver

    Portland

    St. Louis

    San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose

    Seattle

    San Francisco

    Chicago

    Orlando

    Memphis

    Los Angeles

    Miami

    Detroit

    Sacramento

    Atlanta

    Charlotte

    Tampa

    Raleigh

    The ONLY "Major League" markets to have unemployment figures that were better than Cleveland are:

    Oklahoma City

    Minneapolis/St. Paul

    Boston

    Pittsburgh

    Green Bay

    Buffalo

    Salt Lake City

    San Antonio

    Columbus

    Baltimore

    Source: US Department Bureau of Labor

    ok, but what type of jobs are we talking about? that's this whole political shell game bullshit that's been going on for the past two years. do they break it down into sections of the job market? what are the average annual salaries of the same two jobs between those two lists and their cost of living? and if you'll notice the first list are major hubs of the population with high-paying high-end jobs (the only one that threw me off is boston, on your second list).and what about the guy who used to manage a multi-million dollar company, who can't find work at 50% of his past salary and refuses to flip burgers at your local shake shack? a lot of people refuse to accept jobs below what they are worth and are living off the system until everything shakes down or blows up.

    oh and to get back on topic: james harrison is still a roided-out ape.

  • Zombo said:

    Let's give credit where credit is due.

    Roidison was spot on about Big Ben:

    "Hey, at least throw a pick on their side of the field instead of asking the D to bail you out again," Harrison said. "Or hand the ball off and stop trying to act like Peyton Manning. You ain't that and you know it, man; you just get paid like he does."

    Roids must be like a truth serum for the barely evolved.

    Zombo

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/kerry_byrne/07/20/peyton-manning-ben-roethlisberger/index.html?eref=sihp&sct=hp_t13_a2

    http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/22526/harrison%E2%80%99s-wrong-about-roethlisberger

  • Zombo said:

    I'm not clicking your links and ending up on some gay porn site. What's your point?

    Zombo

    Click the links. Directly refutes your previous statement and in handed fashion. Ben also isn't asked to be Peyton Manning but he's a VERY capable passer and one of the best in the league. The links just reaffirm that or you could play it off like I posted porn links. We both know you clicked each.

  • Zombo said:

    Ben is no Peyton Manning. There is no link in the world that could change my mind.

    If Manning had had the Steelers defense the past decade he would probably own four or five rings.

    Peyton is the greatest QB of our generation. Ben is just a guy on a good team. That rapes.

    Zombo

    Peyton Manning is a great QB but he's also one of the biggest choke artists in the league. Give Ben a solid offensive line and the Steelers have another two rings. His stats also show EXACTLY the opposite of what you claim but hey those stats must be wrong. lol

  • mikeyP72 said:

    How do his stats show the opposite? He has 2 rings.

    Zombo said Peyton would have 4 or 5 with the Steelers team. Without a doubt that is true. His defense was swiss cheese last year and the Colts didn't suffer. With a defense? Forget about it.

    How can you say without a doubt that is true? Do you see how often Ben has to evade a sack over the course of the season. Do you honestly think Peyton Manning could and would do the same? Manning would be on his back a lot with our offensive line. Pouncey was a revelation and thank god for Sean Kugler because he allowed our patch work o-line to work. He was arguably the best acquisition for the Steelers last year. Peyton Manning would not have 4 or 5 rings. Downplaying how good Ben actually is, is also ignorant. I don't expect anyone to agree. We are on a Browns board after all.

  • homo, I've said and have said for years that stats are not indicative of a QB's worth. Yea I'll admit it can help a lot, but there's so many factors that go into a QB's development. Whether or not you would admit it, Ben came into an AMAZING situation for pittsburgh. The first 3 years he was there he had an amazing run game, almost unstoppable defense and a HOF coach. He wasn't asked to do much at all for his first ring and you know that. I'll admit without a doubt he's a top 10 QB in the league, but those stats in those articles don't tell the whole tale. If you would even put Ben as a QB in the same breath as Peyton you would be straight up crazy. The way he understands and plays the game is something frankly I don't the league had ever seen before him. Ben is a good, solid QB who does play clutch. But come on, don't look at a couple slanted stats here

    The one that pisses me off more than anything is the YPA. Manning for years has played the short to intermediate game with clark and wayne. They run slants and stick routes about as much as any team in the league. The past 2-3 years Ben has been airing it out to Wallace spreading the ball in general. I also hate the damn TD-INT ratio. It doesn't show game by game stats which is stupid if you really think about it. I can vividly remember Peyton one year throwing 6 ints, and throwing 5 in another. Which means if you take out one bad game the stats are completely different. And to top that all off, ben missing four games could clearly have changed his stats for the worse. They played some pretty good damn teams those first four weeks. Facts are facts, but they DON'T always tell the whole tale.