Skip to content

Heirarchy

The Browns Board
26 8 950
  • To me, Flacco and Manning are B-level QBs in A-level organizations. Rivers and Romo have been A-level QBs on B-level organizations.

    A+

    Tom Brady

    Peyton Manning

    Aaron Rogers

    Drew Brees

    A

    Ben Roethlisberger

    Phillip Rivers

    Tony Romo

    B+

    Andrew Luck

    Russell Wilson

    Joe Flacco

    B

    Eli Manning

    Matt Stafford

    Cam Newton

    Matt Ryan

    Carson Palmer

    Colin Kaepernick

    Andy Dalton

    C+

    Alex Smith

    Ryan Tannehill

    Nick Foles

    Jay Cutler

    C

    Robert Griffin

    Sam Bradford

    C- (placeholders but really backups)

    Ryan Fitzpatrick

    Brian Hoyer

    D (Developmental) in order:

    Derek Carr

    Teddy Twatwater

    Blake Bortles

    Geno Smith

    Zack Mettenberger/

    Mike Glennon/J

    EJ Manuel

    Zombo said:

    To me, Flacco and Manning are B-level QBs in A-level organizations. Rivers and Romo have been A-level QBs on B-level organizations.

    Much more in tune with my thinking.....pretty much agree with that list!

    @the-gipper said:

    You take Rivers with his 4-5 postseason record.

    I will take Eli with his 8-3 playoff record....or Flacco with his 10-4 playoff record.....

    But, you dont get the winning record, you just get the Quarterback.....as wins/losses are a team function, not a player function...this is a thread about rating QB's, not teams....right?

    IE....had ANY of these players played on a different team, their win/loss records would be very different....yet they would still be the same players....sooooo....

    Rivers hasn't won anything, yet people seem to think he's pretty good.....what if he went to the Giants...could he be god by now?

    What if Ely went to San Diego?....would he even be in this discussion?....(I doubt it)

  • Zombo said:

    To me, Flacco and Manning are B-level QBs in A-level organizations. Rivers and Romo have been A-level QBs on B-level organizations.

    Much more in tune with my thinking.....pretty much agree with that list!

    @the-gipper said:

    You take Rivers with his 4-5 postseason record.

    I will take Eli with his 8-3 playoff record....or Flacco with his 10-4 playoff record.....

    But, you dont get the winning record, you just get the Quarterback.....as wins/losses are a team function, not a player function...this is a thread about rating QB's, not teams....right?

    IE....had ANY of these players played on a different team, their win/loss records would be very different....yet they would still be the same players....sooooo....

    Rivers hasn't won anything, yet people seem to think he's pretty good.....what if he went to the Giants...could he be god by now?

    What if Ely went to San Diego?....would he even be in this discussion?....(I doubt it)

    @mudfly said:

    Much more in tune with my thinking.....pretty much agree with that list!

    But, you dont get the winning record, you just get the Quarterback.....as wins/losses are a team function, not a player function...this is a thread about rating QB's, not teams....right?

    IE....had ANY of these players played on a different team, their win/loss records would be very different....yet they would still be the same players....sooooo....

    Rivers hasn't won anything, yet people seem to think he's pretty good.....what if he went to the Giants...could he be god by now?

    What if Ely went to San Diego?....would he even be in this discussion?....(I doubt it)

    You are talking about what coulda/woulda happened. I am talking about what HAS happened. When Romo and Rivers have had their opportunities to put their teams on their backs and win the big games, they have failed. Eli did not fail, he succeeded spectacularly.

    So....actual accomplishment must count for something......not theoretical ability.

  • @mudfly said:

    Much more in tune with my thinking.....pretty much agree with that list!

    But, you dont get the winning record, you just get the Quarterback.....as wins/losses are a team function, not a player function...this is a thread about rating QB's, not teams....right?

    IE....had ANY of these players played on a different team, their win/loss records would be very different....yet they would still be the same players....sooooo....

    Rivers hasn't won anything, yet people seem to think he's pretty good.....what if he went to the Giants...could he be god by now?

    What if Ely went to San Diego?....would he even be in this discussion?....(I doubt it)

    You are talking about what coulda/woulda happened. I am talking about what HAS happened. When Romo and Rivers have had their opportunities to put their teams on their backs and win the big games, they have failed. Eli did not fail, he succeeded spectacularly.

    So....actual accomplishment must count for something......not theoretical ability.

    @the-gipper said:

    You are talking about what coulda/woulda happened. I am talking about what HAS happened. When Romo and Rivers have had their opportunities to put their teams on their backs and win the big games, they have failed. Eli did not fail, he succeeded spectacularly.

    So....actual accomplishment must count for something......not theoretical ability.

    Ok you win.....Ely is GREAT!....and better than Rivers....

    Actually, thats a lie....I disagree....moving on now.....bye

    ๐Ÿ™‚

  • To me, Flacco and Manning are B-level QBs in A-level organizations. Rivers and Romo have been A-level QBs on B-level organizations.

    A+

    Tom Brady

    Peyton Manning

    Aaron Rogers

    Drew Brees

    A

    Ben Roethlisberger

    Phillip Rivers

    Tony Romo

    B+

    Andrew Luck

    Russell Wilson

    Joe Flacco

    B

    Eli Manning

    Matt Stafford

    Cam Newton

    Matt Ryan

    Carson Palmer

    Colin Kaepernick

    Andy Dalton

    C+

    Alex Smith

    Ryan Tannehill

    Nick Foles

    Jay Cutler

    C

    Robert Griffin

    Sam Bradford

    C- (placeholders but really backups)

    Ryan Fitzpatrick

    Brian Hoyer

    D (Developmental) in order:

    Derek Carr

    Teddy Twatwater

    Blake Bortles

    Geno Smith

    Zack Mettenberger/

    Mike Glennon/J

    EJ Manuel

    Zombo said:

    To me, Flacco and Manning are B-level QBs in A-level organizations. Rivers and Romo have been A-level QBs on B-level organizations.

    A+

    Tom Brady

    Peyton Manning

    Aaron Rogers

    Drew Brees

    A

    Ben Roethlisberger

    Phillip Rivers

    Tony Romo

    B+

    Andrew Luck

    Russell Wilson

    Joe Flacco

    B

    Eli Manning

    Matt Stafford

    Cam Newton

    Matt Ryan

    Carson Palmer

    Colin Kaepernick

    Andy Dalton

    C+

    Alex Smith

    Ryan Tannehill

    Nick Foles

    Jay Cutler

    C

    Robert Griffin

    Sam Bradford

    C- (placeholders but really backups)

    Ryan Fitzpatrick

    Brian Hoyer

    D (Developmental) in order:

    Derek Carr

    Teddy Twatwater

    Blake Bortles

    Geno Smith

    Zack Mettenberger/

    Mike Glennon/J

    EJ Manuel

    Move Luck to A and Ryan to B+ and this is on the money.
  • Zombo said:

    To me, Flacco and Manning are B-level QBs in A-level organizations. Rivers and Romo have been A-level QBs on B-level organizations.

    Much more in tune with my thinking.....pretty much agree with that list!

    @the-gipper said:

    You take Rivers with his 4-5 postseason record.

    I will take Eli with his 8-3 playoff record....or Flacco with his 10-4 playoff record.....

    But, you dont get the winning record, you just get the Quarterback.....as wins/losses are a team function, not a player function...this is a thread about rating QB's, not teams....right?

    IE....had ANY of these players played on a different team, their win/loss records would be very different....yet they would still be the same players....sooooo....

    Rivers hasn't won anything, yet people seem to think he's pretty good.....what if he went to the Giants...could he be god by now?

    What if Ely went to San Diego?....would he even be in this discussion?....(I doubt it)

    @mudfly said:

    Much more in tune with my thinking.....pretty much agree with that list!

    But, you dont get the winning record, you just get the Quarterback.....as wins/losses are a team function, not a player function...this is a thread about rating QB's, not teams....right?

    IE....had ANY of these players played on a different team, their win/loss records would be very different....yet they would still be the same players....sooooo....

    Rivers hasn't won anything, yet people seem to think he's pretty good.....what if he went to the Giants...could he be god by now?

    What if Ely went to San Diego?....would he even be in this discussion?....(I doubt it)

    If you put each QB on the exact same team....I still think Eli might come out the best. Again, to me, it is the "it" factor. The Clutch factor. Eli has proven to have it. The others have not. Quite the opposite.

  • @everlastingxxx said:

    Premium QBs or Elite ones are rare. Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Brees. Thatโ€™s it. If Romo can win a Super Bowl he can join that conversation.

    Eli has already won two. BR has already won two.