Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Last years Seahawk D proved a great D trumps any QB. Attack them.

Last years Seahawk D proved a great D trumps any QB. Attack them.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
13 Posts 9 Posters 437 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SkippinTurtles S Conversation Starter Dedicated First Post Collaborator One Year In Week One Done One Month Later
    • 436 Posts
    • 49 Reputation
    S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Big money pretty boys don't like contact, Hit them and their receivers and you disrupt their whole gameplan. Punch those pussies in the mouth and watch them fold.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • WalterWhite WalterWhiteW
      • 3k Posts
      • 183 Reputation
      WalterWhiteW WalterWhite wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Agree and Disagree.

      The Colts games was a michrochosim of what's plagued us since the 1990's: NO QB.

      That Colts game was the best defensive effort I've ever seen by our team and we still lost.

      You have be able to score points.

      By the way, Russell Wilson is a 100+ rated QB every year and Marshawn Lynch is a badass. It's not like they are weak offensively.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite

        Agree and Disagree.

        The Colts games was a michrochosim of what's plagued us since the 1990's: NO QB.

        That Colts game was the best defensive effort I've ever seen by our team and we still lost.

        You have be able to score points.

        By the way, Russell Wilson is a 100+ rated QB every year and Marshawn Lynch is a badass. It's not like they are weak offensively.

        browns52 B Banned One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 1k Posts
        • 123 Reputation
        B browns52 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @walterwhite said:

        Agree and Disagree.

        The Colts games was a michrochosim of what's plagued us since the 1990's: NO QB.

        That Colts game was the best defensive effort I've ever seen by our team and we still lost.

        You have be able to score points.

        By the way, Russell Wilson is a 100+ rated QB every year and Marshawn Lynch is a badass. It's not like they are weak offensively.

        you're right, we had a decent offense til mack went down. after that, the running game was el zilcho. based on the browns playbook for hoyer with his play action, they need a strong running game to make that work. and it was working quite well. no excuse though, if this was a belechick team, he'd find a way to compensate as he always does. don't matter now, we now are back to square 1....hoyer will be gone...and johnny football is really johnny feeble...and with the steelers starting to build something really special...AGAIN....the ravens retooling and improving...and the bengals who i think after last night are the best team in the division, it is not looking good for the ole browns..

        1 Reply Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • bbedward bbedwardB Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 9k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          bbedwardB bbedward wrote on last edited by
          #4

          #1 rushing YPG

          #29 passing YPG on offense.

          #1 defensive passing and rushing YPG.

          They have an efficient and time consuming offensive with a nasty defense. That's my type of team.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 23k Posts
            • 6k Reputation
            T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Seahawks have a better 3rd string RB than any of our 1st stringers. They also have a real defensive front 7 with no holes to exploit. It's a bad joke that with all the low picks the Browns have had over the years we could not have matched that building effort. We need another $100,000 study to determine what they did vs. what the Browns did with an explicit long term plan to correct past mistakes going forward. If we are also going to keep JF then we need to study what was actually working for him that CAN translate to the pros. Here's a hint-he rarely used the pistol and he rarely used the read option. Too dangerous for a small QB.

            MudflyM Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • T TexasAg1969

              Seahawks have a better 3rd string RB than any of our 1st stringers. They also have a real defensive front 7 with no holes to exploit. It's a bad joke that with all the low picks the Browns have had over the years we could not have matched that building effort. We need another $100,000 study to determine what they did vs. what the Browns did with an explicit long term plan to correct past mistakes going forward. If we are also going to keep JF then we need to study what was actually working for him that CAN translate to the pros. Here's a hint-he rarely used the pistol and he rarely used the read option. Too dangerous for a small QB.

              Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 7k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @texasag1969 said:

              If we are also going to keep JF then we need to study what was actually working for him that CAN translate to the pros.

              That is a pretty short list.

              My main issue is that he cant do what other QB's do. To create a system that caters just to one player is death....especially is he gets hurt.....

              Gimme prototype QB play....not studies on how to get my QB to work right

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                • 11k Posts
                • 3k Reputation
                OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                #7

                From what I have seen of Crowell he hits a hole if it is there and makes decent yardage. I just see time after time the O line not giving him any openings. The Browns did have a running game with Mack as center and it disappeared after Mack got hurt.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • MudflyM Mudfly

                  @texasag1969 said:

                  If we are also going to keep JF then we need to study what was actually working for him that CAN translate to the pros.

                  That is a pretty short list.

                  My main issue is that he cant do what other QB's do. To create a system that caters just to one player is death....especially is he gets hurt.....

                  Gimme prototype QB play....not studies on how to get my QB to work right

                  TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 23k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @mudfly said:

                  That is a pretty short list.

                  My main issue is that he cant do what other QB's do. To create a system that caters just to one player is death....especially is he gets hurt.....

                  Gimme prototype QB play....not studies on how to get my QB to work right

                  I agree Mudfly. The key words here are "if we retain him". My own thought is that the Browns will not do so. History is on my side for that decision, so they have to maximize the trade now while he still has some value. Running him in the pistol and read option is going to fuck him up big time and then he has no value to anyone.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 7k Posts
                    • 1k Reputation
                    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Yeah, I have no idea what they'll do with him, honestly.....

                    And, in fairness to what you're saying, I think they're not sure how to use him either.

                    Just not sure if thats a coaching problem, system problem or Johnny problem.

                    So, for one player, do you start changing the whole system, coaches, etc????

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                      • 11k Posts
                      • 3k Reputation
                      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I don't believe it could have been more disastrous for Manziel than this. He loses out to Hoyer to start the season (which was the right decision) and then when he comes in late in the year the offense gets shut out and they look terrible. The Browns look to start him the last few games of the year to try and evaluate him and he promptly get's hurt the following game and is out for the season. Pettine is being very diplomatic when his evaluation of Manziel is that he shows flashes of an NFL quarterback in practice. I am not a Manziel hater, I wanted him to succeed here but this really has been an awful showing by Heisman winner Manziel. If I had my choice I would want Hoyer starting next year.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Opal312 Opal312O
                        • 2k Posts
                        • 100 Reputation
                        Opal312O Opal312 wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Agree with Mudfly

                        DAMN THE TORPEDOES! FULL SPEED AHEAD!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Opal312 Opal312O
                          • 2k Posts
                          • 100 Reputation
                          Opal312O Opal312 wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Although the first two picks in the draft haven't shown up, Farmer did show he knew talent in later rounds. I do think that we are heading in the right direction and I'm excited for the draft. Pettine seems like a good fit for a club that needs to learn how to win. I'm convinced they will address their needs and act accordingly in the off season. It's going to be a long off season again though.

                          DAMN THE TORPEDOES! FULL SPEED AHEAD!
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • T TexasAg1969

                            Seahawks have a better 3rd string RB than any of our 1st stringers. They also have a real defensive front 7 with no holes to exploit. It's a bad joke that with all the low picks the Browns have had over the years we could not have matched that building effort. We need another $100,000 study to determine what they did vs. what the Browns did with an explicit long term plan to correct past mistakes going forward. If we are also going to keep JF then we need to study what was actually working for him that CAN translate to the pros. Here's a hint-he rarely used the pistol and he rarely used the read option. Too dangerous for a small QB.

                            Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                            • 30k Posts
                            • 6k Reputation
                            Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @texasag1969 said:

                            Seahawks have a better 3rd string RB than any of our 1st stringers. They also have a real defensive front 7 with no holes to exploit. If we are also going to keep JF then we need to study what was actually working for him that CAN translate to the pros. Here's a hint-he rarely used the pistol and he rarely used the read option. Too dangerous for a small QB.

                            First, who's this "we"? You got an elf in your pocket? 😉

                            Second, define "rarely". Been a while, but I seem to remember read options run out of the shotgun.

                            Third, study? We have you. What worked for him? If you called Sumlin, what would he say he did to maximize Johnny's contribution?

                            @texasag1969 said:

                            I agree Mudfly. The key words here are "if we retain him". My own thought is that the Browns will not do so. History is on my side for that decision, so they have to maximize the trade now while he still has some value. Running him in the pistol and read option is going to fuck him up big time and then he has no value to anyone.

                            I remember the last guy that proclaimed how history would see his predictions. You are not that guy... hank God...

                            "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Theme
                            • System
                            • Light
                            • Dark
                            The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                            The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Forums
                            • Recent
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Donate