Hawkins
-
Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.
lol.. Who's next? Melanie?
About Austin, am I the only one who thinks he's being underutilized??? He's averaging 3 receptions and 5 targets per game and 12 ypc. I know he' not going to produce like its 2009 again, but with his size and hands, I'm just a bit suprised they dont try and get him the ball a little more. Especially considering all our other WR's are smaller shiftier guys. He's the only WR that can use his body to establish position and shield off the DB's.
Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.
As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.
lol.. Who's next? Melanie?
With Candles in the Rain
Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.
As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.
We will target Gordon when he returns.
-
If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.
We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.
And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.
Nope, no compensatory pick. Just a FA signing.
for clarification, Cinci tendered an 'Exclusive Rights FA' contract, meaning they had first refusal on any contract; if they refuse, they are entitled to a compensatory pick equivalent to where the player was drafted. However, since Hawkins was a UDFA, no pick is 'traded'.
We'd be in the same position with Gipson, FWIW.
for clarification, Cinci tendered an 'Exclusive Rights FA' contract, meaning they had first refusal on any contract; if they refuse, they are entitled to a compensatory pick equivalent to where the player was drafted. However, since Hawkins was a UDFA, no pick is 'traded'.
We'd be in the same position with Gipson, FWIW.
Not to be nit-picky here, but compensatory is the wrong terminology here. They would have been compensated with a pick equal to where he was drafted. So if he were drafted as a 3rd rounder, and they failed to match the Brown's offer, they would have owed Cincinnati a 3rd round pick.
Compensated with a pick is different than compensatory picks. Maybe not in plain English, but in NFL football business jargon it is.
-
We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.
And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.
Gotcha, I had it in my head that it was all about the players production the next year.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login