Skip to content

Colt Mccoy And The O-Line Myth

The Browns Board
43 14 2.0k
  • Another thing, when the squeeeelers play... you ever see butt rothlicksbooger get sacked? Take off running?

    Of course you do. "Gosh, why didn't he just make them pay for the blitz by quickly throwing the ball?" you ask?

    Because nobody was available. Nobody was open. The rush came too fast, and his oline is strong, but not invincible.

    It just doesn't happen to butt R very often.

    It happens to Colt most of the time. The squeelers drafted the guy I wanted for the Browns... Gilbert, RT, in the second round.

    The squeelers have bookend tackles and a #1 draft pick at center. butt R has more time and faster, far more elusive receivers...

    (with Little being the exception). That RT problem has been ruining a lot of the Browns' chances on offense, running and passing. You watch them fix that problem next spring.

    This stupid stuff about dissing olinemen as being "dime a dozen"... then why the hell have the squeelers spent any draft picks at all on them?

    Why didn't the squeeeelers just sign their entire offensive line from some little college somewhere as FA's ?

  • all of the above plus

    4. Lack of strength at WR

    I know otheres have brought this topic up, but without a good core of WR's the def can blitz more often and get away with 1 on 1 coverage.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    So you want him to throw ints, and out of bounds every play.

    Got it.

    Baloney.

    You obviously don't know much about football plays, or have never even played Madden. When the defense brings 6 guys and you send out 5, that usually means everyone will be covered 1 on 1 with no additional help. It the QBs job to exploit that situation and get rid of the ball quickly before the free blitzing defender can get to him. This puts pressure on the defense. When the defense blitzes a good QB makes them pay.

    @websterslaughter said:

    or have never even played Madden.

    😆 :lol: 😆 :lol:

    just like playing 'tour of duty' will make you an ass kickin soldier. GTFO!

  • @websterslaughter said:

    or have never even played Madden.

    😆 :lol: 😆 :lol:

    just like playing 'tour of duty' will make you an ass kickin soldier. GTFO!

    @miktoxic said:

    😆 :lol: 😆 :lol:

    just like playing 'tour of duty' will make you an ass kickin soldier. GTFO!

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty. NFL players do play Madden, and some have even said that it helps them recognize coverage and make reads. I bet you don't know the difference between a cover 2 and a cover 4. What's the strong safety's first move in a cover 2? What's a zone dog? How do you recognize if a defense is playing man under or zone? Whats the best way to attack a cover 3? Guess where I learned those things? Yes playing Madden.

  • Web translation:

    "Looka me ! Looka me ! I'm a race car driver because I won a race on my XBox ! YAY ! " 🙄

  • @miktoxic said:

    😆 :lol: 😆 :lol:

    just like playing 'tour of duty' will make you an ass kickin soldier. GTFO!

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty. NFL players do play Madden, and some have even said that it helps them recognize coverage and make reads. I bet you don't know the difference between a cover 2 and a cover 4. What's the strong safety's first move in a cover 2? What's a zone dog? How do you recognize if a defense is playing man under or zone? Whats the best way to attack a cover 3? Guess where I learned those things? Yes playing Madden.

    @websterslaughter said:

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty. NFL players do play Madden, and some have even said that it helps them recognize coverage and make reads. I bet you don't know the difference between a cover 2 and a cover 4. What's the strong safety's first move in a cover 2? What's a zone dog? How do you recognize if a defense is playing man under or zone? Whats the best way to attack a cover 3? Guess where I learned those things? Yes playing Madden.

    Reading defenses is predicated on what the Free Safety does and where he cheats pre snap...Just ask Bernie Kosar

  • @miktoxic said:

    😆 :lol: 😆 :lol:

    just like playing 'tour of duty' will make you an ass kickin soldier. GTFO!

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty. NFL players do play Madden, and some have even said that it helps them recognize coverage and make reads. I bet you don't know the difference between a cover 2 and a cover 4. What's the strong safety's first move in a cover 2? What's a zone dog? How do you recognize if a defense is playing man under or zone? Whats the best way to attack a cover 3? Guess where I learned those things? Yes playing Madden.

    @websterslaughter said:

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty.

    just proved my point kid.

    who's the idiot? you spend $60 for a video game, play it for a month or two, sit in your mom's basement smoking weed at 40 years old.

    at least i know how to waste money. a bottle of cuervo, some fine ladies and some loud prog rock (maybe some camel or some hawkwind) and a football game on the widescreen. now that's the way to go there buddy boy. 😆

    talk to me when you're done weening off of teet milk.

  • @websterslaughter said:

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty. NFL players do play Madden, and some have even said that it helps them recognize coverage and make reads. I bet you don't know the difference between a cover 2 and a cover 4. What's the strong safety's first move in a cover 2? What's a zone dog? How do you recognize if a defense is playing man under or zone? Whats the best way to attack a cover 3? Guess where I learned those things? Yes playing Madden.

    Reading defenses is predicated on what the Free Safety does and where he cheats pre snap...Just ask Bernie Kosar

    @nickers said:

    Reading defenses is predicated on what the Free Safety does and where he cheats pre snap...Just ask Bernie Kosar

    Both safeties line up on or near the hashes and their 1st step is backwards in a cover 2. And if your making a basic 3-step drop read you're most likely going to be reading a linebacker or SS. Reading the free safety is usually only important if you plan on throwing deep.

  • @websterslaughter said:

    You're an idiot. And the game is called Call of Duty.

    just proved my point kid.

    who's the idiot? you spend $60 for a video game, play it for a month or two, sit in your mom's basement smoking weed at 40 years old.

    at least i know how to waste money. a bottle of cuervo, some fine ladies and some loud prog rock (maybe some camel or some hawkwind) and a football game on the widescreen. now that's the way to go there buddy boy. 😆

    talk to me when you're done weening off of teet milk.

    @miktoxic said:

    just proved my point kid.

    who's the idiot? you spend $60 for a video game, play it for a month or two, sit in your mom's basement smoking weed at 40 years old.

    at least i know how to waste money. a bottle of cuervo, some fine ladies and some loud prog rock (maybe some camel or some hawkwind) and a football game on the widescreen. now that's the way to go there buddy boy. 😆

    talk to me when you're done weening off of teet milk.

    Actually I'm in my 20's and I still play football instead of just watching it on TV like you. FYI I don't even play Madden anymore, no time for it. I did play it everyday while in college though. At least we can agree on the prog rock. Good stuff.

  • @nickers said:

    Reading defenses is predicated on what the Free Safety does and where he cheats pre snap...Just ask Bernie Kosar

    Both safeties line up on or near the hashes and their 1st step is backwards in a cover 2. And if your making a basic 3-step drop read you're most likely going to be reading a linebacker or SS. Reading the free safety is usually only important if you plan on throwing deep.

    @websterslaughter said:

    Both safeties line up on or near the hashes and their 1st step is backwards in a cover 2. And if your making a basic 3-step drop read you're most likely going to be reading a linebacker or SS. Reading the free safety is usually only important if you plan on throwing deep.

    Uh no,you couldnt be more wrong..where the FS shifts in most cases predetermines what defense is gonna be run along with the def alignment. You almost always read the FS first. This isnt xxxxing Madden dude.

  • @miktoxic said:

    just proved my point kid.

    who's the idiot? you spend $60 for a video game, play it for a month or two, sit in your mom's basement smoking weed at 40 years old.

    at least i know how to waste money. a bottle of cuervo, some fine ladies and some loud prog rock (maybe some camel or some hawkwind) and a football game on the widescreen. now that's the way to go there buddy boy. 😆

    talk to me when you're done weening off of teet milk.

    Actually I'm in my 20's and I still play football instead of just watching it on TV like you. FYI I don't even play Madden anymore, no time for it. I did play it everyday while in college though. At least we can agree on the prog rock. Good stuff.

    @websterslaughter said:

    Actually I'm in my 20's and I still play football instead of just watching it on TV like you.

    yeah, i'm too old for that crap. i think if someone hit me coming free off the line i might explode into a bag of dust.

    20's. i think i'd give my left nut to be in my 20's again. those were the days. 😎

  • Hahahaha.....Madden football generation! Omg....keep posting Webster.....this shits great.

  • @websterslaughter said:

    Both safeties line up on or near the hashes and their 1st step is backwards in a cover 2. And if your making a basic 3-step drop read you're most likely going to be reading a linebacker or SS. Reading the free safety is usually only important if you plan on throwing deep.

    Uh no,you couldnt be more wrong..where the FS shifts in most cases predetermines what defense is gonna be run along with the def alignment. You almost always read the FS first. This isnt xxxxing Madden dude.

    @nickers said:

    Uh no,you couldnt be more wrong..where the FS shifts in most cases predetermines what defense is gonna be run along with the def alignment. You almost always read the FS first. This isnt xxxxing Madden dude.

    Actually I'm right. I don't think you ever played or analyzed football. The free safety is playing a deep zone in most coverages with the exception of cover 0. Do you even know what a cover 0 is?

  • You are right that you have to look at the safeties first but that only tells you so much, such as whether its a cover 2 or 3. I'm talking about making the read on where to go with the ball quickly.

  • @rich4eagle said:

    I made it clear last year we had no offensive weapons and Hilis was a half season fluke. I emphasized the lack of field stretchers and playmakers at the receiving position, further I made it clear we needed to get either Green or Jones whichever was standing when picked. Instead we stupidly traded down instead of taking Jones and took another fat slob lineman. It seems no matter whom is running this team we keep making the same dumb mistakes. BTW, Peterson would be as effective on this team as he is at Minnesota because they have zippo offensively even less than us, except for that stud, whom we also passed on for a lineman to get us nowhere

    You can't hate on the Atlanta trade until we see who the Browns draft next year with Atlanta's 1st and 4th rounders..

    And you don't think Peterson has been effective this year? 800 yards rushing (out of Minnesota's 1200 total) and 9 TD's seems a lot better than the Browns 600 yards and 2 TD's. If Minnesota had zippo offensively and was worse on offense than the Browns, why are they ranked 18th in total offense while the Browns are 31st? The Vikings offense has averaged 21.5 pts per game compared to the Browns 14.9. More proof you have no idea what you are talking about.

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    You can't hate on the Atlanta trade until we see who the Browns draft next year with Atlanta's 1st and 4th rounders..

    And you don't think Peterson has been effective this year? 800 yards rushing (out of Minnesota's 1200 total) and 9 TD's seems a lot better than the Browns 600 yards and 2 TD's. If Minnesota had zippo offensively and was worse on offense than the Browns, why are they ranked 18th in total offense while the Browns are 31st? The Vikings offense has averaged 21.5 pts per game compared to the Browns 14.9. More proof you have no idea what you are talking about.

    The future is now, losers say wait till next year

    And you misterpreted what I said about Peterson, I said as bad as Minny is and as good as he is doing is indicative of how great he is and that he would be way better on a team with a complete offense

    for the cover two cover three and cover 0 guys, like these defenses are something invented recently they been around as long as football..................back in the day the cover 2 was called the deep zone when people could actually spell deep and understood what zone coverage meant. The alternative is man to man. Everything else is a variation of each of these or combination of the two concepts. That includes covers 0,1,2,3,4,5 and duck and cover!

    btw, ben got sacked 5 times sunday and the steelers won 24-17 so much for "dime a dozen OL guys"

  • We routinely run the cover 0, because we can't cover shit.

    Man lock Haden, Cover 2, and combo the other side of the field. That's playing to our strengths, of which there are few.

    Or we can try the Tony Dungy Tampa 2, although were not getting beat deep middle enough to warrant that.

  • @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    You can't hate on the Atlanta trade until we see who the Browns draft next year with Atlanta's 1st and 4th rounders..

    And you don't think Peterson has been effective this year? 800 yards rushing (out of Minnesota's 1200 total) and 9 TD's seems a lot better than the Browns 600 yards and 2 TD's. If Minnesota had zippo offensively and was worse on offense than the Browns, why are they ranked 18th in total offense while the Browns are 31st? The Vikings offense has averaged 21.5 pts per game compared to the Browns 14.9. More proof you have no idea what you are talking about.

    The future is now, losers say wait till next year

    And you misterpreted what I said about Peterson, I said as bad as Minny is and as good as he is doing is indicative of how great he is and that he would be way better on a team with a complete offense

    for the cover two cover three and cover 0 guys, like these defenses are something invented recently they been around as long as football..................back in the day the cover 2 was called the deep zone when people could actually spell deep and understood what zone coverage meant. The alternative is man to man. Everything else is a variation of each of these or combination of the two concepts. That includes covers 0,1,2,3,4,5 and duck and cover!

    btw, ben got sacked 5 times sunday and the steelers won 24-17 so much for "dime a dozen OL guys"

    @rich4eagle said:

    The future is now, losers say wait till next year

    And you misterpreted what I said about Peterson, I said as bad as Minny is and as good as he is doing is indicative of how great he is and that he would be way better on a team with a complete offense

    ok good. We agree here.

    for the cover two cover three and cover 0 guys, like these defenses are something invented recently they been around as long as football..................back in the day the cover 2 was called the deep zone when people could actually spell deep and understood what zone coverage meant. The alternative is man to man. Everything else is a variation of each of these or combination of the two concepts. That includes covers 0,1,2,3,4,5 and duck and cover!

    btw, ben got sacked 5 times sunday and the steelers won 24-17 so much for "dime a dozen OL guys"

    So because a team got sacked a lot and still won the game you are jumping to the conclusion that offensive linemen are a dime a dozen? Pittsburgh also won the turnover battle which is a much bigger factor in winning games. I have stated this before, but I'll do it again. Sacks aren't everything. Dalton wasn't sacked but how much was he hurried and flushed out of the pocket? The answer is a lot. He was 15-30 with 2 picks. The Steelers defense combined with Leon Hall and A.J. Green's injuries helped to win that game. Roethisberger, while good, hangs around in the pocket too long to try and make plays which results in more sacks than your average quarterback. It was a close game and still could have gone either way, so you really don't have any substance to support your dime a dozen theory here.

  • I do not jump to conclusiions, all i say is based on numbers and facts for fifty years

    the best is OL is a "dime a dozen"

    keep spinning otherwise bs while we keep losing and spending our best resources on teh OL over and over

  • I do not jump to conclusiions, all i say is based on numbers and facts for fifty years

    the best is OL is a "dime a dozen"

    keep spinning otherwise bs while we keep losing and spending our best resources on teh OL over and over

    @rich4eagle said:

    I do not jump to conclusiions, all i say is based on numbers and facts for fifty years

    the best is OL is a "dime a dozen"

    keep spinning otherwise bs while we keep losing and spending our best resources on teh OL over and over

    In other words, you can't refute any facts I just threw at you. Typical..

  • Rich is a puss.