Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. NorrinRadd12 will be released by The Browns Board today

NorrinRadd12 will be released by The Browns Board today

The Browns Board
154 35 8.2k
  • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on
    #33

    browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

    John.R.Brown1968J Mr. Make-BelieveM 2 Replies
  • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI

    browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

    John.R.Brown1968J John.R.Brown1968 wrote on
    #34

    @cleinchi said:

    browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

    The Browns are also going to have to resign Haden. That's a lot of money to tie up in one position. And regardless of Revis having a good year last year, he's still not that far removed from a torn ACL, and he's aging.

  • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI

    browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

    Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on
    #35

    @cleinchi said:

    browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

    I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

    We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

  • Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe

    @cleinchi said:

    browns could resign mack at a deal that the bucs want, and trade for revis with a condition that he would restructure....what would you rather have mack at 10 mil for one year and a draft pick or Revis for 11 m a year for the next 4 years? ( 11m and 4 years are guesses)

    I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

    We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

    gftChrisG gftChris wrote on
    #36

    @mr.-make-believe said:

    I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

    We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

    Word is we're signing Whitner.

    Mr. Make-BelieveM 1 Reply
  • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on
    #37

    now reports are dansby and whitner coming to the browns.... our new identity... bone crushing defense

  • GoBrowns 0G GoBrowns 0 wrote on
    #38

    Mack doesn't want to be here (my opinion). His agent is trying to produce a deal that the browns can't match.

  • John.R.Brown1968J John.R.Brown1968

    I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #39

    @john.r.brown1968 said:

    I like the idea of Revis, and regardless of if there's potential truth to these rumors, I don't like it if it includes not only a 1st round pick, but also a key free agent. There's other parts to this rumor floating around, that Revis could be had for a mid to late round pick, so why on earth would they trade not only a 1st rounder, but Mack as well. It doesn't make any sense, even if the front office is trying to use "better than getting nothing for Mack" logic. Hell No.

    Mack for Revis straight up is reasonable- throwing in picks on top of it? Bite me. They both would have to restructure.

  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @mr.-make-believe said:

    I'd rather not have to take so many steps back in order to go forward.

    We lose Ward and Mack and pick up Revis? Part of me is excited. Most of me is pissed that we're no further ahead overall.

    Word is we're signing Whitner.

    Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on
    #40

    @gftchris said:

    Word is we're signing Whitner.

    First I've heard of Hitner. I guess I have to be like everyone else and just be patient.

    Whitner would help temper my disappointment though.

  • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on
    #41

    Per source, IF Browns trade for Revis, they could send Alex Mack to TB in the deal. Basic swap of salaries after restructure w/Revis.




    that would be awesome


  • CLEinCHIC CLEinCHI wrote on
    #42

    Daryl Ruiter ‏@RuiterWrongFAN 19s

    Daryl Ruiter@RuiterWrongFAN
    Hearing Donte Whitner is a done deal #Browns
    Mar 11, 2014 25 9View on X

    Hearing Donte Whitner is a done deal #Browns

  • Mr. Make-BelieveM Mr. Make-Believe wrote on
    #43

    Shit is happening...

  • DownSouthKCD DownSouthKC wrote on
    #44

    I don't like to toot my own horn but 'toot, toot'. If this happens I called it first yesterday ... If it doesn't happen though? I was just messing around.

  • Flyin JF Flyin J wrote on
    #45

    Revis won't restructure for trade.

  • B beare wrote on
    #46

    LOVE to have him but not at 15-16 mill. ALSO theres no way we trade a 1st rd pick for him.

  • B beare wrote on
    #47

    Profootballtalk reports Darrelle Revis is unwilling to take a pay cut to facilitate a trade.



    It's hardly a surprise. Revis' best card is to refuse any and all requests to take a pay cut, forcing his release. He'd then be free to pick his own team, and get some guarantees beyond 2014. Even the Browns would reportedly insist on a pay cut in any potential trade. It's unclear what the Raiders' stance is. The Raiders have the cap room to absorb Revis' $16 million salary.


    I highly doubt browns will go after him after reading this!

  • B bonedawg wrote on
    #48

    We don't need Revis, what we DO need to be doing is looking for the next Revis.

  • mdice42M mdice42 wrote on
    #49

    While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning 🙂

    thenew23T B 2 Replies
    👍
  • mdice42M mdice42

    While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning 🙂

    thenew23T thenew23 wrote on
    #50

    @mdice42 said:

    While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning 🙂

    You mean Tom Brady? Nobody wants us to draft a QB that high... 😎

    #Justsayin'
  • mdice42M mdice42 wrote on
    #51

    That's a good point, a true value.

  • mdice42M mdice42

    While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning 🙂

    B bonedawg wrote on
    #52

    @mdice42 said:

    While we're at it, we'll just go ahead and find the next Peyton Manning 🙂

    Hardy Har. I get it. Everyone wants the next Manning etc. My point is that Revis' best days may be behind him. You want to throw 10 mil a year for a guy who is on the downslope? I'd rather take shots getting young talent. Adding a veteran to an already established team is one thing. You can't rebuild with also-rans. Hey while we're at it, we can lock up Chris Johnson and Steve Smith.

Log in to reply