Clowney Recently Ran Sub 4.5 40-Yard Dash
-
If by some chance we do end up with the #1 overall pick I definitely wouldn't be objected to taking him. Of course that is dependent upon how Weeden performs this year (I think he show marked improvement across the board and will buy himself another year). Having Clowney be one of the ends with either Kruger, Sheard or Mingo as the OLB behind him would be a dangerous combination.
I don't think we will get the #1 overall pick, we will do better than 5 wins from last year and many teams will just plain out suck, ie NYJ, Jacksonville and Oakland.
If by some chance we do end up with the #1 overall pick I definitely wouldn't be objected to taking him. Of course that is dependent upon how Weeden performs this year (I think he show marked improvement across the board and will buy himself another year). Having Clowney be one of the ends with either Kruger, Sheard or Mingo as the OLB behind him would be a dangerous combination.
I don't think we will get the #1 overall pick, we will do better than 5 wins from last year and many teams will just plain out suck, ie NYJ, Jacksonville and Oakland.
He wouldn't be a 3-4 DE... not big enough. He'd be converted to OLB in a 3-4 system...
-
The guy has been a man mountain since his freshman year. He is going to be scary this year.
I think he will win the Heisman.
The guy has been a man mountain since his freshman year. He is going to be scary this year.
I think he will win the Heisman.
He won't win the Heisman
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
This guy could willingly sit out this year and be a guaranteed top 3 pick. That's why I've always contended a mandatory college rule is stupid. I want to see all kids graduate high school but why college? It's the teams decision to draft a guy and the players decision to know when hes ready. Unfortunately the NCAA won't let it happen because there's too much money to lose.
-
He won't win the Heisman
You are correct, there is a QB at Ohio State that I think has a great chance to win the Heisman, it is all set up for him
-
He won't win the Heisman
I don't know. There is a lot of sentiment to not just have the Heisman be a QB/RB award. If the guy stays healthy and has a monster season I think there would be a huge movement to have the first pure defensive player to win the award. (Woodson was a defender, but it helped him a lot that he was a very good return man.
I think Johnny Football will retrench a bit, and not be in the running, so this Clown
has as good a chance as anyone.If he gets hurt, then all bets are off.
-
This guy could willingly sit out this year and be a guaranteed top 3 pick. That's why I've always contended a mandatory college rule is stupid. I want to see all kids graduate high school but why college? It's the teams decision to draft a guy and the players decision to know when hes ready. Unfortunately the NCAA won't let it happen because there's too much money to lose.
This guy could willingly sit out this year and be a guaranteed top 3 pick. That's why I've always contended a mandatory college rule is stupid. I want to see all kids graduate high school but why college? It's the teams decision to draft a guy and the players decision to know when hes ready. Unfortunately the NCAA won't let it happen because there's too much money to lose.
Not true. The NCAA has no control over this rule. It is a collectively bargained rule between the NFL and the players association.
Now, maybe the motivation for the rule is to keep peace with the NCAA, but still, the NCAA has no control.
The NFL has the 3 year rule, and the NBA has the one and done rule...all collectively bargained.
They make these rules for their own protection as much as for the NCAA. The NFL does not want immature people coming into the league. They believe that if freshman and sophomores were eligible that a large percentage of them would bust out. Right now the first round bust rate probably stands close to 50%. It would probably jump up much higher if younger players were allowed in.
Remember, the Maurice Clarett challenge to the 3 year rule was decided along the lines that it was a collectively bargained rule, and thus legal.
-
He won't win the Heisman
You are correct, there is a QB at Ohio State that I think has a great chance to win the Heisman, it is all set up for him
You are correct, there is a QB at Ohio State that I think has a great chance to win the Heisman, it is all set up for him
Here is a link to what one publication views as the top 12 Heisman candidates:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2012/12/12/2013-heisman-watch-list/1762777/
Note, there is one RB, one WR and Clowney is the only defensive player, then 9 QBs.
-
This guy could willingly sit out this year and be a guaranteed top 3 pick. That's why I've always contended a mandatory college rule is stupid. I want to see all kids graduate high school but why college? It's the teams decision to draft a guy and the players decision to know when hes ready. Unfortunately the NCAA won't let it happen because there's too much money to lose.
Not true. The NCAA has no control over this rule. It is a collectively bargained rule between the NFL and the players association.
Now, maybe the motivation for the rule is to keep peace with the NCAA, but still, the NCAA has no control.
The NFL has the 3 year rule, and the NBA has the one and done rule...all collectively bargained.
They make these rules for their own protection as much as for the NCAA. The NFL does not want immature people coming into the league. They believe that if freshman and sophomores were eligible that a large percentage of them would bust out. Right now the first round bust rate probably stands close to 50%. It would probably jump up much higher if younger players were allowed in.
Remember, the Maurice Clarett challenge to the 3 year rule was decided along the lines that it was a collectively bargained rule, and thus legal.
Not true. The NCAA has no control over this rule. It is a collectively bargained rule between the NFL and the players association.
Now, maybe the motivation for the rule is to keep peace with the NCAA, but still, the NCAA has no control.
The NFL has the 3 year rule, and the NBA has the one and done rule...all collectively bargained.
They make these rules for their own protection as much as for the NCAA. The NFL does not want immature people coming into the league. They believe that if freshman and sophomores were eligible that a large percentage of them would bust out. Right now the first round bust rate probably stands close to 50%. It would probably jump up much higher if younger players were allowed in.
Remember, the Maurice Clarett challenge to the 3 year rule was decided along the lines that it was a collectively bargained rule, and thus legal.
I suppose technically it's mandated by the NFL but I feel extremely confident the NCAA has their hands on it in some form. I see your point but maturity is a subjective thing. I've met 20 year olds who are 10x more mature than someone double their age. The thing about specifically football is even if no such rule existed, MAYBE one player a year would come out of high school if that. Again, it's the conscious decision of both player and team to draft someone.
Heck, look at the NBA. A fair amount of the top players (Kobe, Lebron, Howard) came out of high school. I mean idk, but it's just a shame for a guy like Clowney who literally has nothing else to prove. There's no way his stock could be higher. If I knew my physical ability was going to make me millions I'd want to start making the money ASAP.
-
He won't win the Heisman
I don't know. There is a lot of sentiment to not just have the Heisman be a QB/RB award. If the guy stays healthy and has a monster season I think there would be a huge movement to have the first pure defensive player to win the award. (Woodson was a defender, but it helped him a lot that he was a very good return man.
I think Johnny Football will retrench a bit, and not be in the running, so this Clown
has as good a chance as anyone.If he gets hurt, then all bets are off.
I don't know. There is a lot of sentiment to not just have the Heisman be a QB/RB award. If the guy stays healthy and has a monster season I think there would be a huge movement to have the first pure defensive player to win the award. (Woodson was a defender, but it helped him a lot that he was a very good return man.
I think Johnny Football will retrench a bit, and not be in the running, so this Clown
has as good a chance as anyone.If he gets hurt, then all bets are off.
Exactly. Clowney just plays DE. It'll be extremely hard to put up the numbers needed to compete with the QBs/HBs in the running.
I'll also root against it every step of the way for Woodson's sake. Unless it came down to Braxton and Clowney... that'd be tough.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
He won't win the Heisman
You are correct, there is a QB at Ohio State that I think has a great chance to win the Heisman, it is all set up for him
You are correct, there is a QB at Ohio State that I think has a great chance to win the Heisman, it is all set up for him
The schedule definitely is. I think he's one of the preseason favorites too
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I don't know. There is a lot of sentiment to not just have the Heisman be a QB/RB award. If the guy stays healthy and has a monster season I think there would be a huge movement to have the first pure defensive player to win the award. (Woodson was a defender, but it helped him a lot that he was a very good return man.
I think Johnny Football will retrench a bit, and not be in the running, so this Clown
has as good a chance as anyone.If he gets hurt, then all bets are off.
Exactly. Clowney just plays DE. It'll be extremely hard to put up the numbers needed to compete with the QBs/HBs in the running.
I'll also root against it every step of the way for Woodson's sake. Unless it came down to Braxton and Clowney... that'd be tough.
Exactly. Clowney just plays DE. It'll be extremely hard to put up the numbers needed to compete with the QBs/HBs in the running.
I'll also root against it every step of the way for Woodson's sake. Unless it came down to Braxton and Clowney... that'd be tough.
You would root against Clowney winning the Heisman? Why? What does Woodson have to do with it? To be the only defensive player to have won it? Except, Woodson didn't really win it on the strength of his defense, but at least 50% on his return ability.
If he did not return kicks I do not believe he would have won.
I guess you just have to face it: 2 of the 3 top candidates will apparently be people you don't like. (the other being Manziel).
But, just like last year, I suggest someone will come out of the woodwork to become a top candidate.
-
I'm not sure you can pencil in Braxton or Clowney as for sure being in the final three....
And yes, it would be so Woodson could remain the only primarily defensive player to win the Heisman.
I'm also not big on anything SEC, even though USC isn't that bad .
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
As long as no one from Michigan wins, I'm cool.
-
You are correct, there is a QB at Ohio State that I think has a great chance to win the Heisman, it is all set up for him
The schedule definitely is. I think he's one of the preseason favorites too
The schedule definitely is. I think he's one of the preseason favorites too
The Ohio State schedule and the Michigan schedule this year are pretty much on par:
OSU's non conference schedule:
Buffalo (MAC), home
San Diego St. (MWC) home
@ Cal Bears
Fla. A&M home
Mich. non conf. schedule:
Central Mich (MAC). home
Notre Dame, home
Akron (MAC)
@ UConn.
Ohio State's Big Ten opponents:
Wisconsin
@Northwestern
Iowa
Penn St.
@Purdue
@ Illinois
Indiana
@ Mich
Michigan's Big Ten sched:
Minnesota
@Penn St.
Indiana
@Mich State
Nebraska
@Northwestern
@Iowa
Ohio St.
My only objection about Ohio States schedule is the scheduling of FCS Florida A&M. Though Fla. A&M may be as good as any MAC school, I just don't like them scheduling FCS schools.
Both schools have their MAC opponents.
UConn and San Diego St. are programs that are about on par with each other.
Ohio St. has Cal, Mich has ND.
Ohio St. has traditionally done a rotation schedule with Pac-12 schools, though that won't be the case the following years when they do a home and home with Va. Tech. In the 2015 season they start playing Rutgers and Maryland who will be in the Big Ten. Their non conference games will be reduced from 4 to 3.
The only seeming "strength" of schedule next year that Mich has vs. OSU is that game vs. Notre Dame. Based on last season it seems that ND is a stronger opponent than Cal. But I am not sure that for the decade prior to last year that claim could be made.
-
I'm not sure you can pencil in Braxton or Clowney as for sure being in the final three....
And yes, it would be so Woodson could remain the only primarily defensive player to win the Heisman.
I'm also not big on anything SEC, even though USC isn't that bad .
I'm not sure you can pencil in Braxton or Clowney as for sure being in the final three....
And yes, it would be so Woodson could remain the only primarily defensive player to win the Heisman.
I'm also not big on anything SEC, even though USC isn't that bad .
Jesus, now you have just given me motivation to root FOR Clowney. Though, since the Gamecocks are my father-in-laws favorite team (at 90 he lives just outside Columbia SC) , I might have been prone to favor him anyway. I too though would not root for an SEC team, except the Gamecocks.
-
You gotta love South Carolina's battle cry:
-
Well all I know is I've got a kick ass season lined up on the student section.
I'd still say OSU has an easier schedule though. If they aren't undefeated heading into the game it will be a disappointment
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I'm not sure you can pencil in Braxton or Clowney as for sure being in the final three....
And yes, it would be so Woodson could remain the only primarily defensive player to win the Heisman.
I'm also not big on anything SEC, even though USC isn't that bad .
Jesus, now you have just given me motivation to root FOR Clowney. Though, since the Gamecocks are my father-in-laws favorite team (at 90 he lives just outside Columbia SC) , I might have been prone to favor him anyway. I too though would not root for an SEC team, except the Gamecocks.
Jesus, now you have just given me motivation to root FOR Clowney. Though, since the Gamecocks are my father-in-laws favorite team (at 90 he lives just outside Columbia SC) , I might have been prone to favor him anyway. I too though would not root for an SEC team, except the Gamecocks.
Because OSU fans totally wouldn't root against someone that might win their second Heisman....
-
I really think Ohio State is set up to take the National title and the Heisman this year. Miller is the real deal, now I do not know what he would do in the NFL. More than likely nothing, but you never know. As for the team up North, I hope they lose every game, but when bowl games come I hope they kick the shit out of a SEC team
-
Well all I know is I've got a kick ass season lined up on the student section.
I'd still say OSU has an easier schedule though. If they aren't undefeated heading into the game it will be a disappointment
Well all I know is I've got a kick ass season lined up on the student section.
I'd still say OSU has an easier schedule though. If they aren't undefeated heading into the game it will be a disappointment
There are two things that might point to that:
A. Notre Dame should probably be ranked ahead of Cal.
B. Fla. A&M is a FCS school. Though, like I said, in a head to head game with Buffalo/Cent. Mich/Akron Florida A&M could likely even be favored.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login