Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Pioli Favors Ferentz

Pioli Favors Ferentz

The Browns Board
37 14 2.9k
  • P PlayoffsIN09 wrote on
    #1

    I just seen on ESPN that the Browns are prepared to make a huge offer to Pioli and Pioli said he favors Ferentz for HC.

    C 1 Reply
  • ? Aloysius wrote on
    #2

    I checked ESPN News; it said that Pioli prefers Kirk Ferentz.

  • rich4eagleR rich4eagle wrote on
    #3

    Kirk Ferentz is not championship material.........PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes
    L S 2 Replies
  • P PlayoffsIN09 wrote on
    #4

    I see Butch Davis all over again. 😠

  • ? mz. wrote on
    #5

    Fcuk. Pioli better know something I don't...

    Let's all "scout" our new coach during the Outback Bowl tomorrow. 🙄

  • rich4eagleR rich4eagle wrote on
    #6

    I scouted him for five years..........he has NOT what it takes..............case closed..........you can hate me for diss too

    Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes
  • ? Aloysius wrote on
    #7

    If it is indeed Ferentz, then I'm pretty concerned. The guy's been out of the NFL for ten years...

    Then again, his zone blocking system will do wonders for Thomas and Steinbach (a former Hawkeye).

  • nickersN nickers wrote on
    #8

    "ugh"...I just flelt a lump fall to the pit of My stomach...Instant Agida!

    Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
  • ? Aloysius wrote on
    #9
    Grossi's hearing that even if Pioli is hired, he won't be formally offered the job until after Rick McKay's been interviewed tomorrow.
  • ? Aloysius wrote on
    #10

    OBR is reporting that negotiations have ended for now. Pioli is expected to listen to the Chiefs' offer, and Rich McKay will be interviewed for the GM job tomorrow.

  • ? mz. wrote on
    #11

    This search is going just fine, eh. 🙄

  • GipsG Gips wrote on
    #12

    I dont like Ferentz either guys he isnt made of what we need in brownstown.lerner should quickly consider backing out of the pioli deal if mcdaniels isnt going to come along i only see that as a package deal only..

    We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
  • ? Aloysius wrote on
    #13

    Yep, everything's going peachy.

    Next up for an interview: the guy who hired Bobby Petrino

  • V Vegasdogg wrote on
    #14

    The concern I have of hiring an NFL OC or DC over a CFB HC is that once the DC/OC is hired, he no longer can run the D/O. Just because he can run a D/O does not mean he can run a team. We need a guy with HC experience to turn this around, not some first time HC who was a good OC/DC.

    Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

    That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.

    "I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
    D 1 Reply
  • rich4eagleR rich4eagle

    Kirk Ferentz is not championship material.........PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    L lemosley01 wrote on
    #15

    @rich4eagle said:

    Kirk Ferentz is not championship material.........PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I agree. If Ferentz is hired, I'm on the wagon with Ghoolie and Rich.

    H 1 Reply
  • V Vegasdogg

    The concern I have of hiring an NFL OC or DC over a CFB HC is that once the DC/OC is hired, he no longer can run the D/O. Just because he can run a D/O does not mean he can run a team. We need a guy with HC experience to turn this around, not some first time HC who was a good OC/DC.

    Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

    That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.

    D Dawg Pound wrote on
    #16

    @vegasdogg said:

    The concern I have of hiring an NFL OC or DC over a CFB HC is that once the DC/OC is hired, he no longer can run the D/O. Just because he can run a D/O does not mean he can run a team. We need a guy with HC experience to turn this around, not some first time HC who was a good OC/DC.

    Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

    That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    L V 2 Replies
  • D Dawg Pound

    @vegasdogg said:

    The concern I have of hiring an NFL OC or DC over a CFB HC is that once the DC/OC is hired, he no longer can run the D/O. Just because he can run a D/O does not mean he can run a team. We need a guy with HC experience to turn this around, not some first time HC who was a good OC/DC.

    Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

    That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    L lemosley01 wrote on
    #17

    @dawg-pound said:

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    The Ravens have a stable front office. ATL has Arthur Blank, who actually has a clue, and Rich McKay.

    We have none of that. They also haven't really accomplished anything yet. Let's see what happens next year when they are playing a much tougher schedule. We've seen ourselves that one good season may just be fool's gold.

  • L lemosley01

    @dawg-pound said:

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    The Ravens have a stable front office. ATL has Arthur Blank, who actually has a clue, and Rich McKay.

    We have none of that. They also haven't really accomplished anything yet. Let's see what happens next year when they are playing a much tougher schedule. We've seen ourselves that one good season may just be fool's gold.

    D Dawg Pound wrote on
    #18

    @lemosley01 said:

    The Ravens have a stable front office. ATL has Arthur Blank, who actually has a clue, and Rich McKay.

    We have none of that. They also haven't really accomplished anything yet. Let's see what happens next year when they are playing a much tougher schedule. We've seen ourselves that one good season may just be fool's gold.

    Arthur Blank gave Vick a huge extension, he doesn't have a clue at all

    L 1 Reply
  • D Dawg Pound

    @vegasdogg said:

    The concern I have of hiring an NFL OC or DC over a CFB HC is that once the DC/OC is hired, he no longer can run the D/O. Just because he can run a D/O does not mean he can run a team. We need a guy with HC experience to turn this around, not some first time HC who was a good OC/DC.

    Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

    That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    V Vegasdogg wrote on
    #19

    @dawg-pound said:

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    The Ravens were a good team. They had no HC worth a shit after his D could not bail him out.

    Atlanta did well, and so did Miami. They also played shit schedules. I know we'll play a shit schedule next season, I am concerned about the year after when we play "that" schedule.

    We'll see how Sparano and Harbaugh and Smith do in 2009.

    "I will not insult your intelligence by suggesting you really believe what you just said." William F Buckley
  • V Vegasdogg

    @dawg-pound said:

    Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

    The Ravens were a good team. They had no HC worth a shit after his D could not bail him out.

    Atlanta did well, and so did Miami. They also played shit schedules. I know we'll play a shit schedule next season, I am concerned about the year after when we play "that" schedule.

    We'll see how Sparano and Harbaugh and Smith do in 2009.

    D Dawg Pound wrote on
    #20

    @vegasdogg said:

    The Ravens were a good team. They had no HC worth a shit after his D could not bail him out.

    Atlanta did well, and so did Miami. They also played shit schedules. I know we'll play a shit schedule next season, I am concerned about the year after when we play "that" schedule.

    We'll see how Sparano and Harbaugh and Smith do in 2009.

    😆 Atlanta didnt play a shit schedule. They played the NFC south (no teams with a losing record in the division), Vikings are a playoff team, Denver, Chargers a playoff team. That schedule wasnt easy at all.

    V 1 Reply
Log in to reply