Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Would you rather have an elite TE or elite WR?

Would you rather have an elite TE or elite WR?

The Browns Board
43 22 1.6k
  • miktoxicM miktoxic

    @mld-woody said:

    We could probably wait later than #19 to take Maxx.

    i'm surprised you're not touting funchess...besides a true TE like maxx williams, funchess kinda falls into that hybrid mode with his size.

    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on
    #28

    @miktoxic said:

    i'm surprised you're not touting funchess...besides a true TE like maxx williams, funchess kinda falls into that hybrid mode with his size.

    Well, Maxx is more of a traditional TE than Funchess.

    You could probably eventually move Funchess to full time TE, but it would take time.

    Funchess is best served on a team that can utilize his hybrid skill set. Idk if we're that team.

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
  • WalterWhiteW WalterWhite

    I just think we might be going after both in this draft. Thoughts?

    Would you rather have a Gates/Gronk/Witten or a Green/Megatron/Fitzgerald?

    C Chicopee John wrote on
    #29

    @walterwhite said:

    I just think we might be going after both in this draft. Thoughts?

    Would you rather have a Gates/Gronk/Witten or a Green/Megatron/Fitzgerald?

    Well, Defensive Gurus like Bill Belichick always look for big, fast, ball-catching TEs over WRs.

    Remember how he, supposedly, pulled the phone out of the wall when the Jets drafted TE Kyle Brady before the Browns?

    He then drafted Gronk and Hernandez the same year and used them at the same time.

    Sounds like big, mobile TEs are more difficult for Defenses to contain than do WRs.

    The Pats won the SB with a couple of UDAs, etc. among their TE corps.

    "God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy."
  • C Chicopee John

    @walterwhite said:

    I just think we might be going after both in this draft. Thoughts?

    Would you rather have a Gates/Gronk/Witten or a Green/Megatron/Fitzgerald?

    Well, Defensive Gurus like Bill Belichick always look for big, fast, ball-catching TEs over WRs.

    Remember how he, supposedly, pulled the phone out of the wall when the Jets drafted TE Kyle Brady before the Browns?

    He then drafted Gronk and Hernandez the same year and used them at the same time.

    Sounds like big, mobile TEs are more difficult for Defenses to contain than do WRs.

    The Pats won the SB with a couple of UDAs, etc. among their TE corps.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #30

    @chicopee-john said:

    Well, Defensive Gurus like Bill Belichick always look for big, fast, ball-catching TEs over WRs.

    Remember how he, supposedly, pulled the phone out of the wall when the Jets drafted TE Kyle Brady before the Browns?

    He then drafted Gronk and Hernandez the same year and used them at the same time.

    Sounds like big, mobile TEs are more difficult for Defenses to contain than do WRs.

    The Pats won the SB with a couple of UDAs, etc. among their TE corps.

    Defensive gurus and teams like the Pats with a couple of UDAs in the TE corps win Super Bowls when they have Tom Brady at Quarterback.

    Got Tom Brady at QB? No. Got Aaron Rodgers? No. The rest don't matter.

  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @chicopee-john said:

    Well, Defensive Gurus like Bill Belichick always look for big, fast, ball-catching TEs over WRs.

    Remember how he, supposedly, pulled the phone out of the wall when the Jets drafted TE Kyle Brady before the Browns?

    He then drafted Gronk and Hernandez the same year and used them at the same time.

    Sounds like big, mobile TEs are more difficult for Defenses to contain than do WRs.

    The Pats won the SB with a couple of UDAs, etc. among their TE corps.

    Defensive gurus and teams like the Pats with a couple of UDAs in the TE corps win Super Bowls when they have Tom Brady at Quarterback.

    Got Tom Brady at QB? No. Got Aaron Rodgers? No. The rest don't matter.

    C Chicopee John wrote on
    #31

    @the-gipper said:

    Defensive gurus and teams like the Pats with a couple of UDAs in the TE corps win Super Bowls when they have Tom Brady at Quarterback.

    Got Tom Brady at QB? No. Got Aaron Rodgers? No. The rest don't matter.

    Gip, you have to get your head out of your ass when it comes to BB.

    HOF Coach. Perhaps the best of all time.

    "God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy."
  • C Chicopee John

    @the-gipper said:

    Defensive gurus and teams like the Pats with a couple of UDAs in the TE corps win Super Bowls when they have Tom Brady at Quarterback.

    Got Tom Brady at QB? No. Got Aaron Rodgers? No. The rest don't matter.

    Gip, you have to get your head out of your ass when it comes to BB.

    HOF Coach. Perhaps the best of all time.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #32

    @chicopee-john said:

    Gip, you have to get your head out of your ass when it comes to BB.

    HOF Coach. Perhaps the best of all time.

    Two winning seasons and 5 losing seasons without Tom Brady. I think we know who has their head up their ass.

    If we were choosing sides for a pickup game (where picking coaches and players would be part of the deal), I will take Brady and give you BB all day every day.....and whip you all day every day.

    C 1 Reply
  • W Westside Steve wrote on
    #33

    who was quarterback for most of those losing seasons again?

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #34

    The point is: It doesn't matter how good your WR are until your QB, OL, and DL are dominating.. because you'll lose.

    When your QB, OL, and DL are dominating, it still doesn't matter how good your WR are.. because you'll win.

    So, why bother with WR at all? Keep drafting OL/DL/QB early.

    Besides... think about it. EVEN IF you get a great WR, he's leaving at the end of that rookie deal unless you get that great QB. And if you get that great QB, you'll find that you don't need a great WR to win.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
  • slowburnS slowburn wrote on
    #35

    one of the best duo:

    s sharp and r smith for the Broncos in the 90's came to mind for some reason

    Gipper started the straying thread

    btw, I'd rather have a tight end sized wide receiver

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #36

    I thought the thread was about WR vs TE...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • MudflyM Mudfly wrote on
    #37

    It is....(about to be)(again)

    I'd rather have an elite TE, than an elite WR.....

  • W Westside Steve wrote on
    #38

    Tight end because it's important for blocking and short and intermediate passes. With an average or below average quarterback you are going to lose the opportunity for the long pass anyway. (a great one will do a good job with a wide receiver or TE but...)

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
  • The GipperT The Gipper

    @chicopee-john said:

    Gip, you have to get your head out of your ass when it comes to BB.

    HOF Coach. Perhaps the best of all time.

    Two winning seasons and 5 losing seasons without Tom Brady. I think we know who has their head up their ass.

    If we were choosing sides for a pickup game (where picking coaches and players would be part of the deal), I will take Brady and give you BB all day every day.....and whip you all day every day.

    C Chicopee John wrote on
    #39

    @the-gipper said:

    Two winning seasons and 5 losing seasons without Tom Brady. I think we know who has their head up their ass.

    If we were choosing sides for a pickup game (where picking coaches and players would be part of the deal), I will take Brady and give you BB all day every day.....and whip you all day every day.

    Now you're just being silly, Gip.

    This thread was about TEs and WRs and I pointed out that Defensive Guru BB has a history of drafting big TEs. Therefore, I surmise they must be harder for a Defense than WRs.

    Brady has NOTHING to do with this.

    You continue to take swipes at BB. Jealous? Probably, IMHO

    You are simply being petty because (my guess) BB cut your favorite boy Bernie.

    "God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy."
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on
    #40

    I can't believe we're having this discussion still.

    Both the TE and WR have shit for wins without QB and the OL to block for the run game.

    Evans and Jackson were both good fantasy producers last year.. how many playoff games did TB win?

    NO won their SB because they had a great OL and a moderately useful D.. they had everything but the OL recently and haven't been back to the playoffs.

    "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on
    #41

    QB

    I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on
    #42

    I'd take Calvin over Gronk

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
  • B BitchTits wrote on
    #43

    I think an elite WR might be better for a good running game, especially if he requires double coverage. And I am assuming the tight end is an elite catcher which means usually they are crap blockers. If the tight end can block well, and is a great receiver then I would take the tight end.

Log in to reply