Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Hawkins

Hawkins

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
23 Posts 11 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ManzierM Manzier

    Cinci has to regret letting Hawkins go. Big time. Sometimes you don't know what you got till it's gone.

    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
    • 57k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @manzier said:

    Cinci has to regret letting Hawkins go. Big time. Sometimes you don't know what you got till it's gone.

    Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.

    Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • slimdawg slimdawgS
      • 541 Posts
      • 49 Reputation
      slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by
      #11

      He's definitely been productive. Hopefully now that he broke the seal with his 1st TD, he starts scoring more frequently.

      About Austin, am I the only one who thinks he's being underutilized??? He's averaging 3 receptions and 5 targets per game and 12 ypc. I know he' not going to produce like its 2009 again, but with his size and hands, I'm just a bit suprised they dont try and get him the ball a little more. Especially considering all our other WR's are smaller shiftier guys. He's the only WR that can use his body to establish position and shield off the DB's.

      !!!!hopefully i'll be alive when it happens!!!!
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Thaak ThaakT
        • 1k Posts
        • 26 Reputation
        ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
        #12

        I love Hawkins. I loved him in the Michael Irvin/Dallas Cowboys reality show. I wanted him to win.

        I love what he's doing for the Browns right now.

        I think he's a long term answer in the slot once Gordon comes back.

        But I'm also really, really impressed with #18! Taylor Gabriel! He's making plays man! That's all this kid is doing right now is making plays!

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • slimdawg slimdawgS
          • 541 Posts
          • 49 Reputation
          slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by
          #13

          If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.

          !!!!hopefully i'll be alive when it happens!!!!
          ManzierM gftChrisG 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Thaak ThaakT
            • 1k Posts
            • 26 Reputation
            ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by Thaak
            #14

            We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.

            And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.

            slimdawgS 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • slimdawgS slimdawg

              If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.

              Manzier ManzierM
              • 853 Posts
              • 125 Reputation
              ManzierM Manzier wrote on last edited by
              #15

              @slimdawg said:

              If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.

              Nope, no compensatory pick. Just a FA signing.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • slimdawgS slimdawg

                If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.

                gftChris gftChrisG
                • 13k Posts
                • 428 Reputation
                gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                #16

                @slimdawg said:

                If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.

                @thaak said:

                We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.

                And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.

                @manzier said:

                Nope, no compensatory pick. Just a FA signing.

                for clarification, Cinci tendered an 'Exclusive Rights FA' contract, meaning they had first refusal on any contract; if they refuse, they are entitled to a compensatory pick equivalent to where the player was drafted. However, since Hawkins was a UDFA, no pick is 'traded'.

                We'd be in the same position with Gipson, FWIW.

                ThaakT 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • The GipperT The Gipper

                  @manzier said:

                  Cinci has to regret letting Hawkins go. Big time. Sometimes you don't know what you got till it's gone.

                  Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.

                  Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                  • 30k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @the-gipper said:

                  Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.

                  lol.. Who's next? Melanie?

                  @slimdawg said:

                  About Austin, am I the only one who thinks he's being underutilized??? He's averaging 3 receptions and 5 targets per game and 12 ypc. I know he' not going to produce like its 2009 again, but with his size and hands, I'm just a bit suprised they dont try and get him the ball a little more. Especially considering all our other WR's are smaller shiftier guys. He's the only WR that can use his body to establish position and shield off the DB's.

                  Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                  As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                  "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                  ManzierM slimdawgS The GipperT 3 Replies Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                    @the-gipper said:

                    Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.

                    lol.. Who's next? Melanie?

                    @slimdawg said:

                    About Austin, am I the only one who thinks he's being underutilized??? He's averaging 3 receptions and 5 targets per game and 12 ypc. I know he' not going to produce like its 2009 again, but with his size and hands, I'm just a bit suprised they dont try and get him the ball a little more. Especially considering all our other WR's are smaller shiftier guys. He's the only WR that can use his body to establish position and shield off the DB's.

                    Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                    As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                    Manzier ManzierM
                    • 853 Posts
                    • 125 Reputation
                    ManzierM Manzier wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    @tour2ma said:

                    Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                    As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                    I agree with this. Hoyer doesn't seem to play favorites and is spreading it around pretty good. I'd guess Austin gets targeted when he's open, eh? Seems to have good hands, but maybe a little slow. So not open as often as the younger guys. And not likely to provide the same YAC either. A very good role receiver, but not a 1 or 2 anymore.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • ThaakT Thaak

                      We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.

                      And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.

                      slimdawg slimdawgS
                      • 541 Posts
                      • 49 Reputation
                      slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      @thaak said:

                      We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.

                      And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.

                      Gotcha, I had it in my head that it was all about the players production the next year.

                      !!!!hopefully i'll be alive when it happens!!!!
                      ThaakT 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                        @the-gipper said:

                        Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.

                        lol.. Who's next? Melanie?

                        @slimdawg said:

                        About Austin, am I the only one who thinks he's being underutilized??? He's averaging 3 receptions and 5 targets per game and 12 ypc. I know he' not going to produce like its 2009 again, but with his size and hands, I'm just a bit suprised they dont try and get him the ball a little more. Especially considering all our other WR's are smaller shiftier guys. He's the only WR that can use his body to establish position and shield off the DB's.

                        Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                        As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                        slimdawg slimdawgS
                        • 541 Posts
                        • 49 Reputation
                        slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        @tour2ma said:

                        lol.. Who's next? Melanie?

                        Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                        As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                        Nah I wasnt talking about trying to force any throws to him, more like making him 1st read on more plays. Similar to the play they ran in back to back games which both resulted in TD's. I absolutely see him as a possession type reciever, he reminds me of Joe J. alot but I swear I remember Joe being more involved than what Austin is though

                        !!!!hopefully i'll be alive when it happens!!!!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                          @the-gipper said:

                          Pave paradise and put up a parking lot. Thanks Joni.

                          lol.. Who's next? Melanie?

                          @slimdawg said:

                          About Austin, am I the only one who thinks he's being underutilized??? He's averaging 3 receptions and 5 targets per game and 12 ypc. I know he' not going to produce like its 2009 again, but with his size and hands, I'm just a bit suprised they dont try and get him the ball a little more. Especially considering all our other WR's are smaller shiftier guys. He's the only WR that can use his body to establish position and shield off the DB's.

                          Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                          As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                          The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                          • 57k Posts
                          • 4k Reputation
                          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          @tour2ma said:

                          lol.. Who's next? Melanie?

                          With Candles in the Rain

                          Austin is essentially seems to have settled into the "possession" role. Which for his size and relative lack of speed seems appropriate.

                          As for try... no. Take what the D gives. Mix it up. Trying to target a WR often ends badly.

                          We will target Gordon when he returns.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • gftChrisG gftChris

                            @slimdawg said:

                            If I remember correctly, Cincinnati wanted to resign him but Cleveland offered him more money than Cincinatti was willing to match. Also I believe we will end up having to give Cincinatti a compensatory pick.

                            @thaak said:

                            We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.

                            And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.

                            @manzier said:

                            Nope, no compensatory pick. Just a FA signing.

                            for clarification, Cinci tendered an 'Exclusive Rights FA' contract, meaning they had first refusal on any contract; if they refuse, they are entitled to a compensatory pick equivalent to where the player was drafted. However, since Hawkins was a UDFA, no pick is 'traded'.

                            We'd be in the same position with Gipson, FWIW.

                            Thaak ThaakT
                            • 1k Posts
                            • 26 Reputation
                            ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            @gftchris said:

                            for clarification, Cinci tendered an 'Exclusive Rights FA' contract, meaning they had first refusal on any contract; if they refuse, they are entitled to a compensatory pick equivalent to where the player was drafted. However, since Hawkins was a UDFA, no pick is 'traded'.

                            We'd be in the same position with Gipson, FWIW.

                            Not to be nit-picky here, but compensatory is the wrong terminology here. They would have been compensated with a pick equal to where he was drafted. So if he were drafted as a 3rd rounder, and they failed to match the Brown's offer, they would have owed Cincinnati a 3rd round pick.

                            Compensated with a pick is different than compensatory picks. Maybe not in plain English, but in NFL football business jargon it is.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • slimdawgS slimdawg

                              @thaak said:

                              We won't have to give Cincinnati anything. The NFL hands out compensatory picks.

                              And while the algorithm for how compensatory picks are handed out is convoluted at best, I don't believe an undrafted free agent will get you anything. Compensatory picks are handed out based on the drafted position of the free agents you lose.

                              Gotcha, I had it in my head that it was all about the players production the next year.

                              Thaak ThaakT
                              • 1k Posts
                              • 26 Reputation
                              ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              @slimdawg said:

                              Gotcha, I had it in my head that it was all about the players production the next year.

                              Trades are often done in such a way that a team can owe a pick within a range based on production for the new team.

                              But this has nothing to do with signing a free agent.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              Theme
                              • System
                              • Light
                              • Dark
                              The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                              The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Forums
                              • Recent
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Donate