Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. According to Adam Schefter

According to Adam Schefter

The Browns Board
66 26 3.5k
  • USFBrownU USFBrown

    They better not trade Gordon. I understand trading Richardson since he wasn't producing and didn't show anything that was worth a #3 pick.

    Gordon actually produces and after his performance today, if they trade him, there will be a riot from the fans.

    Gordon is a true #1.

    B beefjerky wrote on
    #38

    @usfbrown said:

    They better not trade Gordon. I understand trading Richardson since he wasn't producing and didn't show anything that was worth a #3 pick.

    Gordon actually produces and after his performance today, if they trade him, there will be a riot from the fans.

    Gordon is a true #1.

    Agreed. We finally have a true #1 and they're "listening to offers"? YOU CAN'T BUILD A FUTURE IF YOU RUIN THE PRESENT.

  • F FairHooker11 wrote on
    #39

    gordon just glides on that field...

    S Wilcots CBS says - Like a Randy Moss

  • K KYBROWNSFAN wrote on
    #40

    We gotta keep Gordon best receiver we have,our TE Cameron going to be a beast before season is over.

    miktoxicM 1 Reply
  • H Hempman wrote on
    #41

    problem is if Gordon gets in trouble again. I would take 2 first rounders for him. My guess, though, that closes that door.

  • K KYBROWNSFAN

    We gotta keep Gordon best receiver we have,our TE Cameron going to be a beast before season is over.

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on
    #42

    @kybrownsfan said:

    We gotta keep Gordon best receiver we have,our TE Cameron going to be a beast before season is over.

    i called it before the year and a lot agreed that under turner as OC cameron will be huge this year.

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on
    #43

    From MKC:

    Josh Gordon on if he was making the statement 'don't trade me': "it was kind of that sense."

  • S SunDawg wrote on
    #44

    I would be EXTREMELY disappointed if they trade Gordon. This team won't win a game beyond that point.

    Who wants Little, seriously? He's quickly disappearing from this offense's plans.

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on
    #45

    Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

    Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

    The Cysko KidT 1 Reply
  • S SunDawg wrote on
    #46

    Gordon accounted for 168 yards of our 406 total yards on offense, or 41% of our offense. IF they trade him they are complete f#@king incompetents, period.

  • S SunDawg

    Gordon accounted for 168 yards of our 406 total yards on offense, or 41% of our offense. IF they trade him they are complete f#@king incompetents, period.

    JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on
    #47

    @sundawg said:

    Gordon accounted for 168 yards of our 406 total yards on offense, or 41% of our offense. IF they trade him they are complete f#@king incompetents, period.

    Yep.

    Been saying ever since I saw him that he can be elite if he wants to be.

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF

    Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

    Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

    The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid wrote on
    #48

    @jafbf said:

    Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

    Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

    You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

    This shit ain't nothing to me, man.
    H JAFBFJ 2 Replies
  • H Hempman wrote on
    #49

    Gordon is the only reason the Browns won today. Getting in the way of Banner's tanking plans?

  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid

    @jafbf said:

    Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

    Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

    You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

    H Hempman wrote on
    #50

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

    Ball is thrown? Little is terrible vertically. Weeden placed a "Manningesque" terrific pass and Little just dropped it down the seam vs. the Ravens. Hoyer can't make that throw at all.

    Little was in the only position that he can play.

    The Cysko KidT 1 Reply
  • The Cysko KidT The Cysko Kid

    @jafbf said:

    Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

    Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

    You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

    JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on
    #51

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

    Yeah, I was thinking that as well - Hoyer puts more touch on it whereas Weeden seems to drill everything.

  • JAFBFJ JAFBF

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

    Yeah, I was thinking that as well - Hoyer puts more touch on it whereas Weeden seems to drill everything.

    flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on
    #52

    @jafbf said:

    Yeah, I was thinking that as well - Hoyer puts more touch on it whereas Weeden seems to drill everything.

    I really liked the touch on the lofts into the end zone. Weedon's looked more like a broken wing and a prayer. Hoyer had a much better touch

  • F FairHooker11 wrote on
    #53

    notice?

    hempman - weeden

    like

    lumbergh - DA lol

    weeds manningesque? BWAHAAA

  • Flyin JF Flyin J

    Well its good to know were all watching Countdown. Gordon for Mallett anyone?

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on
    #54

    XxDaBuckeyexX said:

    Well its good to know were all watching Countdown. Gordon for Mallett anyone?

    LOL please for the love of God tell me you are kidding. Elite talent wide receiver for a bust QB?

    Flyin JF 1 Reply
  • PoeticGP PoeticG

    I would try Little out at Runningback, he was one before. He can catch well enough to catch out the backfield like a RB though.

    ...I don't want Ben Tate....

    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on
    #55

    @poeticg said:

    I would try Little out at Runningback, he was one before. He can catch well enough to catch out the backfield like a RB though.

    ...I don't want Ben Tate....

    +1 , not a bad idea at all. As a receiver he is total crap but maybe he could run

  • SojuS Soju wrote on
    #56

    only reason we have Gordon on the trading block is bc of his off the field drug issues. The FO thinks he is a liability in that regard and are banking on him screwing up again. That would THE ONLY reason they are looking to shop him aroun. And I wouldn't take anything less than a 2nd rounder for him. Exactly what we spent to get him. He is a first round talent, so the bargain for the other team is a getting him one round cheaper.

  • S Shep wrote on
    #57

    I can't fathom trading Gordon. He's our best player on offense... makes it almost hilarious that people were saying that about T-Rich and his 2 or 3 yards a carry week after week.

Log in to reply