Buckeyes
-
Won 20 in a row, and nobody gives a damn.
Do you think we have a chance at the BCS Championship if we win out? I think we are still being penalized for losing those title games years ago.
The voters forget we beat Oregon in the Rose Bowl, and Arkansas in the Sugar since those losses. Our defense has looked shaky until last night, time the voters look past this SEC stuff, and our soft early season schedule.
-
Won 20 in a row, and nobody gives a damn.
Do you think we have a chance at the BCS Championship if we win out? I think we are still being penalized for losing those title games years ago.
The voters forget we beat Oregon in the Rose Bowl, and Arkansas in the Sugar since those losses. Our defense has looked shaky until last night, time the voters look past this SEC stuff, and our soft early season schedule.
Won 20 in a row, and nobody gives a damn.
Do you think we have a chance at the BCS Championship if we win out? I think we are still being penalized for losing those title games years ago.
The voters forget we beat Oregon in the Rose Bowl, and Arkansas in the Sugar since those losses. Our defense has looked shaky until last night, time the voters look past this SEC stuff, and our soft early season schedule.
People will give a damn. Its just that the media likes to think that teams in the southeast/west are better than those in the midwest...but like you said, OSU beat the last 2 teams from the south and west that they met. Sure, they lost a couple of title games to FLa. and LSU...but they also beat Miami. Last time I looked Miami was in the south.
The other thing is that it is true the Buckeyes haven't looked totally dominant this year against everyone.....but if they continue to win, things will turn out OK in the end.
Note: If Ohio St. were eligible last year, Alabama would never have been in the BCS title game. That would have been OSU/Notre Dame.
A similar thing could happen here. Alabama does not seem unbeatable this year (maybe there HGH program is not working quite as well). FSU could lose vs. Miami this week. Oregon seems to me to be the most sure thing.
(btw....does anyone at Oregon miss Chip Kelly?). In 2-3 years Kelly will be back in college, just like Steve Spurrier. Probably at Rutgers or Maryland or somewhere. He and Greg Schiano.
-
Real talk, OSU won't be hopping FSU or Oregon any time soon. They haven't looked impressive enough and haven't played as many good teams. If they run the table, along with FSU, Oregon and Bama, they'll be 4th.... that's just the truth. They needed NW to keep playing well, they also need some big wins against highly ranked teams at the end of the year and in the B1G title game.
Or, and you guys never beat Arkansas, remember?
-
Real talk, OSU won't be hopping FSU or Oregon any time soon. They haven't looked impressive enough and haven't played as many good teams. If they run the table, along with FSU, Oregon and Bama, they'll be 4th.... that's just the truth. They needed NW to keep playing well, they also need some big wins against highly ranked teams at the end of the year and in the B1G title game.
Or, and you guys never beat Arkansas, remember?
Real talk, OSU won't be hopping FSU or Oregon any time soon. They haven't looked impressive enough and haven't played as many good teams. If they run the table, along with FSU, Oregon and Bama, they'll be 4th.... that's just the truth. They needed NW to keep playing well, they also need some big wins against highly ranked teams at the end of the year and in the B1G title game.
Or, and you guys never beat Arkansas, remember?
OK, they may not jump those teams unless those teams lose...which they can do....but that does not mean that they could not beat them if they played.
As for the schedules....have you seen Alabama's schedule? They play a lousier schedule than the Buckeyes do. Their non-conference games:
Colorado St.
Georgia St.
Chattanooga.
(that is a far bigger cupcake schedule than OSU playing Cal, SDSU, Fla. A&M and Buffalo)
And Alabama's SEC schedule includes
Texas A&M
Kentucky
Arkansas
Tennesseee
Missisissipi St.
LSU
Auburn
(I do not see where, this year anyway, that these teams are significantly, if at all better than Penn St., Wisconsin, Iowa, Northwestern, Indiana, Illinois, Purdue and Michigan...do you?)
-
I know our (Buckeyes) schedule isn't stellar, but 21 in a row speaks for itself.
Also, we started ranked #2, & we were dropped in the polls because we didn't look good vs. Cal. Then we beat up a team we shouldn't even play 76-0, and we drop another spot to #4.
I think the only way we can play for the BCS title is for all 3 teams ahead of us to lose once. The national media hates OSU, and the SEC coaches will never give props to any Big 10 team in the coaches poll.
-
The media is SEC bias, but they don'y hate OSU. OSU just doesn't have as many impressive wins as FSU or Oregon
-
The media is SEC bias, but they don'y hate OSU. OSU just doesn't have as many impressive wins as FSU or Oregon
The media is SEC bias, but they don'y hate OSU. OSU just doesn't have as many impressive wins as FSU or Oregon
You're partially right....only Mark may & Tim Brando (biggest SEC rah rah guy ever) seem to have total Buckeye hate.
-
Now since Oregon has lost, people are saying Baylor should be ranked over OSU. I highly disagree.
-
Wow, STA and BAY are still ranked below OSU, despite them both crushing Top 10 teams!
-
Unfortunately for OSU, Stanford has a much juicier schedule, playing ranked opponents the rest of the way: USC, CAL & N. Dame.
BAY plays #12 OK S. and #24 Texas.
-
Who determines the schedule? It seems a bit unfair for someone to determine who you play, then criticise you for it.
-
Who determines the schedule? It seems a bit unfair for someone to determine who you play, then criticise you for it.
Who determines the schedule? It seems a bit unfair for someone to determine who you play, then criticise you for it.
For the conference portion of the schedule, the Big Ten decides the schedule. For the non-conference portion the schools make their own arrangements. And the contracts for these games are often made a decade in advance, especially those against other major conference teams. See this link:
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa/big-ten/ohio-state-buckeyes.php
-
Stanford also lost.
-
Who determines the schedule? It seems a bit unfair for someone to determine who you play, then criticise you for it.
-
Luckily, there will be a playoff starting next season.
That seems much more sensible, who on earth came up with the idea of voting which teams are the best? OK, I get that in olden times, when travel was difficult/expensive you don't want more matches than necessary, but this is 2013, surely this should have changed some time ago?
-
Luckily, there will be a playoff starting next season.
That seems much more sensible, who on earth came up with the idea of voting which teams are the best? OK, I get that in olden times, when travel was difficult/expensive you don't want more matches than necessary, but this is 2013, surely this should have changed some time ago?
That seems much more sensible, who on earth came up with the idea of voting which teams are the best? OK, I get that in olden times, when travel was difficult/expensive you don't want more matches than necessary, but this is 2013, surely this should have changed some time ago?
Consider college football like evolution: change comes, but it comes very very slowly.
-
Well if this was the political forum then we wouldn't consider evolution at all.
-
Well if this was the political forum then we wouldn't consider evolution at all.
(In their case, no, evolution has not occurred)
-
Real talk, OSU won't be hopping FSU or Oregon any time soon. They haven't looked impressive enough and haven't played as many good teams. If they run the table, along with FSU, Oregon and Bama, they'll be 4th.... that's just the truth. They needed NW to keep playing well, they also need some big wins against highly ranked teams at the end of the year and in the B1G title game.
Or, and you guys never beat Arkansas, remember?
Real talk, OSU won't be hopping FSU or Oregon any time soon. They haven't looked impressive enough and haven't played as many good teams. If they run the table, along with FSU, Oregon and Bama, they'll be 4th.... that's just the truth. They needed NW to keep playing well, they also need some big wins against highly ranked teams at the end of the year and in the B1G title game.
Or, and you guys never beat Arkansas, remember?
2011 Sugar Bowl
Also it hurts OSU that Wisconsin lost a dumb game(refs admitted a mistake), Michigan isn't at its usual position, Vanderbilt dropped out of a game(almost at the last moment) forcing OSU to schedule who was left(San Diego State) and Northwestern basically collapsed after they lost to OSU
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login