Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Week 12 Game Impressions: Steelers Vs. Browns

Week 12 Game Impressions: Steelers Vs. Browns

The Browns Board
232 33 5.5k
  • VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #158

    I'd say good game but it wasn't. Good luck next week.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • b86bB b86b wrote on
    #159

    8 turnovers, 7 that count and Shurmur only can muster 20 points????

  • 4 4Browns wrote on
    #160

    A rather unsatisfying win. Plus six on turnovers and win by six? Punt Shurmer never let McCoy throw the ball. Handing off on third and ten.

  • BadNewsBrownsB BadNewsBrowns wrote on
    #161

    Only the Browns can "cause" 8-9 turnovers and win by less than a touchdown. lol

    Fucking Shurmur is a Retard, fails to call a time out in time to let Money Dawson seal the win.

    Oh well a win is a win.

    EAT SHIT STEELER FAGS!!!

    "All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" ~Arthur Schopenhauer
  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid wrote on
    #162

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    This shit ain't nothing to me, man.
    BadNewsBrownsB VagitronV DieHardBrownsFanD 3 Replies
  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    BadNewsBrownsB BadNewsBrowns wrote on
    #163

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    Yeah I'm getting there myself, people will still pull out every excuse possible for him though like they did with McCoy.

    "All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" ~Arthur Schopenhauer
  • F FearTheRoo wrote on
    #164

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    VagitronV C 2 Replies
  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #165

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    I said to a friend I hope the "Dream Killer" doesn't make it in to the game because if the Steelers pulled that one off it was going to be a miracle. McCoy if he were Weeden with an arm and similar in size would be one of the most hated QB's in the game. He's a gamer and I didn't want him in there with the game close. Take it for what it's worth coming from a Steeler fan. He's had some bad games but when he's against the wall he has the gamesmanship to find a way. No matter what tho the Steeler defense is playing in ridiculous fashion this season even without the key turnovers. If the Steelers get healthy and that's a coin flip they can make a deep run. It's a big IF tho.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • BadNewsBrownsB BadNewsBrowns wrote on
    #166

    Harrison concusses another Brown indirectly. I wonder if he'll get fined? 😆 :lol: 😆

    "All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" ~Arthur Schopenhauer
    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • F FearTheRoo

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #167

    @feartheroo said:

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    B hoortaH 2 Replies
  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on
    #168

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.

    You've got to be kidding me. Weeden is 100 times better then McCoy. I wish they would trade him.

    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
    The Cysko KidT 1 Reply
    👍
  • BadNewsBrownsB BadNewsBrowns

    Harrison concusses another Brown indirectly. I wonder if he'll get fined? 😆 :lol: 😆

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #169

    @badnewsbrowns said:

    Harrison concusses another Brown indirectly. I wonder if he'll get fined? 😆 :lol: 😆

    Adolf Baddell will find a way. Just wait.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • F FearTheRoo

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    C clebro wrote on
    #170

    @feartheroo said:

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    But when we get injuries, we replace Weeden with Colt and run the same plays. Their offense is actually based around their starting qb. Basically my point is, we took a Retard tight end 6th overall in 2004 instead of a qb.

    VagitronV 1 Reply
    👍
  • VagitronV Vagitron

    @feartheroo said:

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.

    B bringbackbrownie2 wrote on
    #171

    Homotron said:

    It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.

    Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..

    VagitronV 1 Reply
  • B Banana Stand wrote on
    #172

    as giftwrapped of a win as you'll ever see

    Steve Holt is a bastard.
  • C clebro

    @feartheroo said:

    How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses

    But when we get injuries, we replace Weeden with Colt and run the same plays. Their offense is actually based around their starting qb. Basically my point is, we took a Retard tight end 6th overall in 2004 instead of a qb.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #173

    @clebro said:

    But when we get injuries, we replace Weeden with Colt and run the same plays. Their offense is actually based around their starting qb. Basically my point is, we took a Retard tight end 6th overall in 2004 instead of a qb.

    He's a "Soldier" tho. 😉

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
  • BadNewsBrownsB BadNewsBrowns wrote on
    #174

    Shurmur tried his best to pull defeat from the jaws of victory.

    "All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" ~Arthur Schopenhauer
  • B bringbackbrownie2

    Homotron said:

    It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.

    Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on
    #175

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..

    The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption. (Please check the state line for Ben in the Oakland game and report back)

    EDIT: Actually I doubt you'll actually check and if you do you won't post it. He was 36 for 49 for 384 4 td's no int's. I'm not going to sh.it up this thread with a bunch of "woe is me" after a Browns win but the facts are the facts. You'd have likely lost if Ben played and I think that's pretty obvious. Enjoy the win. I just hope the Steelers can get healthy.

    AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
    DieHardBrownsFanD B 2 Replies
  • BadNewsBrownsB BadNewsBrowns wrote on
    #176

    Weeden couldn't outplay a 37 year old third string QB = fact. Start with your excuses for him now.

    "All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" ~Arthur Schopenhauer
    B B 2 Replies
  • VagitronV Vagitron

    @bringbackbrownie2 said:

    Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..

    The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption. (Please check the state line for Ben in the Oakland game and report back)

    EDIT: Actually I doubt you'll actually check and if you do you won't post it. He was 36 for 49 for 384 4 td's no int's. I'm not going to sh.it up this thread with a bunch of "woe is me" after a Browns win but the facts are the facts. You'd have likely lost if Ben played and I think that's pretty obvious. Enjoy the win. I just hope the Steelers can get healthy.

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on
    #177

    Homotron said:

    The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption.

    Assume meant make an ass out of you and me. And you lost.

    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
Log in to reply