Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Quinn still hasn't shown he's our guy

Quinn still hasn't shown he's our guy

The Browns Board
63 15 3.9k
  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on
    #1

    I think I'd still rather have Anderson under center. Please don't group me with Lum, that guy's seriously in love with DA. Like, he wants to marry him.

    Anywho.

    Pros:

    Quinn: Nice touch on the short ball. More mobile than Anderson, might always be a threat to run (if we can give him more than 3 seconds to throw). Seems to go through progressions better than DA.

    Anderson: Rocket arm. Quick release. Can thread a needle with his rocket pass. Looked like Tom Brady against the Giants.

    Cons:

    Quinn: No long ball. Everything long I've seen him throw in the NFL was a quacker.

    Anderson: Rocket arm. Known to throw the ball directly to DB's. Probably has a low self-esteem after the treatment he got this year (I was at the Ravens game and thought the Brady chant was bullshit. DA didn't lose us that game, it was our xxxxing defense and Braylon's stone hands.) Inconsistent.

    So yeah. Those are my thoughts. It just seems that DA's an all or nothing type player. When he's hot, he can't be stopped. Whereas, Quinn's more consistent, but I think his performance last year can best be described as adequate. When it comes down it, I just think that we'd get more W's (and risk more losses) with DA at the helm than with Quinn. I would like to see us take that risk.

    Please keep this civilized.

    ? ITHIKAI 2 Replies
  • ? AdaM wrote on
    #2

    I can't believe you know how to breathe.

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on
    #3

    How dare you question Quinn? Huh? WTF........

    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on
    #4

    How about posting some kind of meaningful rebuttal instead of trolling?

    ? 1 Reply
  • S smalls1129 wrote on
    #5

    Ok, I really don't want to lump you in with some group; but

    A) You felt this needed its' own thread when there's already 5 of them

    😎 You say that DA, not only could get more wins the BQ, but also that b/c

    of his style he'll risk more losses. So your conclusion is that DA would lead

    to more wins...and losses

  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

    How about posting some kind of meaningful rebuttal instead of trolling?

    ? AdaM wrote on
    #6

    @vaportrail said:

    How about posting some kind of meaningful rebuttal instead of trolling?

    You are a troll for starting this idiotic thread.

    You have opinions, then you have delusions. Guess which one this is.

  • next2nothingN next2nothing wrote on
    #7
    facepalm.jpg
  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on
    #8

    I was saying that DA, if he's at his best, would get more wins than BQ at his best would. That's a big if. Really big if.

    And adam, go away if that's all you have to say.

    ? 1 Reply
  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

    I think I'd still rather have Anderson under center. Please don't group me with Lum, that guy's seriously in love with DA. Like, he wants to marry him.

    Anywho.

    Pros:

    Quinn: Nice touch on the short ball. More mobile than Anderson, might always be a threat to run (if we can give him more than 3 seconds to throw). Seems to go through progressions better than DA.

    Anderson: Rocket arm. Quick release. Can thread a needle with his rocket pass. Looked like Tom Brady against the Giants.

    Cons:

    Quinn: No long ball. Everything long I've seen him throw in the NFL was a quacker.

    Anderson: Rocket arm. Known to throw the ball directly to DB's. Probably has a low self-esteem after the treatment he got this year (I was at the Ravens game and thought the Brady chant was bullshit. DA didn't lose us that game, it was our xxxxing defense and Braylon's stone hands.) Inconsistent.

    So yeah. Those are my thoughts. It just seems that DA's an all or nothing type player. When he's hot, he can't be stopped. Whereas, Quinn's more consistent, but I think his performance last year can best be described as adequate. When it comes down it, I just think that we'd get more W's (and risk more losses) with DA at the helm than with Quinn. I would like to see us take that risk.

    Please keep this civilized.

    ? mz. wrote on
    #9

    @vaportrail said:

    Quinn: No long ball.

    Blame that on the previous staff, not Quinn.

    @vaportrail said:

    When [DA]'s hot, he can't be stopped.

    You mean unless other teams have film on him.

    @vaportrail said:

    Please keep this civilized.

    You really didn't think that was possible, did you?

    VaporTrailV 1 Reply
  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

    I was saying that DA, if he's at his best, would get more wins than BQ at his best would. That's a big if. Really big if.

    And adam, go away if that's all you have to say.

    ? AdaM wrote on
    #10

    @vaportrail said:

    I was saying that DA, if he's at his best, would get more wins than BQ at his best would. That's a big if. Really big if.

    And adam, go away if that's all you have to say.

    Utterly moronic statement. DA's best is 10 wins vs a shitty schedule. No one knows BQ's best yet.

    Next time you get the urge to start a thread regarding BQ or DA, just punch yourself in the neck.

    VaporTrailV 1 Reply
  • ? Guest

    @vaportrail said:

    Quinn: No long ball.

    Blame that on the previous staff, not Quinn.

    @vaportrail said:

    When [DA]'s hot, he can't be stopped.

    You mean unless other teams have film on him.

    @vaportrail said:

    Please keep this civilized.

    You really didn't think that was possible, did you?

    VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on
    #11

    mz. said:

    Blame that on the previous staff, not Quinn.

    I hope you're right.

    You mean unless other teams have film on him.

    Or if our receivers drop balls that would have gotten us a win.

    You really didn't think that was possible, did you?

    Not really... lol. But at least this way I can sift out the wet biscuit Retards and know who to ignore. I didn't make this thread and say I'm right. I just want some discussion about it. I'm not Lumbergh. Maybe I'll change my mind.

    ? 1 Reply
  • M mario wrote on
    #12

    add me to this group. I'd rather have Anderson under center vs. Quinn. You ask why? Wait until the season starts, you'll see why Quinn isn't the man for the job.

    ? 1 Reply
  • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

    mz. said:

    Blame that on the previous staff, not Quinn.

    I hope you're right.

    You mean unless other teams have film on him.

    Or if our receivers drop balls that would have gotten us a win.

    You really didn't think that was possible, did you?

    Not really... lol. But at least this way I can sift out the wet biscuit Retards and know who to ignore. I didn't make this thread and say I'm right. I just want some discussion about it. I'm not Lumbergh. Maybe I'll change my mind.

    ? mz. wrote on
    #13

    @vaportrail said:

    I hope you're right.

    We all do, or we'll be back on the market for a QB yet again.

    ? 1 Reply
  • M mario

    add me to this group. I'd rather have Anderson under center vs. Quinn. You ask why? Wait until the season starts, you'll see why Quinn isn't the man for the job.

    ? mz. wrote on
    #14

    @mario said:

    Wait until the season starts, you'll see why Quinn isn't the man for the job.

    That's an incredibly insightful analysis from one of our most valued members.

    I'm tired of this shit. If the guy sucks, we'll soon find out. Like we did with Anderson.

  • ? Guest

    @vaportrail said:

    I hope you're right.

    We all do, or we'll be back on the market for a QB yet again.

    ? AdaM wrote on
    #15

    mz. said:

    We all do, or we'll be back on the market for a QB yet again.

    And that market sure as hell does NOT include DA.

  • ? Guest

    @vaportrail said:

    I was saying that DA, if he's at his best, would get more wins than BQ at his best would. That's a big if. Really big if.

    And adam, go away if that's all you have to say.

    Utterly moronic statement. DA's best is 10 wins vs a shitty schedule. No one knows BQ's best yet.

    Next time you get the urge to start a thread regarding BQ or DA, just punch yourself in the neck.

    VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on
    #16

    AdaM said:

    Utterly moronic statement. DA's best is 10 wins vs a shitty schedule. No one knows BQ's best yet.

    Next time you get the urge to start a thread regarding BQ or DA, just punch yourself in the neck.

    Well, you're an utterly moronic person. DA at his best plays a game like he did against the Giants (the guy looked like a top 5 QB this game). BQ at his best (from what we've seen so far) plays his game against the Broncos.

    On the other hand, DA at his worst, see his last two games against Cincy. Quinn at his worst, Texans game.

    Take the stick out of your ass, you're obviously in a bad mood.

  • M mario wrote on
    #17

    and mz the pussy what have you offered to be so insightful? Besides being a Vagina, I don't see much from you.

    ? 1 Reply
  • M mario wrote on
    #18

    What was the last big game Quinn won in College vs a good defense?

    ? 1 Reply
  • M mario wrote on
    #19

    when was the last time Quinn completed a deep ball? Last I remember was a underthrown DUck to steptoe, and Steptoe ripped it out of the defenders hands after having to chase him down backwards.

    ? 2 Replies
  • M mario wrote on
    #20

    Whats the most popular Browns jersey? A Pink #10, the most recent being sold to mz the pussy

    ? 1 Reply
Log in to reply