sage 4th???
-
if the vikes are willing to give up a 4th for that guy then we should b able to get nothing lower than a 2nd for DA esp after we take his cap hit DA is way better than sage and would b a starter first so we should deffently b able to get a 2nd for DA
-
if the vikes are willing to give up a 4th for that guy then we should b able to get nothing lower than a 2nd for DA esp after we take his cap hit DA is way better than sage and would b a starter first so we should deffently b able to get a 2nd for DA
if the vikes are willing to give up a 4th for that guy then we should b able to get nothing lower than a 2nd for DA esp after we take his cap hit DA is way better than sage and would b a starter first so we should deffently b able to get a 2nd for DA
If he can be a starter and is that good sholdn't we keep him?
IMO, he isn't that good and that's why we will have a problem getting a 3rd even after we pay most of his 2009 salary.
-
yes this is true i understand what ur saying but compare da to sage da is way better than sage IMO so we should b able to get a 2nd if the vikes are going to give a 4th for a back up qb da is starter material but we invested to much into BQ so we have to make a decision soon on who we want as our qb of the futuer
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login