Kruger Knows What You're Feeling Mario
-
Kruger may not outright "suck"...cause that would imply he doesn't belong on an NFL field and he's clearly shown he can hang. He's just not very skilled. He made his contract with us by playing basically as a dropback DE for Blt. That year that Suggs got hurt, I read the article of how the infamous Blt 3-4 began lining up predominantly as a 4-3 over 60% of their snaps. They used Kruger as a pure pass rusher that would drop back every now and then but only in zone.
Kruger was a different cat when he played for Blt. You can see it in footage of him. He was listed at 280 when we signed him, he was probably well into the 280's. Dude used his strength to go through or around tackles. He can't do it anymore. He had already lost enough weight, ie leverage, his first year under Horton that he couldn't power around the edge anymore. Still had his bulrush though. So when we signed him we said now Paul, you have to become a complete 3-4 OLB'er for us. And he tried, i'll give him credit. But he was never a 3-4 OLB'er. Somebody possibly ruined what might have been a decent career for him as a pass rushing 4-3 DE, by telling him he should try being an OLB'er.
There's another kid that I think the same happened to, Bjoern Werner for Indy. He was a "stud" 4-3 DE for FSU, at one point they thought he might go #1 too. He played with all kinds of leverage in college. I saw tape of him holding off a pair of enormous offensive lineman that tried to wash him out. He held them off for a second, than got low and disappeared...then reappeared somewhere off to the side. Was fucking ridiculous, until Bosa I hadn't seen a college player squat the edge like Werner. In run defense he would jump off the edge like he was pass rushing but then just stop and squat down like an immovable Golem and you'd see the tackles shoulder pads popping up. And his reaction time off the line in pass rush was "world class", even in the NFL. But someone said hey Bjoern talk about how you'd be happy as a pig in shit to play 3-4 OLB'er.
Fast forward to his first game in Indy and I'm watching a completely different player. He's getting washed out by a TE. His pads are higher, he looks smaller...etc, etc. They completely ruined the natural leverage he played with in college. I'm not even sure if he's still on Indy's roster. I guess he became a pretty good run stopper last I read of him but just nonexistent as a pass rusher. I don't understand who the fucktards are that keep telling natural DE's that they need to play standup and go out into deep coverage against slot WR's. I'm gettin real tired of this 3-4 BS to be honest. They've gotten way too gimmicky. Pgh and Blt's 3-4's...and SF's 3-4 from a couple years ago when they had Aldon and Justin next to each other....of course yes. But those were defense's with rational player allignments. Aldon was their jack strong side like Harrison was in Pgh. Zone was about all they did in coverage with those guys. SF also had the luxury of having two of the best ILB'ers playing of course, but they also didn't have another jack type on the field opposite of Aldon. In fact I couldn't name who their will was. I think they just used 2nd string types. They were only asking them to do so much.
So I don't know what Pettine is trying to run here. And apparently some of the cats in Buffalo are wondering wtf Ryan is trying to run. I remember when we played Buffalo in preseason where they werent' doing nothing fancy with their front 7. I was just like wow..this is another food chain. They were "effortlessly" in our backfield it seemed like. I thought him and Hughes would have over 20 sacks between them at this point. But a couple weeks into the season I saw that their defense was having issues and I looked it up, and sure enough there's an article wondering just wtf is Ryan doing with this defense. I think I watched the first NE game and I was like who are these guys? They were hardly doing anything from what I saw them do in pre season. This is what happens when coaches over complicate the fuck out of defense's. Ryan has a unit "very" comparable to Carolina's in terms of talent....and look at the difference in production.
-
2.5 sacks thru 13 games from the team's sack specialist is pathetic.
2.5 sacks thru 13 games from the team's sack specialist is pathetic.
Is it easy to sack people in coverage or did Mario Williams have a legit scheme-induced gripe? If you understand the point of the article - you understand the same exact drop off in sack volume.
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
2.5 sacks thru 13 games from the team's sack specialist is pathetic.
Is it easy to sack people in coverage or did Mario Williams have a legit scheme-induced gripe? If you understand the point of the article - you understand the same exact drop off in sack volume.
If you understand the point of the article - you understand the same exact drop off in sack volume.
If you understand Buffalos Defense, you also understand it set records under Pettine for sacks....not the same D....not the same coach....and not the same alignments......
Kruger has had 310 opportunities to rush the passer and only hit home 3 times......thats once every 100 rushes....and thats pathetic for ANY system and far and away the worst on the Browns.....Armonty gets there every 39 attempts...Orchard every 50....
and they cover too.....
-
Well....you know Im happy to take this one on......
Not sure why you're trying to lay Buffalo and Rexy's problems on Pettines back, considering Buffalo set their sack record at 57 with Pettine and NOW they have 19....heck of a drop off.....
1) This is an old article that keeps making the rounds. Id first point out that is is a misnomer to say Pettine and Rexy have the same D's. Rexy is running a 4-3 in Buffalo, while Pettine ran his hybrid multi front 3-4 there and here...
2) Williams is complalining about frequently having to drop into coverage. Id point out the he is a 4-3 DE and Kruger is a 3-4 OLB.....and there IS a difference....(plus, Wiiliams is a heck of a pass rusher and Kruger isnt).....
- 2013(under Pettine)....Williams dropped into coverage 7 times the WHOLE season....
- 2014............................Williams dropped into coverage 13 times the whole season....
- 2015............................Williams dropped into coverage 20 time so far....
So.....CLEARLY.....Rexy is having him cover WAY more then Pettine did, but still only 20 times(just over once a game)(whiny)
Kruger has the EXACT same #'s he had in 2013 & 2012....so it's not like he's fallen off. He's had one good season ever(in terms of sacks at least) and that was last year under Pettine.....the other 6 years he's played, he's basically sucked......and, LAST YEAR, he only had 11 sacks and nothing else.....terrible against the run......
NOW.....lets look at Krugers coverage(Ive posted this several times, but it seems not to be sinking in)......
- 2012(Baltimore)....Kruger dropped into coverage 97 times or 6.0 times per game....
- 2013(Chud)...........Kruger dropped into coverage 109 times or 6.8 times per game....
- 2014(Pettine)........Kruger dropped into coverage 65 times or 4.0 times per game...
- 2015(Pettine)........Kruger dropped into coverage 58 times or 4.4 times per game...
And the facts dont lie.....Kruger is covering LESS now than he ever has.....and whats happening in Buffalo is NOT what happened in Buffalo when Pettine was there.....Plain and simple....
Now,.....Please.....Stop making up stories Cal.....I thought you were more objective than that.....
What changed from last year???.........
1) Sheard isnt pushing the other side, which got Kruger 4 sacks last year......
2) He;s getting blocked out. Last year 2 were unblocked sacks.....(there's 6)....
3) Our DB's are not defending well, meaning the opposing QB's are not holding the ball....meaning not enough time for Kruger to get er done.....
4) Finally.....his snaps have now been cut drastically....WHY???.....cause Orchard and Armonty are getting to the QB at 2 and 3 times the efficiency that Kruger is....and they can do it within this system, while Kruger apparently cannot ....
OK, I answered your question "what has changed?"....so my question is....WHAT CHANGES when Armonty goes in ????
Buffalo is not Cleveland....Rexy is not Pettine.....A 4-3 DE is not a 3-4 OLB....and Paul Kruger aint no Mario Williams....
Well....you know Im happy to take this one on......
Not sure why you're trying to lay Buffalo and Rexy's problems on Pettines back, considering Buffalo set their sack record at 57 with Pettine and NOW they have 19....heck of a drop off.....
1) This is an old article that keeps making the rounds. Id first point out that is is a misnomer to say Pettine and Rexy have the same D's. Rexy is running a 4-3 in Buffalo, while Pettine ran his hybrid multi front 3-4 there and here...
2) Williams is complalining about frequently having to drop into coverage. Id point out the he is a 4-3 DE and Kruger is a 3-4 OLB.....and there IS a difference....(plus, Wiiliams is a heck of a pass rusher and Kruger isnt).....
- 2013(under Pettine)....Williams dropped into coverage 7 times the WHOLE season....
- 2014............................Williams dropped into coverage 13 times the whole season....
- 2015............................Williams dropped into coverage 20 time so far....
So.....CLEARLY.....Rexy is having him cover WAY more then Pettine did, but still only 20 times(just over once a game)(whiny)
Kruger has the EXACT same #'s he had in 2013 & 2012....so it's not like he's fallen off. He's had one good season ever(in terms of sacks at least) and that was last year under Pettine.....the other 6 years he's played, he's basically sucked......and, LAST YEAR, he only had 11 sacks and nothing else.....terrible against the run......
NOW.....lets look at Krugers coverage(Ive posted this several times, but it seems not to be sinking in)......
- 2012(Baltimore)....Kruger dropped into coverage 97 times or 6.0 times per game....
- 2013(Chud)...........Kruger dropped into coverage 109 times or 6.8 times per game....
- 2014(Pettine)........Kruger dropped into coverage 65 times or 4.0 times per game...
- 2015(Pettine)........Kruger dropped into coverage 58 times or 4.4 times per game...
And the facts dont lie.....Kruger is covering LESS now than he ever has.....and whats happening in Buffalo is NOT what happened in Buffalo when Pettine was there.....Plain and simple....
Now,.....Please.....Stop making up stories Cal.....I thought you were more objective than that.....
What changed from last year???.........
1) Sheard isnt pushing the other side, which got Kruger 4 sacks last year......
2) He;s getting blocked out. Last year 2 were unblocked sacks.....(there's 6)....
3) Our DB's are not defending well, meaning the opposing QB's are not holding the ball....meaning not enough time for Kruger to get er done.....
4) Finally.....his snaps have now been cut drastically....WHY???.....cause Orchard and Armonty are getting to the QB and 2 and 3 times the efficiency that Kruger is....and they can do it within this system, while Kruger apparently cannot not...
OK, I answered your question "what has changed?"....so my question is....WHAT CHANGES when Armonty goes in ????
Buffalo is not Cleveland....Rexy is not Pettine.....A 4-3 DE is not a 3-4 OLB....and Paul Kruger aint no Mario Williams....
Buffalo runs a 3-4 with Dareus on the Nose, Kyle Williams played one 5 technique prior to IR and someone else Wynn/Carrington played the other side. Their 4 LBers are: OLB Mario Williams (who complained about covering people downfield), Nigel Bradham (ILB), Preston Brown(ILB), and Jerry Hughes (OLB). Every once in a while like us they'll deviate from their base.
And wrong, the pioneer of this defense that can't tackle anybody is Rex Ryan without the Revis and Cromartie back end.
Kruger has the same complaints Mario has - purpose of the article.
When Mario was in the first year of Pett's defense - he a good sack volume just like Kruger had. It was the second year of it when full install meant interrupting instincts with hesitate and doubt. Buffalo is in year 2 of Rex Ryan Defense just ;like we are and the brakes have been slammed Mud.
I also noticed how important it was for you to leave out Kruger had 4.5 sacks in the post season punctuated with a Superbowl Championship against playoff caliber competition, which helped him write his own ticket in FA following his best extract of football against his highest level of competition in a world where timing is everything.
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
2.5 sacks thru 13 games from the team's sack specialist is pathetic.
Is it easy to sack people in coverage or did Mario Williams have a legit scheme-induced gripe? If you understand the point of the article - you understand the same exact drop off in sack volume.
Flug, your typically one of the better posters on this board but this post leaves me scratching my head.Is it easy to sack people in coverage or did Mario Williams have a legit scheme-induced gripe? If you understand the point of the article - you understand the same exact drop off in sack volume.
What does Mario Williams have to do with Paul Kruger?
What does Rex Ryan have to do with Pettine?
What does the Buffalo Bills have to do with the Cleveland Browns?
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Well....you know Im happy to take this one on......
Not sure why you're trying to lay Buffalo and Rexy's problems on Pettines back, considering Buffalo set their sack record at 57 with Pettine and NOW they have 19....heck of a drop off.....
1) This is an old article that keeps making the rounds. Id first point out that is is a misnomer to say Pettine and Rexy have the same D's. Rexy is running a 4-3 in Buffalo, while Pettine ran his hybrid multi front 3-4 there and here...
2) Williams is complalining about frequently having to drop into coverage. Id point out the he is a 4-3 DE and Kruger is a 3-4 OLB.....and there IS a difference....(plus, Wiiliams is a heck of a pass rusher and Kruger isnt).....
- 2013(under Pettine)....Williams dropped into coverage 7 times the WHOLE season....
- 2014............................Williams dropped into coverage 13 times the whole season....
- 2015............................Williams dropped into coverage 20 time so far....
So.....CLEARLY.....Rexy is having him cover WAY more then Pettine did, but still only 20 times(just over once a game)(whiny)
Kruger has the EXACT same #'s he had in 2013 & 2012....so it's not like he's fallen off. He's had one good season ever(in terms of sacks at least) and that was last year under Pettine.....the other 6 years he's played, he's basically sucked......and, LAST YEAR, he only had 11 sacks and nothing else.....terrible against the run......
NOW.....lets look at Krugers coverage(Ive posted this several times, but it seems not to be sinking in)......
- 2012(Baltimore)....Kruger dropped into coverage 97 times or 6.0 times per game....
- 2013(Chud)...........Kruger dropped into coverage 109 times or 6.8 times per game....
- 2014(Pettine)........Kruger dropped into coverage 65 times or 4.0 times per game...
- 2015(Pettine)........Kruger dropped into coverage 58 times or 4.4 times per game...
And the facts dont lie.....Kruger is covering LESS now than he ever has.....and whats happening in Buffalo is NOT what happened in Buffalo when Pettine was there.....Plain and simple....
Now,.....Please.....Stop making up stories Cal.....I thought you were more objective than that.....
What changed from last year???.........
1) Sheard isnt pushing the other side, which got Kruger 4 sacks last year......
2) He;s getting blocked out. Last year 2 were unblocked sacks.....(there's 6)....
3) Our DB's are not defending well, meaning the opposing QB's are not holding the ball....meaning not enough time for Kruger to get er done.....
4) Finally.....his snaps have now been cut drastically....WHY???.....cause Orchard and Armonty are getting to the QB and 2 and 3 times the efficiency that Kruger is....and they can do it within this system, while Kruger apparently cannot not...
OK, I answered your question "what has changed?"....so my question is....WHAT CHANGES when Armonty goes in ????
Buffalo is not Cleveland....Rexy is not Pettine.....A 4-3 DE is not a 3-4 OLB....and Paul Kruger aint no Mario Williams....
Buffalo runs a 3-4 with Dareus on the Nose, Kyle Williams played one 5 technique prior to IR and someone else Wynn/Carrington played the other side. Their 4 LBers are: OLB Mario Williams (who complained about covering people downfield), Nigel Bradham (ILB), Preston Brown(ILB), and Jerry Hughes (OLB). Every once in a while like us they'll deviate from their base.
And wrong, the pioneer of this defense that can't tackle anybody is Rex Ryan without the Revis and Cromartie back end.
Kruger has the same complaints Mario has - purpose of the article.
When Mario was in the first year of Pett's defense - he a good sack volume just like Kruger had. It was the second year of it when full install meant interrupting instincts with hesitate and doubt. Buffalo is in year 2 of Rex Ryan Defense just ;like we are and the brakes have been slammed Mud.
I also noticed how important it was for you to leave out Kruger had 4.5 sacks in the post season punctuated with a Superbowl Championship against playoff caliber competition, which helped him write his own ticket in FA following his best extract of football against his highest level of competition in a world where timing is everything.
Buffalo runs a 3-4 with Dareus on the Nose, Kyle Williams played one 5 technique prior to IR and someone else Wynn/Carrington played the other side. Their 4 LBers are: OLB Mario Williams (who complained about covering people downfield), Nigel Bradham (ILB), Preston Brown(ILB), and Jerry Hughes (OLB).
And wrong, the pioneer of this defense that can't tackle anybody is Rex Ryan without the Revis and Cromartie back end.
Kruger has the same complaints Mario has - purpose of the article.
Well...Buffalo and the rest of the world think they run a 4-3 and that Williams is a DE....weird....
Plus......You're still ignoring the numbers Fluges.....look at the coverage #'s.....those are stats not opinion....
-
Flug, your typically one of the better posters on this board but this post leaves me scratching my head.Is it easy to sack people in coverage or did Mario Williams have a legit scheme-induced gripe? If you understand the point of the article - you understand the same exact drop off in sack volume.
What does Mario Williams have to do with Paul Kruger?
What does Rex Ryan have to do with Pettine?
What does the Buffalo Bills have to do with the Cleveland Browns?
Flug, your typically one of the better posters on this board but this post leaves me scratching my head.
What does Mario Williams have to do with Paul Kruger?
What does Rex Ryan have to do with Pettine?
What does the Buffalo Bills have to do with the Cleveland Browns?
Just another effort to discredit Pettine....but without any stats or facts.....just the same innuendo weve been hearing for weeks, without any backing....
Probably the reason he's using the Buffalo article to back his argument, because there are no facts, stats or articles relating to Cleveland that will support this Kruger coverage argument....
-
Another thing I don't understand is why does Pettine get the blame for Kruger's poor performance on the field, yet he doesn't get any credit for Kruger's career season in 2014?
Makes no sense.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Another thing I don't understand is why does Pettine get the blame for Kruger's poor performance on the field, yet he doesn't get any credit for Kruger's career season in 2014?
Makes no sense.
Another thing I don't understand is why does Pettine get the blame for Kruger's poor performance on the field, yet he doesn't get any credit for Kruger's career season in 2014?
Makes no sense.
Right.....and the same can be said for many other players......it's called "an agenda"......
Lynch mob mentality is rarely rational....
-
someone LOVES Paul Kruger thread 2014
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=31036
Paul Kruger signs 2013 thread. Miktoxic predicts Raven demise.
"You see the Rams are still thinking that they are playing Tony Dorsett" -Jim Brown 1978 -
Another thing I don't understand is why does Pettine get the blame for Kruger's poor performance on the field, yet he doesn't get any credit for Kruger's career season in 2014?
Makes no sense.
Another thing I don't understand is why does Pettine get the blame for Kruger's poor performance on the field, yet he doesn't get any credit for Kruger's career season in 2014?
Makes no sense.
People read and see what they want to see. For example, Mud never wanted people to see Kruger's 4.5 sacks in the post season extract of best football against best/playoff competition so he made sure he sure he didn't share that with his facts interestingly enough.
-
someone LOVES Paul Kruger thread 2014
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=31036
Paul Kruger signs 2013 thread. Miktoxic predicts Raven demise.
someone LOVES Paul Kruger thread 2014
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=31036
Paul Kruger signs 2013 thread. Miktoxic predicts Raven demise.
wow, thanks rich for pulling that up.
makes me feel bad for calling you a stooler's troll all these years.
-
You're still ignoring the numbers Fluges.....but I didnt expect anything different.....
Show me where Kruger covers more.....or how the D changed this year to make him worse....or why Armonty and Orchard can get to the QB, while Kruger cant....
And I didnt "not share" anything....I compared 16 game seasons so the numbers stacked fairly....
Yeah...Kruger had 4 post season sacks....on a Super Bowl team where he was surrounded by TOP quality players.....he NEVER saw a double team, so life was good that particular year....(funny how Baltimore never thought he was good enough to start)
-
Another thing I don't understand is why does Pettine get the blame for Kruger's poor performance on the field, yet he doesn't get any credit for Kruger's career season in 2014?
Makes no sense.
Right.....and the same can be said for many other players......it's called "an agenda"......
Lynch mob mentality is rarely rational....
Right.....and the same can be said for many other players......it's called "an agenda"......
Lynch mob mentality is rarely rational....
But insinuating a head coach that has led us to 3-15 in our last 18 games where 5 of the last 6 games we gave up over 30 points is gotta keep material is rational? Good luck with that...
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
You're still ignoring the numbers Fluges.....but I didnt expect anything different.....
Show me where Kruger covers more.....or how the D changed this year to make him worse....or why Armonty and Orchard can get to the QB, while Kruger cant....
And I didnt "not share" anything....I compared 16 game seasons so the numbers stacked fairly....
Yeah...Kruger had 4 post season sacks....on a Super Bowl team where he was surrounded by TOP quality players.....he NEVER saw a double team, so life was good that particular year....(funny how Baltimore never thought he was good enough to start)
You're still ignoring the numbers Fluges.....but I didnt expect anything different.....
Show me where Kruger covers more.....or how the D changed this year to make him worse....or why Armonty and Orchard can get to the QB, while Kruger cant....
And I didnt "not share" anything....I compared 16 game seasons so the numbers stacked fairly....
Yeah...Kruger had 4 post season sacks....on a Super Bowl team where he was surrounded by TOP quality players.....he NEVER saw a double team, so life was good that particular year....(funny how Baltimore never thought he was good enough to start)
As much as I love what I feel Nate can be as a player, there is little truth to this statement aside from the San Fran game.
Monty and Orchard have been up and down at applying pressure this season. Which, is to be expected.
-
Right.....and the same can be said for many other players......it's called "an agenda"......
Lynch mob mentality is rarely rational....
But insinuating a head coach that has led us to 3-15 in our last 18 games where 5 of the last 6 games we gave up over 30 points is gotta keep material is rational? Good luck with that...
But insinuating a head coach that has led us to 3-15 in our last 18 games where 5 of the last 6 games we gave up over 30 points is gotta keep material is rational? Good luck with that...
Never said he was "gotta keep"......stop trying to twist and, for once, try to actually consider what is said....
But....for like the 50th time, you still haven't backed or answered one single question, stat or point....
Just blah blah blah, with zero actual fact or content....Kruger sucks, case closed.
-
You're still ignoring the numbers Fluges.....but I didnt expect anything different.....
Show me where Kruger covers more.....or how the D changed this year to make him worse....or why Armonty and Orchard can get to the QB, while Kruger cant....
And I didnt "not share" anything....I compared 16 game seasons so the numbers stacked fairly....
Yeah...Kruger had 4 post season sacks....on a Super Bowl team where he was surrounded by TOP quality players.....he NEVER saw a double team, so life was good that particular year....(funny how Baltimore never thought he was good enough to start)
As much as I love what I feel Nate can be as a player, there is little truth to this statement aside from the San Fran game.
Monty and Orchard have been up and down at applying pressure this season. Which, is to be expected.
As much as I love what I feel Nate can be as a player, there is little truth to this statement aside from the San Fran game.
Monty and Orchard have been up and down at applying pressure this season. Which, is to be expected.
Up or down?.....sure.......while Kruger has been down the whole time....
No matter how you slice it, Armonty and Orchard get home more than twice as often as Kruger does....
In the same system.....with the same coaches.....etc
-
flugs there is no doubt the record sucks and pettine has to assume accountability BUT does that mean clean house? i mean look at our record with coaches. hire/fire. 1 year, 2 years? really??
so we clean house rinse and repeat how many times until you give a guy a chance through how many drafts, through injuries, through young player's growth, through finding a friggin QB, through dealing with busts and bad FA signings......... hell what 'acclaimed' coach would even set foot in cleveland with their record of hiring/firing? that's right, none.
that's why i'm thinking haslam is going to deflect and debunk all the naysayers and let pettine ride out his contract and decide then, NOT now, whether to keep him or let him go. i mean what's another year of riding through turbulence when that's all we've been doing for over 2 decades?
and as usual be careful what you wish for you holmgren lovers.
-
flugs there is no doubt the record sucks and pettine has to assume accountability BUT does that mean clean house? i mean look at our record with coaches. hire/fire. 1 year, 2 years? really??
so we clean house rinse and repeat how many times until you give a guy a chance through how many drafts, through injuries, through young player's growth, through finding a friggin QB, through dealing with busts and bad FA signings......... hell what 'acclaimed' coach would even set foot in cleveland with their record of hiring/firing? that's right, none.
that's why i'm thinking haslam is going to deflect and debunk all the naysayers and let pettine ride out his contract and decide then, NOT now, whether to keep him or let him go. i mean what's another year of riding through turbulence when that's all we've been doing for over 2 decades?
and as usual be careful what you wish for you holmgren lovers.
.... hell what 'acclaimed' coach would even set foot in cleveland with their record of hiring/firing? that's right, none.
If they fire Pettine, there is not a single coach worth his salt that would come here and accept a 2 year deal to make this team a winner.....not a single one.....
So....fire away and then get ready for 5 more years of shit.......(along with another 2.5 HC's)
-
.... hell what 'acclaimed' coach would even set foot in cleveland with their record of hiring/firing? that's right, none.
If they fire Pettine, there is not a single coach worth his salt that would come here and accept a 2 year deal to make this team a winner.....not a single one.....
So....fire away and then get ready for 5 more years of shit.......(along with another 2.5 HC's)
If they fire Pettine, there is not a single coach worth his salt that would come here and accept a 2 year deal to make this team a winner.....not a single one.....
So....fire away and then get ready for 5 more years of shit.......(along with another 2.5 HC's)
Cowher, Gruden and Dungy are all buying houses in Cleveland. For the Dungy lovers.....he was quoted this week as saying he wouldn't have drafted Manziel and he wouldn't want that distraction in his locker room. So for the Dungy lovers, say goodbye to JFF should that rumor come true.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login