In the second round, the Cleveland Browns select...
-
william jackson III, university of houston, 6' 1" 185
If he is still around........been great all year and was great in the peach bowl.
-
-
-
-
Can he put on a bit of weight? Most 6'3" receivers clock in at least 215lbs, and most 5'9" corners are 180-190lbs.
-
Both Dotson and Jackson III seem worthy of consideration at #32 and both look to be positions of need...
Taking a WR that high would also signify a clean break with the past... not exactly "analytical", but very "psychological".
But there should also be an OT or two in that area.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
And then there is my favorite RB.
I could live with a decent WR, just to give whomever a prayer of not getting sacked 8 times a game.
-
QB in the first is a given. Signs point to Goff.
If he's still available at the 32, given his ridiculous speed/quickness/production, I want LB Scooby Wright, Arizona.
Or Corey Coleman/Michael Thomas, whichever one the Vikings don't pick in the first.
DL wouldn't be a bad pick either - Adolphus Washington / Jonathan Bullard, etc. We need players who can runfit, because the current crop just isn't good.
-
Carson Wentz. QB, NDSU
-
#2 Jared Goff, QB, Cal
#32 Shilque Calhoun, DE, MSU
Not sure where Calhoun is projected exactly or if he'll fall that far. Too early to really tell anyway probably.
-
#2 Goff simples
-
Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.
-
Last time we selected the consensus top QB prospect in the draft was 1999. Even then I'm not sure it was a consensus with McNabb at #2.
Drafting the Johnny Manziels, Colt McCoys, Luke McCowns, Brandon Weedens, Charlie Fryes, Brady Quinns was never the answer for us, and it's rarely* the long-term answer for anybody.
Last time we tried taking the #1 QB prospect was 1999...just sayin' Not sure why everybody is opposed to Goff, who is becoming more apparently by the day - deemed worthy of the top pick in the draft.
We have the OL to protect him for a long period of time...as long as we keep JT/Schwartz and get a suitable center.
-
Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.
Oh yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let us draft a QB in the first and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let him ride the bench for 2 years and then maybe give him 5 games to learn the offense under 2 different coaches with 2 different OC and then wonder why it wont work.
Or we could take a justine Gilbert type figure instead? Nah thanks, I'd take the risk on the potential franchise qb personally, especially when we have the use of a great mentor in mccown.
Reward > risk
-
No no no, you draft QBs with the 1st-5th pick when they can contribute day 1. No more top 5 projects, for this team anyway. At pick 15 sure, at pick 2 hell no.
βIt is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.β -
Goff is no project, the guy is as pro football ready as anyone since Luck
-
-
Both Dotson and Jackson III seem worthy of consideration at #32 and both look to be positions of need...
Taking a WR that high would also signify a clean break with the past... not exactly "analytical", but very "psychological".
But there should also be an OT or two in that area.
Both Dotson and Jackson III seem worthy of consideration at #32 and both look to be positions of need...
Taking a WR that high would also signify a clean break with the past... not exactly "analytical", but very "psychological".
But there should also be an OT or two in that area.
Excellent point.
-
Why not grab a guy from FA or by trade who is still in his prime that needs a new team? Do you really want to get a brand new qb and maybey win 2 games next year? I am so sick of this garbage of "rebuilding" that is their excuse for losing
-
Goff is no project, the guy is as pro football ready as anyone since Luck
No one has been pro ready since Luck and this guy is no Luck.
βIt is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.β
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login