Skip to content

Browns Are Better Than The Steelers.

The Browns Board
48 16 3.1k
  • P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
    #12

    If you're not first, you're last.

  • If you're not first, you're last.

    WRREBELW WRREBEL wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    If you're not first, you're last.

    That just happened

  • This team finally has a nice level of talent... but not enough.

    I'm just going to continue to be optimistic and watch the next draft.

    Blazing WR. CB, RT, LB. And a rb somewhere.

    The Browns have only been blown out by Texas.

    That is just a flat out improvement over most other Browns seasons.

    rich4eagleR rich4eagle wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @calfoxwc said:

    This team finally has a nice level of talent... but not enough.

    I'm just going to continue to be optimistic and watch the next draft.

    Blazing WR. CB, RT, LB. And a rb somewhere.

    The Browns have only been blown out by Texas.

    That is just a flat out improvement over most other Browns seasons.

    You do get it Cal what we need is to draft all OL guys the next the ten years........................because it all starts in the trenches as aclaimed by you....................we need OL screw scoring we need OL

  • @mr.-t said:

    The grand scheme behind everything is to hold Hillis out until we play the stoolers so he can demolish their hopes and dreams of getting their asses kicked in another Superbowl by the Green Bay Packers.

    When's the last time the Browns lost a Super Bowl? Oh right, you have to make the playoffs first.

    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @venom said:

    When's the last time the Browns lost a Super Bowl? Oh right, you have to make the playoffs first.

    Watching Green Bay wipe their arse with the the stoolers last year in the SuperBowl was worth watching. And if there is a rematch we will see a even more lopsided score.

  • @pumpkin-eater said:

    If you're not first, you're last.

    That just happened

    P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @wrrebel said:

    That just happened

    Funny movies. We even have Cal here.

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Ghoolie and Rich:

    Minnesota drafted their qb and rb in the first rounds.

    They got beat by Green Bay Monday night.

    45 - 7

    Adrian Peterson didn't get many yards, and Ponder had a tough night.

    Gee. Go look at their offensive line.

    I win. YAY !!!!

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Yep. Peterson gained all of 50 some yards.

    Now, you'd think that Peterson, arguably the best rb in the entire NFL...

    would get a lot more than that. You betcha HE doesn't think offensive linemen are a dime a dozen.

    How do you explain THAT?

    Say, how about those 6th round draft picks on their oline, eh?

    They do have Hutchinson though - and Loadholt, who really should be at OG....

    "offensive linemen are a dime a dozen" = "BALONEY"

    ************************************

    Charlie Johnson #74 Tackle Minnesota Vikings Team Home

    NewsTeam ReportBlogsScores & ScheduleStatsRosterDepth ChartTransactionsPhotosHeight: 6-4 Weight: 305

    Born: May 2, 1984 - Durant, OK

    College: Oklahoma State

    Draft: 2006 - 6th round (30th pick) by the Indianapolis Colts

    Steve Hutchinson #76 Guard Minnesota Vikings Team Home

    NewsTeam ReportBlogsScores & ScheduleStatsRosterDepth ChartTransactionsPhotosHeight: 6-5 Weight: 313

    Born: Nov 1, 1977 - Fort Lauderdale, FL

    College: Michigan

    Draft: 2001 - 1st round (17th pick) by the Seattle Seahawks

    John Sullivan #65 Center Minnesota Vikings Team Home

    NewsTeam ReportBlogsScores & ScheduleStatsRosterDepth ChartTransactionsPhotosHeight: 6-4 Weight: 301

    Born: Aug 8, 1985 - Mount Kisco, NY

    College: Notre Dame

    Draft: 2008 - 6th round (21st pick) by the Minnesota Vikings

    Joe Berger #61 Center Minnesota Vikings Team Home

    NewsTeam ReportBlogsScores & ScheduleStatsRosterDepth ChartTransactionsPhotosHeight: 6-5 Weight: 305

    Born: May 25, 1982 - Fremont, MI

    College: Michigan Tech

    Draft: 2005 - 6th round (33rd pick) by the Carolina Panthers

    Phil Loadholt #71 Tackle Minnesota Vikings Team Home

    NewsTeam ReportBlogsScores & ScheduleStatsRosterDepth ChartTransactionsPhotosHeight: 6-8 Weight: 343

    Born: Jan 21, 1986 - Honolulu, HI

    College: Oklahoma

    Draft: 2009 - 2nd round (22nd pick) by the Minnesota Vikings

  • @venom said:

    When's the last time the Browns lost a Super Bowl? Oh right, you have to make the playoffs first.

    Watching Green Bay wipe their arse with the the stoolers last year in the SuperBowl was worth watching. And if there is a rematch we will see a even more lopsided score.

    B Banana Stand wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @mr.-t said:

    Watching Green Bay wipe their arse with the the stoolers last year in the SuperBowl was worth watching. And if there is a rematch we will see a even more lopsided score.

    Green Bay is going to wipe the floor with anyone coming out of the AFC this year, so does it really matter?

  • K kshutchins wrote on last edited by
    #20

    In my opinion, the only way the Browns can beat the Steelers or the Ravens this season is if both teams play only their second teams to rest everyone else in preparation for the playoffs. I have my doubts that the Browns can even beat the Steelers or Ravens SECOND or THIRD teams. The other possibilities are A) a miracle, and B)suddenly the clouds part, the angels sing, Hillis recovers his former self, while the other players suddenly see the light and start to execute plays (not quite a miracle, but close).

    I expected a difficult season but this is beyond the pale.

  • @venom said:

    When's the last time the Browns lost a Super Bowl? Oh right, you have to make the playoffs first.

    Watching Green Bay wipe their arse with the the stoolers last year in the SuperBowl was worth watching. And if there is a rematch we will see a even more lopsided score.

    VENOMV VENOM wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @mr.-t said:

    Watching Green Bay wipe their arse with the the stoolers last year in the SuperBowl was worth watching. And if there is a rematch we will see a even more lopsided score.

    It must be fun when the highlight of your football season is hoping a rival team loses the Super Bowl because you know your team has no chance of getting there. I don't know what's worse, being a Brown's fan or a Pirate fan?????

  • @mr.-t said:

    Watching Green Bay wipe their arse with the the stoolers last year in the SuperBowl was worth watching. And if there is a rematch we will see a even more lopsided score.

    It must be fun when the highlight of your football season is hoping a rival team loses the Super Bowl because you know your team has no chance of getting there. I don't know what's worse, being a Brown's fan or a Pirate fan?????

    N Neo wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @venom said:

    It must be fun when the highlight of your football season is hoping a rival team loses the Super Bowl because you know your team has no chance of getting there. I don't know what's worse, being a Brown's fan or a Pirate fan?????

    Because that's what RIVALSdo.Apparently you have no understanding on what RIVAL means. Yeah, I sit at home everyday wishing my rivals the very best. Break you neck on the way out.........

  • N Neo

    @venom said:

    It must be fun when the highlight of your football season is hoping a rival team loses the Super Bowl because you know your team has no chance of getting there. I don't know what's worse, being a Brown's fan or a Pirate fan?????

    Because that's what RIVALSdo.Apparently you have no understanding on what RIVAL means. Yeah, I sit at home everyday wishing my rivals the very best. Break you neck on the way out.........

    VENOMV VENOM wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @neo said:

    Because that's what RIVALSdo.Apparently you have no understanding on what RIVAL means. Yeah, I sit at home everyday wishing my rivals the very best. Break you neck on the way out.........

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

  • @neo said:

    Because that's what RIVALSdo.Apparently you have no understanding on what RIVAL means. Yeah, I sit at home everyday wishing my rivals the very best. Break you neck on the way out.........

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @venom said:

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

    Just because Randy Lerner is an inept feckless fuck doesn't mean that the rivalry isn't alive and well.

    If it weren't, you wouldn't be here.

    How often do you troll Ravens boards?

  • @venom said:

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

    Just because Randy Lerner is an inept feckless fuck doesn't mean that the rivalry isn't alive and well.

    If it weren't, you wouldn't be here.

    How often do you troll Ravens boards?

    VENOMV VENOM wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @the-gipper said:

    Just because Randy Lerner is an inept feckless fuck doesn't mean that the rivalry isn't alive and well.

    If it weren't, you wouldn't be here.

    How often do you troll Ravens boards?

    TROLL??? Check my posts! I rarely post anything inflamitory on here unless provoked by some moron as I was above!

  • @neo said:

    Because that's what RIVALSdo.Apparently you have no understanding on what RIVAL means. Yeah, I sit at home everyday wishing my rivals the very best. Break you neck on the way out.........

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

    B bringbackbrownie2 wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @venom said:

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

    So with your definition of "rivalry" the Browns and Steelers were only rivals in the 1980s. Great logic.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Just because Randy Lerner is an inept feckless fuck doesn't mean that the rivalry isn't alive and well.

    If it weren't, you wouldn't be here.

    How often do you troll Ravens boards?

    TROLL??? Check my posts! I rarely post anything inflamitory on here unless provoked by some moron as I was above!

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @venom said:

    TROLL??? Check my posts! I rarely post anything inflamitory on here unless provoked by some moron as I was above!

    Unless you are a Cleveland Browns fan on a Cleveland Browns board, you are a troll. It is simply part of the definition of a troll.

    What you deny being is a "flamer". Perhaps you are one, perhaps you are not.

    When you make ignorant comments about the Ravens being "the real Browns", your denials are counterevidenced.

  • @venom said:

    Wow your comprehension skills are unbelievable! You sure missed my point! I guess thats what years of losing and denial will do to you!

    As for the meaning of Rival, you may be right. I never should have called the Browns a Rival. Thats reserved for the Real Browns / Ravens. You have to be competitive to be a rival.

    Why you make me go here?

    Steelers 22 wins -- New Browns 3 wins

    November 20, 1988 = Browns' last season sweep of Steelers to date. WOW!!!

    So with your definition of "rivalry" the Browns and Steelers were only rivals in the 1980s. Great logic.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    So with your definition of "rivalry" the Browns and Steelers were only rivals in the 1980s. Great logic.

    I brought that point up some time ago. Point in fact is, the Browns and Steelers have never really been good at the same time, ever. Through the 50s and 60s Browns were good, Steelers sucked. In the 70s the Steelers were good and the Browns sucked. In the 80s, Browns good, Steeler sucked. In the 90s there was maybe a couple of years when they were both good. And of course in the 2000s the Browns have sucked and the Steelers have been good.

  • @venom said:

    TROLL??? Check my posts! I rarely post anything inflamitory on here unless provoked by some moron as I was above!

    Unless you are a Cleveland Browns fan on a Cleveland Browns board, you are a troll. It is simply part of the definition of a troll.

    What you deny being is a "flamer". Perhaps you are one, perhaps you are not.

    When you make ignorant comments about the Ravens being "the real Browns", your denials are counterevidenced.

    VENOMV VENOM wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @the-gipper said:

    Unless you are a Cleveland Browns fan on a Cleveland Browns board, you are a troll. It is simply part of the definition of a troll.

    What you deny being is a "flamer". Perhaps you are one, perhaps you are not.

    When you make ignorant comments about the Ravens being "the real Browns", your denials are counterevidenced.

    My comment = Ravens being "the real Browns" was for effect! Someone wants to jump on my case out of the blue so I went for the juggular! Sorry if I offended anyone. I love the fact that the Steelers, Browns, Ravens and Bengals are all close on the map. I think thats what makes this division the best. Wait until next year when Cincy gets even better and McCoy gets a reciever or two. This division is going to be brutal!

    I travel to all the stadiums and have fun. I can dish it out, but I'm not a Stiller Yinzer Idiot.

  • S Stlcrtn01 wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Maybe it is just me, but I still think and always will look at the Browns as the Steelers biggest rival. Growing up in the 80's when the teams fortunes were reversed, my hatred for the Browns grew into maybe why I feel this way now. That is why in a few years when the Browns are better than the Steelers, which unfortunately is going to happen, all the young Browns fans that grew up watching the Steelers beat the Browns will hate the Steelers as much as I hate the Browns. I still get more excited for those two games a year more than any other.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Unless you are a Cleveland Browns fan on a Cleveland Browns board, you are a troll. It is simply part of the definition of a troll.

    What you deny being is a "flamer". Perhaps you are one, perhaps you are not.

    When you make ignorant comments about the Ravens being "the real Browns", your denials are counterevidenced.

    My comment = Ravens being "the real Browns" was for effect! Someone wants to jump on my case out of the blue so I went for the juggular! Sorry if I offended anyone. I love the fact that the Steelers, Browns, Ravens and Bengals are all close on the map. I think thats what makes this division the best. Wait until next year when Cincy gets even better and McCoy gets a reciever or two. This division is going to be brutal!

    I travel to all the stadiums and have fun. I can dish it out, but I'm not a Stiller Yinzer Idiot.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @venom said:

    My comment = Ravens being "the real Browns" was for effect! Someone wants to jump on my case out of the blue so I went for the juggular! Sorry if I offended anyone. I love the fact that the Steelers, Browns, Ravens and Bengals are all close on the map. I think thats what makes this division the best. Wait until next year when Cincy gets even better and McCoy gets a reciever or two. This division is going to be brutal!

    I travel to all the stadiums and have fun. I can dish it out, but I'm not a Stiller Yinzer Idiot.

    Perhaps not....but you are a troll, just by being here.